SCIENTIFIC EXHIBIT - Continuing Medical Education

MR Imaging of Cervical Carcinoma: A Practical Staging Approach

Cervical carcinoma is the third most common gynecologic malignancy and is typically seen in younger women, often with serious consequences. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system provides worldwide epidemiologic and treatment response statistics. However, there are significant inaccuracies in the FIGO staging system, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, although not included in that system, is now widely accepted as optimal for evaluation of important prognostic factors such as lesion volume and metastatic lymph node involvement that will help determine the treatment strategy. MR imaging examination obviates the use of invasive procedures such as cystoscopy and proctoscopy, especially when there is no evidence of local extension. Brachytherapy and external beam therapy are optimized with MR imaging evaluation of the shape and direction of lesion growth. In general, T2-weighted MR imaging more clearly delineates cervical carcinoma and is preferred for evaluation of the lymph nodes. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted imaging may help identify smaller tumors, detect or confirm invasion of adjacent organs, and identify fistulous tracts. MR imaging staging, when available, is invaluable for identifying important prognostic factors and optimizing treatment strategies.

References

  • 1 Reinhold C, Gallix BP, Ascher SM. Uterus and cervix. In: Semelka RC, Ascher SM, Reinhold C, eds. MRI of the abdomen and pelvis: a text atlas. New York, NY: Wiley-Liss, 1997; 585-660. Google Scholar
  • 2 McCarthy S, Hricak H. The uterus and vagina. In: Higgins CB, Hricak H, Helms CA, eds. Magnetic resonance imaging of the body. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Lippincott-Raven, 1997; 761-814. Google Scholar
  • 3 Togashi K, Morikawa K, Kataoka ML, Konishi J. Cervical cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8:391-397. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Subak LL, Hricak H, Powell B, Azizi L, Stern JL. Cervical carcinoma: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 86:43-50. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Swift PS. Carcinoma of the uterine cervix. In: Liebel SA, Phillips TL, eds. Clinical radiation oncology. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 1998; 799-841. Google Scholar
  • 6 Mayr NA, Yuh WT, Zheng J, et al. Cervical cancer: application of MR imaging in radiation therapy. Radiology 1993; 189:601-608. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Yu KK, Hricak H, Subak LL, Zaloudek CJ, Powell CB. Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma: phased array coil fast spin-echo versus body coil spin-echo T2-weighted MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171:707-711. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kim SH, Han MC. Invasion of the urinary bladder by uterine cervical carcinoma: evaluation with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:393-397. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Roy C, Le Bras Y, Mongold L, et al. Small pelvic lymph node metastases: evaluation with MR imaging. Clin Radiol 1997; 52:437-440. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Abe Y, Yamashita Y, Namimoto T, et al. Carcinoma of the uterine cervix: high-resolution turbo spin-echo MR imaging with contrast-enhanced dynamic scanning and T2-weighting. Acta Radiol 1998; 39:322-326. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Seki H, Azumi R, Kimura M, Sakai K. Stromal invasion by carcinoma of the cervix: assessment with dynamic MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:1579-1585. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Tsuda K, Murakami T, Kurachi H, et al. MR imaging of cervical carcinoma: comparison among T2-weighted, dynamic, and postcontrast T1-weighted images with histopathological correlation. Abdom Imaging 1997; 22:103-107. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hawighorst H, Schoenberg SO, Knapstein PG, et al. Staging of invasive cervical carcinoma and of pelvic lymph nodes by high resolution MRI with a phased-array coil in comparison with pathological findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998; 22:75-81. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Scheidler J, Heuck AF, Steinborn M, Kimmig R, Reiser MF. Parametrial invasion in cervical carcinoma: evaluation of detection at MR imaging with fat suppression. Radiology 1998; 206:125-129. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Scheidler J, Hricak H, Yu KK, Subak L, Segal MR. Radiological evaluation of lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. JAMA 1997; 278:1096-1101. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article History

Published in print: Nov 2000