Imaging of the Urachus

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.240122

Frequently overlooked yet clinically significant, the urachus can exhibit a diverse range of pathologic conditions, which can pose a diagnostic challenge at imaging for the radiologist and which require a thorough understanding of urachal embryogenesis.

The urachus is a remnant fibrous cord of the allantois and the ventral aspect of the cloaca that connects the urinary bladder to the anterior abdominal wall at the level of the umbilicus. The authors explore the embryologic origins of the urachus and delineate its normal anatomy, followed by a discussion of urachal pathologic conditions seen with different imaging modalities—including US, CT, and MRI—using a case-based approach. Although it is a vestigial structure, the urachus can harbor significant disease, including congenital anomalies arising secondary to varying degrees of incomplete involution of the urachus and ranging from focal patency (urachal cyst, diverticulum, and sinus) to complete patency (patent urachus). The spectrum of congenital abnormalities can manifest with various clinical findings and is often discovered at imaging when infected. Understanding the embryogenesis of the urachus is therefore crucial for understanding the imaging manifestations of urachal abnormalities. Nonneoplastic urachal masses can be inflammatory and sometimes difficult to differentiate from malignancy. In women, the urachus can be involved by endometriosis. Neoplastic urachal entities can include mucinous cystadenoma, which can rupture with associated mucinous ascites. Adenocarcinoma is the most common urachal malignancy and frequently can extend to involve the urinary bladder. Other malignant urachal entities include urothelial carcinoma and metastasis. Mimics of urachal pathologic conditions can cause diagnostic misperception and include primary bladder malignancy, infections, and dropped gallstones or appendicoliths. This comprehensive overview aims to enhance radiologists’ proficiency in recognizing and interpreting urachal abnormalities, thus contributing to improved patient outcomes.

©RSNA, 2025

Supplemental material is available for this article.

References

  • 1. Begg RC. The Urachus: its Anatomy, Histology and Development. J Anat 1930;64(Pt 2):170–183.
  • 2. Cappele O, Sibert L, Descargues J, Delmas V, Grise P. A study of the anatomic features of the duct of the urachus. Surg Radiol Anat 2001;23(4):229–235.
  • 3. Wilson AL, Gandhi J, Seyam O, et al. Urachal anomalies: a review of pathological conditions, diagnosis, and management. Translational Research in Anatomy 2019;16:100041.
  • 4. Choi YJ, Kim JM, Ahn SY, Oh JT, Han SW, Lee JS. Urachal anomalies in children: a single center experience. Yonsei Med J 2006;47(6):782–786.
  • 5. Sadler TW. Langman’s medical embryology. 15th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2022.
  • 6. Upadhyay V, Kukkady A. Urachal remnants: an enigma. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2003;13(6):372–376.
  • 7. Zieger B, Sokol B, Rohrschneider WK, Darge K, Tröger J. Sonomorphology and involution of the normal urachus in asymptomatic newborns. Pediatr Radiol 1998;28(3):156–161.
  • 8. Naiditch JA, Radhakrishnan J, Chin AC. Current diagnosis and management of urachal remnants. J Pediatr Surg 2013;48(10):2148–2152.
  • 9. Yu J-S, Kim KW, Lee H-J, Lee Y-J, Yoon C-S, Kim M-J. Urachal remnant diseases: spectrum of CT and US findings. RadioGraphics 2001;21(2):451–461.
  • 10. Parada Villavicencio C, Adam SZ, Nikolaidis P, Yaghmai V, Miller FH. Imaging of the Urachus: Anomalies, Complications, and Mimics. RadioGraphics 2016;36(7):2049–2063.
  • 11. Kim S, Wang LL, Heiken JP, Siegel CL, Hildebolt CF, Bae KT. Opacification of urinary bladder and ureter at CT urography: effect of a log-rolling procedure and postvoiding residual bladder urine volume. Radiology 2008;247(3):747–753.
  • 12. Gleason JM, Bowlin PR, Bagli DJ, et al. A comprehensive review of pediatric urachal anomalies and predictive analysis for adult urachal adenocarcinoma. J Urol 2015;193(2):632–636.
  • 13. Ryan PC, Kelly C, Afridi I, et al. Surgical treatment of urachal remnants in an adult population: a single-centre experience. Ir J Med Sci 2023;192(6):3023–3027.
  • 14. Buddha S, Menias CO, Katabathina VS. Imaging of urachal anomalies. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019;44(12):3978–3989.
  • 15. Torabi H, Shirini K, Ghaffari R. Rare case of umbilical urachal sinus mimicking infected umbilical abscess: a case report. Clin Case Rep 2022;10(3):e05598.
  • 16. Luo X, Lin J, Du L, Wu R, Li Z. Ultrasound findings of urachal anomalies: a series of interesting cases. Med Ultrason 2019;21(3):294–298.
  • 17. Frazzini PPM, Kwon SY. Robotic-assisted Excision of a Urachal Diverticulum. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2016;23(7 Supplement):S123.
  • 18. Das JP, Vargas HA, Lee A, et al. The urachus revisited: multimodal imaging of benign & malignant urachal pathology. Br J Radiol 2020;93(1110):20190118.
  • 19. Goldman IL, Caldamone AA, Gauderer M, Hampel N, Wesselhoeft CW, Elder JS. Infected urachal cysts: a review of 10 cases. J Urol 1988;140(2):375–378.
  • 20. Newman BM, Karp MP, Jewett TC, Cooney DR. Advances in the management of infected urachal cysts. J Pediatr Surg 1986;21(12):1051–1054.
  • 21. Iuchtman M, Rahav S, Zer M, Mogilner J, Siplovich L. Management of urachal anomalies in children and adults. Urology 1993;42(4):426–430.
  • 22. Rowell AC, Sangster GP, Caraway JD, Walker PW, Elmajian DA, Heldmann MG. Genitourinary imaging. I. Congenital urinary anomalies and their management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199(5):W545–W553.
  • 23. Dickhoff C, Campo MM, Ophof PJ, Makkus AF, Tan KG, Plaisier PW. Urachus fistula: a rare first presentation of diverticulitis. Case Rep Gastroenterol 2008;2(3):287–290.
  • 24. Victory R, Diamond MP, Johns DA. Villar’s nodule: a case report and systematic literature review of endometriosis externa of the umbilicus. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007;14(1):23–32.
  • 25. Mizutani T, Sakamoto Y, Ochiai H, Maeshima A. Umbilical endometriosis with urachal remnant. Arch Dermatol 2012;148(11):1331–1332.
  • 26. Del Frate C, Girometti R, Pittino M, Del Frate G, Bazzocchi M, Zuiani C. Deep retroperitoneal pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging appearance with laparoscopic correlation. RadioGraphics 2006;26(6):1705–1718.
  • 27. Froehner M, Jahn S, Plodeck V, Laniado M, Wirth MP. Chronically Infected Urachal Remnant Mimicking Tumor with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis. Urology 2018;116:e3–e4.
  • 28. Chen WJ, Hsieh HH, Wan YL. Abscess of urachal remnant mimicking urinary bladder neoplasm. Br J Urol 1992;69(5):510–512.
  • 29. Li S, Meng X, Liang P, et al. Clinical and Radiological Features of Urachal Carcinoma and Infection. Front Oncol 2021;11:702116.
  • 30. Ballard DH, Mazaheri P, Oppenheimer DC, et al. Imaging of Abdominal Wall Masses, Masslike Lesions, and Diffuse Processes. RadioGraphics 2020;40(3):684–706.
  • 31. Amin MB, Smith SC, Eble JN, et al. Glandular neoplasms of the urachus: a report of 55 cases emphasizing mucinous cystic tumors with proposed classification. Am J Surg Pathol 2014;38(8):1033–1045.
  • 32. Wang D, Sule N. Mucinous Cystadenoma of the Urachus and Review of Current Classification of Urachal Mucinous Cystic Neoplasms. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2019;143(2):258–263.
  • 33. Cheng L, Montironi R, Bostwick DG. Villous adenoma of the urinary tract: a report of 23 cases, including 8 with coexistent adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1999;23(7):764–771.
  • 34. Channer JL, Williams JL, Henry L. Villous adenoma of the bladder. J Clin Pathol 1993;46(5):450–452.
  • 35. Ugwuoke O, Hadjipavlou M, Pinto T, Arora A, Hammadeh MY. Villous adenoma of the urachal remnant: a diagnostic conundrum. Rare Tumors 2018;10:2036361318779514.
  • 36. Gopalan A, Sharp DS, Fine SW, et al. Urachal carcinoma: a clinicopathologic analysis of 24 cases with outcome correlation. Am J Surg Pathol 2009;33(5):659–668.
  • 37. Paner GP, Lopez-Beltran A, Sirohi D, Amin MB. Updates in the Pathologic Diagnosis and Classification of Epithelial Neoplasms of Urachal Origin. Adv Anat Pathol 2016;23(2):71–83.
  • 38. Wright JL, Porter MP, Li CI, Lange PH, Lin DW. Differences in survival among patients with urachal and nonurachal adenocarcinomas of the bladder. Cancer 2006;107(4):721–728.
  • 39. Bruins HM, Visser O, Ploeg M, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Kiemeney LA, Witjes JA. The clinical epidemiology of urachal carcinoma: results of a large, population based study. J Urol 2012;188(4):1102–1107.
  • 40. Zhang J, Wu J. Options for diagnosis and treatment of urachal carcinoma. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2013;9(2):117–122.
  • 41. Koster IM, Cleyndert P, Giard RWM. Best cases from the AFIP: urachal carcinoma. RadioGraphics 2009;29(3):939–942.
  • 42. Mylonas KS, O’Malley P, Ziogas IA, El-Kabab L, Nasioudis D. Malignant urachal neoplasms: a population-based study and systematic review of literature. Urol Oncol 2017;35(1):33.e11–33.e19.
  • 43. Monteiro V, Cunha TM. Urachal carcinoma: imaging findings. Acta Radiol Short Rep 2012;1(1): arsr.2011.110018.
  • 44. Das JP, Vargas HA, Ghafoor S, Goh AC, Ulaner GA. Clinical Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT for Staging and Treatment Planning in Urachal Adenocarcinoma. J Nucl Med 2021;62(5):643–647.
  • 45. Han L, Gallan A, Paner GP. Patterns of Urachal Remnant Involvement by Urothelial Carcinoma: Intraluminal Noninvasive Spread Can Mimic a Deep-seated Bladder Invasion. Am J Surg Pathol 2019;43(4):475–479.
  • 46. Paner GP, Barkan GA, Mehta V, et al. Urachal carcinomas of the nonglandular type: salient features and considerations in pathologic diagnosis. Am J Surg Pathol 2012;36(3):432–442.
  • 47. Vikram R, Sandler CM, Ng CS. Imaging and staging of transitional cell carcinoma. I. Lower urinary tract. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192(6):1481–1487.
  • 48. Percarpio R, Siegel A, Seltzer M. Colon cancer metastatic to a urachus diagnosed by PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med 2012;37(5):528–529.
  • 49. Ashley RA, Inman BA, Sebo TJ, et al. Urachal carcinoma: clinicopathologic features and long-term outcomes of an aggressive malignancy. Cancer 2006;107(4):712–720.
  • 50. Sheldon CA, Clayman RV, Gonzalez R, Williams RD, Fraley EE. Malignant urachal lesions. J Urol 1984;131(1):1–8.
  • 51. Pinthus JH, Haddad R, Trachtenberg J, et al. Population based survival data on urachal tumors. J Urol 2006;175(6):2042–2047; discussion 2047.
  • 52. Limonnik V, Samiei A, Abel S, Wegner RE, Vemana G, Mao SS. Urachal carcinoma: a novel staging system utilizing the National Cancer Database. Cancer Med 2023;12(3):2752–2760.
  • 53. Hoegger MJ, Strnad BS, Ballard DH, et al. Urinary Bladder Masses, Rare Subtypes, and Masslike Lesions: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation. RadioGraphics 2023;43(1):e220034.
  • 54. Pecoraro M, Takeuchi M, Vargas HA, et al. Overview of VI-RADS in Bladder Cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020;214(6):1259–1268.
  • 55. Shebel HM, Elsayes KM, Abou El Atta HM, Elguindy YM, El-Diasty TA. Genitourinary schistosomiasis: life cycle and radiologic-pathologic findings. RadioGraphics 2012;32(4):1031–1046.
  • 56. Darraj M. Urinary Bladder Schistosomiasis Mimicking Neoplasm: A Case Report. Medicina (Kaunas) 2022;58(8):1001.
  • 57. Poturalski MJ, Magi-Galluzzi C, Liu PS. Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder Complicating Schistosomiasis: AIRP Best Cases in Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation. RadioGraphics 2017;37(2):500–504.
  • 58. Lee GY, Lee SW, Choi K-J, Hwang JY. An infected urachal cyst containing an appendicolith: a case report. Clin Imaging 2008;32(6):480–482.
  • 59. Phan D, Goh IY, Muduioa G. Pelvic abscess masquerading as urachal malignancy: a rare presentation of retained appendicolith. J Surg Case Rep 2022;2022(2):rjab597.

Article History

Received: Apr 17 2024
Revision requested: May 23 2024
Revision received: July 4 2024
Accepted: July 9 2024
Published online: Apr 10 2025