Moderate Carotid Artery Stenosis: MR Imaging–depicted Intraplaque Hemorrhage Predicts Risk of Cerebrovascular Ischemic Events in Asymptomatic Men

In men with asymptomatic moderate carotid stenosis, future ipsilatcral cerebrovascular events are associated with carotid intraplaque hemorrhage detected by using a rapid three-dimensional Tl-weighted fat-suppressed spoiled gradientecho MR sequence.


To investigate the association between magnetic resonance (MR) imaging–depicted intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) in the carotid artery wall and the risk of future ipsilateral cerebrovascular events in men with asymptomatic moderate carotid stenosis by using a rapid three-dimensional T1-weighted fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-echo sequence.

Materials and Methods

The institutional ethics review board approved this retrospective chart review and waived the requirement for written informed consent. All patients gave informed verbal consent at follow-up telephone interviews. Ninety-one men (mean age, 74.8 years; range, 47–88 years) who attended a vascular clinic between 2003 and 2006, who had asymptomatic carotid stenosis (50%–70% at Doppler ultrasonography), and who had undergone MR imaging for IPH detection were retrospectively identified. Seventy-five men with 98 eligible carotid arteries were included in the study. Patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year (mean follow-up, 24.92 months; range, 12–43 months). Kaplan-Meier survival and univariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to compare future ipsilateral cerebrovascular event rates between carotid arteries with and those without MR-depicted IPH.


Of the 98 carotid arteries included, 36 (36.7%) had MR-depicted IPH. Six cerebrovascular events (two strokes and four transient ischemic attacks) occurred in the carotid arteries with IPH, as compared with no clinical events in the carotid arteries without IPH. Univariate Cox regression analysis confirmed that MR-depicted IPH was associated with an increased risk of cerebrovascular events (hazard ratio, 3.59; 95% confidence interval: 2.48, 4.71; P < .001). MR-depicted IPH negatively predicted outcomes (negative predictive value = 100%).


In this cohort with asymptomatic moderate carotid stenosis, MR-depicted IPH was associated with future ipsilateral cerebrovascular events. Conversely, patients without MR-depicted IPH remained asymptomatic during follow-up. The absence of IPH at MR imaging, therefore, may be a reassuring marker of plaque stability and of a lower risk of thromboembolism.

© RSNA, 2009


  • 1 Elkins JS, Johnston SC. Thirty-year projections for deaths from ischemic stroke in the United States. Stroke 2003; 34( 9): 2109– 2112. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw Met al.. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 1998; 339( 20): 1415– 1425. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Halliday A, Mansfield A, Marro Jet al.. Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 363( 9420): 1491– 1502. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Qureshi AI, Alexandrov AV, Tegeler CHet al.. Guidelines for screening of extracranial carotid artery disease: a statement for healthcare professionals from the multidisciplinary practice guidelines committee of the American Society of Neuroimaging—cosponsored by the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology. J Neuroimaging 2007; 17( 1): 19– 47. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Rao DS, Goldin JG, Fishbein MC. Determinants of plaque instability in atherosclerotic vascular disease. Cardiovasc Pathol 2005; 14( 6): 285– 293. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke APet al.. Atherosclerotic plaque progression and vulnerability to rupture: angiogenesis as a source of intraplaque hemorrhage. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005; 25( 10): 2054– 2061. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kolodgie FD, Narula J, Yuan C, Burke AP, Finn AV, Virmani R. Elimination of neoangiogenesis for plaque stabilization: is there a role for local drug therapy? J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49( 21): 2093– 2101. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Iemolo F, Martiniuk A, Steinman DA, Spence JD. Sex differences in carotid plaque and stenosis. Stroke 2004; 35( 2): 477– 481. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Dick P, Sherif C, Sabeti S, Amighi J, Minar E, Schillinger M. Gender differences in outcome of conservatively treated patients with asymptomatic high grade carotid stenosis. Stroke 2005; 36( 6): 1178– 1183. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Moody AR, Murphy RE, Morgan PSet al.. Characterization of complicated carotid plaque with magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging in patients with cerebral ischemia. Circulation 2003; 107( 24): 3047– 3052. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Wardlaw JM, Chappell FM, Best JJ, Wartolowska K, Berry E. Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2006; 367( 9521): 1503– 1512. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Maldonado TS. What are current preprocedure imaging requirements for carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy: have magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomographic angiography made a difference? Semin Vasc Surg 2007; 20( 4): 205– 215. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Pilcher JM, Danaher J, Khaw KT. The prevalence of asymptomatic carotid artery disease in patients with peripheral vascular disease. Clin Radiol 2000; 55( 1): 56– 61. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14 House AK, Bell R, House J, Mastaglia F, Kumar A, D'Antuono M. Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis associated with peripheral vascular disease: a prospective study. Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 7( 1): 44– 49. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Cina CS, Safar HA, Maggisano R, Bailey R, Clase CM. Prevalence and progression of internal carotid artery stenosis in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 2002; 36( 1): 75– 82. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Goessens BM, Visseren FL, Kappelle LJ, Algra A, van der Graaf Y. Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis and the risk of new vascular events in patients with manifest arterial disease: the SMART study. Stroke 2007; 38( 5): 1470– 1475. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Takaya N, Yuan C, Chu Bet al.. Association between carotid plaque characteristics and subsequent ischemic cerebrovascular events: a prospective assessment with MRI—initial results. Stroke 2006; 37( 3): 818– 823. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Altaf N, MacSweeney ST, Gladman J, Auer DP. Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage predicts recurrent symptoms in patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. Stroke 2007; 38( 5): 1633– 1635. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Altaf N, Daniels L, Morgan PSet al.. Detection of intraplaque hemorrhage by magnetic resonance imaging in symptomatic patients with mild to moderate carotid stenosis predicts recurrent neurological events. J Vasc Surg 2008; 47( 2): 337– 342. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Murphy RE, Moody AR, Morgan PSet al.. Prevalence of complicated carotid atheroma as detected by magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging in patients with suspected carotid artery stenosis and previous acute cerebral ischemia. Circulation 2003; 107( 24): 3053– 3058. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Yamada N, Higashi M, Otsubo Ret al.. Association between signal hyperintensity on T1-weighted MR imaging of carotid plaques and ipsilateral ischemic events. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28( 2): 287– 292. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Altaf N, Beech A, Goode SDet al.. Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage detected by magnetic resonance imaging predicts embolization during carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46( 1): 31– 36. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Bitar R, Moody AR, Leung Get al.. In vivo 3D high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of intraplaque hemorrhage. Radiology 2008; 249( 1): 259– 267. LinkGoogle Scholar

Article History

Received May 5, 2008; revision requested June 27; revision received October 20; accepted December 2; final version accepted February 24, 2009
Published in print: Aug 2009