Coronary Calcium Coverage Score: Determination, Correlates, and Predictive Accuracy in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

Purpose: To develop a new calcium score for use with unenhanced cardiac computed tomography (CT) that can be used to define the percentage of coronary arteries affected by calcium and to correlate this score with risk factors and cardiovascular events.

Materials and Methods: Institutional review boards at all participating centers approved this HIPAA-compliant study, and all participants gave written informed consent. Calcium coverage score (CCS), which represents the percentage of coronary arteries affected by calcific plaque, was calculated for 3252 participants in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis in whom calcific plaque was detected with CT. Quasi-Poisson models were used to estimate associations (assessed by using t tests with robust standard errors) between CCS and risk factors. Associations between the CCS, Agatston, and calcium mass scores (hereafter, mass scores) and outcomes were estimated and assessed by using Cox proportional hazards models with Wald tests. The predictive ability of these models was assessed by using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves and bootstrap t tests.

Results: After adjustments were made for age, race, ethnicity, and sex in the quasi-Poisson model, CCS was associated with hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes (P < .001 for all diseases). After adjustments for age and sex, a twofold increase in CCS was associated with a 52% (95% confidence interval: 34%, 72%) increase in risk for any coronary heart disease (CHD) event. When Agatston or mass scores were included with CCS in a Cox model for prediction of CHD events, neither Agatston score nor mass score was a significant predictor, whereas CCS remained significantly associated with CHD events. Although receiver operating characteristic curves suggested that there was a difference between CCS score and Agatston and mass scores in prediction of a cardiac event, no differences in prediction of hard cardiac events (myocardial infarction, death) were found.

Conclusion: Both spatial distribution and amount of calcified plaque contribute to risk for CHD.

© RSNA, 2008

Supplemental material:


  • 1 Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen SP, Doherty TM, Detrano RC. Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA 2004; 291(2): 210–215. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Arad Y, Goodman KJ, Roth M, Newstein D, Guerci AD. Coronary calcification, coronary disease risk factors, C-reactive protein, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events: the St Francis Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46(1):158–165. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Taylor AJ, Bindeman J, Feuerstein I, Cao F, Brazaitis M, O'Malley PG. Coronary calcium independently predicts incident premature coronary heart disease over measured cardiovascular risk factors: mean 3-year outcomes in the Prospective Army Coronary Calcium (PACC) Project. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46(5):807–814. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Vliegenthart R, Oudkerk M, Hofman A, et al. Coronary calcification improves cardiovascular risk prediction in the elderly. Circulation 2005;112(4):572–577. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Kaplan G, Gasso J, Hildner F, Viamonte M Jr. Ultrafast computed tomography–detected coronary calcium reflects the angiographic extent of coronary arterial atherosclerosis. Am J Cardiol 1994;74(12):1272–1274. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bild DE, Detrano R, Peterson D, et al. Ethnic differences in coronary calcification: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Circulation 2005;111(10):1313–1320. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bild DE, Folsom AR, Lowe LP, et al. Prevalence and correlates of coronary calcification in black and white young adults: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2001;21(5):852–857. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Newman AB, Naydeck BL, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Feldman A, Edmundowicz D, Kuller LH. Coronary artery calcification in older adults to age 99: prevalence and risk factors. Circulation 2001;104(22):2679–2684. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Newman AB, Naydeck BL, Sutton-Tyrrell K, et al. Relationship between coronary artery calcification and other measures of subclinical cardiovascular disease in older adults. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2002;22(10):1674–1679. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Bild DE, Bluemke DA, Burke GL, et al. Multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis: objectives and design. Am J Epidemiol 2002;156(9):871–881. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972;18(6):499–502. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003;289(19):2560–2572. [Published correction appears in JAMA 2003;290(2):197.] Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Detrano RC, Anderson M, Nelson J, et al. Coronary calcium measurements: effect of CT scanner type and calcium measure on rescan reproducibility—MESA study. Radiology 2005;236(2):477–484. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Carr JJ, Nelson JC, Wong ND, et al. Calcified coronary artery plaque measurement with cardiac CT in population-based studies: standardized protocol of Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) and Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Radiology 2005;234(1):35–43. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Nelson JC, Kronmal RA, Carr JJ, et al. Measuring coronary calcium on CT images adjusted for attenuation differences. Radiology 2005;235(2):403–414. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 16 McCullagh P, Nelder JA. Generalized linear models. Edition 2, Monographs on statistics and applied probability. London, England: Chapman & Hall, 1989. Google Scholar
  • 17 Eggen DA, Strong JP, McGill HC Jr. Coronary calcification relationship to clinically significant coronary lesions and race sex and topographic distribution. Circulation 1965;32(6):948–955. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kajinami K, Seki H, Takekoshi N, Mabuchi H. Coronary calcification and coronary atherosclerosis: site by site comparative morphologic study of electron beam computed tomography and coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29(7):1549–1556. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Baumgart D, Schmermund A, Goerge G, et al. Comparison of electron beam computed tomography with intracoronary ultrasound and coronary angiography for detection of coronary atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30(1):57–64. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Schmermund A, Baumgart D, Adamzik M, et al. Comparison of electron-beam computed tomography and intracoronary ultrasound in detecting calcified and noncalcified plaques in patients with acute coronary syndromes and no or minimal to moderate angiographic coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1998;81(2):141–146. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Schmermund A, Baumgart D, Möhlenkamp S, et al. Natural history and topographic pattern of progression of coronary calcification in symptomatic patients: an electron-beam CT study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2001;21(3):421–426. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article History

Published in print: 2008