Leveraging Imaging for Targeted Treatment

Skull Base Chordoma and Chondrosarcoma: Neuroradiologist’s Guide to Diagnosis, Surgical Management, and Proton Beam Therapy

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.240036

Skull base chordoma and chondrosarcoma are distinct tumors that share important tenets of multimodality management, and treatment decisions should be undertaken in a multidisciplinary tumor board setting where radiologists, skull base surgeons, pathologists, and oncologists individualize recommendations.

Skull base chordomas and chondrosarcomas are distinct types of rare, locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors that share key principles of imaging investigation and multidisciplinary care. Maximal safe surgical resection is the treatment choice for each, often via an expanded endoscopic endonasal approach, with or without multilayer skull base repair. Postoperative adjuvant radiation therapy is frequently administered, usually with particle therapy such as proton beam therapy (PBT). Compared with photon therapy, PBT enables dose escalation while limiting damage to dose-limiting neurologic structures, particularly the brainstem and optic apparatus, due to energy deposition being delivered at a high maximum with a rapid decrease at the end of the penetration range (Bragg peak phenomenon). Essential requirements for PBT following gross total or maximal safe resection are tissue diagnosis, minimal residual tumor after resection, and adequate clearance from PBT dose-limiting structures. The radiologist should understand surgical approaches and surgical techniques, including multilayer skull base repair, and be aware of evolution of postsurgical imaging appearances over time. Accurate radiologic review of all relevant preoperative imaging examinations and of intraoperative and postoperative MRI examinations plays a key role in management. The radiology report should reflect what the skull base surgeon and radiation oncologist need to know, including distance between the tumor and PBT dose-limiting structures, tumor sites that may be difficult to access via the endoscopic endonasal route, the relationship between intradural tumor and neurovascular structures, and tumor sites with implications for postresection stability.

©RSNA, 2024

Supplemental material is available for this article.

References

  • 1. Yeom KW, Lober RM, Mobley BC, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI: distinction of skull base chordoma from chondrosarcoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34(5):1056–1061, S1.
  • 2. Erdem E, Angtuaco EC, Van Hemert R, Park JS, Al-Mefty O. Comprehensive review of intracranial chordoma. RadioGraphics 2003;23(4):995–1009.
  • 3. Kremenevski N, Schlaffer SM, Coras R, Kinfe TM, Graillon T, Buchfelder M. Skull Base Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas. Neuroendocrinology 2020;110(9-10):836–847.
  • 4. Murphey MD, Andrews CL, Flemming DJ, Temple HT, Smith WS, Smirniotopoulos JG. From the archives of the AFIP. Primary tumors of the spine: radiologic pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 1996;16(5):1131–1158.
  • 5. Farsad K, Kattapuram SV, Sacknoff R, Ono J, Nielsen GP. Sacral chordoma. RadioGraphics 2009;29(5):1525–1530.
  • 6. Yamaguchi T, Imada H, Iida S, Szuhai K. Notochordal Tumors: An Update on Molecular Pathology with Therapeutic Implications. Surg Pathol Clin 2017;10(3):637–656.
  • 7. Wang WL, Abramson JH, Ganguly A, Rosenberg AE. The surgical pathology of notochordal remnants in adult intervertebral disks: a report of 3 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2008;32(8):1123–1129.
  • 8. Vujovic S, Henderson S, Presneau N, et al. Brachyury, a crucial regulator of notochordal development, is a novel biomarker for chordomas. J Pathol 2006;209(2):157–165.
  • 9. Stevens AR, Branstetter BF 4th, Gardner P, Pearce TM, Zenonos GA, Arani K. Ecchordosis Physaliphora: Does It Even Exist? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2023;44(8):889–893.
  • 10. Ouyang T, Zhang N, Zhang Y, et al. Clinical characteristics, immunohistochemistry, and outcomes of 77 patients with skull base chordomas. World Neurosurg 2014;81(5-6):790–797.
  • 11. Zenonos GA, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Mukherjee D, et al. Prospective validation of a molecular prognostication panel for clival chordoma. J Neurosurg 2018;130(5):1528–1537.
  • 12. Abdallah HM, Gersey ZC, Muthiah N, et al. An Integrated Management Paradigm for Skull Base Chordoma Based on Clinical and Molecular Characteristics. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2021;82(6):601–607.
  • 13. Young VA, Curtis KM, Temple HT, Eismont FJ, DeLaney TF, Hornicek FJ. Characteristics and Patterns of Metastatic Disease from Chordoma. Sarcoma 2015;2015:517657.
  • 14. Usher I, Flanagan AM, Choi D. Systematic Review of Clinical, Radiologic, and Histologic Features of Benign Notochordal Cell Tumors: Implications for Patient Management. World Neurosurg 2019;130:13–23.
  • 15. Carter JM, Wenger DE, Rose PS, Inwards CY. Atypical Notochordal Cell Tumors: A Series of Notochordal-derived Tumors That Defy Current Classification Schemes. Am J Surg Pathol 2017;41(1):39–48.
  • 16. Du J, Xu L, Cui Y, Liu Z, Su Y, Li G. Benign notochordal cell tumour: clinicopathology and molecular profiling of 13 cases. J Clin Pathol 2019;72(1):66–74.
  • 17. Kim EY, Hong TH. Changes in total lymphocyte count and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio after curative pancreatectomy in patients with pancreas adenocarcinoma and their prognostic role. J Surg Oncol 2019;120(7):1102–1111.
  • 18. Kreshak J, Larousserie F, Picci P, et al. Difficulty distinguishing benign notochordal cell tumor from chordoma further suggests a link between them. Cancer Imaging 2014;14(1):4.
  • 19. Soule E, Baig S, Fiester P, et al. Current Management and Image Review of Skull Base Chordoma: What the Radiologist Needs to Know. J Clin Imaging Sci 2021;11:46.
  • 20. Lin E, Scognamiglio T, Zhao Y, Schwartz TH, Phillips CD. Prognostic Implications of Gadolinium Enhancement of Skull Base Chordomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39(8):1509–1514.
  • 21. Freeze BS, Glastonbury CM. Differentiation of skull base chordomas from chondrosarcomas by diffusion-weighted MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34(10):E113.
  • 22. Guler E, Ozgen B, Mut M, Soylemezoglu F, Oguz KK. The Added Value of Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis and Posttreatment Evaluation of Skull Base Chordomas. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2017;78(3):256–265.
  • 23. Müller U, Kubik-Huch RA, Ares C, et al. Is there a role for conventional MRI and MR diffusion-weighted imaging for distinction of skull base chordoma and chondrosarcoma? Acta Radiol 2016;57(2):225–232.
  • 24. Welzel T, Meyerhof E, Uhl M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of DW MR imaging in the differentiation of chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base: A 3.0-T MRI study of 105 cases. Eur J Radiol 2018;105:119–124.
  • 25. Li L, Wang K, Ma X, et al. Radiomic analysis of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating skull base chordoma and chondrosarcoma. Eur J Radiol 2019;118:81–87.
  • 26. Lagman C, Varshneya K, Sarmiento JM, Turtz AR, Chitale RV. Proposed Diagnostic Criteria, Classification Schema, and Review of Literature of Notochord-Derived Ecchordosis Physaliphora. Cureus 2016;8(3):e547.
  • 27. Wolfe JT 3rd, Scheithauer BW. “Intradural chordoma” or “giant ecchordosis physaliphora”? Report of two cases. Clin Neuropathol 1987;6(3):98–103.
  • 28. Yamaguchi T, Inwards CT. Benign notochordal cell tumour. The WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board, eds. WHO Classification of Tumours Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours. 5th ed: IARC Press, 2020; 449–450.
  • 29. Stuebe CM, Rindler RS, Laack N, et al. Evaluation of Long-Term Follow-Up in Ecchordosis Physaliphora versus Chordoma. World Neurosurg 2023;174:157–168.
  • 30. Potter GM, Siripurapu R. Imaging of Petrous Apex Lesions. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2021;31(4):523–540.
  • 31. Di Maio S, Temkin N, Ramanathan D, Sekhar LN. Current comprehensive management of cranial base chordomas: 10-year meta-analysis of observational studies. J Neurosurg 2011;115(6):1094–1105.
  • 32. Fraser JF, Nyquist GG, Moore N, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic endonasal transclival resection of chordomas: operative technique, clinical outcome, and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 2010;112(5):1061–1069.
  • 33. Wang L, Wu Z, Tian K, et al. Clinical features and surgical outcomes of patients with skull base chordoma: a retrospective analysis of 238 patients. J Neurosurg 2017;127(6):1257–1267.
  • 34. Yaniv D, Soudry E, Strenov Y, Cohen MA, Mizrachi A. Skull base chordomas review of current treatment paradigms. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020;6(2):125–131.
  • 35. Zhai Y, Bai J, Li M, et al. A nomogram to predict the progression-free survival of clival chordoma. J Neurosurg 2019;134(1):144–152.
  • 36. Zhai Y, Bai J, Wang S, et al. Analysis of clinical factors and PDGFR-β in predicting prognosis of patients with clival chordoma. J Neurosurg 2018;129(6):1429–1437.
  • 37. Palmisciano P, Haider AS, Sabahi M, et al. Primary Skull Base Chondrosarcomas: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13(23):5960.
  • 38. Basler L, Poel R, Schröder C, et al. Dosimetric analysis of local failures in skull-base chordoma and chondrosarcoma following pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Radiat Oncol 2020;15(1):266.
  • 39. Hug EB, Loredo LN, Slater JD, et al. Proton radiation therapy for chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base. J Neurosurg 1999;91(3):432–439.
  • 40. Munzenrider JE, Liebsch NJ. Proton therapy for tumors of the skull base. Strahlenther Onkol 1999;175(suppl 2):57–63.
  • 41. Weber DC, Malyapa R, Albertini F, et al. Long term outcomes of patients with skull-base low-grade chondrosarcoma and chordoma patients treated with pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Radiother Oncol 2016;120(1):169–174.
  • 42. Wang B, Tian F, Tong X. Clinical Grading System, Surgical Outcomes and Prognostic Analysis of Cranial Base Chordomas. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2022;65(3):469–478.
  • 43. Passeri T, di Russo P, Champagne PO, et al. Tumor Growth Rate as a New Predictor of Progression-Free Survival After Chordoma Surgery. Neurosurgery 2021;89(2):291–299.
  • 44. García-Garrigós E, Arenas-Jiménez JJ, Monjas-Cánovas I, et al. Transsphenoidal Approach in Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Skull Base Lesions: What Radiologists and Surgeons Need to Know. RadioGraphics 2015;35(4):1170–1185.
  • 45. Schwartz TH, Morgenstern PF, Anand VK. Lessons learned in the evolution of endoscopic skull base surgery. J Neurosurg 2019;130(2):337–346.
  • 46. Gui S, Zong X, Wang X, et al. Classification and surgical approaches for transnasal endoscopic skull base chordoma resection: a 6-year experience with 161 cases. Neurosurg Rev 2016;39(2):321–332; discussion 332–333.
  • 47. Zoli M, Milanese L, Bonfatti R, et al. Clival chordomas: considerations after 16 years of endoscopic endonasal surgery. J Neurosurg 2018;128(2):329–338.
  • 48. Culebras D, Torales J, Reyes LA, et al. Extended endoscopic endonasal surgery for clival chordoma and chondrosarcoma: Our experience in 14 cases. Neurocirugia (Astur: Engl Ed) 2018;29(4):201–208.
  • 49. Folbe AJ, Svider PF, Liu JK, Eloy JA. Endoscopic Resection of Clival Malignancies. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2017;50(2):315–329.
  • 50. Mercado CE, Holtzman AL, Rotondo R, Rutenberg MS, Mendenhall WM. Proton therapy for skull base tumors: A review of clinical outcomes for chordomas and chondrosarcomas. Head Neck 2019;41(2):536–541.
  • 51. Almefty K, Pravdenkova S, Colli BO, Al-Mefty O, Gokden M. Chordoma and chondrosarcoma: similar, but quite different, skull base tumors. Cancer 2007;110(11):2457–2467.
  • 52. Cutler AR, Mundi JS, Solomon N, Suh JD, Wang MB, Bergsneider M. Critical appraisal of extent of resection of clival lesions using the expanded endoscopic endonasal approach. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2013;74(4):217–224.
  • 53. CRANIAL Consortium. CSF rhinorrhoea after endonasal intervention to the skull base (CRANIAL): A multicentre prospective observational study. Front Oncol 2023;12:1049627.
  • 54. Ucisik FE, Huell D, Choi J, et al. Post-Treatment Imaging Evaluation of the Skull Base. Semin Roentgenol 2023;58(3):217–236.
  • 55. Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL, et al. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 2006;116(10):1882–1886.
  • 56. Learned KO, Adappa ND, Loevner LA, Palmer JN, Newman JG, Lee JYK. MR imaging evaluation of endoscopic cranial base reconstruction with pedicled nasoseptal flap following endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. Eur J Radiol 2013;82(3):544–551.
  • 57. Learned KO, Adappa ND, Lee JYK, Newman JG, Palmer JN, Loevner LA. MR imaging evolution of endoscopic cranial defect reconstructions using nasoseptal flaps and their distinction from neoplasm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35(6):1182–1189.
  • 58. Iannalfi A, Riva G, Ciccone L, Orlandi E. The role of particle radiotherapy in the treatment of skull base tumors. Front Oncol 2023;13:1161752.
  • 59. Deraniyagala RL, Yeung D, Mendenhall WM, et al. Proton therapy for skull base chordomas: an outcome study from the university of Florida proton therapy institute. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2014;75(1):53–57.
  • 60. Holtzman AL, Rotondo RL, Rutenberg MS, et al. Proton therapy for skull-base chondrosarcoma, a single-institution outcomes study. J Neurooncol 2019;142(3):557–563.
  • 61. Noël G, Habrand JL, Mammar H, et al. Combination of photon and proton radiation therapy for chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base: the Centre de Protonthérapie D’Orsay experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001;51(2):392–398.
  • 62. Walcott BP, Nahed BV, Mohyeldin A, Coumans JV, Kahle KT, Ferreira MJ. Chordoma: current concepts, management, and future directions. Lancet Oncol 2012;13(2):e69–e76.
  • 63. Wolf RJ, Winkler V, Mattke M, Uhl M, Debus J. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for the management of primary and recurrent chordomas: a retrospective long-term follow-up study. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2023;28(2):207–216.
  • 64. Zorlu F, Gürkaynak M, Yildiz F, Oge K, Atahan IL. Conventional external radiotherapy in the management of clivus chordomas with overt residual disease. Neurol Sci 2000;21(4):203–207.
  • 65. The Society of British Neurological Surgeons. Chordoma and Chondrosarcoma Skull Base and Spinal Pathway Surgery, High Dose Radiation therapy and Proton Beam Therapy Professional Consensus Guidelines. https://www.sbns.org.uk/index.php/policies-and-publications/protocol-and-guidelines-2/. Published 2021. Accessed January 30, 2024.
  • 66. Stacchiotti S, Gronchi A, Fossati P, et al. Best practices for the management of local-regional recurrent chordoma: a position paper by the Chordoma Global Consensus Group. Ann Oncol 2017;28(6):1230–1242.
  • 67. Ares C, Hug EB, Lomax AJ, et al. Effectiveness and safety of spot scanning proton radiation therapy for chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base: first long-term report. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009;75(4):1111–1118.
  • 68. Shapey J, Thomas NWM, Connor SEJ. Neurosurgical Approaches to the Skull Base: A Guide for the Radiologist. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2021;31(4):409–431.
  • 69. Stacchiotti S, Sommer J; Chordoma Global Consensus Group. Building a global consensus approach to chordoma: a position paper from the medical and patient community. Lancet Oncol 2015;16(2):e71–e83.
  • 70. Noel G, Gondi V. Proton therapy for tumors of the base of the skull. Chin Clin Oncol 2016;5(4):51.
  • 71. Winter SF, Vaios EJ, Shih HA, et al. Mitigating Radiotoxicity in the Central Nervous System: Role of Proton Therapy. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2023;24(11):1524–1549.

Article History

Received: Feb 8 2024
Revision requested: Mar 27 2024
Revision received: June 19 2024
Accepted: July 10 2024
Published online: Sept 19 2024