Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2017160035

By assembling a multidisciplinary team, identifying five key drivers, and implementing four specific interventions, the authors reduced their mean functional MR imaging time from 76.3 to 53.2 minutes, and they believe that their results can be applied broadly to improve efficiency of other complex diagnostic MR imaging practices.

Teaching Point Functional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is a complex, specialized examination that is able to noninvasively measure information critical to patient care such as hemispheric language lateralization (1). Diagnostic functional MR imaging requires extensive patient interaction as well as the coordinated efforts of the entire health care team.
We observed in our practice at an academic center that the times to perform functional MR imaging examinations were excessively lengthy, making scheduling of the examination difficult. The purpose of our project was to reduce functional MR imaging acquisition times by increasing the efficiency of our workflow, using specific quality tools to drive improvement of functional MR imaging. We assembled a multidisciplinary team and retrospectively reviewed all functional MR imaging examinations performed at our institution from January 2013 to August 2015. We identified five key drivers: (a) streamlined protocols, (b) consistent patient monitoring, (c) clear visual slides and audio, (d) improved patient understanding, and (e) minimized patient motion. We then implemented four specific interventions over a period of 10 months: (a) eliminating intravenous contrast medium, (b) reducing repeated language paradigms, (c) updating technologist and physician checklists, and (d) updating visual slides and audio. Our mean functional MR imaging acquisition time was reduced from 76.3 to 53.2 minutes, while our functional MR imaging examinations remained of diagnostic quality. As a result, we reduced our routine scheduling time for functional MR imaging from 2 hours to 1 hour, improving patient comfort and satisfaction as well as saving time for additional potential MR imaging acquisitions.
Teaching Point Our efforts to optimize functional MR imaging workflow constitute a practice quality improvement project that is beneficial for patient care and can be applied broadly to other functional MR imaging practices.

©RSNA, 2017

References

  • 1. Bookheimer S. Pre-surgical language mapping with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuropsychol Rev 2007;17(2):145–155.
  • 2. Pillai JJ. The evolution of clinical functional imaging during the past 2 decades and its current impact on neurosurgical planning. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31(2):219–225.
  • 3. Ogawa S, Lee TM, Kay AR, Tank DW. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990;87(24):9868–9872.
  • 4. Bizzi A, Blasi V, Falini A, et al. Presurgical functional MR imaging of language and motor functions: validation with intraoperative electrocortical mapping. Radiology 2008;248(2):579–589.
  • 5. Belyaev AS, Peck KK, Brennan NM, Holodny AI. Clinical applications of functional MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2013;21(2):269–278.
  • 6. Moen RD, Norman CL. Circling back: clearing up myths about the Deming cycle and seeing how it keeps evolving. Qual Prog 2010;43(11):22–28.
  • 7. Larson DB, Kruskal JB, Krecke KN, Donnelly LF. Key concepts of patient safety in radiology. RadioGraphics 2015;35(6):1677–1693.
  • 8. Provost LP, Murray SK. The health care data guide: learning from data for improvement. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass, 2011.
  • 9. Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chiasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2001.
  • 10. Shah CJ, Sullivan JR, Gonyo MB, Wadhwa A, DuBois MS. Practice policy and quality initiatives: using lean principles to improve screening mammography workflow. RadioGraphics 2013;33(5):1505–1517.
  • 11. Kruskal JB, Reedy A, Pascal L, Rosen MP, Boiselle PM. Quality initiatives: lean approach to improving performance and efficiency in a radiology department. RadioGraphics 2012;32(2):573–587.

Article History

Received: Mar 1 2016
Revision requested: May 23 2016
Revision received: June 30 2016
Accepted: July 27 2016
Published online: Jan 11 2017
Published in print: Jan 2017