Acute Cervical Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: MR Imaging Findings Correlated with Neurologic Outcome—Prospective Study with 100 Consecutive Patients

Purpose: To prospectively evaluate whether quantitative and qualitative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging assessments after spinal cord injury (SCI) correlate with patient neurologic status and are predictive of outcome at long-term follow-up.

Materials and Methods: The study included 100 patients (79 male, 21 female; mean age, 45 years; age range, 17–96 years) with traumatic cervical SCI. Ethics committee approval and informed consent were obtained. The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score was used as the outcome measure at admission and follow-up. The ASIA impairment scale was used to classify patients according to injury severity. Three quantitative (maximum spinal cord compression [MSCC], maximum canal compromise [MCC], and lesion length) and six qualitative (intramedullary hemorrhage, edema, cord swelling, soft-tissue injury [STI], canal stenosis, and disk herniation) imaging parameters were studied. Data were analyzed by using the Fisher exact test, the Mantel-Haenszel χ2 test, analysis of variance, analysis of covariance, and stepwise multivariable linear regression.

Results: Patients with complete motor and sensory SCIs had more substantial MCC (P = .005), MSCC (P = .002), and lesion length (P = .005) than did patients with incomplete SCIs and those with no SCIs. Patients with complete SCIs also had higher frequencies of hemorrhage (P < .001), edema (P < .001), cord swelling (P = .001), stenosis (P = .01), and STI (P = .001). MCC (P = .012), MSCC (P = .014), and cord swelling (P < .001) correlated with baseline ASIA motor scores. MSCC (P = .028), hemorrhage (P < .001), and cord swelling (P = .029) were predictive of the neurologic outcome at follow-up. Hemorrhage (P < .001) and cord swelling (P = .002) correlated significantly with follow-up ASIA score after controlling for the baseline neurologic assessment.

Conclusion: MSCC, spinal cord hemorrhage, and cord swelling are associated with a poor prognosis for neurologic recovery. Extent of MSCC is more reliable than presence of canal stenosis for predicting the neurologic outcome after SCI.

© RSNA, 2007


  • 1 Bondurant FJ, Cotler HB, Kulkarni MV, McArdle CB, Harris JH Jr. Acute spinal cord injury: a study using physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 1990; 15(3): 161–168. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Flanders AE, Schaefer DM, Doan HT, Mishkin MM, Gonzalez CF, Northrup BE. Acute cervical spine trauma: correlation of MR imaging findings with degree of neurologic deficit. Radiology 1990;177(1):25–33. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Marciello MA, Flanders AE, Herbison GJ, Schaefer DM, Friedman DP, Lane JI. Magnetic resonance imaging related to neurologic outcome in cervical spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74(9):940–946. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4 O'Beirne J, Cassidy N, Raza K, Walsh M, Stack J, Murray P. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of spinal injuries. Injury 1993;24(3):149–154. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ramon S, Dominguez R, Ramirez L, et al. Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging correlation in acute spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1997;35(10):664–673. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Schaefer DM, Flanders A, Northrup BE, Doan HT, Osterholm JL. Magnetic resonance imaging of acute cervical spine trauma: correlation with severity of neurologic injury. Spine 1989;14(10):1090–1095. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Schaefer DM, Flanders AE, Osterholm JL, Northrup BE. Prognostic significance of magnetic resonance imaging in the acute phase of cervical spine injury. J Neurosurg 1992;76(2):218–223. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Shimada K, Tokioka T. Sequential MR studies of cervical cord injury: correlation with neurological damage and clinical outcome. Spinal Cord 1999;37(6):410–415. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Goldberg AL, Rothfus WE, Deeb ZL, et al. The impact of magnetic resonance on the diagnostic evaluation of acute cervicothoracic spinal trauma. Skeletal Radiol 1988;17(2):89–95. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hackney DB, Asato R, Joseph PM, et al. Hemorrhage and edema in acute spinal cord compression: demonstration by MR imaging. Radiology 1986;161(2):387–390. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kalfas I, Wilberger J, Goldberg A, Prostko ER. Magnetic resonance imaging in acute spinal cord trauma. Neurosurgery 1988;23(3):295–299. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kulkarni MV, McArdle CB, Kopanicky D, et al. Acute spinal cord injury: MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 1987;164(3):837–843. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Mascalchi M, Dal Pozzo G, Dini C, et al. Acute spinal trauma: prognostic value of MRI appearances at 0.5 T. Clin Radiol 1993;48(2):100–108. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Tarr RW, Drolshagen LF, Kerner TC, Allen JH, Partain CL, James AE Jr. MR imaging of recent spinal trauma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987;11(3):412–417. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kang JD, Figgie MP, Bohlman HH. Sagittal measurements of the cervical spine in subaxial fractures and dislocations: an analysis of two hundred and eighty-eight patients with and without neurological deficits. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;76(11):1617–1628. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hayashi K, Yone K, Ito H, Yanase M, Sakou T. MRI findings in patients with a cervical spinal cord injury who do not show radiographic evidence of a fracture or dislocation. Paraplegia 1995;33(4):212–215. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Keiper MD, Zimmerman RA, Bilaniuk LT. MRI in the assessment of the supportive soft tissues of the cervical spine in acute trauma in children. Neuroradiology 1998;40(6):359–363. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kliewer MA, Gray L, Paver J, et al. Acute spinal ligament disruption: MR imaging with anatomic correlation. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3(6):855–861. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Rao SC, Fehlings MG. The optimal radiologic method for assessing spinal canal compromise and cord compression in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. I. An evidence-based analysis of the published literature. Spine 1999;24(6):598–604. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Fehlings MG, Rao SC, Tator CH, et al. The optimal radiologic method for assessing spinal canal compromise and cord compression in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. II. Results of a multicenter study. Spine 1999;24(6):605–613. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Fehlings MG, Furlan JC, Massicotte EM, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of maximum canal compromise and spinal cord compression for evaluation of acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. Spine 2006;31(15):1719–1725. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Chakeres DW, Flickinger F, Bresnahan JC, et al. MR imaging of acute spinal cord trauma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1987;8(1):5–10. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Ragnarsson KT, Wuermser LA, Cardenas DD, Marino RJ. Spinal cord injury clinical trials for neurologic restoration: improving care through clinical research. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005;84(11 suppl):S77–S97. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Mulcahey MJ, Gaughan J. Preliminary evaluation of repeatability of the ASIA motor and sensory examination in children and youth [abstr]. J Spinal Cord Med 2005;28(2):161. Google Scholar
  • 25 Marino RJ, Jones L, Kirshblum S, Tal J. Reliability of the ASIA motor and sensory examination [abstr]. J Spinal Cord Med 2004;27(2):194. Google Scholar
  • 26 Marino RJ, Ditunno JF Jr, Donovan WH, Maynard F Jr. Neurologic recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury: data from the Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80(11):1391–1396. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Maynard FM Jr, Bracken MB, Creasey G, et al. International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury: American Spinal Injury Association. Spinal Cord 1997;35(5):266–274. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Takahashi M, Harada Y, Inoue H, Shimada K. Traumatic cervical cord injury at C3-4 without radiographic abnormalities: correlation of magnetic resonance findings with clinical features and outcome. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2002;10(2):129–135. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Glantz SA, Slinker BK. Primer of applied regression and analysis of variance. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Medical, 2000. Google Scholar
  • 30 Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 4th ed. Boston, Mass: Allyn & Bacon, 2000. Google Scholar
  • 31 Yamazaki T, Yanaka K, Fujita K, Kamezaki T, Uemura K, Nose T. Traumatic central cord syndrome: analysis of factors affecting the outcome. Surg Neurol 2005;63(2):95–99. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Tewari MK, Gifti DS, Singh P, et al. Diagnosis and prognostication of adult spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality using magnetic resonance imaging: analysis of 40 patients. Surg Neurol 2005;63(3):204–209. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Ishida Y, Tominaga T. Predictors of neurologic recovery in acute central cervical cord injury with only upper extremity impairment. Spine 2002;27(15):1652–1658. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Liao CC, Lui TN, Chen LR, Chuang CC, Huang YC. Spinal cord injury without radiological abnormality in preschool-aged children: correlation of magnetic resonance imaging findings with neurological outcomes. J Neurosurg 2005;103(1 suppl):17–23. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Lucas JT, Ducker TB. Motor classification of spinal cord injuries with mobility, morbidity and recovery indices. Am Surg 1979;45(3):151–158. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 36 McAfee PC, Bohlman HH, Han JS, Salvagno RT. Comparison of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the diagnosis of upper cervical spinal cord compression. Spine 1986;11(4):295–304. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Folman Y, el Masri W. Spinal cord injury: prognostic indicators. Injury 1989;20(2):92–93. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Ikata T, Iwasa K, Morimoto K, Tonai T, Taoka Y. Clinical considerations and biochemical basis of prognosis of cervical spinal cord injury. Spine 1989;14(10):1096–1101. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Walker MD. Acute spinal-cord injury. N Engl J Med 1991;324(26):1885–1887. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Fehlings MG, Sekhon LH, Tator C. The role and timing of decompression in acute spinal cord injury: what do we know? what should we do? Spine 2001;26(24 suppl):S101–S110. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Arfanakis K, Haughton VM, Carew JD, Rogers BP, Dempsey RJ, Meyerand ME. Diffusion tensor MR imaging in diffuse axonal injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23(5):794–802. MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Huisman TA. Diffusion-weighted imaging: basic concepts and application in cerebral stroke and head trauma. Eur Radiol 2003;13(10):2283–2297. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Bracken MB, Shepard MJ, Holford TR, et al. Administration of methylprednisolone for 24 or 48 hours or tirilazad mesylate for 48 hours in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury: results of the Third National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Randomized Controlled Trial—National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. JAMA 1997;277(20):1597–1604. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Geisler FH, Coleman WP, Grieco G, Poonian D. Recruitment and early treatment in a multicenter study of acute spinal cord injury. Spine 2001;26(24 suppl):S58–S67. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article History

Published in print: 2007