Hamstring Muscle Complex: An Imaging Review

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.253045711

Increasing activity in the general population and the high demands placed on athletes have resulted in injuries to the hamstring muscle complex (HMC) being commonplace in sports. Imaging of HMC injuries can form a considerable part of a sports medicine practice, with a wide spectrum of such injuries being reflected in their varied imaging appearances. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and ultrasonography (US) are the imaging modalities of choice in this setting. Both MR imaging and US provide exquisitely detailed information about the HMC with respect to localization and characterization of injury. Optimization of MR imaging involves the use of a surface coil and high-resolution techniques, allowing the musculoskeletal radiologist not only to diagnose injury and assess severity but also to provide the clinician with useful clues with respect to prognosis. The portability and availability of US make it an attractive modality for the diagnosis of acute hamstring injuries, although its effectiveness is dependent on operator experience. A thorough knowledge of the HMC anatomy and of the spectrum of imaging findings in HMC injury is crucial for providing optimal patient care and will enable the musculoskeletal radiologist to make an accurate and useful contribution to the treatment of athletes at all levels of participation.

© RSNA, 2005


  • 1 GarrettWE Jr, Rich FR, Nikolaou PK, Vogler JB III. Computed tomography of hamstring muscle strains. Med Sci Sports Exerc1989; 21: 506–514. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2 GarrettWE Jr, Califf JC, Bassett FH III. Histo-chemical correlates of hamstring injuries. Am J Sports Med1984; 12: 98–103. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3 SallayPI, Friedman RL, Coogan PG, Garrett WE Jr. Hamstring muscle injuries among water skiers: functional outcome and prevention. Am J Sports Med1996; 24: 130–136. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 KurosawaH, Nakasita K, Nakasita H, Sakasi S, Takeda S. Complete avulsion of the hamstring tendons from the ischial tuberosity: a report of two cases sustained in judo. Br J Sports Med1996; 30: 72–74. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 McMinnRMH, ed. Last’s anatomy, regional and applied. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Living-stone, 1990. Google Scholar
  • 6 WilliamPL, Warwick R, Dyson M, Bannister LH, eds. Gray’s anatomy. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone, 1989. Google Scholar
  • 7 De SmetAA, Best TM. MR imaging of the distribution and location of acute hamstring injuries in athletes. AJR Am J Roentgenol2000; 174: 393–399. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8 SuttonG. Hamstrung by hamstring strains: a review of the literature. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther1984; 5: 184–195. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9 BurkettLN. Investigation into hamstring strains: the case of the hybrid muscle. J Sports Med1976; 5: 228–231. Google Scholar
  • 10 KoulourisG, Connell D. Evaluation of the hamstring muscle complex following acute injury. Skeletal Radiol2003; 32: 582–589. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11 MarkeeJE, Logue JT, Williams M, Stanton WB, Wrenn RN, Walker B. Two-joint muscles of the thigh. J Bone Joint Surg Am1955; 37-A(1): 125–142. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12 BeltranJ, Matityahu A, Hwang K, et al. The distal semimembranosus complex: normal MR anatomy, variants, biomechanics and pathology. Skeletal Radiol2003; 32: 435–445. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13 RothsteinCP, Laorr A, Helms CA, Tirman PF. Semimembranosustibial collateral ligament bursitis: MR imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol1996; 166: 875–877. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14 HenniganSP, Schneck CD, Mesgarzadeh M, Clancy M. The semimembranosustibial collateral ligament bursa: anatomical study and magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am1994; 76: 1322–1327. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15 KimYC, Yoo WK, Chung IH, Seo JS, Tanka S. Tendinous insertion of semimembranosus muscle into the lateral meniscus. Surg Radiol Anat1997; 19: 365–369. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16 StoaneJM, Gordon DH. MRI of an accessory semimembranosus muscle. J Comput Assist Tomogr1995; 19: 161–162. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17 CattrysseE, Barbaix E, Janssens V, Alewaeters K, Van Roy P, Clarijs JP. Observation of a supernumerary hamstring muscle: a state of the art on its incidence and clinical relevance. Morphologie2002; 86: 17–21. Google Scholar
  • 18 PetersonJE, Currarino G. Unilateral absence of thigh muscles confirmed by CT scan. Pediatr Radiol1981; 11: 157–159. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19 SlocumDB, James SL. Biomechanics of running. JAMA1968; 205: 721–728. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20 CooperDL, Fair J. Trainer’s corner: hamstring strains. Phys Sports Med1978; 8: 104. Google Scholar
  • 21 SafranMR, Seaber AV, Garrett WE Jr. Warm-up and muscular injury prevention: an update. Sports Med1989; 8: 239–249. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22 ShellockFG, Fukunaga T, Mink JH, Edgerton VR. Exertional muscle injury: evaluation of concentric versus eccentric actions with serial MR imaging. Radiology1991; 179: 659–664. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 23 GarrettWE Jr. Muscle strain injuries. Am J Sports Med1996; 24(6 suppl): S2–S8. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24 RubinSJ, Feldman F, Staron RB, Zwass A, Totterman S, Meyers SP. Magnetic resonance imaging of muscle injury. Clin Imaging1995; 19: 263–269. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25 BurkettLN. Causative factors in hamstring strains. Med Sci Sports1970; 2: 39–42. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26 KujalaUM, Orava S, Jarvinen M. Hamstring injuries: current trends in treatment and prevention. Sports Med1997; 23: 397–404. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27 HeiserTM, Weber J, Sullivan G, Clare P, Jacobs RR. Prophylaxis and management of hamstring injuries in intercollegiate football players. Am J Sports Med1984; 12: 368–370. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28 GarrettWE Jr. Muscle strain injuries: clinical and basic aspects. Med Sci Sports Exerc1990; 22: 436–443. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29 El-KhouryGY, Brandser EA, Kathol MH, Tearse DS, Callaghan JJ. Imaging of muscle injuries. Skeletal Radiol1996; 25: 3–11. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 30 FridenJ, Sjostrom M, Ekblom B. A morphological study of delayed muscle soreness. Experientia1981; 37: 506–507. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 31 FleckensteinJL, Weatherall PT, Parkey RW, Payne JA, Peshock RM. Sports-related muscle injuries: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology1989; 172: 793–798. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 32 PalmerWE, Kuong SJ, Elmadbouh HM. MR imaging of myotendinous strain: pictorial essay. AJR Am J Roentgenol1999; 173: 703–709. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 33 NikolaouPK, Macdonald BL, Glisson RR, Seaber AV, Garrett WE Jr. Biomechanical and histological evaluation of muscle after controlled strain injury. Am J Sports Med1987; 15: 9–14. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 34 GrecoA, McNamara MT, Escher RM, Trifillio G, Parienti J. Spin-echo and STIR MR imaging of sports-related muscle injuries at 1.5 T. J Comput Assist Tomogr1991; 15: 994–999. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 35 JonhagenS, Nemeth G, Eriksson E. Hamstring injuries in sprinters: the role of concentric and eccentric hamstring muscle strength and flexibility. Am J Sports Med1994; 22: 262–266. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 36 FridenJ, Sjostrom M, Ekblom B. Myofibrillar damage following intense eccentric exercise in man. Int J Sports Med1983; 4: 170–176. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 37 BrandserEA, el-Khoury GY, Kathol MH, Callaghan JJ, Tearse DS. Hamstring injuries: radiographic, conventional tomographic, CT, and MR imaging characteristics. Radiology1995; 197: 257–262. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 38 AliotoRJ, Browne JE, Barnthouse CD, Scott AR. Complete rupture of the distal semimembranosus complex in a professional athlete. Clin Orthop1997; 336: 162–165. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 39 VarelaJR, Rodriguez, Soler R, Gonzalez J, Pombo S. Complete rupture of the distal semimembranosus tendon with secondary hamstring muscles atrophy: MR findings in two cases. Skeletal Radiol2000; 29: 362–364. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 40 OravaS, Kujala UM. Rupture of the ischial origin of the hamstring muscles. Am J Sports Med1995; 23: 702–705. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 41 YaoL, Lee JK. Avulsions of the posteromedial tibial plateau by the semimembranosus tendon: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology1989; 172: 513–514. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 42 CrossMJ, Roher R, Kujawa P, Anderson IF. Regeneration of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons following their transection for repair of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med1992; 20: 221–223. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 43 ErikssonK, Larsson H, Wredmark T, Hamberg P. Semitendinosus tendon regeneration after harvesting for ACL reconstruction: a prospective MRI study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc1999; 7: 220–225. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 44 FerrettiA, Conteduca F, Morelli F, Masi V. Regeneration of the semitendinosus tendon after its use in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; a histologic study of three cases. Am J Sports Med2002; 30: 204–207. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 45 BencardinoJT, Rosenberg ZS, Brown RR, Hassankhani A, Lustrin ES, Beltran J. Traumatic musculotendinous injuries of the knee: diagnosis with MR imaging. RadioGraphics2000; 20: S103–S120. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 46 PomeranzSJ, Heidt RS. MR imaging in the prognostication of hamstring injury: work in progress. Radiology1993; 189: 897–900. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 47 SpeerKP, Lohnes J, Garrett WE Jr. Radiographic imaging of muscle strain injury. Am J Sports Med1993; 21: 89–96. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 48 VerrallGM, Slavotinek JP, Barnes PG, Fon GT. Diagnostic and prognostic value of clinical findings in 83 athletes with posterior thigh injury: comparison of clinical findings with magnetic resonance imaging documentation of hamstring muscle strain. Am J Sports Med2003; 31: 969–973. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 49 De SmetAA, Fischer DR, Heiner JP, Keene JS. Magnetic resonance imaging of muscle tears. Skeletal Radiol1990; 19: 283–286. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 50 De SmetAA. Magnetic resonance findings in skeletal muscle tears. Skeletal Radiol1993; 22: 479–484. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 51 TopsakalC, Akdemir L, Tiftikci M, Ozercan I, Aydin Y. Malignant schwannoma of the sciatic nerve originating in a spinal plexiform neurofibroma associated with neurofibromatosis type 1: case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)2001; 41: 551–555. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 52 SlavotinekJP, Verrall GM, Fon GT. Hamstring injury in athletes: using MR imaging measurements to compare extent of muscle injury with amount of time lost from competition. AJR Am J Roentgenol2002; 179: 1621–1628. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 53 VerrallGM, Slavotinek JP, Barnes PG, Fon GT, Spriggins AJ. Clinical risk factors for hamstring muscle strain injury: a prospective correlation of injury by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Sports Med2001; 35: 435–440. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 54 ConnellDA, Schneider-Kolsky ME, Hoving JL, et al. Longitudinal study comparing sonographic and MRI assessments of acute and healing hamstring injuries. AJR Am J Roentgenol2004; 183: 975–984. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 55 OrchardJW. Intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors for muscle strains in Australian football. Am J Sports Med2001; 29: 300–303. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 56 VerrallG. Hamstring injuries: safe return to play from MR studies. Presented at the Australasian College of Sports Physicians Annual Scientific Meeting (incorporating Football Australasia Conference—controversies in 2003), Melbourne, Australia, September 22–25, 2003. Google Scholar

Article History

Published in print: May 2005