"skipMainNavigation"
Search
Quick Search in Journals
Quick Search anywhere
Advanced Search
Radiology
Menu
Previous
Next
Original Research

Pulmonary Nodules: Volume Repeatability at Multidetector CT Lung Cancer Screening

Published Online:Jun 1 2009https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2513081313

Abstract

Purpose: To assess in vivo volumetric repeatability of an automated software algorithm in pulmonary nodules detected during a lung cancer screening trial.

Materials and Methods: This study was approved by an institutional review board. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Data were collected from the Multicentric Italian Lung Detection project, a randomized controlled lung cancer screening trial. The first 1236 consecutive baseline computed tomographic (CT) studies performed at the Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan were evaluated. Among the enrolled participants, those who underwent repeat low-dose CT after 3 months and had at least one indeterminate nodule with a volume of more than 60 mm3 (diameter of 4.8 mm or greater) were considered. Nonsolid, part-solid, and pleural-based nodules were excluded from this study. A descriptive analysis was performed by calculating means and standard deviations of nodule volumes at three assessment times (at baseline and 3 and 12 months later). The volume measurement repeatability was determined by using the approach described by Bland and Altman.

Results: One hundred one subjects (70 men, 31 women; mean age, 58 years) with 233 eligible nodules (mean volume, 98.3 mm3; range, 5–869 mm3) were identified. The 95% confidence interval for difference in measured volumes was in the range of ±27%. About 70% of measurements had a relative difference in nodule volume of less than 10%. No malignant lesions were registered during the follow-up of these subjects.

Conclusion: Semiautomatic volumetry is sufficiently accurate and repeatable and may be useful in assisting with lung nodule management in a lung cancer screening program.

© RSNA, 2009

References

  • 1 Fischbach F, Knollmann F, Griesshaber V, Freund T, Akkol E, Felix R. Detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice computed tomography: improved detection rate with reduced slice thickness. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 2378–2383.
    Medline Google Scholar
  • 2 Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF, et al. Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 1999; 354: 99–105.
    Medline Google Scholar
  • 3 Bach PB, Jett JR, Pastorino U, Tockman MS, Swensen SJ, Begg CB. Computed tomography screening and lung cancer outcomes. JAMA 2007; 297: 953–961.
    Medline Google Scholar
  • 4 Pastorino U. Early detection of lung cancer. Respiration 2006; 73: 5–13.
    Medline Google Scholar
  • 5 Pastorino U, Bellomi M, Landoni C, et al. Early lung-cancer detection with spiral CT and positron emission tomography in heavy smokers: 2-year results. Lancet 2003; 362: 593–597.
    Medline Google Scholar
  • 6 MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G, et al. Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2005; 237: 395–400.
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Wiemker R, Rogalla P, Blaffert T, et al. Aspects of computer-aided detection (CAD) and volumetry of pulmonary nodules using multislice CT. Br J Radiol 2005; 78(spec no 1): S46–S56.
    Medline Google Scholar
  • 8 Revel MP, Lefort C, Bissery A, et al. Pulmonary nodules: preliminary experience with three-dimensional evaluation. Radiology 2004; 231: 459–466.
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Ko JP, Rusinek H, Jacobs EL, et al. Small pulmonary nodules: volume measurement at chest CT—phantom study. Radiology 2003; 228: 864–870.
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Gietema HA, Wang Y, Xu D, et al. Pulmonary nodules detected at lung cancer screening: interobserver variability of semiautomated volume measurements. Radiology 2006; 241: 251–257.
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8: 135–160.
    Medline Google Scholar
  • 12 Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Smith JP, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: assessing a regimen's diagnostic performance. Clin Imaging 2004; 28: 317–321.
    Medline Google Scholar
  • 13 Takashima S, Sone S, Li F, Maruyama Y, Hasegawa M, Kadoya M. Indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodules revealed at population-based CT screening of the lung: using first follow-up diagnostic CT to differentiate benign and malignant lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 1255–1263.
    Medline Google Scholar
  • 14 Gould MK, Maclean CC, Kuschner WG, Rydzak CE, Owens DK. Accuracy of positron emission tomography for diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and mass lesions: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2001; 285: 914–924.
    Medline Google Scholar
  • 15 Li H, Boiselle PM, Shepard JO, Trotman-Dickenson B, McLoud TC. Diagnostic accuracy and safety of CT-guided percutaneous needle aspiration biopsy of the lung: comparison of small and large pulmonary nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167: 105–109.
    Medline Google Scholar
  • 16 Winer-Muram HT, Jennings SG, Tarver RD, et al. Volumetric growth rate of stage I lung cancer prior to treatment: serial CT scanning. Radiology 2002; 223: 798–805.
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Revel MP, Bissery A, Bienvenu M, Aycard L, Lefort C, Frija G. Are two-dimensional CT measurements of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules reliable? Radiology 2004; 231: 453–458.
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Yankelevitz DF, Reeves AP, Kostis WJ, Zhao B, Henschke CI. Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation. Radiology 2000; 217: 251–256.
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Ravenel JG, Leue WM, Nietert PJ, et al. Pulmonary nodule volume: effects of reconstruction parameters on automated measurements—a phantom study. Radiology 2008; 247: 400–408.
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Wang Y, van Klaveren RJ, van der Zaag-Loonen HJ, et al. Effect of nodule characteristics on variability of semiautomated volume measurements in pulmonary nodules detected in a lung cancer screening program. Radiology 2008; 248: 625–631.
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Kostis WJ, Yankelevitz DF, Reeves AP, et al. Small pulmonary nodules: reproducibility of three-dimensional volumetric measurements and estimation of time to follow-up CT. Radiology 2004; 231: 446–452.
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Wormanns D, Kohl G, Klotz E, et al. Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility. Eur Radiol 2003; 14: 86–92.
    Medline Google Scholar
  • 23 Gietema HA, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Mali WP, Groenewegen G, Prokop M. Pulmonary nodules: interscan variability of semiautomated volume measurements with multisection CT—influence of inspiration level, nodule size, and segmentation performance. Radiology 2007; 245: 888–894.
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Yankelevitz DF, Henschke CI. Does 2-year stability imply that pulmonary nodules are benign? AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168: 325–328.
    Medline Google Scholar
  • 25 Ost D, Fein AM, Feinsilver SH. The solitary pulmonary nodule. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 2535–2542.
    Medline Google Scholar
  • 26 Gimenez A, Franquet T, Prats R, Estrada P, Villalba J, Bague S. Unusual primary lung tumors: a radiologic-pathologic overview. RadioGraphics 2002; 22: 601–619.
    Google Scholar

Article History

Published in print: 2009