Quantitation of Emphysema with Three-dimensional CT Densitometry: Comparison with Two-dimensional Analysis, Visual Emphysema Scores, and Pulmonary Function Test Results

PURPOSE: To compare lung densitometric measurements that use a three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the lungs with those obtained from analysis of two-dimensional (2D) computed tomographic (CT) images, visual emphysema scores, and data from pulmonary function tests.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thoracic helical CT scans were obtained in 60 adult patients (35 with no visual evidence of emphysema and 25 with emphysema). The lungs were reconstructed as a 3D model on a commercial workstation, with a threshold of −600 HU. By analysis of histograms, the proportions of lung volumes with attenuation values below −950, −910, and −900 HU were measured, in addition to mean lung attenuation. These values were compared with lung densitometric results obtained from 2D CT images, visual emphysema scores, and data from pulmonary function tests.

RESULTS: Quantitation of emphysema with 3D reconstruction was efficient and accurate. Correlation was good among densitometric quantitation with 3D analysis, that obtained with 2D analysis (r = 0.98–0.99), and visual scoring (r = 0.74–0.82). Correlation was reasonable between 3D densitometric quantitation and the diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (Dlco) (r = −0.57 to −0.64), total lung capacity (r = 0.62–0.71), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (r = −0.57 to −0.60), and the ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity (FVC) (r = −0.75 to −0.82). The visual CT quantitation of emphysema correlated best with Dlco (r = −0.82) and FEV1/FVC (r = −0.89).

CONCLUSION: Lung densitometry with 3D reconstruction of helical CT data is a fast and accurate method for quantifying emphysema.

References

  • 1 Sakai F, Gamsu G, Im JG, Ray CS. Pulmonary function abnormalities in patients with CT-determined emphysema. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987; 11: 963-968. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kinsella M, Müller NL, Staples C, Abboud RT, Morrison NJ, DyBuncio A. Quantitation of emphysema by computed tomography using a “density mask” program and correlation with pulmonary function test. Chest 1990; 97: 315-321. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Gurney JW, Jones KK, Robbins RA, et al. Regional distribution of emphysema: correlation of high-resolution CT with pulmonary function tests in unselected smokers. Radiology 1992; 183: 457-463. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Sakai N, Mishima M, Nishimura K, Itch H, Kuno K. An automated method to assess the distribution of low attenuation areas on chest CT scans in chronic pulmonary emphysema patients. Chest 1994; 106: 1319-1325. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Wu MT, Chang JM, Chiang AA, et al. Use of quantitative CT to predict postoperative lung function in patients with lung cancer. Radiology 1994; 191: 257-262. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bae KT, Slone RM, Gierada DS, Yusen RD, Cooper JD. Patients with emphysema: quantitative CT analysis before and after lung volume reduction surgery. Radiology 1997; 203: 705-714. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gierada DS, Slone RM, Bae KT, Yusen RD, Lefrak SS, Cooper JD. Pulmonary emphysema: comparison of preoperative quantitative CT and physiologic index values with clinical outcome after lung-volume reduction surgery. Radiology 1997; 205: 235-242. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Holbert JM, Brown ML, Sciurba FC, Keenan RJ, Landreneau RJ, Holzer AD. Changes in lung volume and volume of emphysema after unilateral lung reduction surgery: analysis with CT lung densitometry. Radiology 1996; 201: 793-797. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kazerooni EA, Martinez FJ, Quint LE, Whyte RI. Quantitative helical CT indexes of emphysema as predictors of outcome after lung volume reduction surgery (abstr). Radiology 1996; 201(P): 298. Google Scholar
  • 10 Kazerooni EA, Whyte RI, Flint A, Martinez FJ. Imaging of emphysema and lung volume reduction surgery. RadioGraphics 1997; 17: 1023-1036. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Müller NL, Staples CA, Miller RR, Abboud RT. “Density mask”: an objective method to quantitate emphysema using computed tomography. Chest 1988; 94: 782-787. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kalender WA, Fichte H, Bautz W, Skalej M. Semiautomatic evaluation procedures for quantitative CT of the lung. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991; 15: 248-255. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Archer DC, Coblentz CL, deKemp RA, Nahmias C, Norman G. Automated in vivo quantification of emphysema. Radiology 1993; 188: 835-838. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Zagers R, Vrooman HA, Aarts NJ, et al. Quantitative analysis of computed tomography scans of the lungs for the diagnosis of pulmonary emphysema: a validation study of a semiautomated contour detection technique. Invest Radiol 1995; 9: 552-562. Google Scholar
  • 15 Genevois PA, De Vuyst P, Sy M, et al. Pulmonary emphysema: quantitative CT during expiration. Radiology 1996; 199: 825-829. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 16 . Standardization of spirometry: 1987 update—statement of the American Thoracic Society. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987; 136: 1285-1298. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17 . Single breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (transfer factor): recommendation for a standard technique. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987; 136: 1299-1307. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Crapo RO, Morris AH, Gardner RM. Reference spirometric values using techniques and equipment that meet ATS recommendations. Am Rev Respir Dis 1981; 123: 659-664. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Miller A, Thornton JC, Warshaw R, Anderson H, Teirstein AS, Selikoff IJ. Single breath diffusing capacity in a representative sample of the population of Michigan, a large industrial state: predicted values, lower limits of normal, and frequencies of abnormality by smoking history. Am Rev Respir Dis 1983; 127: 270-277. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Goldman HI, Becklake MR. Respiratory function tests: normal values at median altitudes and the prediction of normal results. Am Rev Tuberc 1959; 79: 457-467. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Stern EJ, Frank MS. CT of the lung in patients with pulmonary emphysema: diagnosis, quantification, and correlation with pathologic and physiologic findings. AJR 1994; 162: 791-798. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Thurlbeck WM, Müller NL. Emphysema: definition, imaging, quantification. AJR 1994; 163: 1017-1025. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Adams H, Bernard MS, McConnochie K. An appraisal of CT pulmonary density mapping in normal subjects. Clin Radiol 1991; 43: 238-242. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kemerink GJ, Lamers RJS, Thelissen GRP, van Engelshoven JMA. Scanner conformity in CT densitometry of the lungs. Radiology 1995; 197: 749-752. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Lamers RJ, Thelissen GR, Kessels AG, Wouters EF, Engelshoven JM. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: evaluation with spirometrically controlled CT lung densitometry. Radiology 1994; 193: 109-113. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Bergin CJ, Müller NL, Nichols DM, et al. The diagnosis of emphysema: a computed tomographic-pathologic condition. Am Rev Respir Dis 1986; 133: 541-546. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Klein JS, Gamsu G, Webb WR, Golden JA, Müller NL. High-resolution CT diagnosis of emphysema in symptomatic patients with normal chest radiographs and isolated low diffusing capacity. Radiology 1992; 182: 817-821. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Sanders C, Nath PH, Bailey WC. Detection of emphysema with computed tomography: correlation with pulmonary function tests and chest radiography. Invest Radiol 1988; 23: 262-266. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Miniati M, Filippi E, Falaschi F, et al. Radiologic evaluation of emphysema in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: chest radiography versus high resolution computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 151: 1359-1367. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Gevenois PA, de Maertelaer V, De Vuyst P, Zanen J, Yernault JC. Comparison of computed density and macroscopic morphometry in pulmonary emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 152: 653-657. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Gevenois PA, De Vuyst P, de Maertelaer V, et al. Comparison of computed density and microscopic morphometry in pulmonary emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996; 154: 187-192. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Hartman TE, Tazelaar HD, Swensen SJ, Müller NL. Cigarette smoking: CT and pathologic findings of associated pulmonary diseases. RadioGraphics 1997; 17: 377-390. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Schwaiblmair M, Vogelmeier C, Fruhmann G. Long-term augmentation therapy in 20 patients with severe alpha-l-antitrypsin deficiency: three-year follow-up. Respiration 1997; 64: 10-15. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Hutchison DCS, Hughes MD. Alpha-l-antitrypsin replacement therapy: will its efficacy ever be proved?. Eur Respir J 1997; 10: 2191-2193. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article History

Published in print: May 1999