Superiority of Pentobarbital versus Chloral Hydrate for Sedation in Infants during Imaging

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of oral pentobarbital and oral chloral hydrate for sedation in infants younger than 1 year during magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A computerized database was used to collect information about all cases in which sedation was used. Outcomes of all infants who received oral pentobarbital or oral chloral hydrate for sedation between 1997 and 2002 were reviewed. Two study groups were compared for sedation and discharge times by using Student t test and for adverse events by using Fisher exact test and multiple logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS: Infants (n = 1,316) received an oral medication for sedation. Mean doses were 50 mg/kg chloral hydrate and 4 mg/kg pentobarbital. Student t test demonstrated no difference in mean time to sedation and in time to discharge between groups. Overall adverse event rate during sedation was lower with pentobarbital (0.5%) than with chloral hydrate (2.7%) (P < .001). There were fewer episodes of oxygen desaturation with pentobarbital (0.2%) than with chloral hydrate (1.6%) (P < .01). Both medications were equally effective in providing successful sedation.

CONCLUSION: Although oral pentobarbital and oral chloral hydrate are equally effective, the incidence of adverse events with pentobarbital was significantly reduced.

© RSNA, 2003

References

  • 1 Ferrer-Brechner T, Winter J. Anesthetic considerations for cerebral computer tomography. Anesth Analg 1977; 56:344-347.
  • 2 Greenberg SB, Faerber EN, Aspinall CL, Adams RC. High-dose chloral hydrate sedation for children undergoing MR imaging: safety and efficacy in relation to age. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161:639-641.
  • 3 Greenberg SB, Faerber EN, Aspinall L. High dose chloral hydrate sedation for children undergoing CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991; 15:467-469.
  • 4 American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs and Committee on Environmental Health. Use of chloral hydrate for sedation in children. Pediatrics 1993; 92:471-473.
  • 5 Thompson JR, Schneider S, Ashwal S, Holden BS, Hinshaw DB, Jr, Hasso AN. The choice of sedation for computed tomography in children: a prospective evaluation. Radiology 1982; 143:475-479.
  • 6 Napoli KL, Ingall CG, Martin GR. Safety and efficacy of chloral hydrate sedation in children undergoing echocardiography. J Pediatr 1996; 129:287-291.
  • 7 Ronchera-Oms CL, Casillas C, Marti-Bonmati L, et al. Oral chloral hydrate provides effective and safe sedation in paediatric magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Pharm Ther 1994; 19:239-243.
  • 8 Chung T, Hoffer FA, Connor L, Zurakowski D, Burrows PE. The use of oral pentobarbital sodium (Nembutal) versus oral chloral hydrate in infants undergoing CT and MR imaging: a pilot study. Pediatr Radiol 2000; 30:332-335.
  • 9 American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs. Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Pediatrics 1992; 89:1110-1115.
  • 10 Mason KP, Zurakowski D, Karian VE, Connor L, Fontaine PJ, Burrows PE. Sedatives used in pediatric imaging: comparison of iv pentobarbital with iv pentobarbital with midazolam added. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177:427-430.
  • 11 Armitage P, Berry G. Statistical methods in medical research 3rd ed. Oxford, England: Blackwell Science, 1994; 394-403.
  • 12 Conover WJ. Practical nonparametric statistics 3rd ed. New York, NY: Wiley, 1999; 271-286.
  • 13 Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley, 1981; 29-38.
  • 14 Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley, 2000; 47-69.
  • 15 Mason KP, Michna E, DiNardo JA, et al. Evolution of a protocol for ketamine-induced sedation as an alternative to general anesthesia for interventional radiologic procedures in pediatric patients. Radiology 2002; 225:457-465.
  • 16 Karian VE, Burrows PE, Zurakowski D, Connor L, Mason KP. Sedation for pediatric radiological procedures: analysis of potential causes of sedation failure and paradoxical reactions. Pediatr Radiol 1999; 29:869-873.
  • 17 Sury MR, Hatch DJ, Deeley T, Dicks-Mireaux C, Chong WK. Development of a nurse-led sedation service for paediatric magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet 1999; 353:1667-1671.
  • 18 Vade A, Sukhani R, Dolenga M, Habisohn-Schuck C. Chloral hydrate sedation of children undergoing CT and MR imaging: safety as judged by American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165:905-909.
  • 19 Nair SG, Dundee JW, Clarke RS, Howard PJ. Plasma pentobarbitone levels: influence of the preparation, route and method of administration. Anaesthesia 1976; 31:1037-1042.
  • 20 Hoffman GM, Nowakowski R, Troshynski TJ, Berens RJ, Weisman SJ. Risk reduction is pediatric procedural sedation by application of an American Academy of Pediatrics/American Society of Anesthesiologists process model. Pediatrics 2002; 109:236-243.
  • 21 Egelhoff JC, Ball WS, Jr, Koch BL, Parks TD. Safety and efficacy of sedation in children using a structured sedation program. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:1259-1262.
  • 22 Hubbard AM, Markowitz RI, Kimmel B, Kroger M, Bartko MB. Sedation for pediatric patients undergoing CT and MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992; 16:3-6.

Article History

Published in print: Feb 2004