"skipMainNavigation"
Search
Quick Search in Journals
Quick Search anywhere
Advanced Search
RadioGraphics
Menu
Previous
Next
Patient-Centered Care

Customer Service in Radiology: Satisfying Your Patients and Referrers

Published Online:Oct 10 2018https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2018180026

Abstract

Customer service principles can be used in radiology practices to engage patients, ordering providers, and employees.

Radiology has long been a service-oriented specialty. Although physicians in other specialties have direct interactions with patients, radiologists’ interactions with patients are often indirect, most often occurring as a direct result of another provider’s order. As such, radiology practices have had to focus on two distinct groups, patients and ordering providers, to grow their businesses and retain their patients. One could argue that during the past 2 decades, many of the most visible customer service initiatives in radiology practices have been directed toward the ordering provider. These initiatives have included implementing picture archiving and communication systems to improve image distribution and availability, voice dictation systems to decrease report turnaround time, computerized order entry to ease the ordering process, and structured reporting to improve the readability of the radiology report. As the practice of radiology is evolving to become more patient oriented, it is clear that the specialty needs to pivot and implement more initiatives that directly benefit patients. In this article, the concepts of customer service and a radiology department’s primary customer are defined and discussed, and the concept of service quality is introduced. In addition, the author highlights the five dimensions of service quality: reliability, assurance, tangibles, empathy, and responsiveness. Each dimension is described in detail, first by using an archetypal business example and then by using an example of a project that has been successfully implemented in the author’s radiology department.

©RSNA, 2018

References

  • 1. Turban E. Electronic commerce 2002: a managerial perspective. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle, NJ: Pearson Education, 2002.
    Google Scholar
  • 2. Customer: definitions (2). Business Dictionary website. http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/customer.html. Accessed January 16, 2018.
    Google Scholar
  • 3. Joseph C. What is an internal customer & a external customer? Chron website. https://smallbusiness.chron.com/internal-customer-external-customer-11698.html. Accessed January 16, 2018.
    Google Scholar
  • 4. Simons R. Choosing the right customer. Harv Bus Rev 2014;92(3):48–55.
    Google Scholar
  • 5. Ellenbogen PH. Imaging 3.0: what is it? J Am Coll Radiol 2013;10(4):229.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6. Abboud S, Partovi S, Nakamoto D, Azar N. The radiologist will see you now: patients’ perceptions of an outpatient interventional clinic. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2016;45(2):137–138.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7. Chen PH, Zafar H, Galperin-Aizenberg M, Cook T. Integrating natural language processing and machine learning algorithms to categorize oncologic response in radiology reports. J Digit Imaging 2018;31(2):178–184.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8. Cook TS, Oh SC, Kahn CE Jr. Patients’ use and evaluation of an online system to annotate radiology reports with lay language definitions. Acad Radiol 2017;24(9):1169–1174.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9. Koney N, Roudenko A, Ro M, Bahl S, Kagen A. Patients want to meet with imaging experts. J Am Coll Radiol 2016;13(4):465–470.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10. Lee CI, Langlotz CP, Elmore JG. Implications of direct patient online access to radiology reports through patient web portals. J Am Coll Radiol 2016;13(12 pt B): 1608–1614.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11. Lutjeboer J, Burgmans MC, Chung K, van Erkel AR. Impact on patient safety and satisfaction of implementation of an outpatient clinic in interventional radiology (IPSIPOLI-Study): a quasi-experimental prospective study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2015;38(3):543–551.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12. Mangano MD, Bennett SE, Gunn AJ, Sahani DV, Choy G. Creating a patient-centered radiology practice through the establishment of a diagnostic radiology consultation clinic. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;205(1):95–99.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13. Oh SC, Cook TS, Kahn CE Jr. PORTER: a prototype system for patient-oriented radiology reporting. J Digit Imaging 2016;29(4):450–454.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14. Reicher JJ, Reicher MA. Implementation of vertified EHR, patient portal, and “direct” messaging technology in a radiology environment enhances communication of radiology results to both referring physicians and patients. J Digit Imaging 2016;29(3):337–340.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15. Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL. SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J Retail 1988;64(1):12–40.
    Google Scholar
  • 16. Zeithaml VA, Berry LL, Parasuraman A. Communication and control processes in the delivery of service quality. J Mark 1988;52(2):35–48.
    Google Scholar
  • 17. Lee D. HEALTHQUAL: a multi-item scale for assessing healthcare service quality. Serv Bus 2017;11(3):491–516.
    Google Scholar
  • 18. Larson DB, Kruskal JB, Krecke KN, Donnelly LF. Key concepts of patient safety in radiology. RadioGraphics 2015;35(6):1677–1693.
    Google Scholar
  • 19. Hawkins CM, Anton CG, Bankes WM, et al. Improving the availability of clinical history accompanying radiographic examinations in a large pediatric radiology department. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;202(4):790–796.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20. Arlen C. The 5 service dimensions all customers care about. Service Performance website. https://www.serviceperformance.com/the-5-service-dimensions-all-customers-care-about/. Published October 24, 2008. Accessed January 16, 2018.
    Google Scholar
  • 21. The evolution of Toyota’s quality assurance system. Toyota website. https://www.toyota-global.com/company/toyota_traditions/quality/oct_dec_2010.html. Published October 2010. Accessed January 16, 2018.
    Google Scholar
  • 22. Toyota: company history. Toyota - USA Newsroom website. https://corporatenews.pressroom.toyota.com/corporate/company+history/. Accessed January 16, 2018.
    Google Scholar
  • 23. Toyota: Toyota motor sales reports December 2016 and year-end sales. Toyota - USA Newsroom website. https://corporatenews.pressroom.toyota.com/releases/toyota-lexus-december-2016-sales.htm. Published January 4, 2017. Accessed January 16, 2018.
    Google Scholar
  • 24. Choose the gold standard in accreditation. American College of Radiology website. https://www.acraccreditation.org/. January 16, 2018.
    Google Scholar
  • 25. Larson DB, Strauss KJ, Podberesky DJ. Toward large-scale process control to enable consistent CT radiation dose optimization. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;204(5): 959–966.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26. Larson DB, Wang LL, Podberesky DJ, Goske MJ. System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. I. Optimization model. Radiology 2013;269(1):167–176.
    Google Scholar
  • 27. Larson DB, Malarik RJ, Hall SM, Podberesky DJ. System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. II. Process control system. Radiology 2013;269(1):177–185.
    Google Scholar
  • 28. Goske MJ, Strauss KJ, Coombs LP, et al. Diagnostic reference ranges for pediatric abdominal CT. Radiology 2013;268(1):208–218.
    Google Scholar
  • 29. National radiology data registry. American College of Radiology National radiology data registry website. https://nrdr.acr.org/Portal/Nrdr/Main/page.aspx. Accessed January 16, 2018.
    Google Scholar
  • 30. Gebhard RD, Goske MJ, Salisbury SR, Leopard AC, Hater DM. Improving health literacy: use of an informational brochure improves parents’ understanding of their child’s fluoroscopic examination. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;204(1):W95–W103.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 31. The Image Gently Alliance. Image Gently website. https://www.imagegently.org/. Accessed January 16, 2018.
    Google Scholar
  • 32. Isaacson W. Steve Jobs. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster, 2011.
    Google Scholar
  • 33. Spector R, McCarthy PD. The Nordstrom way: the inside story of America’s #1 customer service company. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley, 2000.
    Google Scholar
  • 34. Burton N. Empathy vs sympathy. Psychology Today website. https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/hide-and-seek/201505/empathy-vs-sympathy. Published May 22, 2015. Accessed January 16, 2018.
    Google Scholar
  • 35. Ryan J, Khanda GE, Hibbert R, et al. Is a picture worth a thousand words? the effect of viewing patient photographs on radiologist interpretation of CT studies. J Am Coll Radiol 2015;12(1):104–107.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 36. Tridandapani S, Ramamurthy S, Provenzale J, Obuchowski NA, Evanoff MG, Bhatti P. A multiobserver study of the effects of including point-of-care patient photographs with portable radiography: a means to detect wrong-patient errors. Acad Radiol 2014;21(8):1038–1047.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 37. Koch BL, Hater D, Nees K, Leopard AC. Improving communication, collaboration, and faculty comfort in communicating difficult news in the pediatric radiology department. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016;207(5):971–975.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 38. Robischon N. Why Amazon is the world’s most innovative company of 2017. Fast Company website. https://www.fastcompany.com/3067455/why-amazon-is-the-worlds-most-innovative-company-of-2017. Published February 13, 2017. Accessed January 16, 2018.
    Google Scholar
  • 39. Asfaw BA, Nagtegaal BJ, Rabiner P, Thrall J. The outpatient availability score: an alternative approach to measuring demand. J Am Coll Radiol 2007;4(3):171–177.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 40. Donnelly LF, Gessner KE, Dickerson JM, et al. Quality initiatives: department scorecard—a tool to help drive imaging care delivery performance. RadioGraphics 2010;30(7):2029–2038.
    Google Scholar
  • 41. Towbin AJ, Iyer SB, Brown J, Varadarajan K, Perry LA, Larson DB. Practice policy and quality initiatives: decreasing variability in turnaround time for radiographic studies from the emergency department. RadioGraphics 2013;33(2):361–371.
    Google Scholar
  • 42. Donnelly LF, Dickerson JM, Lehkamp TW, Gessner KE, Moskovitz J, Hutchinson S. IRQN Award paper: operational rounds—a practical administrative process to improve safety and clinical services in radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 2008;5(11):1142–1149.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 43. Towbin AJ, Hall S, Moskovitz J, Johnson ND, Donnelly LF. Creating a comprehensive customer service program to help convey critical and acute results of radiology studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196(1):W48–W51.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article History

Received: Feb 19 2018
Revision requested: May 30 2018
Revision received: June 28 2018
Accepted: July 6 2018
Published online: Oct 10 2018
Published in print: Oct 2018