A Pictorial Review of Changes in the BI-RADS Fifth Edition

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2016150178

An overview of changes in the fifth edition of the BI-RADS lexicon is presented, and detailed descriptions of updates in the mammography, US, and MR imaging sections are provided, with imaging examples.

Initially developed in 1993, the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon serves to standardize breast imaging reports, improve communication with referring physicians, and provide a quality assurance tool. The long-awaited BI-RADS fifth edition consolidates, improves, and expands the lexicon for mammography, breast ultrasonography (US), and breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The new edition has increased the number of imaging examples to nearly 600. The breast MR imaging lexicon is significantly expanded since it first appeared in the fourth edition. New terms have been added to the US lexicon to reflect technologic advances. Minor but important changes have been made to the mammography section. Calcification descriptors in the lexicon are now consolidated into two categories: benign and suspicious. The controversial “intermediate concern” grouping has been eliminated, and a table in the lexicon summarizes the literature supporting the recommendation to biopsy such calcifications. New descriptors such as “developing asymmetry” are illustrated, and abstracts are provided to reference their significance. A generous guidance section is included after the lexicon description for each modality. Useful frequently asked questions are succinctly answered, and the literature to support each answer is included in the reference section for each modality. This review article illustrates and highlights changes to the BI-RADS lexicon and provides readers with a general overview to familiarize them with the fifth edition.

©RSNA, 2016

References

  • 1. D’Orsi C, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS breast imaging atlas. 5th ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2013.
  • 2. Rominger M, Wisgickl C, Timmesfeld N. Breast microcalcifications as type descriptors to stratify risk of malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 665 cases with special focus on round/punctate microcalcifications. Rofo 2012;184(12):1144–1152.
  • 3. Price ER, Joe BN, Sickles EA. The developing asymmetry: revisiting a perceptual and diagnostic challenge. Radiology 2015;274(3):642–651.
  • 4. Hambly NM, Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Brennan S, Morris EA. Background parenchymal enhancement on baseline screening breast MRI: impact on biopsy rate and short-interval follow-up. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196(1):218–224.
  • 5. Tugwell P, Wells G, Peterson J, et al. Do silicone breast implants cause rheumatologic disorders? A systematic review for a court-appointed national science panel. Arthritis Rheum 2001;44(11):2477–2484.
  • 6. Lipworth L, Holmich LR, McLaughlin JK. Silicone breast implants and connective tissue disease: no association. Semin Immunopathol 2011;33(3):287–294.

Article History

Received: June 10 2015
Revision requested: Sept 11 2015
Revision received: Jan 18 2016
Accepted: Feb 4 2016
Published online: Apr 15 2016
Published in print: May 2016