RSNA Education Exhibits

CT Enterography as a Diagnostic Tool in Evaluating Small Bowel Disorders: Review of Clinical Experience with over 700 Cases

Published Online:

Computed tomographic (CT) enterography combines the improved spatial and temporal resolution of multi–detector row CT with large volumes of ingested neutral enteric contrast material to permit visualization of the small bowel wall and lumen. Adequate luminal distention can usually be achieved with oral hyperhydration, thereby obviating nasoenteric intubation and making CT enterography a useful, well-tolerated study for the evaluation of diseases affecting the mucosa and bowel wall. Unlike routine CT, which has been used to detect the extraenteric complications of Crohn disease such as fistula and abscess, CT enterography clearly depicts the small bowel inflammation associated with Crohn disease by displaying mural hyperenhancement, stratification, and thickening; engorged vasa recta; and perienteric inflammatory changes. As a result, CT enterography is becoming the first-line modality for the evaluation of suspected inflammatory bowel disease. CT enterography has also become an important alternative to traditional fluoroscopy in the assessment of other small bowel disorders such as celiac sprue and small bowel neoplasms.

© RSNA, 2006


  • 1 YoungBM, Fletcher JG, Paulsen SR, et al. Comparison of oral contrast agents for cross-sectional enterography: timing, small bowel distention and side effects. San Antonio, Tex: Society of Gastrointestinal Radiologists, 2005.
  • 2 BenderGN, Timmons JH, Williard WC, Carter J. Computed tomographic enteroclysis: one methodology. Invest Radiol1996; 31: 43–49.
  • 3 GoreRM, Balthazar EJ, Ghahremani GG, Miller FH. CT features of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol1996; 167: 3–15.
  • 4 BooyaF, Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, et al. CT enterography: detection of active Crohn’s disease during optimal bowel wall enhancement (abstr). In: Radiological Society of North America scientific assembly and annual meeting program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2004;611.
  • 5 MazzeoS, Caramella D, Battolla L, et al. Crohn disease of the small bowel: spiral CT evaluation after oral hyperhydration with isotonic solution. J Comput Assist Tomogr2001; 25: 612–616.
  • 6 WoldPB, Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Sandborn WJ. Assessment of small bowel Crohn disease: noninvasive peroral CT enterography compared with other imaging methods and endoscopy—feasibility study. Radiology2003; 229: 275–281.
  • 7 MaglinteDD, Bender GN, Heitkamp DE, Lappas JC, Kelvin FM. Multidetector-row helical CT enteroclysis. Radiol Clin North Am2003; 41: 249–262.
  • 8 BoudiafM, Jaff A, Soyer P, Bouhnik Y, Hamzi L, Rymer R. Small-bowel diseases: prospective evaluation of multi–detector row helical CT enteroclysis in 107 consecutive patients. Radiology2004; 233: 338–344.
  • 9 MaccioniF, Viscido A, Broglia L, et al. Evaluation of Crohn disease activity with magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging2000; 25: 219–228.
  • 10 LauensteinTC, Schneemann H, Vogt FM, Herborn CU, Ruhm SG, Debatin JF. Optimization of oral contrast agents for MR imaging of the small bowel. Radiology2003; 228: 279–283.
  • 11 RollandiGA, Curone PF, Biscaldi E, et al. Spiral CT of the abdomen after distention of small bowel loops with transparent enema in patients with Crohn’s disease. Abdom Imaging1999; 24: 544–549.
  • 12 GourtsoyiannisN, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Maris T, Prassopoulos P. MR enteroclysis protocol optimization: comparison between 3D FLASH with fat saturation after intravenous gadolinium injection and true FISP sequences. Eur Radiol2001; 11: 908–913.
  • 13 AngelelliG, Macarini L. CT of the bowel: use of water to enhance depiction. Radiology1988; 169: 848–849.
  • 14 HortonKM, Fishman EK. The current status of multidetector row CT and three-dimensional imaging of the small bowel. Radiol Clin North Am2003; 41: 199–212.
  • 15 GoldbergHI, Gore RM, Margulis AR, Moss AA, Baker EL. Computed tomography in the evaluation of Crohn disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol1983; 140: 277–282.
  • 16 FragerDH, Goldman M, Beneventano TC. Computed tomography in Crohn disease. J Comput Assist Tomogr1983; 7: 819–824.
  • 17 BerlinerL, Redmond P, Purow E, Megna D, Sottile V. Computed tomography in Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol1982; 77: 548–553.
  • 18 FishmanEK, Wolf EJ, Jones B, Bayless TM, Siegelman SS. CT evaluation of Crohn’s disease: effect on patient management. AJR Am J Roentgenol1987; 148: 537–540.
  • 19 OrelSG, Rubesin SE, Jones B, Fishman EK, Bayless TM, Siegelman SS. Computed tomography vs barium studies in the acutely symptomatic patient with Crohn disease. J Comput Assist Tomogr1987; 11: 1009–1016.
  • 20 NagamataH, Inadama E, Arihiro S, Matsuoka M, Torii A, Fukuda K. The usefulness of MDCT in Crohn’s disease [in Japanese]. Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi2002; 99: 1317–1325.
  • 21 ReittnerP, Goritschnig T, Petritsch W, et al. Multiplanar spiral CT enterography in patients with Crohn’s disease using a negative oral contrast material: initial results of a noninvasive imaging approach. Eur Radiol2002; 12: 2253–2257.
  • 22 HaraAK, Leighton JA, Sharma VK, Fleischer DE. Small bowel: preliminary comparison of capsule endoscopy with barium study and CT. Radiology2004; 230: 260–265.
  • 23 HeighRI, Leighton JA, Hara AK, et al. Diagnosing small bowel Crohn’s disease: video capsule endoscopy and CT enterography lead the way—small bowel follow through less helpful (abstr). Gastroenterology2004; 126(suppl 1): A37.
  • 24 GayG, Delvaux M, Laurent V, et al. Temporary intestinal occlusion induced by a “patency capsule” in a patient with Crohn’s disease. Endoscopy2005; 37: 174–177.
  • 25 BoivinML, Voderholzer W, Lochs H. M2A patency capsule: the Berlin experience (abstr). Gastroenterology2004; 126(suppl 2): 459.
  • 26 MeyersMA, McGuire PV. Spiral CT demonstration of hypervascularity in Crohn disease: “vascular jejunization of the ileum” or the “comb sign”. Abdom Imaging1995; 20: 327–332.
  • 27 MakoEK, Mester AR, Tarjan Z, Karlinger K, Toth G. Enteroclysis and spiral CT examination in diagnosis and evaluation of small bowel Crohn’s disease. Eur J Radiol2000; 35: 168–175.
  • 28 GoreRM, Marn CS, Kirby DF, Vogelzang RL, Neiman HL. CT findings in ulcerative, granulomatous, and indeterminate colitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol1984; 143: 279–284.
  • 29 Del CampoL, Arribas I, Valbuena M, Mate J, Moreno-Otero R. Spiral CT findings in active and remission phases in patients with Crohn disease. J Comput Assist Tomogr2001; 25: 792–797.
  • 30 BooyaF, Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, et al. Conspicuity of small bowel inflammation at CT enterography: “enteric” vs. “hepatic” phase imaging (abstr). In: Radiological Society of North America scientific assembly and annual meeting program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2004;611.
  • 31 ChoiD, Lee SJ, Cho YA, et al. Bowel wall thickening in patients with Crohn’s disease: CT patterns and correlation with inflammatory activity. Clin Radiol2003; 58: 68–74.
  • 32 LeeSS, Ha HK, Yang SK, et al. CT of prominent pericolic or perienteric vasculature in patients with Crohn’s disease: correlation with clinical disease activity and findings on barium studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol2002; 179: 1029–1036.
  • 33 DesreumauxP, Ernst O, Geboes K, et al. Inflammatory alterations in mesenteric adipose tissue in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology1999; 117: 73–81.
  • 34 GoreRM, Miller FH, Yaghmai V, Berlin JW, Newmark G. Inflammatory conditions of the colon. Semin Roentgenol2001; 36: 126–137.
  • 35 HortonKM, Corl FM, Fishman EK. CT evaluation of the colon: inflammatory disease. RadioGraphics2000; 20: 399–418.
  • 36 PhilpottsLE, Heiken JP, Westcott MA, Gore RM. Colitis: use of CT findings in differential diagnosis. Radiology1994; 190: 445–449.
  • 37 MaglinteDD, O’Connor K, Bessette J, Chernish SM, Kelvin FM. The role of the physician in the late diagnosis of primary malignant tumors of the small intestine. Am J Gastroenterol1991; 86: 304–308.
  • 38 CiresiDL, Scholten DJ. The continuing clinical dilemma of primary tumors of the small intestine. Am Surg1995; 61: 698–703.
  • 39 MinardiAJ Jr, Zibari GB, Aultman DF, McMillan RW, McDonald JC. Small-bowel tumors. J Am Coll Surg1998; 186: 664–668.
  • 40 NorthJH, Pack MS. Malignant tumors of the small intestine: a review of 144 cases. Am Surg2000; 66: 46–51.
  • 41 TrierJS. Diagnosis of celiac sprue. Gastroenterology1998; 115: 211–216.
  • 42 RubesinSE, Herlinger H, Saul SH, Grumbach K, Laufer I, Levine MS. Adult celiac disease and its complications. RadioGraphics1989; 9: 1045–1066.
  • 43 StroblPW, Warshauer DM. CT diagnosis of celiac disease. J Comput Assist Tomogr1995; 19: 319–320.
  • 44 de BoerWA, Maas M, Tytgat GN. Disappearance of mesenteric lymphadenopathy with gluten-free diet in celiac sprue. J Clin Gastroenterol1993; 16: 317–319.
  • 45 TomeiE, Marini M, Messineo D, et al. Computed tomography of the small bowel in adult celiac disease: the jejunoileal fold pattern reversal. Eur Radiol2000; 10: 119–122.
  • 46 DoerflerOC, Ruppert-Kohlmayr AJ, Reittner P, Hinterleitner T, Petritsch W, Szolar DH. Helical CT of the small bowel with an alternative oral contrast material in patients with Crohn disease. Abdom Imaging2003; 28: 313–318.
  • 47 KohDM, Miao Y, Chinn RJ, et al. MR imaging evaluation of the activity of Crohn’s disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol2001; 177: 1325–1332.
  • 48 BarlowJM, Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Sandborn WJ. Non-invasive multidetector CT enterography may improve the prediction of Crohn disease activity as estimated by clinical assessment. Orlando, Fla: Society of Gastrointestinal Radiology, 2002.
  • 49 SolemCA, Loftus EAJ, Fletcher JG, et al. Small bowel imaging in Crohn’s disease: a prospective, blinded, 4-way comparison trial. Gastroenterology2005; 128(suppl 2): A74.
  • 50 PaulsonEK, Jaffe TA, Thomas J, Harris JP, Nelson RC. MDCT of patients with acute abdominal pain: a new perspective using coronal reformations from submillimeter isotropic voxels. AJR Am J Roentgenol2004; 183: 899–906.
  • 51 YaghmaiV, Nikolaidis P, Hammond N, et al. CT diagnosis of small bowel obstruction using coronal reformations without the aid of axial images: accuracy and practical implications—Abdominal Radiology Course 2005. San Antonio, Tex: Society of Gastrointestinal Radiologists, 2005.
  • 52 HaAS, Levine MS, Rubesin SE, Laufer I, Herlinger H. Radiographic examination of the small bowel: survey of practice patterns in the United States. Radiology2004; 231: 407–412.
  • 53 VoderholzerWA, Beinhoelzl J, Rogalla P, et al. Small bowel involvement in Crohn’s disease: a prospective comparison of wireless capsule endoscopy and computed tomography enteroclysis. Gut2005; 54: 369–373.

Article History

Published in print: May 2006