Airway Dimensions at Inspiratory and Expiratory Multisection CT in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Correlation with Airflow Limitation

Published Online:Sep 1 2008https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2491071650

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the relationship between airflow limitation and airway dimensions from the third to the fifth generation of bronchi in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) by using inspiratory and expiratory multisection computed tomography (CT).

Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, which waived the need for informed consent. The study included 50 patients with COPD who underwent both inspiratory and expiratory 64-detector CT. In each patient, mean values of airway luminal areas from the third to the fifth generation of three bronchi (right B1, right B10, and left B3) were measured at inspiratory CT (IA3, IA4, and IA5) and expiratory CT (EA3, EA4, and EA5). To evaluate the change of the airway luminal area between inspiration and expiration, the ratio of expiratory to inspiratory airway luminal area in each generation was calculated (EA3/IA3, EA4/IA4, and EA5/IA5). Correlations between airway dimensions and pulmonary function test results were evaluated.

Results: The correlation coefficients between airway luminal area measured at expiratory CT and the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) were higher than those for inspiratory CT and improved as the airway size decreased from the third to the fifth generation (IA3, r = .02; IA4, r = .18; IA5, r = .26; EA3, r = .09; EA4, r = .40; EA5, r = .63). EA5/IA5 had the highest correlations with FEV₁ (r = .72, P < .001). There were no significant correlations between EA3/IA3 and pulmonary function test results.

Conclusion: Airway lumen measured at expiratory CT was more closely related to expiratory airflow measurements than was lumen measured at inspiratory CT. In addition, the changes of airway luminal area between inspiration and expiration were strongly related to airflow limitation.

References

1 Pauwels RA, Buist AS, Calverley PM, Jenkins CR, Hurd SS; GOLD Scientific Committee. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: NHLBI/WHO Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Workshop summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 163: 1256–1276. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
2 Hogg JC, Macklem PT, Thurlbeck WM. Site and nature of airways obstruction in chronic obstructive lung disease. N Engl J Med 1968;278:1355–1360. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
3 Yanai M, Sekizawa K, Ohrui T, Sasaki H, Takishima T. Site of airway obstruction in pulmonary disease: direct measurement of intrabronchial pressure. J Appl Physiol 1992;72:1016–1023. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
4 Hogg JC, Chu F, Utokaparch S, et al. The nature of small-airway obstruction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2645–2653. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
5 Lamers RJ, Thelissen GR, Kessels AG, Wouters EF, van Engelshoven JM. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: evaluation with spirometrically controlled CT lung densitometry. Radiology 1994;193:109–113. Link, Google Scholar
6 Eda S, Kubo K, Fujimoto K, Matsuzawa Y, Sekiguchi M, Sakai F. The relations between expiratory chest CT using helical CT and pulmonary function tests in emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155:1290–1294. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
7 O'Donnell RA, Peebles C, Ward JA, et al. Relationship between peripheral airway dysfunction, airway obstruction, and neutrophilic inflammation in COPD. Thorax 2004;59:837–842. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
8 Matsuoka S, Kurihara Y, Yagihashi K, Nakajima Y. Quantitative assessment of peripheral airway obstruction on paired expiratory/inspiratory thin-section CT in COPD with emphysema. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2007;31:384–389. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
9 Nakano Y, Wong JC, de Jong PA, et al. The prediction of small airway dimensions using computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;171:142–146. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
10 Hasegawa M, Nasuhara Y, Onodera Y, et al. Airflow limitation and airway dimensions in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;173:1309–1315. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
11 Nakano Y, Muro S, Sakai H, et al. Computed tomographic measurements of airway dimensions and emphysema in smokers: correlation with lung function. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:1102–1108. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
12 Orlandi I, Moroni C, Camiciottoli G, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: thin-section CT measurement of airway wall thickness and lung attenuation. Radiology 2005;234:604–610. Link, Google Scholar
13 Berger P, Perot V, Desbarats P, Tunon-de-Lara JM, Marthan R, Laurent F. Airway wall thickness in cigarette smokers: quantitative thin-section CT assessment. Radiology 2005;235:1055–1064. Link, Google Scholar
14 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: updated 2005. NHLBI/WHO workshop and report. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Web site. http://www.goldcopd.com/. Updated 2005. Accessed September 1, 2007. Google Scholar
15 de Jong PA, Müller NL, Paré PD, Coxson HO. Computed tomographic imaging of the airways: relationship to structure and function. Eur Respir J 2005;26:140–152. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
16 Nakano Y, Whittall KP, Kalloger SE, et al. Development and validation of human airway analysis algorithm using multidetector row CT. In: Clough AV, Chen CT, eds. Proceedings of SPIE: medical imaging 2002—physiology and function from multidimensional images. Vol 4683. Bellingham, Wash: International Society for Optical Engineering, 2002; 460–469. Google Scholar
17 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307–310. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
18 The Committee of Pulmonary Physiology, Japanese Respiratory Society. Guidelines for pulmonary function tests: spirometry, flow-volume curve, diffusion capacity of the lung [in Japanese]. Tokyo, Japan: Japanese Respiratory Society, 2004. Google Scholar
19 Tiddens HA, Pare PD, Hogg JC, Hop WC, Lambert R, de Jongste JC. Cartilaginous airway dimensions and airflow obstruction in human lungs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152:260–266. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
20 Kurosawa H, Kohzuki M. Images in clinical medicine: dynamic airway narrowing. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1036. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
21 Brown RH, Scichilone N, Mudge B, Diemer FB, Permutt S, Togias A. High-resolution computed tomographic evaluation of airway distensibility and the effects of lung inflation on airway caliber in healthy subjects and individuals with asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:994–1001. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
22 Nishino M, Siewert B, Roberts DH, et al. Excessive collapsibility of bronchi in bronchiectasis: evaluation on volumetric expiratory high-resolution CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2006;30:474–478. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
23 Sin DD, McAlister FA, Man SF, Anthonisen NR. Contemporary management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: scientific review. JAMA 2003;290:2301–2312. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
24 Burge PS, Calverley PM, Jones PW. Randomized double blind, placebo controlled trial of fluticasone propionate in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the ISOLDE trial. BMJ 2000;320:1297–1303. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
25 Goldin JG, Tashkin DP, Kleerup EC, et al. Comparative effects of hydrofluoroalkane and chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone dipropionate inhalation on small airways: assessment with functional helical thin-section computed tomography. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999;104:S258–S267. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
26 Tack D, De Maertelaer V, Petit W, et al. Multi–detector row CT pulmonary angiography: comparison of standard-dose and simulated low-dose techniques. Radiology 2005;236:318–325. Link, Google Scholar
27 Schueller-Weidekamm C, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Weber M, Herold CJ, Prokop M. CT angiography of pulmonary arteries to detect pulmonary embolism: improvement of vascular enhancement with low kilovoltage settings. Radiology 2006;241:899–907. Link, Google Scholar
28 Bankier AA, Schaefer-Prokop C, De Maertelaer V, et al. Air trapping: comparison of standard-dose and simulated low-dose thin-section CT techniques. Radiology 2007;242:898–906. Link, Google Scholar
29 Madani A, De Maertelaer V, Zanen J, Gevenois PA. Pulmonary emphysema: radiation dose and section thickness at multidetector CT quantification—comparison with macroscopic and microscopic morphometry. Radiology 2007;243:250–257. Link, Google Scholar

Article History

Published in print: 2008

Vol. 248, No. 3

Metrics

Altmetric Score

PDF download