White Matter Thresholds for Ischemic Penumbra and Infarct Core in Patients with Acute Stroke: CT Perfusion Study

Published Online:Jun 1 2008https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2473070551

Abstract

Purpose: To prospectively determine the parameters derived at admission computed tomographic (CT) perfusion imaging admission that best differentiate ischemic white matter that recovers from that which infarcts, with the latter retrospectively defined at a CT examination performed without contrast material (unenhanced CT) 5–7 days after the event.

Materials and Methods: Ethics committee approval and informed consent were obtained. Thirty patients with stroke underwent unenhanced CT, CT angiography, and CT perfusion studies at admission. Additionally, CT angiography was performed 24 hours after the stroke, and an unenhanced CT study was performed 5–7 days after the stroke. Five patients were excluded; the remaining patients (10 men, 15 women; mean age, 70 years ± 13 [standard deviation]) were separated into those with recanalization (n = 16) and those without recanalization (n = 9) at 24 hours. For patients with recanalization, the final infarct was outlined on unenhanced CT images obtained 5–7 days after the event and was superimposed on coregistered maps from the CT perfusion study performed at admission. Ischemic white matter tissue (cerebral blood flow [CBF] < 14 mL/min/100 g) was identified at the admission CT perfusion study, and the penumbra was defined as the difference between the ischemic region and the infarct region.

Results: Infarct regions showed a matched decrease in CBF and cerebral blood volume (CBV) at admission, whereas penumbra regions showed a significant (P < .05) decrease in CBF but no change in CBV (P > .05) from contralateral values. A threshold CBF · CBV value of 8.14 was the most sensitive (95%, 20 of 21 regions) and specific (94%, 32 of 34 regions) parameter for differentiating between regions of ischemic white matter that recovered and regions of ischemic white matter that infarcted.

Conclusion: The product of CBF and CBV derived from CT perfusion data provided the best differentiation between regions of ischemic white matter that infarcted and regions of ischemic white matter that recovered 5–7 days after a stroke.

References

1 Astrup J, Siesjo BK, Symon L. Thresholds in cerebral ischemia: the ischemic penumbra. Stroke 1981; 12: 723–725.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
2 O'Collins VE, Macleod MR, Donnan GA, Horky LL, van der Worp BH, Howells DW. 1,026 experimental treatments in acute stroke. Ann Neurol 2006;59:467–477.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
3 Rostrup E, Knudsen GM, Law I, Holm S, Larsson HB, Paulson OB. The relationship between cerebral blood flow and volume in humans. Neuroimage 2005;24:1–11.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
4 Rohl L, Ostergaard L, Simonsen CZ, et al. Viability thresholds of ischemic penumbra of hyperacute stroke defined by perfusion-weighted MRI and apparent diffusion coefficient. Stroke 2001;32:1140–1146.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
5 Wintermark M, Reichhart M, Thiran JP, et al. Prognostic accuracy of cerebral blood flow measurement by perfusion computed tomography, at the time of emergency room admission, in acute stroke patients. Ann Neurol 2002;51:417–432.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
6 Heiss WD, Sobesky J, Hesselmann V. Identifying thresholds for penumbra and irreversible tissue damage. Stroke 2004;35:2671–2674.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
7 Heiss WD, Kracht LW, Thiel A, Grond M, Pawlik G. Penumbral probability thresholds of cortical flumazenil binding and blood flow predicting tissue outcome in patients with cerebral ischaemia. Brain 2001;124:20–29.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
8 Marchal G, Benali K, Iglesias S, Viader F, Derlon JM, Baron JC. Voxel-based mapping of irreversible ischaemic damage with PET in acute stroke. Brain 1999;122(pt 12):2387–2400.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
9 Murphy BD, Fox AJ, Lee DH, et al. Identification of penumbra and infarct in acute ischemic stroke using computed tomography perfusion-derived blood flow and blood volume measurements. Stroke 2006;37:1771–1777.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
10 Arakawa S, Wright PM, Koga M, et al. Ischemic thresholds for gray and white matter: a diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance study. Stroke 2006;37:1211–1216.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
11 Falcao AL, Reutens DC, Markus R, et al. The resistance to ischemia of white and gray matter after stroke. Ann Neurol 2004;56:695–701.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
12 Koga M, Reutens DC, Wright P, et al. The existence and evolution of diffusion-perfusion mismatched tissue in white and gray matter after acute stroke. Stroke 2005;36:2132–2137.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
13 Bristow MS, Simon JE, Brown RA, et al. MR perfusion and diffusion in acute ischemic stroke: human gray and white matter have different thresholds for infarction. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2005;25:1280–1287.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
14 Eastwood JD, Provenzale JM, Hurwitz LM, Lee TY. Practical injection-rate CT perfusion imaging: deconvolution-derived hemodynamics in a case of stroke. Neuroradiology 2001;43:223–226.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
15 Kudo K, Terae S, Katoh C, et al. Quantitative cerebral blood flow measurement with dynamic perfusion CT using the vascular-pixel elimination method: comparison with H2(15)O positron emission tomography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:419–426.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
16 Wintermark M, Reichhart M, Cuisenaire O, et al. Comparison of admission perfusion computed tomography and qualitative diffusion- and perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in acute stroke patients. Stroke 2002;33:2025–2031.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
17 Cenic A, Nabavi DG, Craen RA, Gelb AW, Lee TY. Dynamic CT measurement of cerebral blood flow: a validation study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:63–73.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
18 Wintermark M, Thiran JP, Maeder P, Schnyder P, Meuli R. Simultaneous measurement of regional cerebral blood flow by perfusion CT and stable xenon CT: a validation study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:905–914.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
19 Simon JE, Bristow MS, Lu H, et al. A novel method to derive separate gray and white matter cerebral blood flow measures from MR imaging of acute ischemic stroke patients. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2005;25:1236–1243.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
20 Schaefer PW, Roccatagliata L, Ledezma C, et al. First-pass quantitative CT perfusion identifies thresholds for salvageable penumbra in acute stroke patients treated with intra-arterial therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:20–25.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
21 Roberts HC, Roberts TP, Smith WS, Lee TJ, Fischbein NJ, Dillon WP. Multisection dynamic CT perfusion for acute cerebral ischemia: the “toggling-table” technique. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1077–1080.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
22 Hsieh J, Wei Y, Wang G. Fractional scan algorithms for low-dose perfusion CT. Med Phys 2004;31:1254–1257.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
23 Smith WS, Roberts HC, Chuang NA, et al. Safety and feasibility of a CT protocol for acute stroke: combined CT, CT angiography, and CT perfusion imaging in 53 consecutive patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:688–690.
MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article History

Published in print: 2008

Vol. 247, No. 3

Metrics

Altmetric Score

PDF download