"skipMainNavigation"
Search
Quick Search in Journals
Quick Search anywhere
Advanced Search
Radiology
Menu
Previous
Next
Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Uterine Fibroids: Uterine Artery Embolization versus Abdominal Hysterectomy for Treatment—A Prospective, Randomized, and Controlled Clinical Trial

Published Online:Feb 1 2003https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2262011716

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of uterine artery embolization (UAE) in the management of bleeding in patients with uterine fibroids and to compare UAE with hysterectomy, particularly with regard to length of hospital stay and associated complications (ie, safety).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective clinical trial was performed with patients who were randomly assigned to one of two groups: patients who were offered the option of undergoing either UAE or hysterectomy (group 1) and patients who were not informed of the alternative treatment—that is, UAE (group 2). The primary variables that were considered for evaluation of the effectiveness, efficiency, and safety of the two procedures were, respectively, bleeding cessation, total length of hospital stay, and resulting complications. The lengths of hospital stay in the two study arms were compared on an intent-to-treat basis. Owing to crossover between the treatment arms, however, effectiveness and safety were evaluated on the basis of the actual treatment received.

RESULTS: The clinical success rate for the patients who underwent UAE, which was based on the cessation of bleeding, was 86% (31 of 36 patients). The mean hospital stay for group 1 was 4.14 days shorter than that for group 2 (P < .001). Ten (25%) of the 40 patients who underwent UAE experienced minor complications, in contrast to four (20%) of the 20 who underwent hysterectomy and experienced major complications.

CONCLUSION: Compared with hysterectomy, UAE is safe and effective for treatment of bleeding fibroids, necessitates a shorter hospital stay, and results in fewer major complications.

© RSNA, 2003

References

  • 1 Buttram VC, Reiter RC. Uterine leiomyomata: etiology, symptomatology and management. Fertil Steril 1981; 36:433-445.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Greenberg MD, Kazamel TIG. Medical and socioeconomic impact of uterine fibroids. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1995; 22:625-636.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Gambone JC, Rester RC, Lench JB, Moore JG. The impact of a quality assurance process on the frequency and confirmation rate of hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 144:841-848.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Amerikia H, Evans TN. Ten-year review of hysterectomies: trends, indications, risks. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 134:431-437.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Friedman AJ, Hoffman DI, Comite F, Browneller RW, Miller JD. Treatment of leiomyomata uteri with leuprolide acetate depot: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77:720-725.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Matta WHM, Shaw RW, Nye M. Long-term follow-up of patients with uterine fibroids after treatment with the LHRH agonist buserilin. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 96:200-206.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ravina JH, Merland JJ, Herbreteau D, Houdart E, Bouret JM, Madelenat P. Embolization pré-opératoire des fibromes utérins. Presse Med 1994; 23:1540.
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Ravina JH, Herbreteau D, Ciaru-Vigneron N, et al. Arterial embolization to treat uterine myomata. Lancet 1995; 346:671-672.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Goodwin SC, Vedantham S, McLucas B, Forno AE, Perrella R. Preliminary experience with uterine artery embolization for uterine fibroids. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1997; 8:517-526.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ellis PK, Kidney DD, Deutsch LS. Uterine arterial embolization in the management of symptomatic leiomyomata. J Intervent Radiol 1998; 13:16-19.
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Ravina JH, Aymard A, Ciraru-Vigneron N, Bouret JM, Houdart E, Le Dref O. Embolisation arterielle particulaire: un nouveau traitement des hemorragies des leiomyomes utérins. Presse Med 1998; 27:299-303.
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Worthington-Kirsch RL, Popky GL, Hutchins Jr FL. Uterine arterial embolization for the management of leiomyomas: quality-of-life assessment and clinical response. Radiology 1998; 208:25-29.
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Bradley EA, Reidy JF, Forman RG, et al. Transcatheter uterine artery embolization to treat large uterine fibroids. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105:235-240.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Spies JB, Scialli AR, Jha RC, et al. Initial results from uterine fibroid embolization for symptomatic leiomyomata. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1999; 10:1149-1157.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Vashisht A, Studd J, Carey A, Burn P. Fatal septicaemia after fibroid embolization. Lancet 1999; 354:397-308.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Berkowitz RP, Hutchins FL, Jr, Worthington-Kirsch RL. Vaginal expulsion of submucosal fibroids after uterine artery embolization. J Reprod Med 1999; 44:373-376.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Siskin GP, Eaton LA, Jr, Stainken BF, Dowling K, Herr A, Schwartz J. Pathologic findings in a uterine leiomyoma after bilateral uterine artery embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1999; 10:891-894.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Abbara S, Spies JB, Scialli AR, Jha RC, Lage JM, Nikolic B. Transcervical expulsion of a fibroid as a result of uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1999; 10:409-411.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Goodwin SC, McLucas B, Lee M, et al. Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine leiomyomata: midterm results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1999; 10:1159-1165.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Nikolic B, Spies JB, Abbara S, Goodwin SC. Ovarian artery supply of uterine fibroids as a cause of treatment failure after uterine artery embolization: a case report. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1999; 10:1167-1170.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Smith SJ, Sewall LE, Handelsman A. A clinical failure of uterine fibroid embolization due to adenomyosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1999; 10:1171-1174.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Burn P, Mccall J, Chinn R, Healy J. Embolization of uterine fibroids. Br J Radiol 1999; 72:159-161.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hutchins FL, Jr, Worthington-Kirsch R, Berkowitz RP. Selective uterine artery embolization as primary treatment for symptomatic leiomyomata uteri. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1999; 6:279-284.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Lai AC, Goodwin SC, Bonilla SM, et al. Sexual dysfunction after uterine artery embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000; 11:755-758.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Matson M, Nicholson A, Belli AM. Anastomoses of the ovarian and uterine arteries: a potential pitfall and cause of failure of uterine embolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2000; 23:393-396.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Brunereau L, Herbreteau D, Gallas S, et al. Uterine artery embolization in the primary treatment of uterine leiomyomas: technical features and prospective follow-up with clinical and sonographic examinations in 58 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175:1267-1272.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Siskin GP, Stainken BF, Dowling K, Meo P, Ahn J, Dolen EG. Outpatient uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids: experience in 49 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000; 11:305-311.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Chrisman HB, Saker MB, Ryu RK, et al. The impact of uterine fibroid embolization on resumption of menses and ovarian function. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000; 11:699-703.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Pelage JP, Le Dref O, Soyer P, et al. Fibroid-related menorrhagia: treatment with superselective embolization of the uterine arteries and midterm follow-up. Radiology 2000; 215:428-431.
    Google Scholar
  • 30 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Quality assurance in obstetrics and gynecology Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1989.
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Zelen M. A new design for randomized clinical trials. N Engl J Med 1979; 300:1242-1245.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Pocock SJ. Clinical trials: a practical approach Essex, England: Wiley, 1983; 88.
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Altman DG. Statistics and ethics in medical research. III. How large a sample? Br Med J 1980; 281:1336-1338.
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Ben Menachem Y, Coldwell DM, Young JWR, Burgess AR. Hemorrhage associated with pelvic fractures: causes, diagnosis, and emergent management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 157:1005-1014.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Katz MD, Teitelbaum GP, Pentecost MJ. Diagnostic arteriography and therapeutic transcatheter embolization for post-traumatic pelvic haemorrhage. Semin Intervent Radiol 1992; 9:4-12.
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Pisco JM, Martins JM, Correia MG. Internal iliac artery: embolization to control hemorrhage from pelvic neoplasms. Radiology 1989; 172:337-339.
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Yamashita Y, Takahashi M, Ito M, Okamura H. Transcatheter arterial embolization in the management of postpartum hemorrhage due to genital tract injury. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77:160-163.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Gilbert WM, Moore TR, Resnik R, Doemeny J, Chin H, Bookstein JJ. Angiographic embolization in the management of the hemorrhagic complications of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166:493-497.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Stancato-Pasik A, Mitty HA, Richard HM, Eshkar N. Obstetric embolotherapy: effect on menses and pregnancy. Radiology 1997; 204:791-793.
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Pelage JP, Le Dref O, Mateo J, et al. Life-threatening primary postpartum hemorrhage: treatment with emergency selective arterial embolization. Radiology 1998; 208:359-362.
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Kjerulff KH, Guzinski GM, Langenberg PW, Stolley PD, Adler NE, Kazandjian VA. Hysterectomy and race. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82:757-764.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Carlson KJ, Miller BA, Fowler FJ. The Maine Women’s Health Study. I. Outcomes of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83:556-565.
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Dwyer N, Stirrat GM. Randomised controlled trial comparing endometrial resection with abdominal hysterectomy for the surgical treatment of menorrhagia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100:237-243.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Dicker RC, Greenspan JR, Strauss LT, et al. Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States: the collaborative review of sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 144:841-848.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Mittendorf R, Aronson MP, Berry RE, et al. Avoiding serious infections associated with abdominal hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of antibiotic prophylaxis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169:1119-1124.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Worthington-Kirsch RL, Hutchins FL, Jr, Berkowitz RP. Regarding sloughing of fibroids after uterine artery embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1999; 10:1135.
    Google Scholar
  • 47 Braude P, Reidy J, Nott V, Taylor A, Forman R. Embolization of uterine leiomyomata: current concepts in management. Hum Reprod Update 2000; 6:603-608.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Gannon MJ, Holt EM, Fairbank J, et al. A randomized trial comparing endometrial resection and abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of menorrhagia. BMJ 1991; 303:1362-1364.
    MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article History

Published in print: Feb 2003