Breast Implant Classification with MR Imaging Correlation

References

• 1 Steinbach BG, Hardt NS, Abbitt PL, Lanier L, Caffee HH. Breast implants, common complications, and concurrent breast disease. RadioGraphics 1993; 13:95-118. Link, Google Scholar
• 2 Salomon JA, Barton FE, Jr. Augmentation mammaplasty. Selective Reading Plast Surg 1998; 8:1-34. Google Scholar
• 3 Middleton MS. Magnetic resonance evaluation of breast implants and soft-tissue silicone. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 9:92-137. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 4 Middleton MS. Breast implant classification. In: Gorczyca DP, Brenner RJ, eds. The augmented breast: radiologic and clinical perspectives. New York, NY: Thieme, 1997; 28-44. Google Scholar
• 5 Middleton MS. MR breast implant and soft tissue evaluation. In: Stark DD, Bradley W, eds. Magnetic resonance imaging. 2nd ed. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby, 1998; 335-353. Google Scholar
• 6 Angell M. Science on trial New York, NY: Norton, 1996. Google Scholar
• 7 Plaintiff's Steering Committee brief to the National Science Panel, dated 10/6/97, as modified 10/15/97, In Re: Silicone gel breast implant products liability litigation (MDL-926) Google Scholar
• 8 Defendant's Steering Committee brief to the National Science Panel, dated 10/3/97, In Re: Silicone gel breast implant products liability litigation (MDL-926) Google Scholar
• 9 Bondurant S, Ernster V, Herdman R, eds.. Safety of silicone breast implants 1999. Report produced by the Committee on the Safety of Silicone Breast Implants, Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences. Google Scholar
• 10 Brown SL, Silverman BG, Berg WA. Rupture of silicone-gel breast implants: causes, sequelae, and diagnosis. Lancet 1997; 350:1531-1537. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 11 Marotta JS, Widenhouse CW, Habal MB, Goldberg EP. Silicone gel breast implant failure and frequency of additional surgeries: analysis of 35 studies reporting examination of more than 8000 explants. J Biomed Mater Res (Appl Biomater) 1999; 48:354-364. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 12 Czerny V. Plastischer ersatz der brustdrüse durch ein lipom. Zent Chir 1895; 22:72. Google Scholar
• 13 Czerny V. Drei plastische operationen. Ver Deutsch Gesell Chir 1895; 24:211-217. Google Scholar
• 14 Czerny V. Drei plastische operationen. Arch F Klin Chir Berl 1895; 26:544-550. Google Scholar
• 15 Goldwyn RM. The paraffin story. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 65:517-524. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 16 Gersuny R. Uber eine subcutane prothese. Zeitschrift Heilkunde Wien u Leipzig 1900; 21:199. This was translated as “Concerning a subcutaneous prosthesis”. Euerle R. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 65:525-527. Google Scholar
• 17 Thorek M. Amastia, hypomastia, and inequality of the breasts In: Plastic surgery of the breast and abdominal wall. Springfield, Ill: Thomas, 1942; 369-386. Google Scholar
• 18 Harris HI. Research in plastic implants: their use in augmentation for amastia or hypomastia. J Int Coll Surg 1961; 35:630-643. Medline, Google Scholar
• 19 Rees TD. Plastic surgery of the breast. In: Converse JM, eds. Reconstructive plastic surgery. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 1964; 1903-1938. Google Scholar
• 20 Stephenson KL. A history of mammaplasty. In: Masters FW, Lewis JR, eds. Symposium on aesthetic surgery of the face, eyelid, and breast. St Louis, Mo: Mosby, 1972; 115-129. Google Scholar
• 21 Lalardrie J, Mouly R. History of augmentation mammaplasty. J Aesth Plast Surg 1978; 2:167-176. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 22 Schalk DN. The history of augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Surg Nurs 1988; 8:88-95. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 23 Clarkson P, Jeffs J. Modern mammaplasty. Brit J Plast Surg 1967; 20:297-310. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 24 Caffee HH. Augmentation mammaplasty. In: Georgiade GS, Riefkohl R, Levin LS, eds. Plastic, maxillofacial, and reconstructive surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Williams & Wilkins, 1997; 730-735. Google Scholar
• 25 Sperber PA. Silicone augmentation In: Treatment of the aging skin and dermal defects. Springfield, Ill: Thomas, 1965; 73-101. Google Scholar
• 26 Schwarzmann E. Die technik der mammaplastik. Der Chir 1930; 2:932-943. Google Scholar
• 27 Perras C. The prevention and treatment of infections following breast implants. Plast Reconstruct Surg 1965; 35:649-656. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 28 Pitanguy I, Barbato C, Degand M, Lopez CET. Augmentation mammaplasty: considerations on capsular contraction. Rev Bras De Cirurg 1979; 69:237-250. Google Scholar
• 29 Ingraham FD, Alexander E, Matson DD. Synthetic plastic materials in surgery. N Engl J Med 1947; 236:362-368. 402-407. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 30 Ingraham FD, Alexander E, Matson DD. Polyethylene, a new synthetic plastic for use in surgery: experimental applications in neurosurgery. JAMA 1947; 135:82-87. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 31 Grindlay JH, Clagett OT. Plastic sponge prosthesis for use after pneumonectomy: preliminary report of experimental study. Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clin 1949; 24:538-539. Medline, Google Scholar
• 32 Rubin LR. Polyethylene: a three year study. Plast Reconstruct Surg 1951; 7:131-142. Crossref, Google Scholar
• 33 Gillet G. Suspension mammaire par prothèse sous-cutanée. Prese Médic 1952; 60:1325-1326. Google Scholar
• 34 Naso A. Mastectomia e ricostruzione estetica della regione mammaria con spugna di polietilene. Riforma Medica 1953; 67:662-664. Medline, Google Scholar
• 35 Giacomelli V. Protesi sostitutiva con spugna di polystan dopo mastectomia. Minerva Chir 1953; 8:584-585. Medline, Google Scholar
• 36 Franklyn RA. Breastplasty. South Gen Pract Med Surg (formerly South Med Surg) April 1953; 71-76. Google Scholar
• 37 Schnohr E. Anvendelse af polystan-mammaprotese ved progressiv lipodystrofi. Ugeskrift for Læger 1954; 116:1247-1252. Medline, Google Scholar
• 38 Pangman WJ, II, Wallace RM. The use of plastic prosthesis in breast plastic and other soft tissue surgery: clinical experience using Ivalon (polyvinyl) sponge in surgery. West J Surg Ob Gyn 1955; 63:503-512. Medline, Google Scholar
• 39 Franklyn RA. Der neue kunststoff “Surgifoam” und seine chirurgische nutzbarkeit. Zentralblatt für Chir 1956; 81:1192-1194. Medline, Google Scholar
• 40 Edgerton MT. Augmentation mammaplasty: psychiatric implications and surgical indications. Plast Reconstruct Surg 1958; 21:279-305. Crossref, Google Scholar
• 41 Arons MS, Sabesin SM, Smith RR. Experimental studies with Etheron sponge: effect of implantation in tumor-bearing animals. Plast Reconstruct Surg 1961; 28:72-80. Crossref, Google Scholar
• 42 Edgerton MT, Meyer E, Jacobson WE. Augmentation mammaplasty. II. Further surgical and psychiatric evaluation. Plast Reconstruct Surg 1961; 27:279-302. Google Scholar
• 43 Vinas JC. Surgical experience with silicone implants October 1962. Typed copy of the 21-page paper presented to 5th session of the Rio de la Plata Society for Plastic Surgery, Carmelo, UR. Google Scholar
• 44 Vinas JC. Surgical experience with silicone rubber implants. Abstract of paper presented to 5th session of the Rio de la Plata Society for Plastic Surgery, Carmelo, UR, October 1962. The Bulletin of the Dow Corning Center for Aid to Medical Research, 1964; 6:7. Google Scholar
• 45 Demergian P. Experiences with the newer subcutaneous implant materials. Surg Clin N Amer 1963; 32:1313-1321. Google Scholar
• 46 Speirs AC, Blocksma R. New implantable silicone rubbers: an experimental evaluation of tissue response. Plast Reconstruct Surg 1963; 31:166-175. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 47 Edwards BF. Teflon-silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstruct Surg 1963; 32:519-526. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 48 Malbec EF. Mammary hypoplasia: corrective implants Transactions of the Third International Congress of Plastic Surgery. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Excerpta Medica Foundation, 1964; 60-65. Google Scholar
• 49 Regnault P. One hundred cases of retromammary implantation of Etheron followed up for 30 months Transactions of the Third International Congress of Plastic Surgery. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Excerpta Medica Foundation, 1964; 74. Google Scholar
• 50 Calnan JS. Assessment of biological properties of implants before their clinical use. Proc R Soc Med 1970; 63:1115-1118. Medline, Google Scholar
• 51 Smahêl J, Schneider K, Donski P. Bizarre implants for augmentation mammaplasty: long term reaction to polyethylene strips. Brit J Plast Surg 1977; 30:287-290. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 52 Rees TD, Höhler H. Plastic surgery of the breast. In: Converse JM, eds. Reconstructive plastic surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 1977; 3661-3726. Google Scholar
• 53 Aston ST, Rees TD. Mammary augmentation, correction of asymmetry, and gynecomastia. In: Rees TD, eds. Aesthetic plastic surgery. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 1980; 957. Google Scholar
• 54 Freeman BS. Complications following subcutaneous insertion of plastic sponge. Plast Reconstruct Surg 1955; 15:149-153. Crossref, Google Scholar
• 55 Oppenheimer BS, Oppenheimer ET, Stout AP. Sarcomas induced in rodents by imbedding various plastic films. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1952; 79:366-369. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 56 Oppenheimer BS, Oppenheimer ET, Danishefsky I, Stout AP, Eirich FR. Further studies of polymers as carcinogenic agents in animals. Cancer Res 1955; 15:333-340. Medline, Google Scholar
• 57 Peters WJ, Smith DC. Ivalon breast prostheses: evaluation 19 years after implantation (case report). Plast Reconstruct Surg 1981; 67:514-518. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 58 Cronin TD, Gerow FJ. Augmentation mammoplasty: a new “natural feel” prosthesis Transactions of the Third International Congress of Plastic Surgery. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Excerpta Medica Foundation, 1964; 41-49. Google Scholar
• 59 Kagan HD. Sakurai injectable silicone formula. Arch Otol 1963; 78:663-668. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 60 Helal B. Toxicology of silicones. Br Med J 1968; 3:184-185. Google Scholar
• 61 Cronin TD. Silicone breast implant In: Biomaterials in reconstructive surgery. St Louis, Mo: Mosby, 1983; 552-563. Google Scholar
• 62 Delage C, Shane JJ, Johnson FB. Mammary silicone granuloma. Arch Dermatol 1973; 108:105-107. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 63 Winer LH, Sternberg TH, Lehman R, Ashley FL. Tissue reactions to injected silicone liquids. Arch Derm 1964; 90:588-593. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 64 Ben-Hur N, Neuman Z. Siliconoma: another cutaneous response to dimethylpolysiloxane. Plast Reconstr Surg 1965; 36:629-631. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 65 Part of Fifth Annual Review of IND 2702 from on or just before 5/30/74 (Bates I-000001918, p43) Google Scholar
• 66 Ashley FL, Braley S, Rees TD, Goulian D, Ballantyne DL. The present status of silicone fluid in soft tissue augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1967; 39:411-420. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 67 Ellenbogen R, Rubin L. Injectable fluid silicone therapy: human morbidity and mortality. JAMA 1975; 234:308-309. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 68 Letter dated 6/22/77 from Donald T. Salt, Freedom of Information Officer, Division of Surgical-Dental Drug Products (FDA), to an individual with a Maryland address, stating “liquid silicone for injection into human tissue is a new drug as defined in Section 201(p) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act”, and “it has not been approved for any use in the human body” (Bates MD 114603) Google Scholar
• 69 First Annual Report (Human Study portion) of IND # 2702 dated 9/30/66 (Bates DCC106006742) Google Scholar
• 70 Second Annual Report for IND # 2702 dated 4/17/68 (Bates I-000000360) Google Scholar
• 71 Cover letter for Third Annual Report for IND # 2702 dated 8/12/70 (Bates I-00001304) Google Scholar
• 72 Fourth Annual Report for IND # 2702 dated 3/16/72 (Bates I-00001292, MM 263117) Google Scholar
• 73 Cover letter for Fifth Annual Report for IND # 2702 dated 5/28/74 (Bates I-00001916, DCCK MM 171247) Google Scholar
• 74 Biostatistical Review of Dow Corning Medical-Grade Silicone Fluid Study, part of Fifth Annual Review of IND # 2702 from on or just before 5/30/74 (Bates I-000001968) Google Scholar
• 75 Annual Report for IND # 2702 dated 8/23/82 (Bates N-000000477) Google Scholar
• 76 Final Clinical Report for IND # 2702 dated 8/24/90 (Bates N-000009398) Google Scholar
• 77 Supplement to Final Clinical Report for IND # 2702 dated 9/21/90 (Bates P-000006550) Google Scholar
• 78 Supplement to Final Clinical Report for IND # 2702 dated 1/21/91 (Bates P-000006620) Google Scholar
• 79 Pennisi VR. Obscure carcinoma encountered in subcutaneous mastectomy in silicone- and paraffin-injected breasts: two patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 74:535-538. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 80 Chen TH. Silicone injection granulomas of the breast: treatment by subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate subpectoral breast implant. Br J Plast Surg 1995; 48:71-76. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 81 8-page document dated October 1964 entitled “Dr. Akiyama's DIMETHYPOLYSILOXANE Elicon”, describing the development and use of injectable silicone gel in Japan. (Bates MM 149886) Google Scholar
• 82 Mutou Y. Augmentation mammaplasty with the Akiyama prosthesis. Br J Plast Surg 1970; 23:58-62. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 83 7-page catalogue from about 1964 from Koken Kogyo Co. Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan) listing several forms of “D.M.P.S.” (silicone) “synthetic fat” products under the trade name “Elicon” with special stainless steel syringes and needles specifically intended for injection into breasts. (Bates M-350031) Google Scholar
• 84 2 page document from Japan Medical Plastics Center (Tokyo, Japan) describing “Dr. Akiyama's Dimethylpolysiloxane Elicon” for injection into breasts, the face, and other parts of the body (Bates M-360037) Google Scholar
• 85 Dow Corning memo dated 7/12/62 in which it is stated that Dr Gerow was using about 200 cc of silicone gel for his breast gel injection patients (Bates M-320001) Google Scholar
• 86 Boo-Chai K. The complications of augmentation mammaplasty by silicone injection. Br J Plast Surg 1969; 22:281-285. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 87 Conway H, Goulian D, Jr. Experience with an injectable Silastic RTV as a subcutaneous prosthetic material: a preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1963; 32:294-302. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 88 Freeman BS. Reconstruction of the breast form by silastic gel from breast prostheses. Br J Plast Surg 1974; 27:284-286. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 89 Cavon JF. Cast gel implantable prosthesis. U.S. patent 4,470,160 1984. Google Scholar
• 90 Cavon JF. Cast gel implantable prosthesis. U.S. patent 4,740,208 1988. Google Scholar
• 91 Cronin TD. Surgically implantable human breast prosthesis. U.S. patent 3,293,663 1966. Google Scholar
• 92 Letter dated 4/11/62 from Dr T. D. Cronin (Baylor University) to Mr Silas Braley (Dow Corning Center for Aid to Medical Research) describing placement of first set of silicone gel-filled implants, which together with previous and subsequent letters and memos indicate that a SILASTIC sponge was used in the construction of each of those first implants (Bates M-44043, M-44048) Google Scholar
• 93 Braley SA. The use of silicones in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973; 50:280-288. Google Scholar
• 94 Letter dated 10/29/63 from the offices of Dr F. Ashley (University of California, Los Angeles) to Dow Corning requesting 6 sets of breast implants, which together with subsequent letters indicate that perhaps these were being sold to Dr. Ashley (Bates M-330116) Google Scholar
• 95 American V. Mueller catalogue dated “January/February 1964” listing 3 sizes of silicone gel-filled mammary prostheses from Dow Corning (Bates DCC-80021639) Google Scholar
• 96 “Augmentation mammaplasty” by Robert H. Pudenz, MD, Heyer-Schulte Corporation, dated July 1978 (Bates MB 104861) Google Scholar
• 97 Letter dated 6/27/62 from Dr Frank Gerow (Baylor University) to Mr Silas Braley (Dow Corning Center for Aid to Medical Research) stating that on that date a pair of saline-filled implants were placed experimentally (Bates M-440020) Google Scholar
• 98 Arion HG. Presentation d'une prothese retromammaire. Comp Rend Soc Fran Gyn 1965; 35:427-431. Google Scholar
• 99 Young VL, Lund H, Ueda K, Pidgeon L, Schorr MW, Kreeger J. Bleed of and biologic response to triglyceride filler used in radiolucent breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97:1179-1193. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 100 4-page “Dear Doctor” letter, and 2-page document entitled “Product Information for Surgeons” from PIP/USA, Inc. (Miami, Fla), describing their breast prosthesis consisting of a silicone elastomer shell, preinflated with a fixed volume of saline Google Scholar
• 101 Snyder GB. Augmentation mammoplasty and subcutaneous mastectomy. In: Grabb WC, Smith JW, eds. Plastic surgery: a concise guide to clinical practice. 2nd ed. Boston, Mass: Little, Brown, 1973; 987-1004. Google Scholar
• 102 Gerow FJ. Breast implants. In: Georgiade NG, eds. Reconstructive breast surgery. St Louis, Mo: Mosby, 1976; 31-49. Google Scholar
• 103 Gerow FJ. A pictorial inventory of breast implants. In: Owsley JQ, Peterson RA, eds. Symposium on aesthetic surgery of the breast. St Louis, Mo: Mosby, 1978; 326-328. Google Scholar
• 104 Baker JL. Augmentation mammoplasty. In: Grabb WC, Smith JW, eds. Plastic surgery. 3rd ed. Boston, Mass: Little, Brown, 1979; 719-736. Google Scholar
• 105 Elbaz JS, Ohana J. Prosthèses mammaires Paris, France: Médecine et Sciences Internationales, 1982; 39-54. Google Scholar
• 106 Berg WA, Caskey CI, Hamper UM, et al. Diagnosing breast implant rupture with MR imaging, US, and mammography. RadioGraphics 1993; 13:1323-1336. Link, Google Scholar
• 107 Middleton MS, McNamara MP. Breast implant classification and identification: a pictorial review (abstract). Radiology 1995; 197(P):371, 460. Google Scholar
• 108 Middleton MS, McNamara MP. “Mammary implant product list: 1962 to 2000”. Internal University of California, San Diego, document. Google Scholar
• 109 Capozzi A, Pennisi VR. Clinical experience with polyurethane covered gel-filled mammary prostheses. Plast Reconstr Surg 1981; 68:512-518. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 110 Wagner H, Beller FK, Pfautsch M. Electron and light microscopy examination of capsules around breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 1977; 60:49-55. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 111 3-page Heyer-Schulte document dated 9/23/77, interoffice correspondence, describing chemistry and a literature survey of polyurethane coated implants, in which it is stated “the polyurethane degrades extensively after 4-6 months (in humans)” (Bates MD 138269) Google Scholar
• 112 57-page Heyer-Schulte file containing papers with signature approval dates of 3/18/83, 3/21/83, and 4/6/83, pertaining to a 510(k) application for premarket approval for a low-bleed implant shell, in which it is stated on page 9 that “polyester velour, when used as an internal fixation patch, will eventually deteriorate and may result in separation and/or migration of fragments into the surrounding tissues” (Bates MB 173514) Google Scholar
• 113 Heyer-Schulte document dated 9/23/77, interoffice correspondence, and 8 pages of attachments related to polyurethane, in which it is stated “it tends to fragment and undergo dissolution in tissue”, and “the polyurethane cover tends to separate from the silicone shell producing a composite encapsulation ...” (Bates MB 174362) Google Scholar
• 114 17-page Heyer-Schulte internal circular titled “Heyer Sales” dated 8/79 in which it is stated “polyurethane foam may eventually deteriorate and may result in separation and/or migration of fragments into surrounding tissues” (Bates MC 227518) Google Scholar
• 115 Dahl CH, Baccari E, Arfai P. A silicone gel inflatable mammary prosthesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1974; 53:234-235. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 116 Document entitled “Introductory Data Sheet”, “Gel-saline reconstructive mammary prosthesis”, “©1972 Heyer-Schulte Corporation” dated “11/73”, with a footnote reference to Richard Jobe, MD, Los Altos, Calif (Bates BAX 78234) Google Scholar
• 117 Document entitled “Introductory Data Sheet”, “Gel-saline reconstructive mammary prosthesis”, “©1973 Heyer-Schulte Corporation” dated “6/73” (partially illegible), with a footnote reference to Richard P. Jobe MD, Los Altos, CA (Bates MB 123114) Google Scholar
• 118 Jobe RP. Progress toward the definition of a proper prosthesis for reconstructive mammaplasties. In: Owsley JQ, Peterson RA, eds. Symposium on aesthetic surgery of the breast. Vol 18. St Louis, Mo: Mosby, 1978; 230-240. Google Scholar
• 119 Letter dated 8/29/77 from a Pennsylvania plastic surgeon to Heyer-Schulte stating that they had been using the “new modified Jobe prosthesis with the double inflating valve for the last 9 months”, but were more pleased with the “earlier model”, requesting several of them at that time (Bates MD 176661) Google Scholar
• 120 Arion HG. Retromammary prosthesis. U.S. patent 3,416,160, 1968; French patent 483,238 1965. Google Scholar
• 121 Tabari K. Augmentation with Simaplast implant. Plast Reconstr Surg 1969; 44:468-470. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 122 Arion HG. Retromammary prosthesis. U.S. patent 3,860,969 1975. Google Scholar
• 123 9-page catalogue from Roger Klein Limited (New York, NY) describing available Mammatech saline-filled implants, not dated, but including references up to and including the year 1975 (Bates BAX 277604) Google Scholar
• 124 2-page Dow Corning memo dated 4/29/70 documenting a 4/21/70 telephone call with a Dow Corning employee during which the current status of Roger Klein as a distributor and possible manufacturer of inflatable breast implants was discussed. (Bates DCC-007 118521) Google Scholar
• 125 4-page product advertisement for the NovaGold PVP-filled implant from Novamed Medical products Mfg., Inc., Minneapolis, Minn. Google Scholar
• 126 Hartley JH. Specific applications of the double lumen prosthesis. Clin Plast Surg 1976; 3:247-263. Medline, Google Scholar
• 127 Hartley JH. Deflatable mammary augmentation prosthesis. U.S. patent 3,934,274 1976. Google Scholar
• 128 Three pages of Heyer-Schulte custom orders dated 11/17/72 for experimental standard double-lumen implants for Dr John Hartley, with 165 cc inner lumen silicone gel, nominal total capacity 230 cc, and a posterior retention valve, with three kinds of fixation: a 2.5-cm posterior polyurethane patch, a 3-cm silicone fixation patch, and a silicone fixation patch covering he entire shell patch (Bates MA 187853, 187854, 187855) Google Scholar
• 129 Birnbaum LM, Olsen JA. Case reports: customized reconstruction of the breast after radical and modified radical mastectomies. West J Med 1976; 125:388-390. Medline, Google Scholar
• 130 Birnbaum LM. Breast reconstruction following radical mastectomy, using custom designed implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 61:355-363. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 131 Birnbaum LM. Use of dermal grafts to cover implants in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 63:487-491. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 132 Deposition of Dr Joseph Cavon on 2/5/85 in the case of Cavon v Aesthetech (84-7228), U.S. District Court, Central District of California Google Scholar
• 133 Pennisi VR, Capozzi A, Walsh J, Christensen N. Obscure breast carcinoma encountered in subcutaneous mastectomies. Plast Reconstr Surg 1971; 47:17-20. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 134 Braley SA. The medical silicones. Trans Am Soc Artific Int Org 1964; 10:240-243. Medline, Google Scholar
• 135 Pangman WJ, II. Compound prosthesis device. U.S. patent 2,842,775 1958. Describes compound prosthesis consisting of an inner (Ivalon) sponge core surrounded by an inflatable barrier layer, all contained within an outer layer of more (Ivalon) sponge material. Google Scholar
• 136 Pangman WJ, II. Compound prosthesis. U.S. patent 3,189,921 1965. Expands on the first Pangman patent and mentions use of polyurethane instead of Ivalon. Google Scholar
• 137 Pangman WJ, II. Compound prosthesis. U.S. patent 3,366,975 1968. Describes modifications of the prior designs consisting of a thinning of the outer sponge layer, a continuous inflatable or a fenestrated barrier layer, and an inner sponge core that could have silicone gel added. Google Scholar
• 138 Pangman WJ, II. Surgically implantable compound breast prosthesis. U.S. patent 3,683,424 1972. Describes what became the Polyplastic Adjustable and the New Polyplastic Adjustable implants. Google Scholar
• 139 Responses to Interrogatory No. 12, contained in the responses submitted by Baxter Healthcare Corporation dated 12/6/93 (Case JCCP - 2754, Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego), with regard to the “Polyplastic Adjustable Volume” and the “New Polyplastic - Silicone Compound” prostheses Google Scholar
• 140 Data sheet entitled “Polyplastic Adjustable Volume Mammary Prosthesis”, “Manufactured for Polyplastic Silicone Products by Schulte Medical Products”, dated 2/71 (Bates BAX 93520) Google Scholar
• 141 Pangman WJ, II. Compound prosthesis. U.S. patent 3,559,214 1971. Describes a polyurethane-coated silicone gel-filled silicone elastomer shell breast implant with a Y-shaped internal baffle. Google Scholar
• 142 Ashley FL. A new type of breast prosthesis: preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1970; 45:421-424. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 143 Document entitled “Introductory Data Sheet”, “Tabari inflatable mammary prosthesis”, “Manufactured for Polyplastic Silicone Products by Schulte Medical Products”, dated 2/71 (Bates BAX 93506) Google Scholar
• 144 Document entitled “Introductory Data Sheet”, “Tabari inflatable mammary prosthesis”, “Heyer-Schulte Corporation”, dated 9/71 (Bates BAX 94287) Google Scholar
• 145 References are made in 13 documents to tubes attached to early Dow Corning experimental implants, contained in memoranda of phone calls, letters, and fabrication requests from 8/9/61 to 10/22/62 (Bates # M-320001, 440028, 440043, 440046, 440049, 440050, 440051, 440054, 440056, 440108, 440122, 820032) Google Scholar
• 146 Regnault P, Baker TJ, Gleason MC, et al. Clinical trial and evaluation of a proposed new inflatable mammary prosthesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1972; 50:220-226. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 147 Lewis LN, Lewis N, Uriarte RJ. Hydrosilylation: A “homogeneous” reaction really catalyzed by colloids In: Moser WR, Slocum DW, eds. Homogeneous transition metal catalyzed reactions. Washington D.C.: American Chemical Society, 1992; 541-549. Google Scholar
• 148 Georgiade NG. Breast reconstruction following mastectomy St Louis, Mo: Mosby, 1979. Google Scholar
• 149 4-page internal Heyer-Schulte document dated 4/17/80 concerning the proposed mammary insurance program, in which it is stated “these amounts assume a 2% failure rate, or double that which we have historically experienced, which seems to be the consensus of opinion as to future expectations with the program in place” (Bates MD 187065) Google Scholar
• 150 Gabriel SE, Woods JE, O'Fallon WM, et al. Complications leading to surgery after breast implantation. N Engl J Med 1997; 336:677-682. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 151 Nelson GD. Complications from the treatment of fibrous capsular contracture of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 1981; 68:969-970. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar