Small Pulmonary Nodules: Volumetrically Determined Growth Rates Based on CT Evaluation

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of high-resolution computed tomographic (CT) volumetric measurements of small pulmonary nodules to assess growth and malignancy status.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) image extraction and isotropic resampling techniques was assessed by performing three experiments. The first experiment measured volumes in spherical synthetic nodules of two diameters (3.20 and 3.96 mm), the second measured deformable silicone synthetic nodules prior to and after their shape had been altered markedly, and the third measured nodules of various shapes and sizes. Three-dimensional techniques were used to assess growth in 13 patients for whom the final diagnosis was known and whose initial nodule diameters were less than 10 mm. By using the exponential growth model and the calculated nodule volume at two points in time, the doubling time for each subject was calculated.

RESULTS: The three synthetic nodule studies revealed that the volume could be measured accurately to within ±3%. All five malignant nodules grew, and all had doubling times less than 177 days. Some malignant nodules had asymmetric patterns of growth identified by using the 3D techniques but not the two-dimensional methods. All eight benign nodules had doubling times of 396 days or greater or showed a decrease in volume.

CONCLUSION: CT volumetric measurements are highly accurate for determining volume and are useful in assessing growth of small nodules and calculating their doubling times.

References

  • 1 Friese SA, Rieber A, Fleiter T, Brambs HJ, Claussen CD. Pulmonary nodules in spiral volumetric and single-slice computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 1994; 18:48-51. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Diederich S, Lenzen H, Windmann R, et al. Pulmonary nodules: experimental and clinical studies at low-dose CT. Radiology 1999; 213:289-298. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Chiou YS, Lure YM. Hybrid lung nodule detection (HLND) system. Cancer Lett 1994; 77:119-126. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Zhu X, Lee KN, Levin DL, et al. Temporal image database design for outcome analysis of lung nodule. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1996; 20:347-356. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kanazawa K, Kawata Y, Niki N, et al. Computer-aided diagnosis for pulmonary nodules based on helical CT images. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1998; 22:157-167. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Yankelevitz DF, Gupta R, Zhao B, Henschke CI. Small pulmonary nodules: evaluation with repeat CT—preliminary experience. Radiology 1999; 212:561-566. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Armato SG, III, Giger ML, Moran CJ, Blackburn JT, Doi K, MacMahon H. Computerized detection of pulmonary nodules on CT scans. RadioGraphics 1999; 19:1303-1311. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Henschke CI, Miettinen OS, Yankelevitz DF, Libby D, Smith JP. Radiographic screening for cancer: new paradigm for its scientific basis. Clin Imaging 1994; 18:16-20. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF, et al. Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 1999; 354:99-105. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Munden RF, Pugatch RD, Liptay MJ, Sugarbaker DJ, Le LU. Small pulmonary lesions detected at CT: clinical importance. Radiology 1997; 202:105-110. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Lillington GA. Management of solitary pulmonary nodules. Postgrad Med 1997; 101:145-150. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lillington GA. Management of the solitary pulmonary nodule. Disease-a-month 1991; 37:271-318. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Yankelevitz DF, Henschke CI. Does 2-year stability imply that pulmonary nodules are benign?. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:325-328. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Jain AK. Fundamentals of digital image processing Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1989. Google Scholar
  • 15 Harris KM, Adams H, Lloyd DC, Harvey DJ. The effect on apparent size of simulated pulmonary nodules of using three standard CT window settings. Clin Radiol 1993; 47:241-244. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Mizuno T, Masaoka A, Ichimura H, Shibata K, Tanaka H, Niwa H. Comparison of actual survivorship after treatment with survivorship predicted by actual tumor-volume doubling time from tumor diameter at first observation. Cancer 1984; 53:2716-2720. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Russ JC. The image processing handbook 2nd ed. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC, 1995. Google Scholar
  • 18 Spratt JS, Meyer JS, Spratt JA. Rates of growth of human solid neoplasms: part I. J Surg Oncol 1995; 60:137-146. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article History

Published in print: Oct 2000