Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.295095002

Technical aspects of CT angiography of the cardiac valves are reviewed, with an emphasis on the appearances of normal, pathologic, and postoperative cardiac valves.

Although echocardiography remains the principal imaging technique for assessment of the cardiac valves, contrast material–enhanced electrocardiographically gated computed tomographic (CT) angiography is proving to be an increasingly valuable complementary modality in this setting. CT angiography allows excellent visualization of the morphologic features and function of the normal valves, as well as of a wide range of valve diseases, including congenital and acquired diseases, infectious endocarditis, and complications of valve replacement. The number, thickness, and opening and closing of the valve leaflets, as well as the presence of valve calcification, can be directly observed. CT angiography also permits simultaneous assessment of the valves and coronary arteries, which may prove valuable in presurgical planning. Unlike echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging, however, CT angiography requires ionizing radiation and does not provide a direct measure of the valvular pressure gradient. Nevertheless, with further development of related imaging techniques, CT angiography can be expected to play an increasingly important role in the evaluation of the cardiac valves. Supplemental material available at here.

© RSNA, 2009

References

  • 1 Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, et al.. Heart disease and stroke statistics: 2008 update—a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2008;117:e25–e146.
  • 2 Rosamond W, Flegal K, Friday G, et al.. Heart disease and stroke statistics: 2007 update—a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2007;115:e69–e171.
  • 3 Thom T, Haase N, Rosamond W, et al.. Heart disease and stroke statistics: 2006 update—a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2006;113:e85–e151.
  • 4 Manghat NE, Rachapalli V, Van Lingen R, Veitch AM, Roobottom CA, Morgan-Hughes GJ. Imaging the heart valves using ECG-gated 64-detector row cardiac CT. Br J Radiol 2008;81:275–290.
  • 5 Didier D. Assessment of valve disease: qualitative and quantitative. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2003;11:115–134, vii.
  • 6 Didier D, Ratib O, Lerch R, Friedli B. Detection and quantification of valvular heart disease with dynamic cardiac MR imaging. RadioGraphics 2000; 20:1279–1299; discussion 1299–1301.
  • 7 Glockner JF, Johnston DL, McGee KP. Evaluation of cardiac valvular disease with MR imaging: qualitative and quantitative techniques. RadioGraphics 2003;23:e9.
  • 8 Rozenshtein A, Boxt LM. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of patients with valvular heart disease. J Thorac Imaging 2000;15:252–264.
  • 9 Cawley PJ, Maki JH, Otto CM. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for valvular heart disease: technique and validation. Circulation 2009;119:468–478.
  • 10 Grothues F, Smith GC, Moon JC, et al.. Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:29–34.
  • 11 Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, et al.. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:147–154.
  • 12 Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:552–557.
  • 13 Boxt LM. Magnetic resonance and computed tomographic evaluation of congenital heart disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:827–847.
  • 14 Goo HW, Park IS, Ko JK, Kim YH, Seo DM, Park JJ. Computed tomography for the diagnosis of congenital heart disease in pediatric and adult patients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2005;21:347–365; discussion 367.
  • 15 Goo HW, Park IS, Ko JK, et al.. CT of congenital heart disease: normal anatomy and typical pathologic conditions. RadioGraphics 2003;23(spec no): S147–S165.
  • 16 Haramati LB, Glickstein JS, Issenberg HJ, Haramati N, Crooke GA. MR imaging and CT of vascular anomalies and connections in patients with congenital heart disease: significance in surgical planning. RadioGraphics 2002;22:337–347; discussion 348–349.
  • 17 Markle BM, Cross RR. Cross-sectional imaging in congenital anomalies of the heart and great vessels: magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. Semin Roentgenol 2004;39:234–262.
  • 18 Siegel MJ, Bhalla S, Gutierrez FR, Billadello JB. MDCT of postoperative anatomy and complications in adults with cyanotic heart disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:241–247.
  • 19 Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Becker C, et al.. Cardiac imaging by means of electrocardiographically gated multisection spiral CT: initial experience. Radiology 2000;217:564–571.
  • 20 Weinreb JC, Larson PA, Woodard PK, et al.. American College of Radiology clinical statement on noninvasive cardiac imaging. Radiology 2005;235:723–727.
  • 21 Willmann JK, Weishaupt D, Lachat M, et al.. Electrocardiographically gated multi–detector row CT for assessment of valvular morphology and calcification in aortic stenosis. Radiology 2002;225:120–128.
  • 22 Abbara S, Soni AV, Cury RC. Evaluation of cardiac function and valves by multidetector row computed tomography. Semin Roentgenol 2008;43:145–153.
  • 23 Hoffmann U, Millea R, Enzweiler C, et al.. Acute myocardial infarction: contrast-enhanced multi–detector row CT in a porcine model. Radiology 2004; 231:697–701.
  • 24 Nieman K, Cury RC, Ferencik M, et al.. Differentiation of recent and chronic myocardial infarction by cardiac computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2006; 98:303–308.
  • 25 Raman SV, Shah M, McCarthy B, Garcia A, Ferketich AK. Multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance. Am Heart J 2006;151:736–744.
  • 26 Vogel-Claussen J, Pannu H, Spevak PJ, Fishman EK, Bluemke DA. Cardiac valve assessment with MR imaging and 64-section multi–detector row CT. RadioGraphics 2006;26:1769–1784.
  • 27 Chung R, Zidan M, Henein MY. One stop cardiac investigation ‘CT or echocardiography’: beyond ejection fraction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;24:327–329.
  • 28 Rowe JC, Bland EF, Sprague HB, White PD. The course of mitral stenosis without surgery: ten- and twenty-year perspectives. Ann Intern Med 1960;52:741–749.
  • 29 Rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2004;923:1–122, back cover.
  • 30 Otto CM. Valvular heart disease. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 2004.
  • 31 Virmani R, Burke A, Farb A. Atlas of cardiovascular pathology. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 1996.
  • 32 Fox DJ, Khattar RS. Carcinoid heart disease: presentation, diagnosis, and management. Heart 2004; 90:1224–1228.
  • 33 Brickner ME, Hillis LD, Lange RA. Congenital heart disease in adults: first of two parts. N Engl J Med 2000;342:256–263.
  • 34 Abbara S, Pena AJ, Maurovich-Horvat P, et al.. Feasibility and optimization of aortic valve planimetry with MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:356–360.
  • 35 Subramanian R, Olson LJ, Edwards WD. Surgical pathology of pure aortic stenosis: a study of 374 cases. Mayo Clin Proc 1984;59:683–690.
  • 36 Carabello BA, Crawford FA. Valvular heart disease. N Engl J Med 1997;337:32–41.
  • 37 Sasayama S, Ross J, Franklin D, Bloor CM, Bishop S, Dilley RB. Adaptations of the left ventricle to chronic pressure overload. Circ Res 1976;38:172–178.
  • 38 Pouleur AC, le Polain de Waroux JB, Pasquet A, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber BL. Aortic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Radiology 2007;244:745–754.
  • 39 Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Plass A, et al.. Aortic stenosis: comparative evaluation of 16–detector row CT and echocardiography. Radiology 2006;240:47–55.
  • 40 LaBounty TM, Sundaram B, Agarwal P, Armstrong WA, Kazerooni EA, Yamada E. Aortic valve area on 64-MDCT correlates with transesophageal echocardiography in aortic stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:1652–1658.
  • 41 Laissy JP, Messika-Zeitoun D, Serfaty JM, et al.. Comprehensive evaluation of preoperative patients with aortic valve stenosis: usefulness of cardiac multidetector computed tomography. Heart 2007;93:1121–1125.
  • 42 Cowell SJ, Newby DE, Burton J, et al.. Aortic valve calcification on computed tomography predicts the severity of aortic stenosis. Clin Radiol 2003;58:712–716.
  • 43 Koos R, Kuhl HP, Muhlenbruch G, Wildberger JE, Gunther RW, Mahnken AH. Prevalence and clinical importance of aortic valve calcification detected incidentally on CT scans: comparison with echocardiography. Radiology 2006;241:76–82.
  • 44 Carlsson E, Gross R, Holt RG. The radiological diagnosis of cardiac valvar insufficiencies. Circulation 1977;55:921–933.
  • 45 Feuchtner GM, Dichtl W, Schachner T, et al.. Diagnostic performance of MDCT for detecting aortic valve regurgitation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:1676–1681.
  • 46 Feuchtner GM, Dichtl W, Muller S, et al.. 64-MDCT for diagnosis of aortic regurgitation in patients referred to CT coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:W1–W7.
  • 47 Asante-Korang A, O’Leary PW, Anderson RH. Anatomy and echocardiography of the normal and abnormal mitral valve. Cardiol Young 2006;16(suppl 3):27–34.
  • 48 Ranganathan N, Lam JH, Wigle ED, Silver MD. Morphology of the human mitral valve. II. The value leaflets. Circulation 1970;41:459–467.
  • 49 Alkadhi H, Bettex D, Wildermuth S, et al.. Dynamic cine imaging of the mitral valve with 16-MDCT: a feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:636–646.
  • 50 Roberts WC, Perloff JK. Mitral valvular disease: a clinicopathologic survey of the conditions causing the mitral valve to function abnormally. Ann Intern Med 1972;77:939–975.
  • 51 Braunwald E, Moscovitz HL, Amram SS, et al.. The hemodynamics of the left side of the heart as studied by simultaneous left atrial, left ventricular, and aortic pressures: particular reference to mitral stenosis. Circulation 1955;12:69–81.
  • 52 Selzer A, Cohn KE. Natural history of mitral stenosis: a review. Circulation 1972;45:878–890.
  • 53 Cademartiri F, Runza G, Belgrano M, et al.. Introduction to coronary imaging with 64-slice computed tomography. Radiol Med 2005;110:16–41.
  • 54 Messika-Zeitoun D, Serfaty JM, Laissy JP, et al.. Assessment of the mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis by multislice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:411–413.
  • 55 Garcia-Orta R, Moreno-Escobar E, Ruiz-Lopez MF, Vidal-Alarcon M, Lara-Torrano J, Azpitarte J. Mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation [in Spanish]. Rev Esp Cardiol 2006;59:743–746.
  • 56 Leong SW, Soor GS, Butany J, Henry J, Thangaroopan M, Leask RL. Morphological findings in 192 surgically excised native mitral valves. Can J Cardiol 2006;22:1055–1061.
  • 57 Tomaru T. The multifactorial etiology of mitral valve prolapse, a new entity of postinflammatory mitral valve prolapse. Herz 1988;13:271–276.
  • 58 Tomaru T, Uchida Y, Mohri N, Mori W, Furuse A, Asano K. Postinflammatory mitral and aortic valve prolapse: a clinical and pathological study. Circulation 1987;76:68–76.
  • 59 Barber JE, Kasper FK, Ratliff NB, Cosgrove DM, Griffin BP, Vesely I. Mechanical properties of myxomatous mitral valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:955–962.
  • 60 Fann JI, Ingels NB, Miller DC. Pathophysiology of mitral valve disease. In: Cohn L, ed. Cardiac surgery in the adult. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2008; 973–1012.
  • 61 Virmani R, Atkinson JB, Forman MB. The pathology of mitral valve prolapse. Herz 1988;13:215–226.
  • 62 Waller BF, Howard J, Fess S. Pathology of mitral valve stenosis and pure mitral regurgitation. II. Clin Cardiol 1994;17:395–402.
  • 63 Olson LJ, Subramanian R, Ackermann DM, Orszulak TA, Edwards WD. Surgical pathology of the mitral valve: a study of 712 cases spanning 21 years. Mayo Clin Proc 1987;62:22–34.
  • 64 Jones EC, Devereux RB, Roman MJ, et al.. Prevalence and correlates of mitral regurgitation in a population-based sample (the Strong Heart Study). Am J Cardiol 2001;87:298–304.
  • 65 Hickey AJ, Wilcken DE, Wright JS, Warren BA. Primary (spontaneous) chordal rupture: relation to myxomatous valve disease and mitral valve prolapse. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;5:1341–1346.
  • 66 Carabello BA. Mitral valve regurgitation. Curr Probl Cardiol 1998;23:202–241.
  • 67 Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Bettex DA, et al.. Mitral regurgitation: quantification with 16–detector row CT—initial experience. Radiology 2006;238:454–463.
  • 68 O’Rourke RA. Tricuspid valve, pulmonic valve, and multivalvular disease. In: Fuster VAlexander RWO’Rourke RA, eds. Hurst’s the heart. 11th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2004; 1707–1719.
  • 69 Waller BF, Moriarty AT, Eble JN, Davey DM, Hawley DA, Pless JE. Etiology of pure tricuspid regurgitation based on annular circumference and leaflet area: analysis of 45 necropsy patients with clinical and morphologic evidence of pure tricuspid regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;7:1063–1074.
  • 70 Mylonakis E, Calderwood SB. Infective endocarditis in adults. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1318–1330.
  • 71 Reiner J, Jeudy J, White CS. Valvular vegetations in patients with endocarditis: detection on cardiac CT. In: 35th Annual Meeting & Scientific Sessions of the North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Washington DC, 2007.
  • 72 Coche E, Mauel E, Beauloye C, Pasquet A. Tricuspid valve endocarditis and septic pulmonary emboli illustrated by ECG-gated multi-slice CT of the chest. Eur Heart J 2006;27:20.
  • 73 Burke A, Jeudy J, Virmani R. Cardiac tumours: an update. Heart 2008;94:117–123.
  • 74 Gilkeson RC, Markowitz AH, Balgude A, Sachs PB. MDCT evaluation of aortic valvular disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:350–360.

Article History

Received: Jan 7 2009
Revision received: Feb 11 2009
Revision received: Mar 18 2009
Accepted: Mar 30 2009
Published in print: Sept 2009