Gastrointestinal Imaging
Rectal Carcinoma: Thin-Section MR Imaging for Staging in 28 Patients
Published Online:Apr 1 1999https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.211.1.r99ap35215
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of thin-section magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (in-plane resolution, 0.6 × 0.6 mm) in the preoperative assessment of the depth of extramural tumor infiltration, which is a major prognostic indicator in rectal cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective study of 28 consecutive patients, preoperative MR imaging was performed. The tumor stage according to the TNM classification system and the measured depth of extramural tumor invasion in matched MR images and histopathologic slices were compared.
RESULTS: Preoperative MR imaging correctly indicated the histopathologic tumor stage in all 25 patients in whom comparisons were possible. The difference between the depth of extramural tumor measured on preoperative MR images and corresponding measurements on histopathologic slices of the resection specimen ranged from −5.0 mm to +5.5 mm (mean difference, +0.13 mm; 95% CI: −2.72, +2.98 mm), indicating good agreement. The mesorectal fascia, and the relation of the tumor to it, could be visualized in every case. In all five patients with involvement of the circumferential excision margins of resection specimens, extensive extramural invasion was identified on preoperative MR images.
CONCLUSION: Preoperative thin-section MR imaging accurately indicates the tumor stage of rectal cancer and depth of extramural tumor infiltration. It provides valuable information for identifying T3 tumors for preoperative adjuvant therapy in patients who are at high risk of failure of complete excision.
References
- 1 Cawthorn SJ, Parums DV, Gibbs NM, et al. Extent of mesorectal spread and involvement of lateral resection margin as prognostic factors after surgery for rectal cancer. Lancet 1990; 335:1055-1059. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 2 Lindmark G, Gerdin B, Pahlman L, Bergstrom R, Glimelius B. Prognostic predictors in colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37:1219-1227. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 3 Heald RJ, Ryall RDH. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1986; 1:1479-1482. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 4 Reynolds JV, Joyce WP, Dolan J, Sheahan K, Hyland JM. Pathological evidence in support of total mesorectal excision in the management of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1996; 83:1112-1115. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 5 Adam IJ, Mohamdee MO, Martin IG, et al. Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Lancet 1994; 344:707-711. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 6 Pahlman L, Glimelius B. The value of adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy for rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 1995; 31A:1347-1350. Medline, Google Scholar
- 7 Swedish Rectal Cancer Group. Improved survival with pre-operative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1997; 336:980-987. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 8 Grabbe E, Lierse W, Winkler R. The perirectal fascia: morphology and use in staging of rectal carcinoma. Radiology 1983; 149:241-246. Link, Google Scholar
- 9 Church JM, Raudkivi PJ, Hill GL. The surgical anatomy of the rectum: a review with particular relevance to the hazards of rectal mobilisation. Int J Colorectal Dis 1987; 2:158-166. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 10 Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RDH. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery: the clue to pelvic recurrence. Br J Surg 1982; 69:613-616. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 11 Frykholm GJ, Pahlman L, Glimelius B. Treatment of local recurrences of rectal carcinoma. Radiol Oncol 1995; 34:185-194. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 12 Meyenberger C, Huch Boni RA, Bertschinger P, Zala GF, Klotz HP, Krestin GP. Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer. Endoscopy 1995; 27:469-479. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 13 Lindmark G, Elvin A, Pahlman L, Glimelius B. The value of preoperative endosonography in preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 1992; 7:162-166. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 14 Schnall MD, Furth EE, Rosato E, Kressel HY. Rectal tumor stage correlation of endorectal MR imaging with pathologic findings. Radiology 1994; 190:709-714. Link, Google Scholar
- 15 Hadfield MB, Nicholson AA, MacDonald AW, et al. Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma by magnetic resonance imaging with a pelvic phased array coil. Br J Surg 1997; 84:529-531. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 16 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 327:307-310. Crossref, Google Scholar
- 17 Sobin LH, Wittekind CH, eds. UICC: TNM classification of malignant tumors 5th ed. New York, NY: Wiley, 1997. Google Scholar
- 18 Brown G, Richards CJ, Williams GT, Bourne M. Criteria for local tumour staging in rectal cancer using high resolution fast spin echo (FSE) MRI: preliminary results (abstr). Br J Radiol 1997; 70(suppl):37. Google Scholar
- 19 Katsura Y, Yamada K, Ishizawa T, Yoshinaka H, Shimazu H. Endorectal ultrasonography for the assessment of wall invasion and lymph node metastases in rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35:362-368. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 20 Hulsmans FJH, Tio TL, Fockens P, Bosma A, Tytgat GNJ. Assessment of tumor infiltration depth in rectal cancer with transrectal sonography: caution is necessary. Radiology 1994; 190:715-720. Link, Google Scholar
- 21 Maier AG, Barton PP, Neuhold NR, Herbst F, Teleky BK, Lechner GL. Peritumoral tissue reaction at transrectal US as a possible cause of overstaging in rectal cancer: histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1997; 203:785-789. Link, Google Scholar
- 22 Akasu T, Sugihara K, Moriya Y, Fujita S. Limitations and pitfalls of transrectal ultrasonography for staging of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40(suppl):10-15. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 23 Jass JR. Lymphocytic infiltration and survival in rectal cancer. J Clin Pathol 1986; 39:585-589. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 24 Svennevig JL, Lunde OC, Holter J, Bjørgsvik D. Lymphoid infiltration and prognosis in colorectal carcinoma. Br J Cancer 1984; 49:375-377. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 25 Chung CK, Stryker JA, Demuth WE. Patterns of failure following surgery alone for colorectal carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 1983; 22:65-70. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 26 Schned AR, Wheeler KJ, Hodorowski CA, et al. Tissue shrinkage correction factor in the calculation of prostate cancer volume. Am J Surg Pathol 1996; 20:1501-1506. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 27 Dworak O. Morphology of lymph nodes in the resected rectum of patients with rectal carcinoma. Path Res Pract 1991; 187:1020-1024. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 28 Kusunoki M, Yanagi H, Kamikonya N, Hishikawa Y, Shoji Y, Yamamura T. Preoperative detection of local extension of carcinoma of the rectum using magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Surg 1994; 179:653-656. Medline, Google Scholar
- 29 McNicholas MMJ, Joyce WP, Dolan J, Gibney RG, Macerlaine DP, Hyland J. Magnetic resonance imaging of rectal carcinoma: a prospective study. Br J Surg 1994; 81:911-914. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 30 Zerhouni EA, Rutter C, Hamilton SR, et al. CT and MR imaging in the staging of colorectal carcinoma: report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group II. Radiology 1996; 200:443-451. Link, Google Scholar
- 31 Thaler W, Watzka S, Martin F, et al. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer by endoluminal ultrasound vs magnetic resonance imaging. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37:1189-1193. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
