Three-dimensional Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography with Real-time Fluoroscopic Triggering: Design Specifications and Technical Reliability in 330 Patient Studies

Technical reliability was determined for triggering three-dimensional (3D) contrast material–enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography with MR fluoroscopy. Technical requirements for high reliability were also identified. Reliability was evaluated in 330 consecutive patient studies of the neck, thorax, abdomen, and pelvis. Contrast material arrival was detected fluoroscopically in 325 of the 330 studies (98.5%), and the 3D sequence was successfully triggered in 321 of 330 studies (97.3%). Fluoroscopic triggering of centrically encoded 3D MR angiographic acquisitions is a highly reliable means of obtaining 3D MR angiograms with high spatial resolution.

References

  • 1 Prince MR, Yucel EK, Kaufman JA, Harrison DC, Geller SC. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced 3D abdominal MR arteriography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3:877-881. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC, et al. Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology 1995; 197:785-792. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Maki JH, Prince MR, Londy FJ, Chenevert TL. The effects of time varying intravascular signal intensity and k-space acquisition order on three-dimensional MR angiography image quality. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6:642-651. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hany TF, McKinnon GC, Leung DA, Pfammaatter T, Debatin JF. Optimization of contrast timing for breath-hold three-dimensional MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7:551-556. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Earls JP, Rofsky NM, DeCorato DR, Krinsky GA, Weinreb JC. Breath-hold single-dose gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR aortography: usefulness of a timing examination and MR power injector. Radiology 1996; 201:705-710. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, Mistretta CA. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36:345-351. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Levy RA, Maki JH. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the extracranial carotid arteries: two techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998; 19:688-690. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Remonda L, Heid O, Schroth G. Carotid artery stenosis, occlusion, and pseudo-occlusion: first-pass, gadolinium-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography—preliminary study. Radiology 1998; 209:95-102. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Schoenberg SO, Bock M, Knopp MV, et al. Renal arteries: optimization of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography with bolus timing–independent fast multiphase acquisition in a single breath hold. Radiology 1999; 211:667-679. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Mistretta CA, Grist TM, Korosec FR, et al. 3D time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR DSA: advantages and tradeoffs. Magn Reson Med 1998; 40:571-581. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Foo TKF, Saranathan M, Prince MR, Chenevert TL. Automated detection of bolus arrival and initiation of data acquisition in fast, three-dimensional, gadoliuium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1997; 203:275-280. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Wilman AH, Riederer SJ, King BF, Debbins JP, Rossman PJ, Ehman RL. Fluoroscopically triggered contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with elliptical centric view order: application to the renal arteries. Radiology 1997; 205:137-146. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Wilman AH, Riederer SJ. Improved centric phase encoding orders for three dimensional magnetization prepared MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36:384-392. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Wilman AH, Riederer SJ. Performance of an elliptical centric view order for signal enhancement and motion artifact suppression in breathhold three dimensional gradient echo imaging. Magn Reson Med 1997; 38:793-802. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Debbins JP, Riederer SJ, Rossman PJ, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance fluoroscopy. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36:588-595. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Wright RC, Riederer SJ, Farzaneh F, Rossman PJ, Liu Y. Real-time MR fluoroscopic data acquisition and image reconstruction. Magn Reson Med 1989; 12:407-415. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Busse RF, Debbins JP, Kruger DG, Fain SB, Riederer SJ. Interactive three-point localization of double-oblique sections using MR fluoroscopy. Magn Reson Med 1999; 41:846-849. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Riederer SJ, Tasciyan T, Farzaneh F, Lee JN, Wright RC, Herfkens RJ. MR fluoroscopy: technical feasibility. Magn Reson Med 1988; 8:1-15. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19 van Vaals JJ, Brummer ME, Dixon WT, et al. “Keyhole” method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3:671-675. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Busse R, Kruger D, Debbins J, Fain S, Riederer S. A flexible view ordering technique for fast high-quality real-time 2DFT MR fluoroscopy. Magn Reson Med 1999; 42:69-81. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Wilman AH, Riederer SJ, Huston J, III, Wald JT, Debbins JP. Arterial phase carotid and vertebral artery imaging in 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography by combining fluoroscopic triggering with elliptical centric acquisition order. Magn Reson Med 1998; 40:24-35. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Huston J, III, Fain SB, Riederer SJ, Wilman AH, Bernstein MA, Busse RF. Carotid arteries: maximizing arterial to venous contrast in fluoroscopically triggered contrast-enhanced MR angiography with elliptic centric view ordering. Radiology 1999; 211:265-273. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Du YP, Parker DL, Davis WL, Cao G. Reduction of partial-volume artifacts with zero-filled interpolation in three-dimensional MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994; 4:733-741. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Fain SB, King BF, Riederer SJ. High resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries using point spread function analysis (abstr) In: Proceedings of the Seventh Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1999; 155. Google Scholar
  • 25 Kim JK, Farb RI, Wright GA. Test bolus examination in the carotid artery at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1998; 206:283-289. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Prince MR, Chenevert TL, Foo TK, Londy FJ, Ward JS, Maki JH. Contrast-enhanced abdominal MR angiography: optimization of imaging delay time by automating the detection of contrast material arrival in the aorta. Radiology 1997; 203:109-114. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Isoda H, Yakehara Y, Isogai S, et al. Technique for arterial-phase contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the carotid and vertebral arteries. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998; 19:1241-1244. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Hatabu H, Gaa J, Kim D, Li W, Prasad PV, Edelman RR. Pulmonary perfusion: qualitative assessment with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using ultra-short TE and inversion recovery turbo FLASH. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36:503-508. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Meaney JFM, Saysell M, Ridgway JP, et al. Timing of 3-D abdominal MRA using single slice fluorosocopic imaging with real time complex subtraction and real time display (abstr) In: Proceedings of the Seventh Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1999; 1206. Google Scholar

Article History

Published in print: May 2000