Occupational Health Hazards in the Interventional Laboratory: Time for a Safer Environment

This document is a consensus statement by the major American societies of physicians who work in the interventional laboratory environment. It reviews available data on the prevalence of occupational health risks and summarizes ongoing epidemiologic studies designed to further elucidate these risks. Its purpose is to affirm that the interventional laboratory poses workplace hazards that must be acknowledged, better understood, and mitigated to the greatest extent possible. Vigorous efforts are advocated to reduce these hazards. Interventional physicians and their professional societies, working together with industry, should strive toward minimizing operator radiation exposure, eliminating the need for personal protective apparel, and ending the orthopedic and ergonomic consequences of the interventional laboratory work environment.

© Society of Interventional Radiology, 2009

References

  • 1 Ross AM, Segal J, Borenstein D, Jenkins E, Cho S. Prevalence of spinal disc disease among interventional cardiologists. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79: 68–70.
  • 2 Clark DA. How much is too much? Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2000;51:265.
  • 3 Goldstein JA, Balter S, Cowley M, Hodgson J, Klein LW. Occupational hazards of interventional cardiologists: prevalence of orthopedic health problems in contemporary practice. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2004;63:407–411.
  • 4 Hirshfeld JW Jr, Balter S, Brinker JA, et al. ACCF/AHA/HRS/SCAI clinical competence statement on physician knowledge to optimize patient safety and image quality in fluoroscopically guided invasive cardiovascular procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:2259–2282.
  • 5 Dehmer GJ. Occupational hazards for interventional cardiologists. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2006;68:974–976.
  • 6 Johnson LW, Moore RJ, Balter S. Review of radiation safety in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1992;25:186–194.
  • 7 Hendee WR. Estimation of radiation risks. BEIR V and its significance for medicine. JAMA 1992;268:620–624.
  • 8 Aldridge HE, Chisholm RJ, Dragatakis L, Roy L. Radiation safety in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Can J Cardiol 1997;13:459–467.
  • 9 Vañó E, González L, Guibelalde E, Fernández JM, Ten JI. Radiation exposure to medical staff in interventional and cardiac radiology. Br J Radiol 1998;71:954–960.
  • 10 Finkelstein MM. Is brain cancer an occupational disease of cardiologists? Can J Cardiol 1998;14:1385–1388.
  • 11 Vañó E, González L, Beneytez F, Moreno F. Lens injuries induced by occupational exposure in non-optimized interventional radiology laboratories. Br J Radiol 1998;71:728–733.
  • 12 Machan L. A web based survey of neck and back pain amongst interventional radiologists. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001;12(suppl):S28.
  • 13 Moore B, vanSonnenberg E, Casola G, Novelline RA. The relationship between back pain and lead apron use in radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:191–193.
  • 14 Pleis JR, Lethbridge-Çejku M. Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2006. Vital Health Stat 10 2007;10:1–153.
  • 15 Kim KP, Miller DL, Balter S, et al. Occupational radiation doses to operators performing cardiac catheterization procedures. Health Phys 2008;94:211–227.
  • 16 Tsalafoutas IA, Goni H, Maniatis PN, Pappas P, Bouzas N, Tzortzis G. Patient doses from noncardiac diagnostic and therapeutic interventional procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006;17:1489–1498.
  • 17 United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. New York: United Nations; 2000. Available at http://www.unscear.org/unscear/en/publications/2000_2.html. Accessed September 27, 2008.
  • 18 International Commission on Radiological Protection. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007;37:1–332.
  • 19 Wenzl TB. Increased brain cancer risk in physicians with high radiation exposure. Radiology 2005;235:709–710.
  • 20 Yonehara S, Brenner AV, Kishikawa M, et al. Clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of first primary tumors of the central nervous system and related organs among atomic bomb survivors in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 1958–1995. Cancer 2004;101:1644–1654.
  • 21 Preston DL, Ron E, Tokuoka S, et al. Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958–1998. Radiat Res 2007;168:1–64.
  • 22 Preston DL, Ron E, Yonehara S, et al. Tumors of the nervous system and pituitary gland associated with atomic bomb radiation exposure. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:1555–1563.
  • 23 Matanoski GM, Seltser R, Sartwell PE, Diamond EL, Elliott EA. The current mortality rates of radiologists and other physician specialists: specific causes of death. Am J Epidemiol 1975;101:199–210.
  • 24 Hardell L, Hansson Mild K, Påhlson A, Hallquist A. Ionizing radiation, cellular telephones and the risk for brain tumours. Eur J Cancer Prev 2001;10:523–529.
  • 25 Carozza SE, Wrensch M, Miike R, et al. Occupation and adult gliomas. Am J Epidemiol 2000;152:838–846.
  • 26 Andersen A, Barlow L, Engeland A, Kjaerheim K, Lynge E, Pukkala E. Work-related cancer in the Nordic countries. Scand J Work Environ Health 1999;25(suppl 2):1–116.
  • 27 Blettner M, Schlehofer B, Samkange-Zeeb F, Berg G, Schlaefer K, Schüz J. Medical exposure to ionising radiation and the risk of brain tumours: Interphone study group, Germany. Eur J Cancer 2007;43:1990–1998.
  • 28 McGeoghegan D, Binks K, Gillies M, Jones S, Whaley S. The non-cancer mortality experience of male workers at British Nuclear Fuels plc, 1946–2005. Int J Epidemiol 2008;37:506–518.
  • 29 Neriishi K, Nakashima E, Minamoto A, et al. Postoperative cataract cases among atomic bomb survivors: radiation dose response and threshold. Radiat Res 2007;168:404–408.
  • 30 Worgul BV, Kundiyev YI, Sergiyenko NM, et al. Cataracts among Chernobyl clean-up workers: implications regarding permissible eye exposures. Radiat Res 2007;167:233–243.
  • 31 Kleiman NJ. Radiation cataract. In: Working Party on Research Implications on Health and Safety Standards of the Article 31 Group of Experts, editor. Radiation Protection 145. EU Scientific Seminar 2006;New insights in radiation risk and basic safety standards. Brussels: European Commission, 2007; 81–95.
  • 32 National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Limitation of exposure to ionizing radiation. Report 116. Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, 1993.
  • 33 Occupational Safety & Health Administration. OSHA News Release—May 3, 2005—OSHA seeking information to address health effects of occupational exposure to ionizing radiation. Washington, DC: Department of Labor; 2005. Available at http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=NEWS_RELEASES&p_id=11343. Accessed September 27, 2008.
  • 34 Kuon E, Birkel J, Schmitt M, Dahm JB. Radiation exposure benefit of a lead cap in invasive cardiology. Heart 2003;89:1205–1210.
  • 35 Wagner LK, Archer BR, Cohen AM. Management of patient skin dose in fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000;11:23–33.

Article History

Published in print: 2009