US Identification of the Anal Sphincter Complex and Levator Ani Muscle in Neonates: Infracoccygeal Approach
Abstract
PURPOSE: To identify the anal sphincter complex and levator ani muscle at transperineal ultrasonography (US) with the infracoccygeal approach.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Infracoccygeal US was performed with a 7-MHz linear-array transducer in 40 healthy neonates. The babies were placed in the supine position, and both legs were drawn up to the chest. The buttocks were accordingly lifted up. The approach site was just inferior to the coccyx and posterior to the anus. Scanning was performed to obtain transverse images of the anorectal area. The thickness of the anal sphincter complex and the puborectalis muscle were measured.
RESULTS: Infracoccygeal US revealed the internal anal sphincter (IAS), the external anal sphincter (EAS), and the puborectalis muscle in all babies. The IAS and EAS were depicted as inner and outer hypoechoic ringlike structures, respectively. A round, hyperechoic space (intersphincteral space) was present between the hypoechoic IAS and EAS. The puborectalis muscle was identified as a U-shaped hypoechoic structure. The bulbocavernosus and ischiocavernous muscles were also identified. Mean thicknesses were as follows: IAS, 1.3 mm ± 0.3 (SD) (range, 0.8–1.9 mm); EAS, 1.6 mm ± 0.3 (range, 1.2–2.3 mm); and puborectalis muscle, 1.1 mm ± 0.3 (range, 0.6–1.9 mm).
CONCLUSION: Infracoccygeal transperineal US is an excellent diagnostic modality for demonstrating the anal sphincter complex and levator ani muscle in neonates.
References
- 1 Nielsen MB, Pedersen JF, Hauge C, Rasmussen OO, Christiansen J. Endosonography of the anal sphincter: findings in healthy volunteers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 157:1199-1202. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 2 Hussain SM, Stoker J, Lameris JS. Anal sphincter complex: endoanal MR imaging of normal anatomy. Radiology 1995; 197:671-677. Link, Google Scholar
- 3 deSouza NM, Gilderdale DJ, MacIver DK, Ward HC. High-resolution MR imaging of the anal sphincter in children: a pilot study using endoanal receiver coils. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:201-206. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 4 Teele RL, Share JC. Transperineal sonography in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:1263-1267. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 5 Alexander AA, Miller LS, Liu JB, Feld RI, Goldberg BB. High-resolution endoluminal sonography of the anal sphincter complex. J Ultrasound Med 1994; 13:281-284. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 6 Alexander AA, Liu JB, Merton DA, Nagle DA. Fecal incontinence: transvaginal US evaluation of anatomic causes. Radiology 1996; 199:529-532. Link, Google Scholar
- 7 Bartram CI, Sultan AH. Anal endosonography in faecal incontinence. Gut 1995; 37:4-6. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 8 Nielsen MB, Hauge C, Pedersen JF, Christiansen J. Endosonographic evaluation of patients with anal incontinence: findings and influence on surgical management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 160:771-775. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 9 Schafer A, Enck P, Furst G, Kahn T, Frieling T, Lubke HJ. Anatomy of the anal sphincters: comparison of anal endosonography to magnetic resonance imaging. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37:777-781. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 10 Law PJ, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography: technique and normal anatomy. Gastrointest Radiol 1989; 14:349-353. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 11 Nielsen MB, Pedersen JF. Changes in the anal sphincter with age: an endosonographic study. Acta Radiol 1996; 37:357-361. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 12 Sangwan YP, Solla JA. Internal anal sphincter: advances and insights. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41:1297-1311. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 13 Lunniss PJ, Phillips RK. Anatomy and function of the anal longitudinal muscle. Br J Surg 1992; 79:882-884. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 14 Halligan S. Imaging fistula-in-ano. Clin Radiol 1998; 53:85-95. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 15 Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Nicholls JR, Bartram CI. Endosonography of the anal sphincters: normal anatomy and comparison with manometry. Clin Radiol 1994; 49:368-374. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 16 Sultan AH, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Beynon J, Bartram CI. Anal endosonography and correlation with in vitro and in vivo anatomy. Br J Surg 1993; 80:508-511. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
