Optimizing Performance by Preventing Disruptive Behavior in Radiology

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2018180019

The authors provide a review of disruptive behavior, focusing on how individuals, health care organizations, and leaders can prevent these unprofessional behaviors and foster a just culture in this regard.

Disruptive behaviors impede delivery of high-value health care by negatively impacting patient outcomes and increasing costs. Health care is brimming with potential triggers of disruptive behavior. Given omnipresent environmental and cultural factors such as constrained resources, stressful environments, commercialization, fatigue, unrealistic expectation of perfectionism, and burdensome documentation, a burnout epidemic is raging, and medical providers are understandably at tremendous risk to succumb and manifest these unprofessional behaviors. Each medical specialty has its own unique challenges. Radiology is not exempt; these issues do not respect specialty or professional boundaries. Unfortunately, preventive measures are too frequently overlooked, provider support programs rarely exist, and often organizations either tolerate or ineffectively manage the downstream disruptive behaviors. This review summarizes the background, key definitions, contributing factors, impact, prevention, and management of disruptive behavior. Every member of the health care team can gain from an improved understanding and awareness of the contributing factors and preventive measures. Application of these principles can foster a just culture of understanding, trust, support, respect, and teamwork balanced with accountability. The authors discuss these general topics along with specific issues for radiologists in the current medical environment. Patients, providers, health care organizations, and society all stand to benefit from better prevention of these behaviors. There is a strong moral, ethical, and business case to address this issue head-on.

©RSNA, 2018

References

  • 1. Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med 2010; 363(26):2477–2481.
  • 2. Ulreich S, Harris RD, Sze G, Moriarity AK, Bluth E. The disruptive radiologist. J Am Coll Radiol 2015;12(8):800–804.
  • 3. Bodenheimer T, Sinsky C. From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider. Ann Fam Med 2014; 12(6):573–576.
  • 4. Lee TH. Turning doctors into leaders. Harv Bus Rev 2010;88(4):50–58.
  • 5. Skochelak SE, Hawkins RE, Lawson LE, Starr SR, Borkan J, Gonzalo JD. Health systems science E-book. Philadelphia, Pa: Elsevier Health Sciences, 2016.
  • 6. Donnelly LF. Aspirational characteristics for effective leadership of improvement teams. Pediatr Radiol 2017;47(1):17–21.
  • 7. Nicola R, McNeeley MF, Bhargava P. Burnout in radiology. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2015;44(5):389–390.
  • 8. Shanafelt T, Goh J, Sinsky C. The business case for investing in physician well-being. JAMA Intern Med 2017;177(12): 1826–1832.
  • 9. Goleman D. Leadership: the power of emotional intelligence. Northampton, Mass: More Than Sound, 2011.
  • 10. Policy on physician impairment, Federation of State Medical Boards. https://fsmb.org/Media/Default/PDF/FSMB/Advocacy/grpol_policy-on-physician-impairment.pdf. Updated April 2011. Accessed January 29, 2018.
  • 11. Bender CE, Heilbrun ME, Truong HB, Bluth EI. The impaired radiologist. J Am Coll Radiol 2015;12(3):302–306.
  • 12. Banaji MR, Greenwald AG. Blindspot: hidden biases of good people. New York, NY: Bantam, 2016.
  • 13. Project implicit. https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/aboutus.html. Accessed January 31, 2018.
  • 14. Krackhardt D, Hanson JR. Informal networks: the company behind the chart. Harv Bus Rev 1993;71(4):104–111.
  • 15. The ladder of inference. https://www2.usgs.gov/humancapital/ecd/professionaldevtools/LadderofInference.pdf. Accessed February 11, 2018.
  • 16. Senge PM. The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday/Random House, 2006.
  • 17. Harrison C, Tanner KD. Language matters: considering microaggressions in science. CBE Life Sci Educ 2018;17(1):fe4.
  • 18. Dupree E, Anderson R, McEvoy MD, Brodman M. Professionalism: a necessary ingredient in a culture of safety. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2011;37(10):447–455.
  • 19. Stern DT. Measuring medical professionalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2006.
  • 20. Hewlett SA, Marshall M, Sherbin L. How diversity can drive innovation. Harv Bus Rev 2013;91(12):30.
  • 21. Fiscella K, Mauksch L, Bodenheimer T, Salas E. Improving care teams’ functioning: recommendations from team science. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2017;43(7):361–368.
  • 22. Hughes AM, Salas E. Hierarchical medical teams and the science of teamwork. Virtual Mentor 2013;15(6):529–533.
  • 23. Bae SH, Dang D, Karlowicz KA, Kim MT. Triggers contributing to health care clinicians’ disruptive behaviors. J Patient Saf 2016 Nov 2. [Epub ahead of print].
  • 24. Behaviors that undermine a culture of safety. Sentinel Event Alert 2008;40(40):1–3.
  • 25. Rawson JV, Thompson N, Sostre G, Deitte L. The cost of disruptive and unprofessional behaviors in health care. Acad Radiol 2013;20(9):1074–1076.
  • 26. Lucey CR, Navarro R, King TE Jr. Lessons from an educational never event. JAMA Intern Med 2017;177(10):1415–1416.
  • 27. Souba WW. The being of leadership. Philos Ethics Humanit Med 2011;6(1):5.
  • 28. Lassman D. Note on culture. https://www.scribd.com/document/293106478/Note-on-Culture. Published March 9, 2012. Accessed February 11, 2018.
  • 29. McDermott R, Archibald D. Harnessing your staff’s informal networks. Harv Bus Rev 2010;88(3):82–89.
  • 30. Hirst G, Van Knippenberg D, Zhou J, Quintane E, Zhu C. Heard it through the grapevine: indirect networks and employee creativity. J Appl Psychol 2015;100(2):567–574.
  • 31. Fleishon H, Muroff LR, Patel SS. Change management for radiologists. J Am Coll Radiol 2017;14(9):1229–1233.
  • 32. Kotter JP. Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. Harv Bus Rev 2007;85(1):96.
  • 33. Gladwell M. Tipping point: wie kleine dinge großes bewirken können. Munich, Germany: Goldmann Verlag, 2016.
  • 34. Reiner BI. Optimizing technology development and adoption in medical imaging using the principles of innovation diffusion. I. Theoretical, historical, and contemporary considerations. J Digit Imaging 2011;24(5):750–753.
  • 35. Reiner BI. Optimizing technology development and adoption in medical imaging using the principles of innovation diffusion. II: Practical applications. J Digit Imaging 2012;25(1):7–10.
  • 36. Donnelly LF, Strife JL. Establishing a program to promote professionalism and effective communication in radiology. Radiology 2006;238(3):773–779.
  • 37. Salas E, Lazzara EH, Benishek LE, King H. On being a team player: evidence-based heuristic for teamwork in interprofessional education. Med Sci Educ 2013;23(suppl 3):524–531.
  • 38. McChrystal SA, Collins T, Silverman D, Fussell C. Team of teams: new rules of engagement for a complex world. New York, NY: Penguin, 2015.
  • 39. Rosenstein AH. Taking a new approach to reduce the incidence of physician disruptive behaviors. Hosp Pract (1995) 2015;43(4):221–225.
  • 40. Collins JC. Good to great: why some companies make the leap… and others don’t. New York, NY: Random House, 2001.
  • 41. McCracken J, Hicks R. Personality traits of a disruptive physician. Physician Exec 2012;38(5):66–68.
  • 42. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Performance based interviewing (PBI). https://www.va.gov/PBI/Questions.asp. Updated January 8, 2018. Accessed February 15, 2018.
  • 43. Sandy EA 2nd, Beigi RH, Cohel C, Nash KC. An interview tool to predict disruptive physician behavior. Physician Leadersh J 2014;1(2):36–39.
  • 44. Baylor College of Medicine code of conduct. https://media.bcm.edu/documents/2015/94/bcm-code-of-conduct-final-june-2015.pdf. Updated September 7, 2017. Accessed April 11, 2018.
  • 45. Judson TJ, Volpp KG, Detsky AS. Harnessing the right combination of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to change physician behavior. JAMA 2015;314(21):2233–2234.
  • 46. Pink DH. Drive: the surprising truth about what motivates us. New York, NY: Penguin, 2011.
  • 47. McKenna AM, Straus SE. Charting a professional course: a review of mentorship in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol 2011;8(2): 109–112.
  • 48. Hammerly ME, Harmon L, Schwaitzberg SD. Good to great: using 360-degree feedback to improve physician emotional intelligence. J Healthc Manag 2014;59(5):354–365.
  • 49. Davis RL, Wiggins MN, Mercado CC, O’Sullivan PS. Defining the core competency of professionalism based on the patient’s perception. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2007;35(1):51–54.
  • 50. Saxton R. Communication skills training to address disruptive physician behavior. AORN J 2012;95(5):602–611.
  • 51. Birkinshaw J, Haas M. Increase your return on failure. Harv Bus Rev 2016;94(5):88–93.
  • 52. Rosenstein AH. Physician disruptive behaviors: five year progress report. World J Clin Cases 2015;3(11):930–934.
  • 53. Hickson GB, Pichert JW, Webb LE, Gabbe SG. A complementary approach to promoting professionalism: identifying, measuring, and addressing unprofessional behaviors. Acad Med 2007;82(11):1040–1048.
  • 54. Marton K, Pister K. Coaching: a useful approach to disruptive behavior. Physician Leadersh J 2016;3(1):55–57.
  • 55. Pfeil SA, Paauw DS. Review of current models for remediation of professionalism lapses. In: Byyny RL, Papadakis MA, Paauw DS, eds. Medical professionalism: best practices. Menlo Park, Calif: Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Society, 2015; 51–57.
  • 56. Shapiro J. Cultural transformation in professionalism. In: Byyny RL, Papadakis MA, Paauw DS, eds. Medical professionalism: best practices. Menlo Park, Calif: Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Society, 2015; 59–66.
  • 57. Hickson GB, Cooper WO. Pursuing professionalism (but not without an infrastructure). In: Byyny RL, Papadakis MA, Paauw DS, eds. Medical professionalism: best practices. Menlo Park, Calif: Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Society, 2015; 81–98.
  • 58. Shapiro J, Galowitz P. Peer support for clinicians: a programmatic approach. Acad Med 2016;91(9):1200–1204.

Article History

Received: Feb 15 2018
Revision requested: Mar 22 2018
Revision received: Apr 19 2018
Accepted: Apr 30 2018
Published online: Oct 10 2018
Published in print: Oct 2018