Imaging as a Quantitative Science

References

• 1 Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 1996; 312(7023): 71–72.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 2 Paik S. Development and clinical utility of a 21-gene recurrence score prognostic assay in patients with early breast cancer treated with tamoxifen. Oncologist 2007; 12(6): 631–635.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 3 Mook S, Van't Veer LJ, Rutgers EJ, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Cardoso F. Individualization of therapy using Mammaprint: from development to the MINDACT Trial. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 2007; 4(3): 147–155.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 4 Boone JM. Radiological interpretation 2020: toward quantitative image assessment. Med Phys 2007; 34(11): 4173–4179.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 5 Birkelo CC, Chamberlain WE, Phelps PS, et al. Tuberculosis case finding: a comparison of the effectiveness of various roentgenographic and photofluorographic methods. JAMA 1947; 133: 359–366.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 6 Beam CA, Layde PM, Sullivan DC. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists: findings from a national sample. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156(2): 209–213.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 7 Shukla-Dave A, Hricak H, Kattan MW, et al. The utility of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for predicting insignificant prostate cancer: an initial analysis. BJU Int 2007; 99(4): 786–793.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar