Comatose Patients with Cardiac Arrest: Predicting Clinical Outcome with Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging

Purpose: To examine whether the severity and spatial distribution of reductions in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) are associated with clinical outcomes in patients who become comatose after cardiac arrest.

Materials and Methods: This was an institutional review board–approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study of 80 comatose patients with cardiac arrest who underwent diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. The need to obtain informed consent was waived except when follow-up phone calls were required; in those cases, informed consent was obtained from the families. Mean patient age was 57 years ± 16 (standard deviation); 31 (39%) patients were women. ADC maps were semiautomatically segmented into the following regions: subcortical white matter; cerebellum; insula; frontal, occipital, parietal, and temporal lobes; caudate nucleus; putamen; and thalamus. Median ADCs were measured in these regions and in the whole brain and were compared (with a two-tailed Wilcoxon test) as a function of clinical outcome. Outcome was defined by both early eye opening in the 1st week after arrest (either spontaneously or in response to external stimuli) and 6-month modified Rankin scale score.

Results: Whole-brain median ADC was a significant predictor of poor outcome as measured by no eye opening (specificity, 100% [95% confidence interval {CI}: 86%, 100%]; sensitivity, 30% [95% CI: 18%, 45%]) or 6-month modified Rankin scale score greater than 3 (specificity, 100% [95% CI: 73%, 100%]; sensitivity, 41% [95% CI: 29%, 54%]), with patients with poor outcomes having significantly lower ADCs for both outcome measures (P ≤ .001). Differences in ADC between patients with good and those with poor outcomes varied according to brain region, involving predominantly the occipital and parietal lobes and the putamen, and were dependent on the timing of imaging.

Conclusion: Spatial and temporal differences in ADCs may provide insight into mechanisms of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury and, hence, recovery.

© RSNA, 2009


  • 1 Thel MC, O'Connor CM. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: historical perspective to recent investigations. Am Heart J 1999; 137: 39–48. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Pusswald G, Fertl E, Faltl M, Auff E. Neurological rehabilitation of severely disabled cardiac arrest survivors. II. Life situation of patients and families after treatment. Resuscitation 2000; 47: 241–248. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Levy DE, Caronna JJ, Singer BH, Lapinski RH, Frydman H, Plum F. Predicting outcome from hypoxic-ischemic coma. JAMA 1985; 253: 1420–1426. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Edgren E, Hedstrand U, Nordin M, Rydin E, Ronquist G. Prediction of outcome after cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 1987; 15: 820–825. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Zandbergen EG, Hijdra A, Koelman JH, et al. Prediction of poor outcome within the first 3 days of postanoxic coma. Neurology 2006; 66: 62–68. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Fogel W, Krieger D, Veith M, et al. Serum neuron-specific enolase as early predictor of outcome after cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 1997; 25: 1133–1138. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Prohl J, Rother J, Kluge S, et al. Prediction of short-term and long-term outcomes after cardiac arrest: a prospective multivariate approach combining biochemical, clinical, electrophysiological, and neuropsychological investigations. Crit Care Med 2007; 35: 1230–1237. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Mullie A, Verstringe P, Buylaert W, et al. Predictive value of Glasgow coma score for awakening after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Cerebral Resuscitation Study Group of the Belgian Society for Intensive Care. Lancet 1988; 1: 137–140. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Wijdicks EF, Hijdra A, Young GB, Bassetti CL, Wiebe S. Practice parameter: prediction of outcome in comatose survivors after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2006; 67: 203–210. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Yanagawa Y, Un-no Y, Sakamoto T, Okada Y. Cerebral density on CT immediately after a successful resuscitation of cardiopulmonary arrest correlates with outcome. Resuscitation 2005; 64: 97–101. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hjort N, Christensen S, Solling C, et al. Ischemic injury detected by diffusion imaging 11 minutes after stroke. Ann Neurol 2005; 58: 462–465. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Pierpaoli C, Alger JR, Righini A, et al. High temporal resolution diffusion MRI of global cerebral ischemia and reperfusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996; 16: 892–905. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Dijkhuizen RM, Knollema S, van der Worp HB, et al. Dynamics of cerebral tissue injury and perfusion after temporary hypoxia-ischemia in the rat: evidence for region-specific sensitivity and delayed damage. Stroke 1998; 29: 695–704. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Wijdicks EF, Campeau NG, Miller GM. MR imaging in comatose survivors of cardiac resuscitation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 1561–1565. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Arbelaez A, Castillo M, Mukherji SK. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of global cerebral anoxia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20: 999–1007. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Chalela JA, Wolf RL, Maldjian JA, Kasner SE. MRI identification of early white matter injury in anoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Neurology 2001; 56: 481–485. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Sorensen AG, Wu O, Copen WA, et al. Human acute cerebral ischemia: detection of changes in water diffusion anisotropy by using MR imaging. Radiology 1999; 212: 785–792. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Reese TG, Heid O, Weisskoff RM, Wedeen VJ. Reduction of eddy-current-induced distortion in diffusion MRI using a twice-refocused spin echo. Magn Reson Med 2003; 49: 177–182. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Collins DL, Neelin P, Peters TM, Evans AC. Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994; 18: 192–205. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20 UCLA Laboratory of Neuro Imaging. ICBM-452 T1 5th order polynomial warps atlas. Los Angeles, Calif: UCLA Laboratory of Neuro Imaging, 2008. Google Scholar
  • 21 UCLA Laboratory of Neuro Imaging. ICBM probabilistic atlases. Los Angeles, Calif: UCLA Laboratory of Neuro Imaging, 2008. Google Scholar
  • 22 Mazziotta J, Toga A, Evans A, et al. A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM). Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2001; 356: 1293–1322. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Pierpaoli C, Jezzard P, Basser PJ, Barnett A. Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain. Radiology 1996; 201: 637–648. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Lowry R. VassarStats: Web site for statistical computation. Accessed January 14, 2009. Google Scholar
  • 25 Newcombe RG. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med 1998; 17: 857–872. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Beck JR, Shultz EK. The use of relative operating characteristic (ROC) curves in test performance evaluation. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1986; 110: 13–20. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Li F, Silva MD, Liu KF, et al. Secondary decline in apparent diffusion coefficient and neurological outcomes after a short period of focal brain ischemia in rats. Ann Neurol 2000; 48: 236–244. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Li F, Silva MD, Sotak CH, Fisher M. Temporal evolution of ischemic injury evaluated with diffusion-, perfusion-, and T2-weighted MRI. Neurology 2000; 54: 689–696. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Singhal AB, Topcuoglu MA, Koroshetz WJ. Diffusion MRI in three types of anoxic encephalopathy. J Neurol Sci 2002; 196: 37–40. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Yenari MA, Onley D, Hedehus M, et al. Diffusion- and perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of focal cerebral ischemia and cortical spreading depression under conditions of mild hypothermia. Brain Res 2000; 885: 208–219. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Piepgras A, Elste V, Frietsch T, Schmiedek P, Reith W, Schilling L. Effect of moderate hypothermia on experimental severe subarachnoid hemorrhage, as evaluated by apparent diffusion coefficient changes. Neurosurgery 2001; 48: 1128–1134. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Ginsberg MD, Hedley-Whyte ET, Richardson EP Jr. Hypoxic-ischemic leukoencephalopathy in man. Arch Neurol 1976; 33: 5–14. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Els T, Kassubek J, Kubalek R, Klisch J. Diffusion-weighted MRI during early global cerebral hypoxia: a predictor for clinical outcome? Acta Neurol Scand 2004; 110: 361–367. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Greer DM. MRI in anoxic brain injury. Neurocrit Care 2004; 1: 213–215. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Hald JK, Brunberg JA, Dublin AB, Wootton-Gorges SL. Delayed diffusion-weighted MR abnormality in a patient with an extensive acute cerebral hypoxic injury. Acta Radiol 2003; 44: 343–346. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Hossmann KA, Fischer M, Bockhorst K, Hoehn-Berlage M. NMR imaging of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for the evaluation of metabolic suppression and recovery after prolonged cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1994; 14: 723–731. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article History

Published in print: 2009