Regional but Not Global Brain Damage Contributes to Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14140417

This multiparametric MR study supports the central origin of fatigue in multiple sclerosis by showing that regional damage to specific brain areas, in terms of lesions on T2-weighted images, white matter (WM) microstructural abnormalities, and gray matter and WM atrophy, is associated to this disabling symptom.

Purpose

To use magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and advanced analysis to assess the role of lesions in normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) and gray matter (GM) damage, global versus regional damage, and atrophy versus microstructural abnormalities in the pathogenesis of fatigue in multiple sclerosis (MS).

Materials and Methods

Local ethics committee approval and written informed consent were obtained. Dual-echo, double inversion-recovery, high-resolution T1-weighted and diffusion-tensor (DT) MR was performed in 31 fatigued patients, 32 nonfatigued patients, and 35 control subjects. Global and regional atrophy and DT MR measures of damage to lesions, NAWM, and GM were compared (analysis of variance).

Results

Lesional, atrophy, and DT MR measures of global damage to brain, white matter (WM), and GM did not differ between fatigued and nonfatigued patients. Compared with nonfatigued patients and control subjects, fatigued patients experienced atrophy of the right side of the accumbens (mean volume ± standard deviation, 0.37 mL ± 0.09 in control subjects; 0.39 mL ± 0.1 in nonfatigued patients; and 0.33 mL ± 0.09 in fatigued patients), right inferior temporal gyrus (ITG) (Montreal Neurological Institute [MNI] coordinates: 51, −51, −11; t value, 4.83), left superior frontal gyrus (MNI coordinates: −10, 49, 24; t value, 3.40), and forceps major (MNI coordinates: 11, −91, 18; t value, 3.37). They also had lower fractional anisotropy (FA) of forceps major (MNI coordinates: −17, −78, 6), left inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (MNI coordinates: −25, 2, −11), and right anterior thalamic radiation (ATR) (MNI coordinates: 11, 2, −6) (P < .05, corrected). More lesions were found at T2-weighted imaging in fatigued patients. Multivariable model was used to identify right ITG atrophy (odds ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.82, 0.97; P = .009) and right ATRFA (odds ratio, 0.74; 95% CI: 0.61, 0.90; P = .003) as covariates independently associated with fatigue (C statistic, 0.85).

Conclusion

Damage to strategic brain WM and GM regions, in terms of microstructural abnormalities and atrophy, contributes to pathogenesis of fatigue in MS, whereas global lesional, WM, and GM damage does not seem to have a role.

© RSNA, 2014

Online supplemental material is available for this article.

References

  • 1. Krupp LB, LaRocca NG, Muir-Nash J, Steinberg AD. The fatigue severity scale. Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Neurol 1989;46(10):1121–1123. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2. MacAllister WS, Krupp LB. Multiple sclerosis-related fatigue. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2005;16(2):483–502. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3. Janardhan V, Bakshi R. Quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis: the impact of fatigue and depression. J Neurol Sci 2002;205(1):51–58. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4. Sheean GL, Murray NM, Rothwell JC, Miller DH, Thompson AJ. An electrophysiological study of the mechanism of fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Brain 1997;120(Pt 2):299–315. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5. Roelcke U, Kappos L, Lechner-Scott J, et al. Reduced glucose metabolism in the frontal cortex and basal ganglia of multiple sclerosis patients with fatigue: a 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography study. Neurology 1997;48(6):1566–1571. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6. Filippi M, Rocca MA, Colombo B, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging correlates of fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage 2002;15(3):559–567. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7. Sepulcre J, Masdeu JC, Goñi J, et al. Fatigue in multiple sclerosis is associated with the disruption of frontal and parietal pathways. Mult Scler 2009;15(3):337–344. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8. Riccitelli G, Rocca MA, Forn C, Colombo B, Comi G, Filippi M. Voxelwise assessment of the regional distribution of damage in the brains of patients with multiple sclerosis and fatigue. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32(5):874–879. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9. Pardini M, Bonzano L, Mancardi GL, Roccatagliata L. Frontal networks play a role in fatigue perception in multiple sclerosis. Behav Neurosci 2010;124(3):329–336. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10. Bakshi R, Miletich RS, Henschel K, et al. Fatigue in multiple sclerosis: cross-sectional correlation with brain MRI findings in 71 patients. Neurology 1999;53(5):1151–1153. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11. Mainero C, Faroni J, Gasperini C, et al. Fatigue and magnetic resonance imaging activity in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 1999;246(6):454–458. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12. Tedeschi G, Dinacci D, Lavorgna L, et al. Correlation between fatigue and brain atrophy and lesion load in multiple sclerosis patients independent of disability. J Neurol Sci 2007;263(1-2):15–19. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13. Codella M, Rocca MA, Colombo B, Rossi P, Comi G, Filippi M. A preliminary study of magnetization transfer and diffusion tensor MRI of multiple sclerosis patients with fatigue. J Neurol 2002;249(5):535–537. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14. Gobbi C, Rocca MA, Riccitelli G, et al. Influence of the topography of brain damage on depression and fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2014;20(2):192–201. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15. Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry 1979;134:382–389. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16. Fischer JS, Rudick RA, Cutter GR, Reingold SC. The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite Measure (MSFC): an integrated approach to MS clinical outcome assessment. National MS Society Clinical Outcomes Assessment Task Force. Mult Scler 1999;5(4):244–250. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17. Basser PJ, Mattiello J, LeBihan D. Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo. J Magn Reson B 1994;103(3):247–254. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18. Filippi M, Preziosa P, Pagani E, et al. Microstructural magnetic resonance imaging of cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2013;19(4):418–426. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, et al. Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage 2006;31(4):1487–1505. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20. Chard DT, Jackson JS, Miller DH, Wheeler-Kingshott CA. Reducing the impact of white matter lesions on automated measures of brain gray and white matter volumes. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;32(1):223–228. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21. Patenaude B, Smith SM, Kennedy DN, Jenkinson M. A Bayesian model of shape and appearance for subcortical brain segmentation. Neuroimage 2011;56(3):907–922. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22. Riccitelli G, Rocca MA, Pagani E, et al. Mapping regional grey and white matter atrophy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2012;18(7):1027–1037. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23. Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, et al. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 2002;15(1):273–289. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24. Mori S, Wakana S, Van Zijl PCM, Nagae-Poetscher LM. MRI atlas of human white matter. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier, 2005. Google Scholar
  • 25. Nichols TE, Holmes AP. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Hum Brain Mapp 2002;15(1):1–25. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26. Andreasen AK, Jakobsen J, Soerensen L, et al. Regional brain atrophy in primary fatigued patients with multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage 2010;50(2):608–615. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27. Calabrese M, Rinaldi F, Seppi D, et al. Cortical diffusion-tensor imaging abnormalities in multiple sclerosis: a 3-year longitudinal study. Radiology 2011;261(3):891–898. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 28. Papadopoulou A, Müller-Lenke N, Naegelin Y, et al. Contribution of cortical and white matter lesions to cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2013;19(10):1290–1296. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29. Bester M, Lazar M, Petracca M, et al. Tract-specific white matter correlates of fatigue and cognitive impairment in benign multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 2013;330(1-2):61–66. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 30. Genova HM, Rajagopalan V, Deluca J, et al. Examination of cognitive fatigue in multiple sclerosis using functional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging. PLoS ONE 2013;8(11):e78811. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 31. Pardini M, Krueger F, Raymont V, Grafman J. Ventromedial prefrontal cortex modulates fatigue after penetrating traumatic brain injury. Neurology 2010;74(9):749–754. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 32. Yaldizli Ö, Penner IK, Frontzek K, et al. The relationship between total and regional corpus callosum atrophy, cognitive impairment and fatigue in multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler 2014;20(3):356–364. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 33. Cook DB, O’Connor PJ, Lange G, Steffener J. Functional neuroimaging correlates of mental fatigue induced by cognition among chronic fatigue syndrome patients and controls. Neuroimage 2007;36(1):108–122. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 34. Salamone JD, Correa M, Farrar A, Mingote SM. Effort-related functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine and associated forebrain circuits. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2007;191(3):461–482. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 35. Calabresi P, Castrioto A, Di Filippo M, Picconi B. New experimental and clinical links between the hippocampus and the dopaminergic system in Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol 2013;12(8):811–821. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 36. Geurts JJ, Roosendaal SD, Calabrese M, et al. Consensus recommendations for MS cortical lesion scoring using double inversion recovery MRI. Neurology 2011;76(5):418–424. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article History

Received February 19, 2014; revision requested March 26; revision received April 14; accepted April 24; final version accepted May 5.
Published online: June 14 2014