Flat-Panel Volume CT: Fundamental Principles, Technology, and Applications

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.287085004

Flat-panel volume computed tomography (CT) systems have an innovative design that allows coverage of a large volume per rotation, fluoroscopic and dynamic imaging, and high spatial resolution that permits visualization of complex human anatomy such as fine temporal bone structures and trabecular bone architecture. In simple terms, flat-panel volume CT scanners can be thought of as conventional multidetector CT scanners in which the detector rows have been replaced by an area detector. The flat-panel detector has wide z-axis coverage that enables imaging of entire organs in one axial acquisition. Its fluoroscopic and angiographic capabilities are useful for intraoperative and vascular applications. Furthermore, the high-volume coverage and continuous rotation of the detector may enable depiction of dynamic processes such as coronary blood flow and whole-brain perfusion. Other applications in which flat-panel volume CT may play a role include small-animal imaging, nondestructive testing in animal survival surgeries, and tissue-engineering experiments. Such versatility has led some to predict that flat-panel volume CT will gain importance in interventional and intraoperative applications, especially in specialties such as cardiac imaging, interventional neuroradiology, orthopedics, and otolaryngology. However, the contrast resolution of flat-panel volume CT is slightly inferior to that of multidetector CT, a higher radiation dose is needed to achieve a comparable signal-to-noise ratio, and a slower scintillator results in a longer scanning time.

© RSNA, 2008

References

  • 1 KalenderWA. The use of flat-panel detectors for CT imaging [in German]. Radiologe2003;43: 379–387. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2 GuptaR, Grasruck M, Suess C, et al. Ultra-high resolution flat-panel volume CT: fundamental principles, design architecture, and system characterization. Eur Radiol2006;16:1191–1205. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3 DeweyM, Laule M, Krug L, et al. Multisegment and halfscan reconstruction of 16-slice computed tomography for detection of coronary artery stenoses. Invest Radiol2004;39:223–229. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 KalenderWA. X-ray computed tomography. Phys Med Biol2006;51:R29–R43. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 KalenderWA, Kyriakou Y. Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT). Eur Radiol2007;17:2767–2779. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6 GrasruckM, Suess C, Stierstorfer K, Popescu S, Flohr T. Evaluation of image quality and dose on a flat-panel CT-scanner. In: Flynn MJ, ed. Proceedings of SPIE: medical imaging 2005—physics of medical imaging. Vol 5745. Bellingham, Wash: International Society for Optical Engineering, 2005; 179–188. Google Scholar
  • 7 FeldkampLA, Davis LC, Kress JW. Practical cone-beam algorithm. J Opt Soc Am1984;1:612–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 International Electrotechnical Commission. Particular requirements for the safety of x-ray equipment for computed tomography. IEC publication 60601:2–44. Geneva, Switzerland: International Electrotechnical Commission, 2002. Google Scholar
  • 9 American College of Radiology. Computed tomography accreditation. http://www.acr.org/accreditation/computed.aspx. Accessed June 16, 2008. Google Scholar
  • 10 ObertM, Ahlemeyer B, Baumgart-Vogt E, Traupe H. Flat-panel volumetric computed tomography: a new method for visualizing fine bone detail in living mice. J Comput Assist Tomogr2005;29: 560–565. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11 WeinandC, Pomerantseva I, Neville CM, et al. Hydrogel-beta-TCP scaffolds and stem cells for tissue engineering bone. Bone2006;38:555–563. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12 JiangY, Zhao J, White DL, Genant HK. Micro CT and Micro MR imaging of 3D architecture of animal skeleton. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact2000;1:45–51. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13 KiesslingF, Greschus S, Lichy MP, et al. Volumetric computed tomography (VCT): a new technology for noninvasive, high-resolution monitoring of tumor angiogenesis. Nat Med2004;10:1133–1138. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14 LeeSC, Kim HK, Chun IK, Cho MH, Lee SY, Cho MH. A flat-panel detector based micro-CT system: performance evaluation for small-animal imaging. Phys Med Biol2003;48:4173–4185. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15 NikolaouK, Flohr T, Stierstorfer K, Becker CR, Reiser MF. Flat panel computed tomography of human ex vivo heart and bone specimens: initial experience. Eur Radiol2005;15:329–333. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16 BartlingSH, Gupta R, Torkos A, et al. Flat-panel volume computed tomography for cochlear implant electrode array examination in isolated temporal bone specimens. Otol Neurotol2006;27: 491–498. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17 DalchowCV, Weber AL, Bien S, Yanagihara N, Werner JA. Value of digital volume tomography in patients with conductive hearing loss. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol2006;263:92–99. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18 GuptaR, Bartling SH, Basu SK, et al. Experimental flat-panel high-spatial-resolution volume CT of the temporal bone. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2004; 25:1417–1424. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19 RaffertyMA, Siewerdsen JH, Chan Y, et al. Intra-operative cone-beam CT for guidance of temporal bone surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2006; 134:801–808. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20 RaffertyMA, Siewerdsen JH, Chan Y, et al. Investigation of C-arm cone-beam CT-guided surgery of the frontal recess. Laryngoscope2005;115:2138–2143. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21 GreschusS, Kiessling F, Lichy MP, et al. Potential applications of flat-panel volumetric CT in morphologic and functional small animal imaging. Neoplasia2005;7:730–740. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22 MahnkenAH, Seyfarth T, Flohr T, et al. Flat-panel detector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stents: phantom study in comparison with 16-slice spiral computed tomography. Invest Radiol2005;40:8–13. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23 SiewerdsenJH, Moseley DJ, Burch S, et al. Volume CT with a flat-panel detector on a mobile, isocentric C-arm: pre-clinical investigation in guidance of minimally invasive surgery. Med Phys2005;32: 241–254. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24 BartlingSH, Shukla V, Becker H, Brady TJ, Hayman A, Gupta R. High-resolution flat-panel volume-CT of temporal bone. I. Axial preoperative anatomy. J Comput Assist Tomogr2005;29:420–423. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25 BartlingSH, Shukla V, Becker H, Brady TJ, Hayman A, Gupta R. High-resolution computed tomography of temporal bone. II. Coronal preoperative anatomy. J Comput Assist Tomogr2005;29: 566–569. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26 BabaR, Ueda K, Okabe M. Using a flat-panel detector in high resolution cone beam CT for dental imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol2004;33: 285–290. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27 MajdaniO, Bartling SH, Leinung M, et al. Image-guided minimally invasive cochlear implantation: experiments on cadavers [in German]. Laryngorhinootologie2008;87:18–22. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article History

Published in print: Nov 2008