Injuries to the Rigid Spine: What the Spine Surgeon Wants to Know
Abstract
Rigid spine entities, a group of conditions that can alter the biomechanics of the spine, manifest with particular fracture patterns after trauma; understanding the relevant imaging features can help determine if surgical intervention is required and can help avoid a missed or delayed diagnosis of an injured rigid spine.
The biomechanical stability of the spine is altered in patients with a rigid spine, rendering it vulnerable to fracture even from relatively minor impact. The rigid spine entities are ankylosing spondylitis (AS), diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, degenerative spondylosis, and a surgically fused spine. The most common mechanism of injury resulting in fracture is hyperextension, which often leads to unstable injury in patients with a rigid spine per the recent AOSpine classification system. Due to the increased risk of spinal fractures in this population, performing a spine CT is the first step when a patient with a rigid spine presents with new back pain or suspected spinal trauma. In addition, there should be a low threshold for performing a non–contrast-enhanced spine MRI in patients with a rigid spine, especially those with AS who may have an occult fracture, epidural hematoma, or spinal cord injury. Unfortunately, owing to insufficient imaging and an unfamiliarity with fracture patterns in the setting of a rigid spine, fracture diagnosis is often delayed, leading to significant morbidity and even death. The radiologist’s role is to recognize the imaging features of a rigid spine, identify any fractures at CT and MRI, and fully characterize the extent of injury. Reasons for surgical intervention include neurologic deficit or concern for deterioration, an unstable fracture, or the presence of an epidural hematoma. By understanding the imaging features of various rigid spine conditions and vigilantly examining images for occult fractures, the radiologist can avoid a missed or delayed diagnosis of an injured rigid spine.
©RSNA, 2019
References
- 1. . Biomechanics of the spine. I. Spinal stability. Eur J Radiol 2013;82(1):118–126. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 2. . Ankylosing spondylitis of the cervical spine. In: Shen FH, Samartzis D, Fessler RG, eds. Textbook of the cervical spine. Maryland Heights, Mo: Elsevier Saunders, 2015. Google Scholar
- 3. . Postural control is altered in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2012;27(4):334–340. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 4. Imaging characteristics of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis with an emphasis on acute spinal fractures: review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193(3 suppl):S10–S19; quiz S20–S24. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 5. . Fractures in the ankylosed spine. In: Browner BD, Jupiter JB, Krettek C, Anderson PA, eds. Skeletal trauma: basic science, management, and reconstruction. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Elsevier Health Sciences, 2015. Google Scholar
- 6. . Osteoarthritis of the spine: the facet joints. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2013;9(4):216–224. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 7. . Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine 2004;29(17):1938–1944. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 8. . Clinical spinal instability and low back pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2003;13(4):371–379. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 9. . Biomechanics of the spine. II. Spinal instability. Eur J Radiol 2013;82(1):127–138. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 10. AOSpine subaxial cervical spine injury classification system. Eur Spine J 2016;25(7):2173–2184. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 11. The thoracolumbar AOSpine injury score. Global Spine J 2016;6(4):329–334. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 12. Fractures in spinal ankylosing disorders: a narrative review of disease and injury types, treatment techniques, and outcomes. J Orthop Trauma 2017;31(suppl 4):S57–S74. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 13. . Cervical spine involvement in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol 2003;22(2):94–98. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 14. . Management of acute spinal fractures in ankylosing spondylitis. ISRN Rheumatol 2011;2011:150484. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 15. Evolution of traumatic spinal cord injury in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, in a Romanian rehabilitation clinic. Spinal Cord Ser Cases 2016;2(1):16001. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 16. . Spine fractures in patients with ankylosing spinal disorders. Spine 2010;35(11):e458–E464. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 17. Spinal fracture in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: cohort definition, distribution of injuries, and hospital outcomes. Spine 2016;41(3):191–196. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 18. . Analysis of the literature on cervical spine fractures in ankylosing spinal disorders. Global Spine J 2017;7(5):469–481. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 19. . Spinal fractures in patients with ankylosing spinal disorders: a systematic review of the literature on treatment, neurological status and complications. Eur Spine J 2009;18(2):145–156. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 20. . Trauma to the ankylotic spine: imaging spectrum of vertebral and soft tissue injuries. Emerg Radiol 2007;14(6):371–378. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 21. . Ankylosing spondylitis: patterns of spinal injury and treatment outcomes. Asian Spine J 2016;10(4):655–662. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 22. . Traumatic spinal cord injury as a complication to ankylosing spondylitis: an extended report. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2002;20(1):66–68. Medline, Google Scholar
- 23. . Ankylosing spondylitis and spinal cord injury: origin, incidence, management, and avoidance. Neurosurg Focus 2008;24(1):E12. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 24. . Spectrum of imaging findings in hyperextension injuries of the neck. RadioGraphics 2005;25(5):1239–1254. Link, Google Scholar
- 25. . Hyperextension injuries of the thoracolumbar spine in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis. Spine 2015;40(2):E61–E67. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 26. Cervical spine trauma in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: injury characteristics and outcome with surgical treatment. Spine 2012;37(23):1923–1932. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 27. . Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: differentiation from ankylosing spondylitis. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2009;11(5):321–328. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 28. Quantitative analysis of the anterolateral ossification mass in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis of the thoracic spine. Eur Spine J 2011;20(9):1474–1479. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 29. CT-based morphological analysis of spinal fractures in patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis. J Orthop Sci 2017;22(1):3–9. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 30. Prevalence of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis diagnosed by whole spine computed tomography: a preliminary study. Clin Orthop Surg 2018;10(1):41–46. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 31. . Fracture of the spine in patients with ankylosis due to diffuse skeletal hyperostosis: clinical and imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162(4):899–904. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 32. The management of spinal injuries in patients with ankylosing spondylitis or diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: a comparison of treatment methods and clinical outcomes. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009;22(2):77–85. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 33. . Low back pain and lumbar spine osteoarthritis: how are they related? Curr Rheumatol Rep 2013;15(2):305. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 34. Reformatted images of the thoracic and lumbar spine following CT of chest, abdomen, and pelvis in the setting of blunt trauma: are they necessary? Emerg Radiol 2015;22(4):373–378. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 35. . Department of Health, Government of Western Australia. http://ww2.health.wa.gov.au/∼/media/Files/Corporate/general%20documents/Clinical%20coding/Guides%20and%20summaries/summ-spinal.pdf. Published 2016. Accessed March 4, 2018. Google Scholar
- 36. . Evidence-based analysis of adjacent segment degeneration and disease after ACDF: a systematic review. Spine J 2013;13(10):1370–1378. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 37. Vertebral fracture at the caudal end of a surgical fusion for thoracic vertebral fracture in a patient with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH). Fukushima J Med Sci 2017;63(2):112–115. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 38. Subsequent vertebral fractures following spinal fusion surgery for degenerative lumbar disease: a mean ten-year follow-up. Spine 2010;35(21):1915–1918. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 39. . Predicting the risk of adjacent segment pathology in the cervical spine: a systematic review. Spine 2012;37(22 suppl):S52–S64. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 40. . Sagittal imbalance. The Spine Hospital at The Neurological Institute of New York. http://columbiaspine.org/condition/sagittal-imbalance/. Published 2018. Accessed March 7, 2018. Google Scholar
- 41. . Proximal junctional vertebral fracture in adults after spinal deformity surgery using pedicle screw constructs: analysis of morphological features. Spine 2010;35(2):138–145. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 42. . Discovertebral (Andersson) lesions of the spine in ankylosing spondylitis revisited. Clin Rheumatol 2009;28(8):883–892. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 43. . The Andersson lesion in ankylosing spondylitis: distinguishing between the inflammatory and traumatic subtypes. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011;93(7):961–966. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 44. . MR imaging assessment of the spine: infection or an imitation? RadioGraphics 2009;29(2):599–612. Link, Google Scholar
- 45. . Clinical outcome after traumatic spinal fractures in patients with ankylosing spinal disorders compared with control patients. Spine J 2014;14(5):729–740. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 46. . Mortality in elderly patients with hyperostotic disease of the cervical spine after fracture: an age- and sex-matched study. Spine J 2011;11(4):257–264. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
Article History
Received: Apr 1 2018Revision received: May 15 2018
Revision requested: June 12 2018
Accepted: June 15 2018
Published online: Feb 01 2019
Published in print: Mar 2019









