Placental Imaging: Normal Appearance with Review of Pathologic Findings

Published Online:

A comprehensive imaging review of early placental formation, normal placental imaging features, and various placental pathologic conditions is provided, with discussion of newer imaging techniques for evaluation of the placenta.

The placenta plays a crucial role throughout pregnancy, and its importance may be overlooked during routine antenatal imaging evaluation. Detailed systematic assessment of the placenta at ultrasonography (US), the standard imaging examination during pregnancy, is important. Familiarity with the normal and abnormal imaging appearance of the placenta along with the multimodality and methodical approach for evaluation of its related abnormalities is necessary, so that radiologists can alert clinicians regarding appropriate prompt management decisions. This will potentially decrease fetal and maternal morbidity and mortality. This article reviews early placental formation and the expected imaging appearance of the placenta during pregnancy, as well as variations in its morphology. It also discusses various placental diseases and their potential clinical consequences. Placental pathologic conditions include abnormalities of placental size, cord insertion, placental and cord location, and placental adherence. Other conditions such as bleeding in and around the placenta, as well as trophoblastic and nontrophoblastic tumors of the placenta, are also discussed. US with Doppler imaging is the initial imaging modality of choice for placental evaluation. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is reserved for equivocal cases or when additional information is needed. Computed tomography (CT) has a limited role in evaluation of placental abnormalities because of the ionizing radiation exposure and the relatively limited assessment of the placenta; however, CT can provide important information in specific circumstances, particularly evaluation of trauma and staging of choriocarcinoma. This article also addresses recent techniques and updates in placental imaging, including elastography, diffusion-weighted MR imaging, and blood oxygen level–dependent (BOLD) MR imaging. These advanced imaging techniques may provide additional information in evaluation of abnormal placental adherence and new insights into placental pathophysiology in selected patients.

Online supplemental material is available for this article.

©RSNA, 2017


  • 1. Pinar H. The human placenta: normal developmental biology. Warwick, RI: Core Curriculum Publishers, 2009; 41–203. Google Scholar
  • 2. Moore KL. The developing human: clinically oriented embryology. 8th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders/Elsevier, 2008; 55–135. Google Scholar
  • 3. Jauniaux E, Ramsay B, Campbell S. Ultrasonographic investigation of placental morphologic characteristics and size during the second trimester of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170(1 Pt 1):130–137. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4. Kanne JP, Lalani TA, Fligner CL. The placenta revisited: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2005;34(6):238–255. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5. Elsayes KM, Trout AT, Friedkin AM, et al. Imaging of the placenta: a multimodality pictorial review. RadioGraphics 2009;29(5):1371–1391. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 6. Kuo PL, Lin CC, Lin YH, Guo HR. Placental sonolucency and pregnancy outcome in women with elevated second trimester serum alpha-fetoprotein levels. J Formos Med Assoc 2003;102(5):319–325. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7. Kusanovic JP, Romero R, Gotsch F, et al. Discordant placental echogenicity: a novel sign of impaired placental perfusion in twin-twin transfusion syndrome? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010;23(1):103–106. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8. Raio L, Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Nelle M, Dürig P, Schneider H. The thick heterogeneous (jellylike) placenta: a strong predictor of adverse pregnancy outcome. Prenat Diagn 2004;24(3):182–188. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9. Grannum PA, Berkowitz RL, Hobbins JC. The ultrasonic changes in the maturing placenta and their relation to fetal pulmonic maturity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979;133(8):915–922. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10. Chen KH, Chen LR, Lee YH. Exploring the relationship between preterm placental calcification and adverse maternal and fetal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37(3):328–334. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11. Allen BC, Leyendecker JR. Placental evaluation with magnetic resonance. Radiol Clin North Am 2013;51(6):955–966. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12. Blaicher W, Brugger PC, Mittermayer C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the normal placenta. Eur J Radiol 2006;57(2):256–260. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13. Rahaim NS, Whitby EH. The MRI features of placental adhesion disorder and their diagnostic significance: systematic review. Clin Radiol 2015;70(9):917–925. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14. Zaidi SF, Moshiri M, Osman S, et al. Comprehensive imaging review of abnormalities of the placenta. Ultrasound Q 2016;32(1):25–42. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15. Kani KK, Lee JH, Dighe M, Moshiri M, Kolokythas O, Dubinsky T. Gestatational trophoblastic disease: multimodality imaging assessment with special emphasis on spectrum of abnormalities and value of imaging in staging and management of disease. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2012;41(1):1–10. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16. Wei SH, Helmy M, Cohen AJ. CT evaluation of placental abruption in pregnant trauma patients. Emerg Radiol 2009;16(5):365–373. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17. Abramowicz JS, Sheiner E. Ultrasound of the placenta: a systematic approach. I. Imaging. Placenta 2008;29(3):225–240. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18. Taniguchi H, Aoki S, Sakamaki K, et al. Circumvallate placenta: associated clinical manifestations and complications—a retrospective study. Obstet Gynecol Int 2014;2014:986230. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19. Arlicot C, Herve P, Simon E, Perrotin F. Three-dimensional surface rendering of the chorionic placental plate: the “tire” sign for the diagnosis of a circumvallate placenta. J Ultrasound Med 2012;31(2):340–341. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20. McCarthy J, Thurmond AS, Jones MK, et al. Circumvallate placenta: sonographic diagnosis. J Ultrasound Med 1995;14(1):21–26. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21. Shen O, Golomb E, Lavie O, Goldberg Y, Eitan R, Rabinowitz RR. Placental shelf: a common, typically transient and benign finding on early second-trimester sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;29(2):192–194. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22. Ekoukou D, Ng Wing Tin L, Nere MB, Bourdet O, Elalaoui Y, Bazin C. Placenta membranacea: review of the literature, a case report [in French]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1995;24(2):189–193. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23. Lee AJ, Bethune M, Hiscock RJ. Placental thickness in the second trimester: a pilot study to determine the normal range. J Ultrasound Med 2012;31(2):213–218. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24. Elchalal U, Ezra Y, Levi Y, et al. Sonographically thick placenta: a marker for increased perinatal risk—a prospective cross-sectional study. Placenta 2000;21(2-3):268–272. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25. Reddy UM, Abuhamad AZ, Levine D, Saade GR; Fetal Imaging Workshop Invited Participants. Fetal imaging: executive summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Radiology, Society for Pediatric Radiology, and Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound fetal imaging workshop. J Ultrasound Med 2014;33(5):745–757. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26. Farine D, Peisner DB, Timor-Tritsch IE. Placenta previa: is the traditional diagnostic approach satisfactory? J Clin Ultrasound 1990;18(4):328–330. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27. Lauria MR, Smith RS, Treadwell MC, et al. The use of second-trimester transvaginal sonography to predict placenta previa. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996;8(5):337–340. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28. Mustafá SA, Brizot ML, Carvalho MH, Watanabe L, Kahhale S, Zugaib M. Transvaginal ultrasonography in predicting placenta previa at delivery: a longitudinal study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;20(4):356–359. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29. Dashe JS, McIntire DD, Ramus RM, Santos-Ramos R, Twickler DM. Persistence of placenta previa according to gestational age at ultrasound detection. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99(5 Pt 1): 692–697. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 30. Di Salvo DN, Benson CB, Laing FC, Brown DL, Frates MC, Doubilet PM. Sonographic evaluation of the placental cord insertion site. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170(5):1295–1298. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 31. Liu CC, Pretorius DH, Scioscia AL, Hull AD. Sonographic prenatal diagnosis of marginal placental cord insertion: clinical importance. J Ultrasound Med 2002;21(6):627–632. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 32. Kellow ZS, Feldstein VA. Ultrasound of the placenta and umbilical cord: a review. Ultrasound Q 2011;27(3):187–197. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 33. Society of Maternal-Fetal (SMFM) Publications Committee, Sinkey RG, Odibo AO, Dashe JS. #37: diagnosis and management of vasa previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;213(5): 615–619. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 34. Catanzarite V, Oyelese Y. Diagnosis and management of vasa previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;214(6):764. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 35. Moshiri M, Zaidi SF, Robinson TJ, et al. Comprehensive imaging review of abnormalities of the umbilical cord. RadioGraphics 2014;34(1):179–196. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 36. Thompson MO, Vines SK, Aquilina J, Wathen NC, Harrington K. Are placental lakes of any clinical significance? Placenta 2002;23(8-9):685–690. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 37. Oyelese Y, Ananth CV. Placental abruption. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108(4):1005–1016. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 38. Glantz C, Purnell L. Clinical utility of sonography in the diagnosis and treatment of placental abruption. J Ultrasound Med 2002;21(8):837–840. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 39. Masselli G, Brunelli R, Di Tola M, Anceschi M, Gualdi G. MR imaging in the evaluation of placental abruption: correlation with sonographic findings. Radiology 2011;259(1):222–230. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 40. Sadro C, Bernstein MP, Kanal KM. Imaging of trauma. II. Abdominal trauma and pregnancy: a radiologist’s guide to doing what is best for the mother and baby. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199(6):1207–1219. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 41. Lowdermilk C, Gavant ML, Qaisi W, West OC, Goldman SM. Screening helical CT for evaluation of blunt traumatic injury in the pregnant patient. RadioGraphics 1999;19(Spec No):S243–S255; discussion S256–S258. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 42. Saphier NB, Kopelman TR. Traumatic Abruptio Placenta Scale (TAPS): a proposed grading system of computed tomography evaluation of placental abruption in the trauma patient. Emerg Radiol 2014;21(1):17–22. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 43. Manriquez M, Srinivas G, Bollepalli S, Britt L, Drachman D. Is computed tomography a reliable diagnostic modality in detecting placental injuries in the setting of acute trauma? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202(6):611.e1–611.e5. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 44. Jain V, Chari R, Maslovitz S, et al. Guidelines for the management of a pregnant trauma patient. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2015;37(6):553–574. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 45. Tantbirojn P, Crum CP, Parast MM. Pathophysiology of placenta creta: the role of decidua and extravillous trophoblast. Placenta 2008;29(7):639–645. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 46. Strickland S, Richards WG. Invasion of the trophoblasts. Cell 1992;71(3):355–357. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 47. Collins SL, Ashcroft A, Braun T, et al. Proposal for standardized ultrasound descriptors of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;47(3):271–275. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 48. Hull AD, Moore TR. Multiple repeat cesareans and the threat of placenta accreta: incidence, diagnosis, management. Clin Perinatol 2011;38(2):285–296. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 49. Comstock CH, Bronsteen RA. The antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta. BJOG 2014;121(2):171–181; discussion 181–182. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 50. Comstock CH, Love JJ Jr, Bronsteen RA, et al. Sonographic detection of placenta accreta in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190(4):1135–1140. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 51. Calì G, Giambanco L, Puccio G, Forlani F. Morbidly adherent placenta: evaluation of ultrasound diagnostic criteria and differentiation of placenta accreta from percreta. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41(4):406–412. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 52. Wong HS, Cheung YK, Zuccollo J, Tait J, Pringle KC. Evaluation of sonographic diagnostic criteria for placenta accreta. J Clin Ultrasound 2008;36(9):551–559. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 53. Morita S, Ueno E, Fujimura M, Muraoka M, Takagi K, Fujibayashi M. Feasibility of diffusion-weighted MRI for defining placental invasion. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;30(3): 666–671. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 54. Duan XH, Wang YL, Han XW, et al. Caesarean section combined with temporary aortic balloon occlusion followed by uterine artery embolisation for the management of placenta accreta. Clin Radiol 2015;70(9):932–937. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 55. Cali G, Forlani F, Giambanco L, et al. Prophylactic use of intravascular balloon catheters in women with placenta accreta, increta and percreta. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014; 179:36–41. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 56. Allen SD, Lim AK, Seckl MJ, Blunt DM, Mitchell AW. Radiology of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Clin Radiol 2006;61(4):301–313. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 57. Berkowitz RS, Goldstein DP. Clinical practice: molar pregnancy. N Engl J Med 2009;360(16):1639–1645. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 58. Jain KA. Gestational trophoblastic disease: pictorial review. Ultrasound Q 2005;21(4):245–253. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 59. Ngan HY, Bender H, Benedet JL, et al. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: FIGO 2000 staging and classification. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003;83(suppl 1):175–177. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 60. Himoto Y, Kido A, Minamiguchi S, et al. Prenatal differential diagnosis of complete hydatidiform mole with a twin live fetus and placental mesenchymal dysplasia by magnetic resonance imaging. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014;40(7):1894–1900. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 61. Wentworth P. The incidence and significance of haemangioma of the placenta. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1965;72: 81–88. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 62. Wallenburg HC. Chorioangioma of the placenta: thirteen new cases and a review of the literature from 1939 to 1970 with special reference to the clinical complications. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1971;26(6):411–425. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 63. Zalel Y, Weisz B, Gamzu R, Schiff E, Shalmon B, Achiron R. Chorioangiomas of the placenta: sonographic and Doppler flow characteristics. J Ultrasound Med 2002;21(8):909–913. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 64. Zalel Y, Gamzu R, Weiss Y, et al. Role of color Doppler imaging in diagnosing and managing pregnancies complicated by placental chorioangioma. J Clin Ultrasound 2002;30(5):264–269. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 65. Zanardini C, Papageorghiou A, Bhide A, Thilaganathan B. Giant placental chorioangioma: natural history and pregnancy outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;35(3):332–336. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 66. Taori K, Patil P, Attarde V, Singh A, Rangankar V. Chorioangioma of placenta: sonographic features. J Clin Ultrasound 2008;36(2):113–115. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 67. Ahmed N, Kale V, Thakkar H, Hanchate V, Dhargalkar P. Sonographic diagnosis of placental teratoma. J Clin Ultrasound 2004;32(2):98–101. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 68. Altman JF, Lowe L, Redman B, et al. Placental metastasis of maternal melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;49(6): 1150–1154. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 69. Wu S, Nan R, Li Y, Cui X, Liang X, Zhao Y. Measurement of elasticity of normal placenta using the Virtual Touch quantification technique. Ultrasonography 2016;35(3):253–257. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 70. Sugitani M, Fujita Y, Yumoto Y, et al. A new method for measurement of placental elasticity: acoustic radiation force impulse imaging. Placenta 2013;34(11):1009–1013. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 71. Cimsit C, Yoldemir T, Akpinar IN. Strain elastography in placental dysfunction: placental elasticity differences in normal and preeclamptic pregnancies in the second trimester. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015;291(4):811–817. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 72. Gowland PA, Francis ST, Duncan KR, et al. In vivo perfusion measurements in the human placenta using echo planar imaging at 0.5 T. Magn Reson Med 1998;40(3):467–473. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 73. Francis ST, Duncan KR, Moore RJ, Baker PN, Johnson IR, Gowland PA. Non-invasive mapping of placental perfusion. Lancet 1998;351(9113):1397–1399. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 74. Sørensen A, Peters D, Fründ E, Lingman G, Christiansen O, Uldbjerg N. Changes in human placental oxygenation during maternal hyperoxia estimated by blood oxygen level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD MRI). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;42(3):310–314. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 75. Sørensen A, Peters D, Simonsen C, et al. Changes in human fetal oxygenation during maternal hyperoxia as estimated by BOLD MRI. Prenat Diagn 2013;33(2):141–145. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 76. Bonel HM, Stolz B, Diedrichsen L, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the placenta in fetuses with placental insufficiency. Radiology 2010;257(3):810–819. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 77. Gowland P. Placental MRI. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2005;10(5):485–490. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 78. Derwig I, Lythgoe DJ, Barker GJ, et al. Association of placental perfusion, as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and uterine artery Doppler ultrasound, and its relationship to pregnancy outcome. Placenta 2013;34(10):885–891. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article History

Received: June 13 2016
Revision requested: Aug 24 2016
Revision received: Oct 7 2016
Accepted: Oct 24 2016
Published online: May 11 2017
Published in print: May 2017