Vascular and Interventional Radiology

CT Fluoroscopy-guided Interventional Procedures: Techniques and Radiation Dose to Radiologists

PURPOSE: To determine the radiation dose to radiologists who perform computed tomographic (CT) fluoroscopic interventional procedures by using a quick-check method and a low-milliampere technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred twenty CT fluoroscopy–guided interventional procedures were performed in 189 patients. Procedures included 57 spinal injections, 17 spinal biopsies, 24 chest biopsies, 20 abdominal aspirations, 44 abdominal biopsies, and 58 abdominal drainages. Procedure details were prospectively recorded and included site, depth, target diameter, milliampere value, kilovolt peak, fluoroscopic time, and CT technique (continuous CT fluoroscopy, quick-check method, or a combination of these techniques). An individual collar and finger radiation detector were worn by each radiologist during each procedure to determine the dose per procedure.

RESULTS: The quick-check technique was performed in 191 (87%) of 220 procedures. Four procedures were performed with continuous CT fluoroscopy, and a combination technique was used for 25 (11%) procedures. The overall mean CT fluoroscopic time was 17.9 seconds (range, 1.2–101.5 seconds). The mean milliampere value was 13.2 mA (range, 10–50 mA). The overall mean radiologist radiation dose per procedure was 2.5 mrem (0.025 mSv) (whole body). Individual procedure doses ranged from 0.66 to 4.75 mrem (0.007–0.048 mSv). The finger radiation dose was negligible.

CONCLUSION: By using a low-milliampere technique and the quick-check method, CT fluoroscopic time and radiation exposure can be minimized.


  • 1 Katada K, Anno H, Ogura Y, et al. Early clinical experience with real-time CT fluoroscopy. Nippon Acta Radiol 1994; 54:1172-1174. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Katada K, Kato R, Anno H, et al. Guidance with real-time CT fluoroscopy: early clinical experience. Radiology 1996; 200:851-856. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Meyer CA, White CS, Wu J, Futterer SF, Templeton PA. Real-time CT fluoroscopy: usefulness in thoracic drainage. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171:1097-1101. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Froelich JJ, Saar B, Hoppe M, et al. Real-time CT-fluoroscopy for guidance of percutaneous drainage procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1998; 9:735-740. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Silverman SG, Tuncali K, Adams DF, Nawfel RD, Zou KH, Judy PF. CT fluoroscopy-guided abdominal interventions: techniques, results, and radiation exposure. Radiology 1999; 212:673-681. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Daly B, Krebs TL, Wong-You-Cheong JJ, Wang SS. Percutaneous abdominal and pelvic interventional procedures using CT fluoroscopy guidance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173:637-644. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Sheafor DH, Paulson EK, Kliewer MA, DeLong DM, Nelson RC. Comparison of sonographic and CT guidance techniques: does CT fluoroscopy decrease procedure time?. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:939-942. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Nawfel RD, Judy PF, Silverman SG, Hooton S, Tuncali K, Adams DF. Patient and personnel exposure during CT fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures. Radiology 2000; 216:180-184. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kato R, Katada K, Anno H, Suzuki S, Ida Y, Koga S. Radiation dosimetry at CT fluoroscopy: physician’s hand dose and development of needle holders. Radiology 1996; 201:576-578. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Haaga JR, Alfidi RJ. Precise biopsy localization by computed tomography. Radiology 1976; 118:603-607. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Moran CJ, Naidich TP, Gado MH, Marchosky JA. Central nervous system lesions biopsied or treated by CT-guided needle placement. Radiology 1979; 131:681-686. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Harter LP, Moss AA, Goldberg HI, Gross BH. CT-guided fine-needle aspirations for diagnosis of benign and malignant disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983; 140:363-367. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Mueller PR, vanSonnenberg E. Interventional radiology in the chest and abdomen. N Engl J Med 1990; 322:1364-1374. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Shope TB. Regulations and recommendations relevant to interventional radiology. In: Balter S, Shope T, eds. Syllabus: a categorical course in physics—physical and technical aspects of angiography and interventional radiology. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 1995; 195-205. Google Scholar
  • 15 Wagner LK, Eifel PJ, Geise RA. Potential biological effects following high x-ray dose interventional procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1994; 5:71-84. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hwang E, Gaxiola E, Vlietstra RE, Brenner A, Ebersole D, Browne K. Real-time measurement of skin radiation during cardiac catheterization. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998; 43:367-370. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Curry TS, Dowdey JE, Murry RC, Jr, eds. Christensen’s physics of diagnostic radiology 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lea & Febiger, 1990; 372-391. Google Scholar

Article History

Published in print: July 2001