Deep Venous Thrombosis: Complete Lower Extremity Venous US Evaluation in Patients without Known Risk Factors—Outcome Study

PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic value of venous ultrasonography (US) that includes examination of calf veins in symptomatic patients suspected of having deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of the prevalence of DVT included 977 consecutive patients with possible DVT but without known risk factors for DVT. Color flow and compression US were performed. The outcome was the frequency of overlooked, clinically important DVT after negative initial results from bilateral venous US of above- and below-the-knee veins. Patient records (904 patients), mailed questionnaires (61 patients), and telephone contacts (12 patients) were used to establish a diagnosis of clinically relevant DVT.

RESULTS: The prevalence of DVT was 15% (142 of 977), with DVT in 15% (21 of 142) restricted to the below-the-knee veins. Follow-up (median, 34 months) in 835 patients with negative US findings showed one occurrence of venous thrombosis (superficial thrombophlebitis) during the first 3 months of follow-up. Three other cases of venous thrombosis occurred at 17, 18, and 48 months of follow-up but were believed not to be linked to the initial complaint. The incidence of overlooked DVT was 0% (95% CI, 0.0%, 0.4%).

CONCLUSION: In patients without risk factors for DVT, a negative venous US study can help exclude the presence of clinically important DVT if the examination includes careful evaluation of the calf veins.

References

  • 1 Philbrick JT, Becker DM. Calf vein thrombosis: a wolf in sheep's clothing?. Arch Intern Med 1988; 148:2131-2138. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Oudkerk M, vanBeek EJR, vanPutten WLJ, Buller HR. Cost-effectiveness analysis of various strategies in the diagnostic management of pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 1993; 153:947-954. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Heijboer H, Buller HP, Lensing AWA, Turpie AG, Colly LP, ten Cate JW. A comparison of real-time compression ultrasonography with impedance plethysmography for the diagnosis of DVT in symptomatic outpatients. N Engl J Med 1993; 329:1365-1369. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Yucel EK, Fisher JS, Egglin TK, Geller SC, Waltman AC. Isolated calf venous thrombosis: diagnosis with compression US. Radiology 1991; 179:443-446. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Rose SC, Zwiebel WJ, Nelson BD, et al. Symptomatic lower extremity deep venous thrombosis: accuracy, limitations, and role of color duplex flow imaging in diagnosis. Radiology 1990; 175:639-644. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bradley MJ, Spencer PA, Alexander L, Milner GR. Colour flow mapping in the diagnosis of the calf vein thrombosis. Clin Radiol 1993; 47:399-402. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Pearson SD, Polak JF, Cartwright S, McCabe-Hassan S, Lee TH, Goldhaber SZ. A critical pathway to evaluate suspected deep vein thrombosis. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155:1773-1778. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Cogo A, Lensing AWA, Prandoni P, Hirsh J. Distribution of thrombosis in patients with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis: implications for simplifying the diagnostic process with compression ultrasound. Arch Intern Med 1993; 153:2777-2780. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Verstaete M. The diagnosis and treatment of deep-vein thrombosis (editorial). N Engl J Med 1993; 329:1418-1420. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Prandoni P, Lensing AWA, Buller HR, et al. Deep-vein thrombosis and the incidence of subsequent symptomatic cancer. N Engl J Med 1992; 327:1128-1133. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Polak JF. Doppler ultrasound of the deep leg veins: a revolution in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis and monitoring of thrombolysis. Chest 1991; 99(suppl 4):165S-172S. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Polak JF, Cutler SS, O'Leary DH. Deep veins of the calf: assessment with color Doppler flow imaging. Radiology 1989; 171:481-485. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hull R, Hirsh J, Sackett DL, et al. Clinical validity of a negative venogram in patients with clinically suspected venous thrombosis. Circulation 1981; 64:622-625. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Pedersen LM, Lerche A, Jorgensen M, Urhammer S, Steenberg P, Jensen R. Follow up study of patients with clinically suspected deep venous thrombosis and a normal venogram. J Intern Med 1993; 234:457-460. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Huisman MV, Buller HR, ten Cate JW, Vreeken J. Serial impedance plethysmography for suspected deep venous thrombosis in outpatients. N Engl J Med 1986; 314:823-828. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hull RD, Hirsh J, Carter CJ, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of impedance plethysmography for clinically suspected deep-vein thrombosis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 1985; 102:21-28. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Vaccaro JP, Cronan JJ, Dorfman GS. Outcome analysis of patients with normal compression US examinations. Radiology 1990; 175:645-649. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Simons GR, Skibo LK, Polak JF, Creager MA, Klapec-Fay JM, Goldhaber SZ. Utility of leg ultrasonography in suspected symptomatic isolated calf vein deep venous thrombosis. Am J Med 1995; 99:43-47. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Mattos MA, Melendres G, Sumner DS, et al. Prevalence and distribution of calf vein thrombosis in patients with symptomatic deep venous thrombosis: a color-flow duplex study. J Vasc Surg 1996; 24:738-744. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Birdwell BG, Raskob GE, Whisett TL, et al. The clinical validity of normal compression ultrasonography in outpatients suspected of having deep vein thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128:1-7. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article History

Published in print: June 1999