"skipMainNavigation"
Search
Quick Search in Journals
Quick Search anywhere
Advanced Search
Radiology
Menu
  • Information
    • Previous
    Next
    Musculoskeletal Imaging

    Bone Marrow Edema Pattern in Osteoarthritic Knees: Correlation between MR Imaging and Histologic Findings

    Published Online:Jun 1 2000https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn05835

    Abstract

    PURPOSE: To correlate magnetic resonance (MR) images of a bone marrow edema pattern with histologic findings in osteoarthritic knees.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen consecutive patients (age range, 43–79 years; mean, 67 years) referred for total knee replacement were examined with sagittal short inversion time inversion-recovery (STIR) and T1- and T2-weighted turbo spin-echo MR imaging 1–4 days before surgery. Tibial plateau abnormalities on MR images were compared quantitatively with those on histologic maps.

    RESULTS: The bone marrow edema pattern zone (ill-defined and hyperintense on STIR images and hypointense on T1-weighted MR images) mainly consisted of normal tissue (53% of the area was fatty marrow, 16% was intact trabeculae, and 2% was blood vessels) and a smaller proportion of several abnormalities (bone marrow necrosis [11% of area], abnormal [necrotic or remodeled] trabeculae [8%], bone marrow fibrosis [4%], bone marrow edema [4%], and bone marrow bleeding [2%]). The bone marrow edema pattern zone and the zone with a normal MR imaging appearance differed significantly in the presence of bone marrow necrosis (P = .021), bone marrow fibrosis (P = .014), and abnormal trabeculae (P = .011) but not in the prevalence of bone marrow edema (P = .069). Bone marrow edema also was found in zones with an unremarkable MR appearance (perifocal zone, 5% edema; control zone, 2% edema).

    CONCLUSION: A bone marrow edema pattern in osteoarthritic knees represents a number of noncharacteristic histologic abnormalities. Edema is not a major constituent of MR imaging signal intensity abnormalities in such knees.

    References

    • 1 Yu JS, Cook PA. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee: a pattern approach for evaluating bone marrow edema. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 1996; 37:261-303.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 2 Lecouvet FE, van de Berg BC, Maldague BE, et al. Early irreversible osteonecrosis versus transient lesions of the femoral condyles: prognostic value of subchondral bone and marrow changes on MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170:71-77.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 3 MacDougall L, Conway WF. Controversies in magnetic resonance imaging of the hip. Top Magn Res Imaging 1996; 8:44-50.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 4 Palmer WE, Levine SM, Dupuy DE. Knee and shoulder fractures: association of fracture detection and marrow edema on MR images with mechanism of injury. Radiology 1997; 204:395-401.
      Google Scholar
    • 5 Reinus WR, Fischer KC, Ritter JH. Painful transient tibial edema. Radiology 1994; 192:195-199.
      Google Scholar
    • 6 Vahlensieck M, Reiser M. Bone marrow edema in MRT. Radiologe 1992; 32:509-515.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 7 Vande Berg BE, Malghem JJ, Labaisse MA, Noel HM, Maldague BE. MR imaging of avascular necrosis and transient marrow edema of the femoral head. RadioGraphics 1993; 13:501-520.
      Google Scholar
    • 8 Wilson AJ, Murphy WA, Hardy DC, Totty WG. Transient osteoporosis: transient bone marrow edema?. Radiology 1988; 167:757-760.
      Google Scholar
    • 9 Schweitzer ME, White LE. Does altered biomechanics cause marrow edema?. Radiology 1996; 198:851-853.
      Google Scholar
    • 10 Lazzarini KM, Troiano RN, Smith RC. Can running cause the appearance of marrow edema on MR images of the foot and ankle?. Radiology 1997; 202:540-542.
      Google Scholar
    • 11 Neuhold A, Hofmann S, Engel A, et al. Bone marrow edema of the hip: MR findings after core decompression. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992; 16:951-955.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 12 Plenk H, Jr, Hofmann S, Eschberger J, et al. Histomorphology and bone morphometry of the bone marrow edema syndrome of the hip. Clin Orthop 1997; 73-84.
      Google Scholar
    • 13 Glasser DB, Lane JM, Huvos AG, Marcove RC, Rosen G. Survival, prognosis, and therapeutic response in osteogenic sarcoma: the Memorial Hospital experience. Cancer 1992; 69:698-708.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 14 Huvos AG, Rosen G, Marcove RC. Primary osteogenic sarcoma: pathologic aspects in 20 patients after treatment with chemotherapy en bloc resection, and prosthetic bone replacement. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1977; 101:14-18.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 15 Hayes CW, Conway WF, Daniel WW. MR imaging of bone marrow edema pattern: transient osteoporosis, transient bone marrow edema syndrome, or osteonecrosis. RadioGraphics 1993; 13:1001-1011.
      Google Scholar
    • 16 Lee JK, Yao L. Stress fractures: MR imaging. Radiology 1988; 169:217-220.
      Google Scholar
    • 17 Lotke PA, Ecker ML. Osteonecrosis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988; 70:470-473.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 18 Bergman AG, Willen HK, Lindstrand AL, Pettersson HT. Osteoarthritis of the knee: correlation of subchondral MR signal abnormalities with histopathologic and radiographic features. Skeletal Radiol 1994; 23:445-448.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 19 Quinn SF, Erickson SJ, Dee PM, et al. MR imaging in fibromatosis: results in 26 patients with pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 156:539-542.
      MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 20 Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, Wapner KL, Lackman RD. Plantar fibromatosis: a benign aggressive neoplasm with a characteristic appearance on MR images. Radiology 1994; 193:841-845.
      Google Scholar

    Article History

    Published in print: June 2000