Skip main navigation
Close Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Search
Quick Search in Journals
Quick Search anywhere
Advanced Search
Menu
  • Information
    • Previous
    Next
    Computer Applications

    Evaluation of JPEG and Wavelet Compression of Body CT Images for Direct Digital Teleradiologic Transmission

    Published Online:Dec 1 2000https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.217.3.r00nv22772

    Abstract

    PURPOSE: To determine acceptable levels of JPEG (Joint Photographic Experts Group) and wavelet compression for teleradiologic transmission of body computed tomographic (CT) images.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS: A digital test pattern (Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers, 512 × 512 matrix) was transmitted after JPEG or wavelet compression by using point-to-point and Web-based teleradiology, respectively. Lossless, 10:1 lossy, and 20:1 lossy ratios were tested. Images were evaluated for high- and low-contrast resolution, sensitivity to small signal differences, and misregistration artifacts. Three independent observers who were blinded to the compression scheme evaluated these image quality measures in 20 clinical cases with similar levels of compression.

    RESULTS: High-contrast resolution was not diminished with any tested level of JPEG or wavelet compression. With JPEG compression, low-contrast resolution was not lost with 10:1 lossy compression but was lost at 3% modulation with 20:1 lossy compression. With wavelet compression, there was loss of 1% modulation with 10:1 lossy compression and loss of 5% modulation with 20:1 lossy compression. Sensitivity to small signal differences (5% and 95% of the maximal signal) diminished only with 20:1 lossy wavelet compression. With 10:1 lossy compression, misregistration artifacts were mild and were equivalent with JPEG and wavelet compression. Qualitative clinical findings supported these findings.

    CONCLUSION: Lossy 10:1 compression is suitable for on-call electronic transmission of body CT images as long as original images are subsequently reviewed.

    References

    • 1 Erickson BJ, Manduca A, Palisson P, et al. Wavelet compression of medical images. Radiology 1998; 206:599-607. Link, Google Scholar
    • 2 Iyriboz TA, Zukoski MJ, Hopper KD, Stag PL. A comparison of wavelet and Joint Photographic Experts Group lossy compression methods applied to medical images. J Digit Imaging 1999; 12:14-17. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 3 Wallace GK. The JPEG still picture compression standard. Comm ACM 1991; 34:30-44. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 4 Antonini M, Barlaud M, Mathieu P, Daubechies I. Image coding using wavelet transform. IEEE Trans Imag Proc 1992; 1:205-220. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 5 Persons K, Palisson P, Manduca A, Erickson BJ, Savcenko V. An analytical look at the effects of compression on medical images. J Digit Imaging 1997; 10:60-66. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 6 Goldberg MA, Gazelle GS, Boland GW, et al. Focal hepatic lesions: effect of three-dimensional wavelet compression on detection at CT. Radiology 1997; 202:159-165. Link, Google Scholar
    • 7 Cosman PC, Davidson HC, Bergin CJ, et al. Thoracic CT images: effect of lossy im-age compression on diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 1994; 190:517-524. Link, Google Scholar
    • 8 . ACR Standards for Teleradiology Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 1998; 3-12. Google Scholar
    • 9 Gray JE, Lisk KG, Haddick DH, Harshbarger JH, Oosterhof A, Schwenker R. Test pattern for video displays and hard-copy cameras. Radiology 1985; 154:519- 527. Link, Google Scholar
    • 10 . SMPTE recommended practice: specifications for medical diagnostic imaging test pattern for television monitors and hard-copy recording cameras White Plains, NY: Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers, 1986; 133. Google Scholar
    • 11 Goldberg MA, Pivovarov M, Mayo-Smith WW, et al. Application of wavelet compression to digitized radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163:463-468. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 12 Savcenko V, Erickson BJ, Palisson PM, et al. Detection of subtle abnormalities on chest radiographs after irreversible compression. Radiology 1998; 206:609-616. Link, Google Scholar
    • 13 Aberle DR, Gleeson F, Sayre JW, et al. The effect of irreversible image compression on diagnostic accuracy in thoracic imaging. Invest Radiol 1993; 28:398-403. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 14 Erickson BJ, Manduca A, Persons KR, et al. Evaluation of irreversible compression of digitized postero-anterior chest radiographs. J Digit Imaging 1997; 10:97-102. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 15 MacMahon H, Doi K, Sanada S, et al. Data compression: effect of diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography. Radiology 1991; 178:175-179. Link, Google Scholar
    • 16 Ishigaki T, Sakuma S, Ikeda M, Itoh Y, Suzuki M, Iwai S. Clinical evaluation of irreversible image compression: analysis of chest imaging with computed radiography. Radiology 1990; 175:739-743. Link, Google Scholar
    • 17 Mori T, Nakata H. Irreversible data compression in chest imaging using computed radiography: an evaluation. J Thorac Imaging 1994; 9:23-30. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 18 Uchida K, Nakamura K, Watanabe H, et al. Clinical evaluation of irreversible data compression for computed radiography in excretory urography. J Digit Imaging 1996; 9:145-149. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 19 Good WF, Maitz GS, Gur D. Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) compatible data compression of mammograms. J Digit Imaging 1994; 7:123-132. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 20 Karson TH, Chandra S, Morehead AJ, Stewart WJ, Nissen SE, Thomas JD. JPEG compression of digital echocardiographic images: impact on image quality. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1995; 8:306-318. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 21 Chan KK, Lou S, Huang HK. Full-frame transform compression of CT and MR images. Radiology 1989; 171:847-851. Link, Google Scholar
    • 22 Clunie D, Mitchell P, Howieson J, Roman-Goldstein S, Szumowski J. Detection of discrete white matter lesions after irreversible compression of MR images. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995; 16:1435-1440. Medline, Google Scholar
    • 23 Tobin M. SMPTE test pattern evaluation of teleradiology using data compression and a standard modem. MD Comput 1999; 16:55-59. Medline, Google Scholar
    • 24 Birnbaum BA, Jacobs JE, Ramchandani P. Multiphasic renal CT: comparison of renal mass enhancement during the corticomedullary and nephrographic phases. Radiology 1996; 200:753-758. Link, Google Scholar
    • 25 Saiptech P, Ho BK, Panwar R, Ma M, Wei J. Applying wavelet transforms with arithmetic coding to radiological image compression. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 1995; 14:587-593. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 26 Strinzis MG. A review of compression methods for medical images in PACS. Int J Med Inf 1998; 52:159-165. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar

    Article History

    Published in print: Dec 2000