Benign Conditions That Mimic Prostate Carcinoma: MR Imaging Features with Histopathologic Correlation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2016150030

A range of anatomic and pathologic mimics of prostate carcinoma are reviewed, with emphasis on their multiparametric MR imaging appearances and histopathologic features.

Multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging combines anatomic and functional imaging techniques for evaluating the prostate and is increasingly being used in diagnosis and management of prostate cancer. A wide spectrum of anatomic and pathologic processes in the prostate may masquerade as prostate cancer, complicating the imaging interpretation. The histopathologic and imaging findings of these potential mimics are reviewed. These entities include the anterior fibromuscular stroma, surgical capsule, central zone, periprostatic vein, periprostatic lymph nodes, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), atrophy, necrosis, calcification, hemorrhage, and prostatitis. An understanding of the prostate zonal anatomy is helpful in distinguishing the anatomic entities from prostate cancer. The anterior fibromuscular stroma, surgical capsule, and central zone are characteristic anatomic features of the prostate with associated low T2 signal intensity due to dense fibromuscular tissue or complex crowded glandular tissue. BPH, atrophy, necrosis, calcification, and hemorrhage all have characteristic features with one or more individual multiparametric MR imaging modalities. Prostatitis constitutes a heterogeneous group of infective and inflammatory conditions including acute and chronic bacterial prostatitis, infective and noninfective granulomatous prostatitis, and malacoplakia. These entities are associated with variable clinical manifestations and are characterized by the histologic hallmark of marked inflammatory cellular infiltration. In some cases, these entities are indistinguishable from prostate cancer at multiparametric MR imaging and may even exhibit extraprostatic extension and lymphadenopathy, mimicking locally advanced prostate cancer. It is important for the radiologists interpreting prostate MR images to be aware of these pitfalls for accurate interpretation. Online supplemental material is available for this article.

©RSNA, 2015

References

  • 1. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 2014;64(1):9–29. Google Scholar
  • 2. Gleason DF. Classification of prostatic carcinomas. Cancer Chemother Rep 1966;50(3):125–128. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3. Dickinson L, Ahmed HU, Allen C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting. Eur Urol 2011;59(4):477–494. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4. Akin O, Sala E, Moskowitz CS, et al. Transition zone prostate cancers: features, detection, localization, and staging at endorectal MR imaging. Radiology 2006;239(3):784–792. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 5. Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 2012;22(4):746–757. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6. Padhani AR, Liu G, Koh DM, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia 2009;11(2):102–125. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7. Hambrock T, Somford DM, Huisman HJ, et al. Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer. Radiology 2011;259(2):453–461. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 8. Turkbey B, Shah VP, Pang Y, et al. Is apparent diffusion coefficient associated with clinical risk scores for prostate cancers that are visible on 3-T MR images? Radiology 2011;258(2):488–495. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 9. Russo G, Mischi M, Scheepens W, De la Rosette JJ, Wijkstra H. Angiogenesis in prostate cancer: onset, progression and imaging. BJU Int 2012;110(11 Pt C):E794–E808. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10. Hara N, Okuizumi M, Koike H, Kawaguchi M, Bilim V. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is a useful modality for the precise detection and staging of early prostate cancer. Prostate 2005;62(2): 140–147. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11. Noworolski SM, Henry RG, Vigneron DB, Kurhanewicz J. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in normal and abnormal prostate tissues as defined by biopsy, MRI, and 3D MRSI. Magn Reson Med 2005;53(2):249–255. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12. Ren J, Huan Y, Wang H, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatic carcinoma: correlation with angiogenesis. Clin Radiol 2008;63(2): 153–159. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13. McNeal JE. Normal and pathologic anatomy of prostate. Urology 1981;17(suppl 3):11–16. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14. Hricak H, Dooms GC, McNeal JE, et al. MR imaging of the prostate gland: normal anatomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;148(1):51–58. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15. Allen KS, Kressel HY, Arger PH, Pollack HM. Age-related changes of the prostate: evaluation by MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;152(1):77–81. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16. Semple JE. Surgical capsule of the benign enlargement of the prostate: its development and action. BMJ 1963;1(5346):1640–1643. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17. McNeal JE. The zonal anatomy of the prostate. Prostate 1981;2(1):35–49. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18. McNeal JE. Normal histology of the prostate. Am J Surg Pathol 1988;12(8):619–633. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19. McNeal JE, Burroughs Wellcome C. The prostate gland: morphology and pathobiology. Princeton, NJ: Burroughs Wellcome, 1983. Google Scholar
  • 20. Cohen RJ, Shannon BA, Phillips M, Moorin RE, Wheeler TM, Garrett KL. Central zone carcinoma of the prostate gland: a distinct tumor type with poor prognostic features. J Urol 2008;179(5):1762–1767; discussion 1767. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21. Vargas HA, Akin O, Franiel T, et al. Normal central zone of the prostate and central zone involvement by prostate cancer: clinical and MR imaging implications. Radiology 2012;262(3):894–902. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 22. Hansford BG, Karademir I, Peng Y, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging features of the normal central zone of the prostate. Acad Radiol 2014;21(5):569–577. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23. Rosenkrantz AB, Taneja SS. Radiologist, be aware: ten pitfalls that confound the interpretation of multiparametric prostate MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;202(1):109–120. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24. Ayala AG, Ro JY, Babaian R, Troncoso P, Grignon DJ. The prostatic capsule: does it exist? Its importance in the staging and treatment of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1989;13(1):21–27. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25. Kothari PS, Scardino PT, Ohori M, Kattan MW, Wheeler TM. Incidence, location, and significance of periprostatic and periseminal vesicle lymph nodes in prostate cancer. Am J Surg Pathol 2001;25(11):1429–1432. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26. Yuh B, Wu H, Ruel N, Wilson T. Analysis of regional lymph nodes in periprostatic fat following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2012;109(4):603–607. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27. Grossfeld GD, Coakley FV. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: clinical overview and value of diagnostic imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 2000;38(1):31–47. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28. Oto A, Kayhan A, Jiang Y, et al. Prostate cancer: differentiation of central gland cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia by using diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2010;257(3):715–723. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 29. Kayhan A, Fan X, Oommen J, Oto A. Multi-parametric MR imaging of transition zone prostate cancer: imaging features, detection and staging. World J Radiol 2010;2(5): 180–187. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 30. Schiebler ML, Tomaszewski JE, Bezzi M, et al. Prostatic carcinoma and benign prostatic hyperplasia: correlation of high-resolution MR and histopathologic findings. Radiology 1989;172(1):131–137. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 31. Oyen RH, Van de Voorde WM, Van Poppel HP, et al. Benign hyperplastic nodules that originate in the peripheral zone of the prostate gland. Radiology 1993;189(3):707–711. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 32. Nickel JC, Downey J, Hunter D, Clark J. Prevalence of prostatitis-like symptoms in a population based study using the National Institutes of Health chronic prostatitis symptom index. J Urol 2001;165(3):842–845. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 33. Ramakrishnan K, Salinas RC. Prostatitis: acute and chronic. Prim Care 2010;37(3):547–563, viii–ix. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 34. Gürses B, Tasdelen N, Yencilek F, et al. Diagnostic utility of DTI in prostate cancer. Eur J Radiol 2011;79(2): 172–176. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 35. Sciarra A, Panebianco V, Ciccariello M, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (1H-MRSI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (DCE-MRI): pattern changes from inflammation to prostate cancer. Cancer Invest 2010;28(4):424–432. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 36. Mohan H, Bal A, Punia RP, Bawa AS. Granulomatous prostatitis: an infrequent diagnosis. Int J Urol 2005;12(5): 474–478. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 37. Oppenheimer JR, Kahane H, Epstein JI. Granulomatous prostatitis on needle biopsy. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1997;121(7):724–729. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 38. Stillwell TJ, Engen DE, Farrow GM. The clinical spectrum of granulomatous prostatitis: a report of 200 cases. J Urol 1987;138(2):320–323. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 39. Epstein JI, Hutchins GM. Granulomatous prostatitis: distinction among allergic, nonspecific, and post-transurethral resection lesions. Hum Pathol 1984;15(9):818–825. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 40. Maurice MJ, Zhu H. Sarcoidosis of the prostate. J Urol 2013;190(2):711–712. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 41. Mulpuru SK, Gujja K, Pai VM, Chen CY, Levey RL. A rare and unusual cause of PSA (prostate-specific antigen) elevation: sarcoidosis of the prostate. Am J Med Sci 2008;335(3):246–248. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 42. Furusato B, Koff S, McLeod DG, Sesterhenn IA. Sarcoidosis of the prostate. J Clin Pathol 2007;60(3):325–326. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 43. Wise GJ, Shteynshlyuger A. How to diagnose and treat fungal infections in chronic prostatitis. Curr Urol Rep 2006;7(4):320–328. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 44. Clason AE, McGeorge A, Garland C, Abel BJ. Urinary retention and granulomatous prostatitis following sacral herpes zoster infection: a report of 2 cases with a review of the literature. Br J Urol 1982;54(2):166–169. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 45. Bour L, Schull A, Delongchamps NB, et al. Multiparametric MRI features of granulomatous prostatitis and tubercular prostate abscess. Diagn Interv Imaging 2013;94(1):84–90. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 46. Gupta N, Mandal AK, Singh SK. Tuberculosis of the prostate and urethra: a review. Indian J Urol 2008;24(3):388–391. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 47. Zajaczkowski T. Genitourinary tuberculosis: historical and basic science review—past and present. Cent European J Urol 2012;65(4):182–187. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 48. Wang LJ, Wong YC, Chen CJ, Lim KE. CT features of genitourinary tuberculosis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997;21(2):254–258. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 49. Reddy MN, Verma S. Lesions of the seminal vesicles and their MRI characteristics. J Clin Imaging Sci 2014;4:61. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 50. Alpern HD. Malakoplakia of the prostate. Int Urol Nephrol 1991;23(3):257–259. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 51. Blair JE, Maclennan GT. Malakoplakia. J Urol 2005;173(3):986. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 52. Prando A, Billis A. Focal prostatic atrophy: mimicry of prostatic cancer on TRUS and 3D-MRSI studies. Abdom Imaging 2009;34(2):271–275. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 53. De Visschere PJ, De Meerleer GO, Fütterer JJ, Villeirs GM. Role of MRI in follow-up after focal therapy for prostate carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194(6):1427–1433. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 54. Klimas R, Bennett B, Gardner WA Jr. Prostatic calculi: a review. Prostate 1985;7(1):91–96. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 55. Tamada T, Sone T, Jo Y, et al. Prostate cancer: relationships between postbiopsy hemorrhage and tumor detectability at MR diagnosis. Radiology 2008;248(2):531–539. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 56. Ikonen S, Kivisaari L, Vehmas T, et al. Optimal timing of post-biopsy MR imaging of the prostate. Acta Radiol 2001;42(1):70–73. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 57. Rosenkrantz AB, Kopec M, Kong X, et al. Prostate cancer vs. post-biopsy hemorrhage: diagnosis with T2- and diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;31(6):1387–1394. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 58. Barrett T, Vargas HA, Akin O, Goldman DA, Hricak H. Value of the hemorrhage exclusion sign on T1-weighted prostate MR images for the detection of prostate cancer. Radiology 2012;263(3):751–757. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 59. Zakian KL, Shukla-Dave A, Ackerstaff E, Hricak H, Koutcher JA. 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy of prostate cancer: biomarkers for tumor characterization. Cancer Biomark 2008;4(4-5):263–276. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article History

Received: Feb 21 2015
Revision requested: May 11 2015
Revision received: May 30 2015
Accepted: July 31 2015
Published online: Nov 20 2015
Published in print: Jan 2016