"skipMainNavigation"
closeDrawerMenuopenDrawerMenu
Search
Quick Search in Journals
Quick Search anywhere
Advanced Search
Radiology
Menu
  • Information
    • Previous
    Next
    Original Research

    Crohn Disease of the Small Bowel: Comparison of CT Enterography, MR Enterography, and Small-Bowel Follow-Through as Diagnostic Techniques

    Published Online:Jun 1 2009https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2513081184

    Abstract

    Purpose: To prospectively compare the accuracy of computed tomographic (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) enterography and small-bowel follow-through (SBFT) examination for detection of active small-bowel inflammation and extraenteric complications in patients with Crohn disease (CD).

    Materials and Methods: The institutional review board approved the study protocol; informed consent was obtained from all participants. Thirty-one consecutive patients who had CD or who were suspected of having CD underwent CT and MR enterography, SBFT, and ileocolonoscopy. Two independent readers reviewed CT and MR enterographic and SBFT images for presence of active terminal ileitis and extraenteric complications. Accuracy values of CT and MR enterography and SBFT for identification of active terminal ileitis were evaluated with the receiver operating characteristic method, with ileocolonoscopic findings as the reference standard. Sensitivity values of CT and MR enterography and SBFT for detection of extraenteric complications were compared by using the McNemar test, with results of imaging studies, surgery, and physical examination as reference standards.

    Results: The study population included 30 patients (17 men, 13 women; mean age, 29.0 years) with CD. Differences in areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for CT enterography (0.900 and 0.894), MR enterography (0.933 and 0.950), and SBFT (0.883 and 0.928) for readers 1 and 2, respectively, in the detection of active terminal ileitis were not significant (P > .017). Sensitivity values for detection of extraenteric complications were significantly higher for CT and MR enterography (100% for both) than they were for SBFT (32% for reader 1 and 37% for reader 2) (P < .001).

    Conclusion: Because MR enterography has a diagnostic effectiveness comparable to that of CT enterography, this technique has potential to be used as a radiation-free alternative for evaluation of patients with CD.

    Supplemental material: http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/2513081184/DC1

    © RSNA, 2009

    References

    • 1 Lashner B. Clinical features, laboratory findings, and clinical course of Crohn's disease. In: Kirsner J, ed. Inflammatory bowel disease. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 2000; 305–314. Google Scholar
    • 2 Travis SP, Stange EF, Lémann M, et al. European evidence based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease: current management. Gut 2006; 55(suppl 1): i16–i35. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 3 Hara AK, Leighton JA, Heigh RI, et al. Crohn disease of the small bowel: preliminary comparison among CT enterography, capsule endoscopy, small-bowel follow-through, and ileoscopy. Radiology 2006; 238(1): 128–134. Link, Google Scholar
    • 4 Wold PB, Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Sandborn WJ. Assessment of small bowel Crohn disease: noninvasive peroral CT enterography compared with other imaging methods and endoscopy—feasibility study. Radiology 2003; 229(1): 275–281. Link, Google Scholar
    • 5 Triester SL, Leighton JA, Leontiadis GI, et al. A meta-analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared to other diagnostic modalities in patients with non-stricturing small bowel Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101(5): 954–964. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 6 Wills JS, Lobis IF, Denstman FJ. Crohn disease: state of the art. Radiology 1997; 202(3): 597–610. Link, Google Scholar
    • 7 Maglinte DD, Chernish SM, Kelvin FM, O'Connor KW, Hage JP. Crohn disease of the small intestine: accuracy and relevance of enteroclysis. Radiology 1992; 184(2): 541–545. Link, Google Scholar
    • 8 Maglinte DD, Kelvin FM, O'Connor K, Lappas JC, Chernish SM. Current status of small bowel radiography. Abdom Imaging 1996; 21(3): 247–257. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 9 Albert JG, Martiny F, Krummenerl A, et al. Diagnosis of small bowel Crohn's disease: a prospective comparison of capsule endoscopy with magnetic resonance imaging and fluoroscopic enteroclysis. Gut 2005; 54(12): 1721–1727. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 10 Bernstein CN, Greenberg H, Boult I, Chubey S, Leblanc C, Ryner L. A prospective comparison study of MRI versus small bowel follow-through in recurrent Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100(11): 2493–2502. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 11 Furukawa A, Saotome T, Yamasaki M, et al. Cross-sectional imaging in Crohn disease. RadioGraphics 2004; 24(3): 689–702. Link, Google Scholar
    • 12 Reittner P, Goritschnig T, Petritsch W, et al. Multiplanar spiral CT enterography in patients with Crohn's disease using a negative oral contrast material: initial results of a noninvasive imaging approach. Eur Radiol 2002; 12(9): 2253–2257. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 13 Florie J, Wasser MN, Arts-Cieslik K, Akkerman EM, Siersema PD, Stoker J. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the bowel wall for assessment of disease activity in Crohn's disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186(5): 1384–1392. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 14 Koh DM, Miao Y, Chinn RJ, et al. MR imaging evaluation of the activity of Crohn's disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177(6): 1325–1332. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 15 Maccioni F, Bruni A, Viscido A, et al. MR imaging in patients with Crohn disease: value of T2- versus T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced MR sequences with use of an oral superparamagnetic contrast agent. Radiology 2006; 238(2): 517–530. Link, Google Scholar
    • 16 Sempere GA, Martinez Sanjuan V, Medina Chulia E, et al. MRI evaluation of inflammatory activity in Crohn's disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184(6): 1829–1835. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 17 Laghi A, Borrelli O, Paolantonio P, et al. Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the terminal ileum in children with Crohn's disease. Gut 2003; 52(3): 393–397. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 18 Bodily KD, Fletcher JG, Solem CA, et al. Crohn disease: mural attenuation and thickness at contrast-enhanced CT enterography—correlation with endoscopic and histologic findings of inflammation. Radiology 2006; 238(2): 505–516. Link, Google Scholar
    • 19 Low RN, Francis IR, Politoske D, Bennett M. Crohn's disease evaluation: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR imaging and single-phase helical CT scanning. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 11(2): 127–135. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 20 Bernstein CN, Boult IF, Greenberg HM, van der Putten W, Duffy G, Grahame GR. A prospective randomized comparison between small bowel enteroclysis and small bowel follow-through in Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 1997; 113(2): 390–398. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 21 Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Papamastorakis G, Prassopoulos P, Roussomoustakaki M. Assessment of Crohn's disease activity in the small bowel with MR and conventional enteroclysis: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 2004; 14(6): 1017–1024. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 22 Hong HS, Ha HK, Byun JH, Shin YM, Won HJ, Park SH. Optimization of low-density barium suspension in peroral small bowel follow-through examination [abstr]. In: Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting Program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2005; 185. Google Scholar
    • 23 Ha HK, Shin JH, Rha SE, et al. Modified small-bowel follow-through: use of methylcellulose to improve bowel transradiance and prepare barium suspension. Radiology 1999; 211(1): 197–201. Link, Google Scholar
    • 24 Griffiths PD, Hufton AP, Martin DF. The use of effervescent agents in the small bowel meal examination. Clin Radiol 1993; 48(4): 275–277. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 25 Booya F, Fletcher JG, Huprich JE, et al. Active Crohn disease: CT findings and interobserver agreement for enteric phase CT enterography. Radiology 2006; 241(3): 787–795. Link, Google Scholar
    • 26 Colombel JF, Solem CA, Sandborn WJ, et al. Quantitative measurement and visual assessment of ileal Crohn's disease activity by computed tomography enterography: correlation with endoscopic severity and C reactive protein. Gut 2006; 55(11): 1561–1567. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 27 Lee SS, Ha HK, Yang SK, et al. CT of prominent pericolic or perienteric vasculature in patients with Crohn's disease: correlation with clinical disease activity and findings on barium studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179(4): 1029–1036. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 28 Schunk K, Kern A, Oberholzer K, et al. Hydro-MRI in Crohn's disease: appraisal of disease activity. Invest Radiol 2000; 35(7): 431–437. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 29 Low RN, Sebrechts CP, Politoske DA, et al. Crohn disease with endoscopic correlation: single-shot fast spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging. Radiology 2002; 222(3): 652–660. Link, Google Scholar
    • 30 Juillerat P, Mottet C, Froehlich F, et al. Extraintestinal manifestations of Crohn's disease. Digestion 2005; 71(1): 31–36. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 31 Altman DG. Some common problems in medical research. In: Altman DG, ed. Practical statistics for medical research. London, England: Chapman & Hall, 1991; 403–408. Google Scholar
    • 32 Horsthuis K, Lavini C, Stoker J. MRI in Crohn's disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 22(1): 1–12. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 33 Masselli G, Casciani E, Polettini E, Lanciotti S, Bertini L, Gualdi G. Assessment of Crohn's disease in the small bowel: prospective comparison of magnetic resonance enteroclysis with conventional enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 2006; 16(12): 2817–2827. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 34 Brenner DJ, Elliston CD. Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening. Radiology 2004; 232(3): 735–738. Link, Google Scholar
    • 35 Umschaden HW, Szolar D, Gasser J, Umschaden M, Haselbach H. Small-bowel disease: comparison of MR enteroclysis images with conventional enteroclysis and surgical findings. Radiology 2000; 215(3): 717–725. Link, Google Scholar
    • 36 Bartram CI. Small bowel enteroclysis: cons. Abdom Imaging 1996; 21(3): 245–246. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 37 Maglinte DD, Sandrasegaran K, Chiorean M, Dewitt J, McHenry L, Lappas JC. Radiologic investigations complement and add diagnostic information to capsule endoscopy of small-bowel diseases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189(2): 306–312. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 38 Thoeni RF, Gould RG. Enteroclysis and small bowel series: comparison of radiation dose and examination time. Radiology 1991; 178(3): 659–662. Link, Google Scholar
    • 39 Maglinte DD, Sandrasegaran K, Lappas JC, Chiorean M. CT enteroclysis. Radiology 2007; 245(3): 661–671. Link, Google Scholar

    Article History

    Published in print: 2009