Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations: Real-Time Auto-triggered Elliptic Centric-ordered 3D Gadolinium-enhanced MR Angiography—Initial Assessment

References

• 1 Ehricke HH, Schad LR, Gademann G, Wowra B, Engenhart R, Lorenz WJ. Use of MR angiography for stereotactic planning. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992; 16:35-40.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 2 Mehta MP, Petereit D, Turski P, Gehring M, Levin A, Kinsella T. Magnetic resonance angiography: a three-dimensional database for assessing arteriovenous malformations—technical note. J Neurosurg 1993; 79:289-293.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 3 Marchal G, Bosmans H, Van Fraeyenhoven L, et al. Intracranial vascular lesions: optimization and clinical evaluation of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 1990; 175:443-448.
  Google Scholar
• 4 Petereit D, Mehta M, Turski P, et al. Treatment of arteriovenous malformations with stereotactic radiosurgery employing both magnetic resonance angiography and standard angiography as a database. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993; 25:309-313.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 5 Kauczor HU, Engenhart R, Layer G, et al. 3D TOF MR angiography of cerebral arteriovenous malformations after radiosurgery. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993; 17:184-190.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 6 Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD, Kanal E, Talagala L. Stereotactic magnetic resonance angiography for targeting in arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 1994; 35:585-590.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 7 Wallace C, Bourekas C. Brain arteriovenous malformations. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 1998; 8:383-399.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 8 Blatter DD, Parker DL, Ahn SS, et al. Cerebral MR angiography with multiple overlapping thin slab acquisition. Radiology 1992; 183:379-389.
  Google Scholar
• 9 Marks MP. Vascular malformations. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1995; 3:485-491.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 10 Spigelmann R, Friedman WA, Bova FJ. Limitations of angiographic target localization in planning radiosurgical treatment. Neurosurgery 1992; 30:619-624.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 11 Klisch J, Strecker R, Hennig J, Schumacher M. Time-resolved projection MRA: clinical application in intracranial vascular malformations. Neuroradiology 2000; 42:104-107.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 12 Essig M, Knopp MV, Schoenberg SO, et al. Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: morphologic evaluation by ultrashort 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography (abstr). Proceedings of the Sixth Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1998; 1285.
  Google Scholar
• 13 Hoggard N, Wilkinson ID, Warren DJ, Griffiths PD. The Spetzler grading of cerebral arteriovenous malformations on MR DSA compared to conventional catheter angiography (abstr). Proceedings of the Eighth Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2000; 1237.
  Google Scholar
• 14 Derbyshire AJ, Kim JK, Farb RI, Wright GA. Automated contrast bolus detection and triggered true centric 3D MRA of the carotid arteries (abstr). Proceedings of the Sixth Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1998; 766.
  Google Scholar
• 15 Maki J, Prince M, Londy FJ, Chenevert TL. The effects of time varying intravascular signal intensity and k-space acquisition order on three-dimensional MR angiography image quality. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6:642-651.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 16 Wilman AH, Riederer SJ, King BF, Debbins JP, Rossman PJ, Ehman RL. Fluoroscopically triggered contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with elliptical centric view order: application to the renal arteries. Radiology 1997; 205:137-146.
  Google Scholar
• 17 Wilcock DJ, Jaspan T, Worthington BS. Problems and pitfalls of 3-D TOF magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial circulation. Clin Radiol 1995; 50:526-532.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 18 Parker DL, Tsuruda JS, Goodrich KC, Alexander AL, Buswell HR. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of cerebral arteries: a review. Invest Radiol 1998; 33:560-572.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 19 Prince MR, Chenevert TL, Foo TKF. Contrast-enhanced abdominal MR angiography: optimization of imaging delay time by automating the detection of contrast material arrival in the aorta. Radiology 1997; 203:109-114.
  Google Scholar
• 20 Isoda H, Takehara Y, Isogai S, et al. Technique for arterial-phase contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the carotid and vertebral arteries. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998; 19:1241-1244.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 21 Huston J, III, Fain SB, Riederer SJ, Wilman AH, Bernstein MA, Busse RF. Carotid arteries: maximizing arterial to venous contrast in fluoroscopically triggered contrast enhanced MR angiography with elliptic centric view ordering. Radiology 1999; 211:265-273.
  Google Scholar
• 22 Kim JK, Farb RI, Wright GA. Test bolus examination in the carotid artery at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1998; 206:283-289.
  Google Scholar
• 23 Isoda H, Takehara Y, Isogai S, et al. Software-triggered contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the intracranial arteries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:371-375.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 24 Milburn JM, Moran CJ, Cross DT, III, Diringer MN, Pilgram TK, Dacey RG, Jr. Effect of intraarterial papaverine on cerebral circulation time. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997; 18:1081-1085.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 25 Riederer SJ, Bernstein MA, Breen JF, et al. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography with real-time fluoroscopic triggering: design specifications and technical reliability in 330 patient studies. Radiology 2000; 215:584-593.
  Google Scholar
• 26 Foo TKF, Saranathan M, Prince MR, Chenevert TL. Automated detection of bolus arrival and initiation of data acquisition in fast, three dimensional, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1997; 203:275-280.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 27 Isogai S, Takehara Y, Isoda H, et al. Pitfalls in enhanced MR angiography: view order and contrast bolus trajectory (abstr). Proceedings of the Sixth Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1998; 177.
  Google Scholar
• 28 Kim JK, Farb RI, Derbyshire JA, et al. Initial blinded comparison of first pass centric 3D Gd-MRA, 2DTOF MRA and IADSA of the carotid arteries (abstr). Proceedings of the Seventh Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1999; 204.
  Google Scholar
• 29 Heiserman JE, Dean BL, Hodak JA, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994; 15:1401-1407.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 30 Parker DL, Goodrich KC, Alexander AL, et al. Optimized visualization of vessels in contrast enhanced intracranial MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1998; 40:873-882.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 31 Fain SB, Riederer SJ, Grimm RC, Huston J, III. Real-time contrast-bolus-synchronized k-space sampling with flip angle modulation (abstr). Proceedings of the Seventh Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1999; 1887.
  Google Scholar