Neoplastic Invasion of Laryngeal Cartilage: Reassessment of Criteria for Diagnosis at MR Imaging

Purpose: To evaluate whether proposed diagnostic criteria applied to magnetic resonance (MR) images of patients with laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma may be used to distinguish neoplastic from inflammatory involvement of the laryngeal cartilages.

Materials and Methods: The radiologic and histopathologic data in 121 consecutive patients with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx (n = 63) or hypopharynx (n = 58) who underwent MR imaging before laryngectomy formed the basis of this retrospective study. Patient consent for retrospective chart review was waived by the institutional review board. All laryngectomy specimens were processed with a dedicated histopathologic whole-organ slice technique. MR images were evaluated by two readers according to established (“old”) and proposed (“new”) diagnostic criteria on the basis of the signal intensity behavior of cartilage on T2-weighted images and contrast material–enhanced T1-weighted images compared with that of the adjacent tumor. Specifically, with the new criteria, T2-weighted or postcontrast T1-weighted cartilage signal intensity greater than that of the adjacent tumor was considered to indicate inflammation, and signal intensity similar to that of the adjacent tumor was considered to indicate neoplastic invasion. The results of the MR image interpretation were compared with the histologic reference standard.

Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the new criteria (0.94) was nominally but significantly larger than that for the old criteria (0.92) (P = .01). Overall specificity was significantly improved (82% for new vs 74% for old criteria, P < .001) and was greatest for the thyroid cartilage (75% for new vs 54% for old criteria, P < .001) with the new criteria. The sensitivities of the established and the proposed criteria were identical.

Conclusion: The proposed MR imaging criteria enable improved differentiation of neoplastic cartilage invasion from peritumoral inflammation.

© RSNA, 2008

References

  • 1 Wittekind C, Klimpflinger M, Sobin LH, eds. TNM atlas: illustrated guide to the TNM/pTNM classification of malignant tumors. 5th ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2005.
  • 2 Becker M, Burkhardt K, Dulguerov P, Allal AS. Imaging of the larynx and hypopharynx. Eur J Radiol 2008; 66(3): 460–479.
  • 3 Becker M. Larynx and hypopharynx. Radiol Clin North Am 1998;36(5):891–920.
  • 4 Curtin HD. The importance of imaging demonstration of neoplastic invasion of laryngeal cartilage. Radiology 1995;194(3):643–644.
  • 5 Hermans R. Staging of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer: value of imaging studies. Eur Radiol 2006;16(11):2386–2400.
  • 6 Yousem DM, Tufano RP. Laryngeal imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2004;14(4):611–624.
  • 7 Mancuso AA. Evaluation and staging of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. In: Silver CE, ed. Laryngeal cancer. New York, NY: Thieme, 1991; 46–94.
  • 8 Becker M, Zbären P, Delavelle J, et al. Neoplastic invasion of the laryngeal cartilage: reassessment of criteria for diagnosis at CT. Radiology 1997;203(2):521–532.
  • 9 Castelijns JA, Becker M, Hermans R. Impact of cartilage invasion on treatment and prognosis of laryngeal cancer. Eur Radiol 1996;6(2):156–169.
  • 10 Castelijns JA, van den Brekel MW, Tobi H, et al. Laryngeal carcinoma after radiation therapy: correlation of abnormal MR imaging signal patterns in laryngeal cartilage with the risk of recurrence. Radiology 1996;198(1):151–155.
  • 11 Ljumanovic R, Langendijk JA, Schenk B, et al. Supraglottic carcinoma treated with curative radiation therapy: identification of prognostic groups with MR imaging. Radiology 2004;232(2):440–448.
  • 12 Becker M, Zbären P, Laeng H, Stoupis C, Porcellini B, Vock P. Neoplastic invasion of the laryngeal cartilage: comparison of MR imaging and CT with histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1995;194(3):661–669.
  • 13 Castelijns JA, Gerritsen GJ, Kaiser MC, et al. Invasion of laryngeal cartilage by cancer: comparison of CT and MR imaging. Radiology 1988;167(1):199–206. [Published correction appears in Radiology 1988;168(2):582.]
  • 14 Declercq A, Van den Hauwe L, Van Marck E, Van de Heyning PH, Spanoghe M, De Schepper AM. Patterns of framework invasion in patients with laryngeal cancer: correlation of in vitro MRI and pathological findings. Acta Otolaryngol 1998;118(6):892–895.
  • 15 Zbären P, Becker M, Läng H. Pretherapeutic staging of laryngeal carcinoma: clinical findings, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging compared with histopathology. Cancer 1996;77(7):1263–1273.
  • 16 Gallo A, Mocetti P, De Vincentiis M, et al. Neoplastic infiltration of laryngeal cartilages: histocytochemical study. Laryngoscope 1992;102(8):891–895.
  • 17 Gregor RT, Hammond K. Framework invasion by laryngeal carcinoma. Am J Surg 1987;154(4):452–458.
  • 18 Michaels L, Gregor RT. Examination of the larynx in the histopathology laboratory. J Clin Pathol 1980;33(8):705–710.
  • 19 Agresti A. Models for matched pairs. In: Agresti A, ed. Categorical data analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 1990;347–350.
  • 20 Curtin HD, Ishwaran H, Mancuso AA, Dalley RW, Caudry DJ, McNeil BJ. Comparison of CT and MR imaging in staging of neck metastases. Radiology 1998;207(1):123–130.
  • 21 Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143(1):29–36.
  • 22 Metz CE. ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Invest Radiol 1986;21(9):720–733.
  • 23 Metz CE. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 1989;24(3):234–245.
  • 24 Atula T, Markkola A, Leivo I, Mäkitie A. Cartilage invasion of laryngeal cancer detected by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2001;258(6):272–275.
  • 25 Ljumanovic R, Langendijk JA, van Wattingen M, et al. MR imaging predictors of local control of glottic squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiation alone. Radiology 2007;244(1):205–212.

Article History

Published in print: 2008