Central Nervous System: State of the Art

Functional MR Imaging of Language Processing: An Overview of Easy-to-Implement Paradigms for Patient Care and Clinical Research

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.26si065507

Functional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is one of the most commonly used functional neuroimaging techniques for studying the cerebral representation of language processing and is increasingly being used for both patient care and clinical research. In patient care, functional MR imaging is primarily used in the preoperative evaluation of (a) the relationship of a lesion to critical language areas and (b) hemispheric dominance. In clinical research, this modality is used to study language disorders due to neurologic disease and is generally aimed at language function recovery. A variety of language paradigms (verbal fluency, passive listening, comprehension) have been developed for the study of language processing and its separate components. All of the tasks are easy to implement, analyze, and perform. Silent gap acquisition is preferable for the imaging of specific language processing components because auditory stimuli are not degraded by imager noise. On the other hand, continuous acquisition allows more data to be acquired in less time, thereby increasing statistical power and decreasing the effects of motion artifacts. Although functional MR imaging cannot yet replace intraoperative electrocortical stimulation in patients undergoing neurosurgery, it may be useful for guiding surgical planning and mapping, thereby reducing the extent and duration of craniotomy.

© RSNA, 2006

References

  • 1 NaidichTP, Hof PR, Gannon PJ, Yousry TA, Yousry I. Anatomic substrates of language: emphasizing speech. Neuroimaging Clin N Am2001; 11: 305–341, ix. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2 DemonetJF, Thierry G, Cardebat D. Renewal of the neurophysiology of language: functional neuroimaging. Physiol Rev2005; 85: 49–95. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3 LuritoJT, Dzemidzic M. Determination of cerebral hemisphere language dominance with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am2001; 11: 355–363, x. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 WillmesK, Poeck K. To what extent can aphasic syndromes be localized? Brain1993; 116(pt 6): 1527–1540. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 LesserR. Linguistic investigations of aphasia. London, England: Whurr, 1995. Google Scholar
  • 6 PriceCJ. The anatomy of language: contributions from functional neuroimaging. J Anat2000; 197(pt 3): 335–359. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7 GitelmanDR, Nobre AC, Sonty S, Parrish TB, Mesulam MM. Language network specializations: an analysis with parallel task designs and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage2005; 26: 975–985. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8 FriedericiAD, Opitz B, von Cramon DY. Segregating semantic and syntactic aspects of processing in the human brain: an fMRI investigation of different word types. Cereb Cortex2000; 10: 698–705. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9 BinderJR. Neuroanatomy of language processing studied with functional MRI. Clin Neurosci1997; 4: 87–94. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10 DoesborghSJ, van de Sandt-Koenderman MW, Dippel DW, van Harskamp F, Koudstaal PJ, Visch-Brink EG. Effects of semantic treatment on verbal communication and linguistic processing in aphasia after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke2004; 35: 141–146. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11 GjeddeA. Brain energy metabolism and the physiological basis of the haemodynamic response. In: Jezzard P, Matthews P, Smith S, eds. Functional MRI: an introduction to methods. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 2002; 37–66. Google Scholar
  • 12 OgawaS, Lee TM, Kay AR, Tank DW. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A1990; 87: 9868–9872. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13 ThulbornKR, Waterton JC, Matthews PM, Radda GK. Oxygenation dependence of the transverse relaxation time of water protons in whole blood at high field. Biochim Biophys Acta1982; 714: 265–270. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14 MatthewsP. An introduction to functional magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. In: Jezzard P, Matthews P, Smith S, eds. Functional MRI: an introduction to methods. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 2002; 3–34. Google Scholar
  • 15 DonaldsonD, Buckner R. Effective paradigm design. In: Jezzard P, Matthews PM, Smith S, eds. Functional MRI: an introduction to methods. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 2002; 177–195. Google Scholar
  • 16 HallDA, Haggard MP, Akeroyd MA, et al. “Sparse” temporal sampling in auditory fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp1999; 7: 213–223. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17 ChoZH, Chung SC, Lim DW, Wong EK. Effects of the acoustic noise of the gradient systems on fMRI: a study on auditory, motor, and visual cortices. Magn Reson Med1998; 39: 331–335. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18 FristonKJ, Williams S, Howard R, Frackowiak RS, Turner R. Movement-related effects in fMRI time-series. Magn Reson Med1996; 35: 346–355. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19 FristonKJ, Josephs O, Zarahn E, Holmes AP, Rouquette S, Poline J. To smooth or not to smooth? bias and efficiency in fMRI time-series analysis. Neuroimage2000; 12: 196–208. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20 WorsleyKJ, Friston KJ. Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited—again. Neuroimage1995; 2: 173–181. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21 RordenC, Brett M. Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behav Neurol2000; 12: 191–200. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22 MaldjianJA, Laurienti PJ, Burdette JH. Precentral gyrus discrepancy in electronic versions of the Talairach atlas. Neuroimage2004; 21: 450–455. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23 MaldjianJA, Laurienti PJ, Kraft RA, Burdette JH. An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets. Neuroimage2003; 19: 1233–1239. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24 SunaertS, Yousry TA. Clinical applications of functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am2001; 11: 221–236, viii. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25 DuffauH. Lessons from brain mapping in surgery for low-grade glioma: insights into associations between tumour and brain plasticity. Lancet Neurol2005; 4: 476–486. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26 MoritzC, Haughton V. Functional MR imaging: paradigms for clinical preoperative mapping. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am2003; 11: 529–542, v. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27 YetkinFZ, Mueller WM, Morris GL, et al. Functional MR activation correlated with intraoperative cortical mapping. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol1997; 18: 1311–1315. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28 RuttenGJ, Ramsey NF, van Rijen PC, Noordmans HJ, van Veelen CW. Development of a functional magnetic resonance imaging protocol for intraoperative localization of critical temporoparietal language areas. Ann Neurol2002; 51: 350–360. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29 RouxFE, Boulanouar K, Lotterie JA, Mejdoubi M, LeSage JP, Berry I. Language functional magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative assessment of language areas: correlation with direct cortical stimulation. Neurosurgery2003; 52: 1335–1347. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 30 FernandezG, Specht K, Weis S, et al. Intrasubject reproducibility of presurgical language lateralization and mapping using fMRI. Neurology2003; 60: 969–975. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 31 FernandezG, de Greiff A, von Oertzen J, et al. Language mapping in less than 15 minutes: real-time functional MRI during routine clinical investigation. Neuroimage2001; 14: 585–594. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 32 KloppelS, Buchel C. Alternatives to the Wada test: a critical view of functional magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative use. Curr Opin Neurol2005; 18: 418–423. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 33 TrenerryMR, Loring DW. Intracarotid amobarbital procedure: the Wada test. Neuroimaging Clin N Am1995; 5: 721–728. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 34 GaillardWD, Balsamo L, Xu B, et al. fMRI language task panel improves determination of language dominance. Neurology2004; 63: 1403–1408. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 35 McGrawP, Mathews VP, Wang Y, Phillips MD. Approach to functional magnetic resonance imaging of language based on models of language organization. Neuroimaging Clin N Am2001; 11: 343–353, x. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 36 YetkinFZ, Hammeke TA, Swanson SJ, et al. A comparison of functional MR activation patterns during silent and audible language tasks. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol1995; 16: 1087–1092. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 37 BinderJR, Frost JA, Hammeke TA, Cox RW, Rao SM, Prieto T. Human brain language areas identified by functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci1997; 17: 353–362. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 38 SnowdenJ, Neary D, Mann D. Fronto-temporal lobar degeneration: fronto-temporal dementia, progressive aphasia, semantic dementia (CNNM). New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone, 1996. Google Scholar
  • 39 ThompsonC. Functional neuroimaging: applications for studying aphasia. In: LaPointe L, ed. Aphasia and related neurogenic language disorders. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Thieme, 2005; 19–38. Google Scholar
  • 40 FernandezB, Cardebat D, Demonet JF, et al. Functional MRI follow-up study of language processes in healthy subjects and during recovery in a case of aphasia. Stroke2004; 35: 2171–2176. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 41 PriceCJ, Crinion J. The latest on functional imaging studies of aphasic stroke. Curr Opin Neurol2005; 18: 429–434. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 42 RijntjesM, Weiller C. Recovery of motor and language abilities after stroke: the contribution of functional imaging. Prog Neurobiol2002; 66: 109–122. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 43 MussoM, Weiller C, Kiebel S, Muller SP, Bulau P, Rijntjes M. Training-induced brain plasticity in aphasia. Brain1999; 122(pt 9): 1781–1790. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 44 BehneN, Wendt B, Scheich H, Brechmann A. Contralateral white noise selectively changes left human auditory cortex activity in a lexical decision task. J Neurophysiol2006; 95(4): 2630–2637. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 45 PrinceSE, Daselaar SM, Cabeza R. Neural correlates of relational memory: successful encoding and retrieval of semantic and perceptual associations. J Neurosci2005; 25: 1203–1210. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article History

Published in print: Oct 2006