Pediatric ImagingFree Access

Imaging Review of Normal and Abnormal Skeletal Maturation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.210088

Abstract

The growing skeleton undergoes well-described and predictable normal developmental changes, which may be misinterpreted a as pathologic condition at imaging. Primary and secondary ossification centers (SOCs), which form the diaphysis and the epiphysis of long bones, respectively, are formed by endochondral and intramembranous ossification processes. During skeletal maturation, the SOCs may appear irregular and fragmented, which should not be confused with fractures, osteochondritis dissecans, and osteochondrosis. These normal irregularities are generally symmetric with a smooth, round, and sclerotic appearance, which are aspects that help in the differentiation. The metaphysis, epiphysis, and growth plates or physes are common sites of injuries and normal variants in the pediatric skeleton. The metaphysis contains the newly formed bone from endochondral ossification and is highly vascularized. It is predisposed to easy spread of infections and bone tumors. The physis is the weakest structure of the immature skeleton. Injuries to this location may disrupt endochondral ossification and lead to growth disturbances. Pathologic conditions of the epiphyses may extend into the articular surface and lead to articular damage. At MRI, small and localized foci of bone marrow changes within the epiphysis and metaphysis are also a common finding. These can be related to residual red marrow (especially in the metaphysis of long bones and hindfoot), focal periphyseal edema (associated with the process of physeal closure), and ultimately to a normal ossification process. The authors review the imaging appearance of normal skeletal maturation and discuss common maturation disorders on the basis of developmental stage and location.

©RSNA, 2022

Created with BioRender.com

SA-CME LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After completing this journal-based SA-CME activity, participants will be able to:

  • ■ Describe the fundamental concepts of normal skeleton development.

  • ■ Compare imaging features of normal anatomic variants with those of pathologic conditions.

  • ■ Recognize pertinent imaging features of abnormal skeletal maturation.

Introduction

Skeletal maturation is a dynamic process with foreseeable imaging features and patterns, allowing the radiologist to distinguish normal development from pathologic conditions. In this article, we discuss normal developmental events and their expected imaging features, as well as abnormalities of skeletal maturation based on anatomic structure and developmental stage (Fig 1).

Common disorders of the immature bone. (A) Metaphyseal disorders. 1 =                     simple or aneurysmal bone cyst, 2 = osteochondroma, 3 = osteomyelitis or chronic                     recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO), 4 = fibrous cortical defect or                     nonossifying fibroma (NOF), 5 = osteosarcoma, 6 = residual red marrow, 7 =                     enchondroma. (B) Physeal disorders. 1 = physeal bone bridge, 2 = focal                     periphyseal edema, 3 = stress injury, 4 = fracture. (C) Epiphyseal disorders. 1                     = chondroblastoma, 2 = epiphyseal osteomyelitis, 3 = osteochondritis dissecans                     (OCD), 4 = Trevor disease and epiphyseal growth abnormalities.

Figure 1. Common disorders of the immature bone. (A) Metaphyseal disorders. 1 = simple or aneurysmal bone cyst, 2 = osteochondroma, 3 = osteomyelitis or chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO), 4 = fibrous cortical defect or nonossifying fibroma (NOF), 5 = osteosarcoma, 6 = residual red marrow, 7 = enchondroma. (B) Physeal disorders. 1 = physeal bone bridge, 2 = focal periphyseal edema, 3 = stress injury, 4 = fracture. (C) Epiphyseal disorders. 1 = chondroblastoma, 2 = epiphyseal osteomyelitis, 3 = osteochondritis dissecans (OCD), 4 = Trevor disease and epiphyseal growth abnormalities.

Normal Skeletal Maturation

Bone Formation

Bone formation occurs by intramembranous and endochondral ossification. Intramembranous ossification takes place during the first few months of fetal development in the cranial vault, midclavicle, mandible, and maxilla. Endochondral ossification is the overall dominant process in the skeleton and occurs in the skull base, vertebral column, pelvis, and extremities (1). It utilizes an initial cartilage blueprint that is gradually replaced by bone (2). Both processes occur simultaneously in tubular bone. Longitudinal growth occurs by endochondral ossification, while increase in diameter occurs by intramembranous deposition from the surrounding periosteum (3,4).

Teaching Point The primary ossification center is located in the center of the bone and forms the future diaphysis. The primary physis is located in the ends of the primary ossification center and provides a cartilage precursor for new bone formation, with the newest bone forming the metaphyseal portion (5). The secondary ossification centers (SOCs) are located at the ends of the bone and form the epiphysis (when enclosed by articular cartilage) and apophysis (when it does not articulate with a joint)
(1). They are surrounded by the secondary physis, which is similar to the primary physis and is responsible for spherical bone growth (6). With maturation of both the epiphysis and diaphysis, the physis becomes progressively thinner and eventually disappears, allowing fusion of the epiphyseal and diaphyseal ossification centers (1) (Fig 2).

Bone formation. (A) Endochondral bone formation originates from a                         primary ossification center (POC) utilizing a cartilage model. This model is                         surrounded by a bone collar. (B) Chondrocytes at the center of the cartilage                         model enlarge and die as the matrix calcifies. (C) Blood vessels penetrate                         the cartilage and osteoblasts form new bone, which is the future diaphysis.                         (D) Ossification proceeds from the center toward the ends of the bone, and                         SOCs develop in the epiphyses. (E) Remodeling occurs as growth continues,                         creating a marrow cavity. Endochondral ossification that has finally reached                         the end of the bone becomes better delineated, forming the final physis that                         ultimately rests between the epiphysis and diaphysis of a tubular bone. When                         ossification of both primary and secondary centers is complete, only the                         physis and articular surface contain hyaline cartilage.

Figure 2. Bone formation. (A) Endochondral bone formation originates from a primary ossification center (POC) utilizing a cartilage model. This model is surrounded by a bone collar. (B) Chondrocytes at the center of the cartilage model enlarge and die as the matrix calcifies. (C) Blood vessels penetrate the cartilage and osteoblasts form new bone, which is the future diaphysis. (D) Ossification proceeds from the center toward the ends of the bone, and SOCs develop in the epiphyses. (E) Remodeling occurs as growth continues, creating a marrow cavity. Endochondral ossification that has finally reached the end of the bone becomes better delineated, forming the final physis that ultimately rests between the epiphysis and diaphysis of a tubular bone. When ossification of both primary and secondary centers is complete, only the physis and articular surface contain hyaline cartilage.

Secondary Ossification Centers

The epiphysis begins as a mass of unossified hyaline cartilage between the joint and the primary physis, making it invisible at radiography (68). In infancy, epiphyseal cartilage has low signal intensity at T1-weighted imaging and intermediate-to-high signal intensity with fluid-sensitive sequences (6). As part of endochondral ossification, a preossification center may be visible in certain bones (eg, trochlea of the distal humerus), appearing at MRI as a well-delineated center of high signal intensity at fluid-sensitive imaging within the cartilaginous epiphysis (9). Ossification begins at the center of the cartilaginous epiphysis either as a single center or multiple centers. Newly formed ossification centers contain red marrow and therefore exhibit signal intensity similar to that of the adjacent metaphysis (6). On ossification, the signal intensity converts to that of yellow marrow, which occurs approximately 6 months after radiographic visibility (6,10,11). The remaining epiphyseal cartilage may become progressively heterogeneous with age, with lower signal intensity in the weight-bearing regions, a pattern that is especially observed in the distal femoral condyles (12).

Teaching Point During early development, epiphyseal and apophyseal ossification centers can be numerous, irregular, and fragmented, mimicking fractures, osteochondrosis, and osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) at radiographic examinations
(5,13). Physiologic irregularities of ossification centers are symmetric with smooth, round, and sclerotic borders, sometimes with a jigsaw configuration, and occur along with similar changes in other areas of the skeleton. Conversely, acute fractures have a linear contour with nonsclerotic margins, soft-tissue swelling, and joint effusions (13). MRI is useful in depicting marrow edema or soft-tissue abnormalities, which along with clinical symptoms aid in distinguishing these normal irregularities from traumatic conditions (14)(Fig 3). The age of appearance and fusion of the SOCs varies in each bone, and knowledge of these milestones aids in evaluation of skeletal maturity and differentiation from fractures (15)(Figs 45).

Clinically and radiographically suspected Sever disease in two                         patients with heel pain. (A) Sagittal T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR image in                         a 7-year-old boy shows normal signal intensity of the SOC of the calcaneal                         apophysis (arrowheads). (B) Sagittal T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR image in                         a 9-year-old boy depicts focal high signal intensity in the SOC (arrowhead)                         extending into the calcaneal tuberosity (arrow), which is consistent with                         the diagnosis of calcaneal apophysitis (Sever disease).

Figure 3. Clinically and radiographically suspected Sever disease in two patients with heel pain. (A) Sagittal T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR image in a 7-year-old boy shows normal signal intensity of the SOC of the calcaneal apophysis (arrowheads). (B) Sagittal T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR image in a 9-year-old boy depicts focal high signal intensity in the SOC (arrowhead) extending into the calcaneal tuberosity (arrow), which is consistent with the diagnosis of calcaneal apophysitis (Sever disease).

Ages of appearance (A, B) and fusion (C, D) of the major SOCs of the                         upper and lower extremities (15). F = female, M = male, mths = months, w =                         weeks, y = years.

Figure 4. Ages of appearance (A, B) and fusion (C, D) of the major SOCs of the upper and lower extremities (15). F = female, M = male, mths = months, w = weeks, y = years.

Avulsion of a nonossified medial epicondyle in a 9-year-old boy. (A)                         Anteroposterior radiograph shows visible ossifying centers of the capitellum                         (arrow) and radial head (arrowhead), while those in the medial epicondyle                         and trochlea remain nonossified. (B) Coronal T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR                         image shows avulsion of the unossified center of the medial epicondyle                         (arrow), with distal retraction, resulting in a fluid-filled gap                         (arrowhead). (C) Illustration shows normal ossifying centers of the elbow.                         The medial epicondyle of the distal humerus ossifies by 4–6 years of                         age and fuses at approximately 17 years of age, but there is a large                         variability among these ages. Despite this variability, the medial                         epicondyle usually ossifies before the trochlea. Avulsions of nonossified                         secondary centers are rare. The acronym CRITOE (C = capitellum, R = radial                         head, I = internal or medial epicondyle, T = trochlea, O = olecranon                         process, E = external or lateral epicondyle) serves as a useful guide in the                         assessment of elbow injuries and refers to the order in which SOCs become                         visible on radiographs.

Figure 5. Avulsion of a nonossified medial epicondyle in a 9-year-old boy. (A) Anteroposterior radiograph shows visible ossifying centers of the capitellum (arrow) and radial head (arrowhead), while those in the medial epicondyle and trochlea remain nonossified. (B) Coronal T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR image shows avulsion of the unossified center of the medial epicondyle (arrow), with distal retraction, resulting in a fluid-filled gap (arrowhead). (C) Illustration shows normal ossifying centers of the elbow. The medial epicondyle of the distal humerus ossifies by 4–6 years of age and fuses at approximately 17 years of age, but there is a large variability among these ages. Despite this variability, the medial epicondyle usually ossifies before the trochlea. Avulsions of nonossified secondary centers are rare. The acronym CRITOE (C = capitellum, R = radial head, I = internal or medial epicondyle, T = trochlea, O = olecranon process, E = external or lateral epicondyle) serves as a useful guide in the assessment of elbow injuries and refers to the order in which SOCs become visible on radiographs.

Physis and Metaphysis

The primary physis is organized into three layers from the epiphysis to the metaphysis: the germinal, proliferative, and hypertrophic zones. The hypertrophic zone can be further subdivided into zones of maturation and degeneration and the zone of provisional calcification (ZPC). In the metaphyseal side abutting the ZPC is the primary spongiosa, a highly vascularized structure that contains the newly formed metaphysis (6,16,17). The cartilage layers of the physis, the ZPC, and the primary spongiosa produce a characteristic trilaminar appearance at T2-weighted fat-suppressed MRI (6) (Fig 6).

Normal physis and epiphysis. (A) Sagittal T2-weighted fat-suppressed                         MR image of the medial distal femoral condyle in a 5-year-old girl shows the                         trilaminar appearance of the physeal cartilage (bracketed) from superior to                         inferior: hyperintense primary zone, hypointense ZPC, and hyperintense                         cartilage zone. The ossified SOC (*) with homogeneous low signal                         intensity and the surrounding secondary physis (black arrowhead) are also                         visible. In contrast, the remaining unossified posterior femoral condyle is                         more heterogeneous in signal intensity (arrow). A band of subperiosteal                         fibrovascular tissue separating the periosteum from the adjacent bone cortex                         appears as a thin metaphyseal stripe of high signal intensity (white                         arrowhead). It enhances intensely after administration of an intravenous                         contrast agent because of its rich vascularity and completely disappears                         after physeal closure. (B) Photomicrograph of a rabbit’s physis                         demonstrates the layers in more detail. 1 = germinal zone, 2 = proliferative                         zone, 3 = hypertrophic zone, 4 = zone of endochondral ossification, 5 = zone                         of vascular invasion and ossification. (Masson trichrome stain; original                         magnification, ×100.) (Image courtesy of Jose B. Volpon, MD, PhD,                         Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São                         Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.)

Figure 6. Normal physis and epiphysis. (A) Sagittal T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR image of the medial distal femoral condyle in a 5-year-old girl shows the trilaminar appearance of the physeal cartilage (bracketed) from superior to inferior: hyperintense primary zone, hypointense ZPC, and hyperintense cartilage zone. The ossified SOC (*) with homogeneous low signal intensity and the surrounding secondary physis (black arrowhead) are also visible. In contrast, the remaining unossified posterior femoral condyle is more heterogeneous in signal intensity (arrow). A band of subperiosteal fibrovascular tissue separating the periosteum from the adjacent bone cortex appears as a thin metaphyseal stripe of high signal intensity (white arrowhead). It enhances intensely after administration of an intravenous contrast agent because of its rich vascularity and completely disappears after physeal closure. (B) Photomicrograph of a rabbit’s physis demonstrates the layers in more detail. 1 = germinal zone, 2 = proliferative zone, 3 = hypertrophic zone, 4 = zone of endochondral ossification, 5 = zone of vascular invasion and ossification. (Masson trichrome stain; original magnification, ×100.) (Image courtesy of Jose B. Volpon, MD, PhD, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.)

The physis starts as a flat disk before assuming a more undulating configuration during childhood. The thickness of the normal physis should be uniform throughout, and focal thickening is suggestive of a disturbance in endochondral ossification. Physiologic physeal closure depends on the evaluated bone, although it generally commences in the center before progressing to the periphery. The secondary physis surrounding the SOC has a signal intensity similar to that of the main physis but is thinner and less conspicuous. On physiologic closure, the physis leaves behind a physeal scar representing the residual ZPC (6).

Physiologic arrest of bone growth produces transverse sclerotic metaphyseal lines parallel to the physis, termed Park-Harris lines. When numerous, these lines are suggestive of prior infection, trauma, or the administration of bisphosphonates (8). These insults lead to slowing of cartilage conversion to bone but continued mineralization of the metaphyseal trabeculae, forming a visible growth recovery line (6). With focal insult to the physis, the recovery line deviates from its parallel orientation and remains focally tethered to the physis, forming a physeal bridge (18) (Fig 7). Systemic insults such as metabolic (eg, hypoparathyroidism) or nutritional (eg, vitamin D deficiency) derangements produce similar dense lines of calcification not during the stage of malnutrition but after refeeding (19). Growth arrest lines occur initially along the surface of the epiphysis or apophysis near which they are formed, resulting in a bone-within-bone appearance in vertebral endplates and patellae (8,19).

Distal femoral physeal bridge from previous septic arthritis and                         osteomyelitis. Sagittal CT image of the knee demonstrates a focal bony                         bridge (arrow) tethering the epiphysis to the metaphysis and disrupting                         normal growth. There is also posterior dislocation of the epiphysis with                         respect to the metaphysis (black arrowhead) and transverse lines of                         sclerosis within the metaphysis, representing growth arrest lines or                         Park-Harris lines (white arrowhead).

Figure 7. Distal femoral physeal bridge from previous septic arthritis and osteomyelitis. Sagittal CT image of the knee demonstrates a focal bony bridge (arrow) tethering the epiphysis to the metaphysis and disrupting normal growth. There is also posterior dislocation of the epiphysis with respect to the metaphysis (black arrowhead) and transverse lines of sclerosis within the metaphysis, representing growth arrest lines or Park-Harris lines (white arrowhead).

The chondro-osseous junction in flat bones and the outermost part of the SOC are referred to as metaphyseal equivalents and include the triradiate cartilage, ischiopubic synchondrosis, sacroiliac joint, and periphery of round bones (eg, talus). These sites are highly vascularized with sluggish blood flow and are therefore vulnerable to osteomyelitis and other hematogenous processes, similar to the typical metaphyses of long bones (20).

Periosteum and Perichondrium

The periosteum is subdivided into an outer fibrous layer and an inner osteogenic cambium layer. It lines almost the entire length of long bones, extending along the primary ossification center and the extra-articular portions of the SOC. Sesamoid bones like the carpus and intra-articular portions of SOCs are largely devoid of periosteum (3). At MRI, it is possible to identify the layers of the periosteum. The outer fibrocartilaginous layer exhibits low signal intensity at T2-weighted MRI, is continuous with the perichondrium, and terminates inferiorly with the junction of the epiphyseal articular cartilage. The inner vascular layer (cambium layer) surrounds the cortex and forms a long strip of high signal intensity at T2-weighted imaging that avidly enhances after intravenous administration of a contrast agent (21).

The perichondrium lies at the junction of the physis and the periosteum, surrounding the main physeal cartilage. Its main role is increasing the cross-sectional area of the physis, enabling growth of both length and diameter (20). The groove of Ranvier, a triangular area of intermediate-to-low signal intensity at T2-weighted imaging, lies in the deep portion of the perichondrium and consists of loosely packed cells that induce chondrogenesis and osteogenesis. Transverse fibers extend from the perichondrium to the periphery of the germinal zone of the physis. These transverse fibers tightly secure the perichondrium to the underlying physis, preventing separation of the epiphysis or metaphysis from the physis during trauma and acting as a barrier to the spread of subperiosteal abscesses and tumors (21). Contrary to this tight perichondral-physeal attachment, the attachment of the periosteum to the cortex is very loose. Hemorrhage, pus, or neoplastic cells can easily elevate the periosteum and form subperiosteal collections (6). The chondro-osseous junction of the perichondrium forms the ring of LaCroix, which is composed of a thin bone spur at the periphery of the physis and a straight contour on the metaphysis (3,21) (Fig 8).

Periosteum and perichondrium. (A) Sagittal T2-weighted fat-suppressed                         MR image of the posterior aspect of the distal femur in a 12-year-old girl                         shows the perichondrium (bracket) as an inferior extension of the fibrous                         layer of the periosteum (straight white arrow). Both structures exhibit low                         signal intensity with all sequences. The vascular or cambium layer of the                         periosteum is hyperintense (curved white arrow). The perichondrium extends                         slightly distally beyond the physis (black arrowhead) and terminates at its                         junction with the articular cartilage (black arrow). The perichondrial wedge                         (red arrow) is a triangular area of hypointense signal intensity composed of                         the groove of Ranvier and transverse fibers. (B) Photomicrograph of the                         physis in a 9-week-old mouse demonstrates the epiphysis (1), physis (2), and                         metaphysis (3). The perichondrium (red arrows) is firmly adherent to the                         cartilage and continues longitudinally to surround the adjacent most newly                         formed trabeculae of the metaphysis. The perichondrium and periosteum (black                         arrows) have similar developmental pathways, with some continuous fibers                         merging at the level of the physis, forming the roof over the groove of                         Ranvier. (Hematoxylin-eosin stain; original magnification, ×50.)                         (Image courtesy of Ariane Zamarioli, PhD, Faculdade de Medicina de                         Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão                         Preto, SP, Brazil.)

Figure 8. Periosteum and perichondrium. (A) Sagittal T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR image of the posterior aspect of the distal femur in a 12-year-old girl shows the perichondrium (bracket) as an inferior extension of the fibrous layer of the periosteum (straight white arrow). Both structures exhibit low signal intensity with all sequences. The vascular or cambium layer of the periosteum is hyperintense (curved white arrow). The perichondrium extends slightly distally beyond the physis (black arrowhead) and terminates at its junction with the articular cartilage (black arrow). The perichondrial wedge (red arrow) is a triangular area of hypointense signal intensity composed of the groove of Ranvier and transverse fibers. (B) Photomicrograph of the physis in a 9-week-old mouse demonstrates the epiphysis (1), physis (2), and metaphysis (3). The perichondrium (red arrows) is firmly adherent to the cartilage and continues longitudinally to surround the adjacent most newly formed trabeculae of the metaphysis. The perichondrium and periosteum (black arrows) have similar developmental pathways, with some continuous fibers merging at the level of the physis, forming the roof over the groove of Ranvier. (Hematoxylin-eosin stain; original magnification, ×50.) (Image courtesy of Ariane Zamarioli, PhD, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.)

Teaching Point The perichondrium becomes progressively weaker and less prominent with maturation until it is completely replaced by periosteum after physeal closure. In young children, fractures at the physeal-metaphyseal junction spare the perichondrium, which is contrary to injuries in older children
. Evaluation of the continuity of the perichondrium is particularly important in assessing minimally or nondisplaced physeal fractures and occult Salter-Harris type I injuries. It is crucial to detect interposition of perichondrium or periosteum into the physeal cleavage plane of a fracture, which may preclude fracture healing and cause a predisposition to bone bridge formation (21).

Bone Marrow

Bone is composed of red (hematopoietic) and yellow (fatty) marrow, the proportions of which evolve with skeletal maturation. Hematopoietic or red marrow is 40% fat and 40% water, while yellow or fatty marrow is 80% fat and 15% water (22). Neonatal marrow is predominantly hematopoietic because of an increased demand for oxygen. Conversion from red to yellow marrow occurs during the first few months of life, following a well-established pattern (10,23). In a single long bone, conversion begins in the epiphysis followed by the diaphysis and distal metaphysis before finally reaching the proximal metaphysis. Within the body, this transformation proceeds from the periphery (phalanges) to the center (humeri and femora) of the appendicular skeleton (22,24).

Bone marrow conversion is generally complete by the time an individual reaches 25 years of age. Adult marrow is predominantly yellow, with areas of residual red marrow in the axial skeleton and proximal metaphyses of the appendicular skeleton (ie, proximal femora and humeri) (Fig 9). In situations requiring increased hematopoietic demand (eg, chronic anemia, smoking, at high altitude, and during athletic activities), reconversion from yellow to red marrow occurs in the reverse order from axial to the appendicular skeleton and within the long bones proceeding from the proximal metaphysis, distal metaphysis, diaphysis, and finally, epiphysis (24).

Bone marrow maturation and conversion from hematopoietic to fatty                         marrow. (A) In neonates and infants younger than 1 year of age, the marrow                         is comprised completely of hematopoietic marrow. (B) Between 1 and 10 years                         of age, the conversion from hematopoietic to fatty marrow starts in the most                         distal portions of the extremities and proceeds in a centripetal direction.                         Within a specific long bone, conversion to fatty marrow originates in the                         epiphyseal ossification center and central diaphysis. (C) During adolescence                         (10–20 years of age), this conversion occurs in the distal metaphysis                         and proximal metaphysis. (D) Typically, a small amount of red marrow remains                         in the proximal metaphysis even after skeletal maturation.

Figure 9. Bone marrow maturation and conversion from hematopoietic to fatty marrow. (A) In neonates and infants younger than 1 year of age, the marrow is comprised completely of hematopoietic marrow. (B) Between 1 and 10 years of age, the conversion from hematopoietic to fatty marrow starts in the most distal portions of the extremities and proceeds in a centripetal direction. Within a specific long bone, conversion to fatty marrow originates in the epiphyseal ossification center and central diaphysis. (C) During adolescence (10–20 years of age), this conversion occurs in the distal metaphysis and proximal metaphysis. (D) Typically, a small amount of red marrow remains in the proximal metaphysis even after skeletal maturation.

Changes in the proportions of red and yellow marrow during conversion and reconversion determine their signal intensity (6). Red marrow is depicted with low-to-intermediate signal intensity at T1-weighted imaging, generally lower than that of yellow marrow but higher than that of muscle or intervertebral disks. At fat-suppressed and short τ inversion-recovery (STIR) imaging, the signal intensity is intermediate to high and higher than in yellow marrow. Mild enhancement with administration of intravenous gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) is observed owing to its vascularity (25). Yellow marrow signal intensity is high at T1-weighted imaging and low at fat-suppressed and STIR imaging, similar to that in subcutaneous fat. In the fetus and neonate, the signal intensity of red marrow is typically lower than in muscle or intervertebral disks (10). This appearance should not be mistaken for a hematopoietic or infiltrative marrow disorder (Fig 10).

Normal marrow signal intensity of the lumbar spine in a 5-day-old                         girl. (A) Sagittal T1-weighted MR image of the lumbar spine shows normal low                         signal intensity of the red marrow of the vertebral bodies, similar to that                         of the intervertebral disk. (B) Corresponding sagittal T2-weighted MR image                         shows higher signal intensity of the intervertebral disk compared with that                         of the vertebral body.

Figure 10. Normal marrow signal intensity of the lumbar spine in a 5-day-old girl. (A) Sagittal T1-weighted MR image of the lumbar spine shows normal low signal intensity of the red marrow of the vertebral bodies, similar to that of the intervertebral disk. (B) Corresponding sagittal T2-weighted MR image shows higher signal intensity of the intervertebral disk compared with that of the vertebral body.

A common finding in the pediatric population is heterogeneous residual red marrow. These areas have a typical appearance and location, allowing differentiation from pathologic conditions (22). Normal residual metaphyseal hematopoietic marrow is characterized by a flame-shaped configuration with a base at or adjacent to the physis and straight vertical margins (6,24). Patchy or hemispheric T1-weighted hypointense foci similar to that of the red marrow of the metaphysis can also be seen in the epiphysis, especially in the subarticular regions of the proximal humerus and proximal femur. With T1-weighted sequences, normal red marrow should exhibit higher signal intensity compared with that of adjacent muscle (7). Scattered foci of patchy marrow hyperintensity at T2-weighted imaging throughout the hind and midfoot are also common in children. They are nonspecific and are typically caused by immobilization, residual red marrow, or physiologic stress (6).

Vascular Supply

The metaphysis and epiphysis are supplied by two separate vascular beds. During the first 18 months of life, transphyseal vessels connect the metaphysis and epiphysis through the physis, enabling direct and easy spread of infections and metastatic cells (7,2628). Epiphyseal extension leads to destruction of the articular cartilage, with a predisposition to a higher incidence of septic arthritis in this age group (27). These vessels completely involute at approximately 18 months of age after which terminal vessels of nutrient arteries stop or loop just short of the physis, creating microarcades of sluggish vascular flow, causing a predisposition to easy spread of hematogenous processes to the metaphysis while sparing the epiphysis (29,30).

Abnormal Skeletal Maturation

Disorders of Bone Development: Osteochondrosis

Osteochondrosis refers to a group of disorders characterized by abnormal endochondral ossification of the epiphyses or epiphyseal-equivalent bones. The pathogenesis is not fully understood, but genetic causes, repetitive trauma, vascular abnormalities, mechanical factors, and hormonal imbalances have been implicated (31). Some cases appear to be primarily traumatic, whereas others are mainly ischemic, in which the role of trauma is hypothetical (Figs 1113). Each osteochondrosis has a designated eponymous clinical diagnosis based on location (32) (Table).

Apophyseal disorders due to chronic traction injuries. Sagittal                         T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR image in a 12-year-old boy shows marrow edema                         in the patellar tendon entheses in the inferior pole of the patella and the                         anterior tibial tuberosity (arrows), which is consistent with                         Sinding-Larsen-Johansson and Osgood-Schlatter disease, respectively. Small                         deep infrapatellar bursitis (arrowhead) is also demonstrated.

Figure 11. Apophyseal disorders due to chronic traction injuries. Sagittal T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR image in a 12-year-old boy shows marrow edema in the patellar tendon entheses in the inferior pole of the patella and the anterior tibial tuberosity (arrows), which is consistent with Sinding-Larsen-Johansson and Osgood-Schlatter disease, respectively. Small deep infrapatellar bursitis (arrowhead) is also demonstrated.

(12) Anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis in a 4-year-old boy                         shows bilateral (left greater than right) sclerosis and fragmentation of the                         SOCs of the femoral heads, which are consistent with a more advanced stage                         of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease. (13) Köhler disease in an                         8-year-old boy. (A) Sagittal T1-weighted MR image of the foot shows                         fragmentation and sclerosis of the navicular bone (arrow), which are                         consistent with Köhler disease. (B) Sagittal T2-weighted                         fat-suppressed MR image shows diffusely scattered patchy foci of signal                         hyperintensity throughout the midfoot and hindfoot (arrowheads). These                         “bright spots” are often seen in children’s ankles and                         are nonspecific, with the most common causes being immobilization, residual                         red marrow, and physiologic stress.

Figures 12, 13. (12) Anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis in a 4-year-old boy shows bilateral (left greater than right) sclerosis and fragmentation of the SOCs of the femoral heads, which are consistent with a more advanced stage of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease. (13) Köhler disease in an 8-year-old boy. (A) Sagittal T1-weighted MR image of the foot shows fragmentation and sclerosis of the navicular bone (arrow), which are consistent with Köhler disease. (B) Sagittal T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR image shows diffusely scattered patchy foci of signal hyperintensity throughout the midfoot and hindfoot (arrowheads). These “bright spots” are often seen in children’s ankles and are nonspecific, with the most common causes being immobilization, residual red marrow, and physiologic stress.

Common Osteochondroses

Imaging appearance depends on disease stage and severity. Radiography is useful in the initial assessment, showing sclerosis, fragmentation, and collapse of the SOC.

Teaching Point Fragmentation of certain areas such as the tibial tubercle, calcaneal apophysitis, and tarsal navicular (Osgood-Schlatter disease, Sever disease, and Köhler disease, respectively) can be seen in healthy asymptomatic individuals, making marrow and soft-tissue evaluation with MRI crucial
(32). Osteonecrosis initially manifests with low signal intensity at T1-weighted imaging and increased signal intensity at T2-weighted and STIR imaging. Advanced disease manifests with low signal intensity at T1- and T2-weighted imaging because of sclerosis, usually with morphologic derangements such as subchondral flattening, collapse, or irregularity (32,33).

Disorders of the Physis

Salter-Harris Fractures.—The Salter-Harris classification system subdivides physeal fractures on the basis of anatomy and fracture pattern (17) (Fig 14). These fractures occur at the ZPC, a transition point that is weaker than the surrounding structures and is therefore more prone to trauma (34). Horizontally oriented fractures (Salter-Harris types I and II) that follow the plane of the physis result in less bone bridge formation than vertically oriented fractures traversing the physis and breaching the reserve and proliferative layers (Salter-Harris types III and IV) (16).

Salter-Harris classification of physeal fractures. A type I fracture                         involves the physis only and is recognized for producing subtle radiographic                         findings such as widening, haziness, sclerosis, irregularity of the physis,                         or periphyseal osteopenia. Type II fractures are the most common overall,                         propagating along the physis and exiting through a portion of the                         metaphysis, yielding a triangular fragment. A type III fracture is                         intra-articular, exiting through the epiphysis from the physis and causing a                         predisposition to stunted growth and premature osteoarthritis. A type IV                         fracture extends from the articular surface through the epiphysis and physis                         to exit through the metaphysis and is prone to bony bar formation that leads                         to asymmetric growth and limb deformity. Type V is a crush injury to the                         physis that may also occur secondary to a stress injury and repetitive                         loading.

Figure 14. Salter-Harris classification of physeal fractures. A type I fracture involves the physis only and is recognized for producing subtle radiographic findings such as widening, haziness, sclerosis, irregularity of the physis, or periphyseal osteopenia. Type II fractures are the most common overall, propagating along the physis and exiting through a portion of the metaphysis, yielding a triangular fragment. A type III fracture is intra-articular, exiting through the epiphysis from the physis and causing a predisposition to stunted growth and premature osteoarthritis. A type IV fracture extends from the articular surface through the epiphysis and physis to exit through the metaphysis and is prone to bony bar formation that leads to asymmetric growth and limb deformity. Type V is a crush injury to the physis that may also occur secondary to a stress injury and repetitive loading.

Radiographic findings include a frank physeal fracture, growth arrest line, or a physeal bony bridge (7). Subtle nondisplaced fractures may necessitate imaging of the contralateral side for comparison. Physeal fracture causing growth arrest is the most common cause of bone bridging across the physis (35) (Fig 15). Most bridges occur in areas of physeal undulation such as the distal femoral physis and medial aspect of the distal tibial physis (the Kump bump). Isolated areas of normal physeal undulation should not be mistaken for a bridge (26). Radiographic follow-up to evaluate for growth disturbances is recommended in high-risk physeal injuries. In a high-energy displaced distal femur fracture, radiography should be performed every 3 months until normal growth has resumed and has been documented (36). In many cases, the recommended period of observation can amount to anywhere from 2 years up to skeletal maturity (36,37). Close radiologic monitoring could help identify an angular growth deformity before it is clinically apparent, increasing the chances of successful surgical correction (37). CT enables accurate measurement of the bone bar when surgical excision is contemplated. MRI helps evaluate more complex injuries, directly depicting cartilage and soft-tissue involvement and potential complications (34). Physeal fracture shows low signal intensity with T1-weighted sequences and high signal intensity with fluid-sensitive sequences with disruption of the normal trilaminar appearance of the physis (7,38) (Figs 1617).

Distal radius physeal bridge from previous trauma. Coronal (A) and                         sagittal (B) CT images of the wrist in a 10-year-old girl show a large                         central bony bridge (arrow) tethering the epiphysis to the metaphysis and                         disrupting normal growth. The bone length of the radius is shortened with                         respect to the ulna, and there is also mild volar angulation of the                         epiphysis.

Figure 15. Distal radius physeal bridge from previous trauma. Coronal (A) and sagittal (B) CT images of the wrist in a 10-year-old girl show a large central bony bridge (arrow) tethering the epiphysis to the metaphysis and disrupting normal growth. The bone length of the radius is shortened with respect to the ulna, and there is also mild volar angulation of the epiphysis.

(16) Salter-Harris type I fracture in a 14-year-old adolescent boy.                         Coronal T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR image of the ankle shows extensive                         marrow edema in the metaphysis and epiphysis surrounding a focal area of                         physeal widening (arrowhead), which is consistent with a nondisplaced type I                         Salter-Harris fracture of the fibula. Thin subperiosteal hematoma (arrow)                         along the lateral aspect of the distal fibula is also present. (17)                         Salter-Harris type II fracture in a 15-year-old adolescent boy after falling                         on an outstretched hand. Sagittal T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR image of the                         wrist demonstrates physeal widening (arrowheads) and a fracture fragment                         arising from the metaphyseal corner (arrow), which are findings consistent                         with the Thurston Holland fragment of a Salter-Harris type II                         injury.

Figures 16, 17. (16) Salter-Harris type I fracture in a 14-year-old adolescent boy. Coronal T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR image of the ankle shows extensive marrow edema in the metaphysis and epiphysis surrounding a focal area of physeal widening (arrowhead), which is consistent with a nondisplaced type I Salter-Harris fracture of the fibula. Thin subperiosteal hematoma (arrow) along the lateral aspect of the distal fibula is also present. (17) Salter-Harris type II fracture in a 15-year-old adolescent boy after falling on an outstretched hand. Sagittal T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR image of the wrist demonstrates physeal widening (arrowheads) and a fracture fragment arising from the metaphyseal corner (arrow), which are findings consistent with the Thurston Holland fragment of a Salter-Harris type II injury.

Chronic Stress Injuries.—The pediatric skeleton is prone to stress injuries because of increased physical activity, decreased muscle mass and bone mineral content, and a weak chondro-osseous junction.

Teaching Point The physeal cartilage of the epiphysis and apophysis is the weakest structure, and injuries to this location disrupt endochondral ossification, ultimately leading to growth disturbances if the stressor is not removed
(39).

Radiographs show physeal widening, irregularity, and fragmentation (39). MRI demonstrates effacement of the ZPC, adjacent marrow edema, and T2-weighted and STIR-hyperintense unmineralized cartilage extending into the metaphysis (7,39,40). Physeal widening owing to chronic stress must be distinguished from an acute Salter-Harris type I injury (40) (Fig 18).

Physeal chronic stress injury. Coronal T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR                         image of the shoulder in a 14-year-old male baseball player shows diffuse                         widening and increased signal intensity of the physis of the proximal                         humerus (arrowheads). The absence of a recent traumatic event and the                         patient’s athletic background are more suggestive of overuse injury                         or Little League shoulder rather than an acute physis injury.

Figure 18. Physeal chronic stress injury. Coronal T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR image of the shoulder in a 14-year-old male baseball player shows diffuse widening and increased signal intensity of the physis of the proximal humerus (arrowheads). The absence of a recent traumatic event and the patient’s athletic background are more suggestive of overuse injury or Little League shoulder rather than an acute physis injury.

Focal Periphyseal Edema.—Focal periphyseal edema (FOPE) is a distinct MRI finding in the distal femur, proximal tibia, and proximal fibula of adolescents with knee pain (41). It manifests with focal bone marrow edema centered at an open but narrow physis that extends into the metaphysis and epiphysis (41,42). It is most conspicuous at fat-suppressed or fluid-sensitive imaging, which optimally depict the starburst pattern of edema surrounding the closing physis (41,43). A few authors suggest that it represents a normal step of physeal fusion given the remarkably consistent age and degree of skeletal maturation of patients and location within the affected bone (41). Adjacent marrow edema may be confused for chronic overuse injury, and distinction can be made on the basis of the appearance of the physis (Fig 19).

Normal process of physeal fusion. Sagittal T2-weighted fat-suppressed                         MR image of the knee in a 13-year-old adolescent girl without known sport                         activity shows a focal area of marrow edema surrounding the physis (arrow)                         slightly extending into the metaphysis and the epiphysis, mostly in keeping                         with the normal process of physeal fusion or a FOPE zone. The physis itself                         is normal, without abnormal widening or fragmentation.

Figure 19. Normal process of physeal fusion. Sagittal T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR image of the knee in a 13-year-old adolescent girl without known sport activity shows a focal area of marrow edema surrounding the physis (arrow) slightly extending into the metaphysis and the epiphysis, mostly in keeping with the normal process of physeal fusion or a FOPE zone. The physis itself is normal, without abnormal widening or fragmentation.

Disorders of the Epiphysis

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.—Developmental dysplasia of the hip is a common developmental disorder caused by an abnormal relationship between the femoral head and acetabulum (44). Imaging findings vary with age and range from an immature and shallow acetabulum to hip subluxation and frank dislocation (45). The exact cause is unclear, with multiple risk factors, including mechanical causes (oligohydramnios, breech positioning, neuromuscular disorders, postnatal swaddling in adduction with the hips extended), family history, and female predisposition.

The use of imaging techniques is dictated by the age of the infant. US is the initial imaging modality of choice and should be performed during the first 6–8 weeks (44). It evaluates acetabular morphology, femoral head coverage by the bony and cartilaginous acetabular rim and labrum, joint congruency, and stability through stress dynamic maneuvers (46). Radiography is recommended at 4–6 months of age and allows evaluation of ossification development and symmetry, acetabular morphology, and the relationship between the femoral head and acetabulum (44,47). The use of advanced imaging techniques such as CT and MRI is reserved for complex cases and pre- or postoperative evaluation (Fig 20). MRI helps assess acetabular retroversion and femoral head coverage, shows structures that may hamper reduction, and depicts potential postoperative complications (eg, avascular necrosis) (7,45).

Developmental dysplasia of the hip. (A) Anteroposterior radiograph                         obtained preoperatively in a 1-year-old boy shows superolateral subluxation                         of the right femoral head. The right acetabulum is shallow with a steep                         roof, and the right femoral head ossification center is smaller than that on                         the contralateral side. (B) Coronal CT image obtained after relocation and                         iliac osteotomy (arrows) confirms concentric reduction.

Figure 20. Developmental dysplasia of the hip. (A) Anteroposterior radiograph obtained preoperatively in a 1-year-old boy shows superolateral subluxation of the right femoral head. The right acetabulum is shallow with a steep roof, and the right femoral head ossification center is smaller than that on the contralateral side. (B) Coronal CT image obtained after relocation and iliac osteotomy (arrows) confirms concentric reduction.

Blount Disease.—Blount disease is a developmental abnormality due to delayed endochondral development of the medial aspect of the proximal tibial epiphysis, producing varus and procurvatum deformity of the tibia (7,48). It has a bimodal distribution, typically occurring during early childhood (infant variety) or in adolescence (32). Early-onset or infantile Blount disease (<4 years) is hypothesized to be a form of osteochondrosis, while late-onset disease (≥4 years) is due to premature closure of the medial tibial physis (7,32). Bilateral involvement is common and typically affects children with obesity who are of African American or Scandinavian descent (7).

Standing anteroposterior weight-bearing radiography of both knees is the initial imaging method of choice but is limited in demonstrating the extent of physeal aberration and bone bridge formation. MRI findings include widening, depression, and irregularity of the posteromedial physis; small chondral intrusions into the metaphysis; focal osteochondral defects; and varus deformity of the lower leg (48) (Fig 21). Bone bridge formation between the tibial epiphysis and metaphysis leads to gait deviations, limb-length discrepancy, and premature arthritis (7,48).

Coronal T1-weighted MR image of the knee in a 12-year-old boy with                         Blount disease shows abnormal metaphyseal beaking and downsloping (arrow),                         producing varus deformity of the proximal tibial shaft.

Figure 21. Coronal T1-weighted MR image of the knee in a 12-year-old boy with Blount disease shows abnormal metaphyseal beaking and downsloping (arrow), producing varus deformity of the proximal tibial shaft.

Osteochondritis Dissecans.—OCD is a distinct clinical-pathologic entity resulting from localized disturbance and cessation of normal ossification of a segment of the secondary physis. The segment remains cartilaginous, lagging behind the rest of the epiphysis, which continues to ossify from the center to the periphery, producing a defect that is radiolucent relative to the rest of the secondary physis. This “inside-out” mechanism is contrary to the “outside-in” pathomechanism of acute traumatic osteochondral injury, which affects articular cartilage first and subchondral bone last. With incessant forces applied to the joint surface, the segment can partially ossify or detach from the parent bone (49). An often-implicated mechanism is repetitive epiphyseal trauma that interrupts endochondral ossification at the secondary physis, similar to that of stress injuries in the primary physis (40,50).

The condition can manifest either in childhood (juvenile OCD [JOCD]) or middle age (adult OCD), most commonly between the ages of 10 and 15 years (7,49). Males, especially high-level athletes, are affected more often than females (49). The most commonly affected joint is the knee, followed by the ankle, elbow, shoulder, and hip (51). It is most common in the lateral intercondylar aspect of the medial femoral condyle, with or without extension to the central weight-bearing aspect. Other sites include the inferocentral (weight bearing) aspect, lateral condyle, and patella (49,50).

MRI is primarily performed for detection of the osteochondral defect and bone fragment in situ and to evaluate stability (7). Criteria for instability in JOCD slightly differ from that of adult OCD and include a fluidlike high T2-weighted signal intensity rim around the fragment, a second outer rim of low T2-weighted signal intensity, a high-signal-intensity line extending through the articular cartilage overlying the lesion, osteochondral defect filled with joint fluid, and multiple breaks in the subchondral bone plate (52). In JOCD lesions, multiple cysts and a single cyst greater than 5 mm in diameter have low sensitivity but high specificity for the differentiation between stable and unstable lesions (52). In the knee, a normal developmental ossification may be mistaken for JOCD. The two entities can be differentiated on the basis of location in the femoral condyle, status of the overlying cartilage, and marrow signal intensity (Fig 22). In contrast to JOCD, normal developmental ossification is located in the non–weight-bearing portion of the lateral femoral condyle, with normal overlying cartilage and marrow signal intensity. Untreated JOCD may progress to articular surface incongruity, loose bodies, and early joint degeneration (7,49,50).

Physiologic irregular ossification and OCD. (A, B) Sagittal                         T1-weighted (A) and T2-weighted fat-suppressed (B) MR images of the knee in                         a 9-year-old boy show subchondral irregularity in the posterior aspect                         non–weight-bearing portion of the lateral femoral condyle (arrow).                         The overlying articular cartilage is normal, and there is no corresponding                         marrow edema in the fluid-sensitive sequence, findings consistent with                         developmental irregular ossification. (C, D) Sagittal T1-weighted (C) and                         T2-weighted fat-suppressed (D) MR images of the knee in a 13-year-old boy                         show a large subchondral bone plate concavity and irregularity in the                         central weight-bearing aspect of the medial femoral condyle (black arrow in                         C). There is surrounding marrow edema and an osteochondral fragment in situ                         (arrowheads in D), which are findings indicative of OCD.

Figure 22. Physiologic irregular ossification and OCD. (A, B) Sagittal T1-weighted (A) and T2-weighted fat-suppressed (B) MR images of the knee in a 9-year-old boy show subchondral irregularity in the posterior aspect non–weight-bearing portion of the lateral femoral condyle (arrow). The overlying articular cartilage is normal, and there is no corresponding marrow edema in the fluid-sensitive sequence, findings consistent with developmental irregular ossification. (C, D) Sagittal T1-weighted (C) and T2-weighted fat-suppressed (D) MR images of the knee in a 13-year-old boy show a large subchondral bone plate concavity and irregularity in the central weight-bearing aspect of the medial femoral condyle (black arrow in C). There is surrounding marrow edema and an osteochondral fragment in situ (arrowheads in D), which are findings indicative of OCD.

Growth Abnormalities of the Epiphysis.—Dysplasia epiphysealis hemimelica (DEH) or Trevor disease is a rare benign developmental disorder characterized by asymmetric osteochondral overgrowth in the medial or lateral aspect of the developing epiphysis (7,53). It manifests with a lobulated protruding mass containing a cartilaginous cap similar to that of an osteochondroma (7). Whereas DEH is comprised of clusters of disorganized chondrocytes and unabsorbed cartilage fragments, osteochondromas follow a more orderly contiguous ossification process that closely simulates normal physeal development. It typically affects the lower limb rather than the upper limb and the medial rather than the lateral side. Symptoms depend on the size and location of the lesion and include pain, swelling, and limited movements (53).

Radiography shows multiple ossific masses, asymmetric epiphyseal enlargement, an irregular ossification center, or a combination of these findings. Long-standing disease is characterized by increasingly prominent and numerous ossification centers that are greater than expected for age farther from the central epiphyseal ossification center and asymmetric to the unaffected limb (53). MRI is an invaluable tool for complete assessment of the nonossified components of the lesion, effect on surrounding tissues, and status of the physis and articular cartilage (54,55) (Fig 23).

DEH or Trevor disease. Anteroposterior radiograph (A) and coronal                         T1-weighted (B) and T2-weighted fat-suppressed (C) MR images of the wrist in                         a 7-year-old girl show expansion of a sclerotic distal scaphoid pole, which                         is suggestive of osteochondral overgrowth, whereas the proximal pole is                         fragmented in appearance (arrowhead), representing numerous and irregular                         ossification centers. The disease has three forms based on distribution:                         localized DEH (one epiphysis), classic DEH (more than one epiphysis), and                         generalized DEH (all epiphyses of an extremity from the pelvis to the                         foot).

Figure 23. DEH or Trevor disease. Anteroposterior radiograph (A) and coronal T1-weighted (B) and T2-weighted fat-suppressed (C) MR images of the wrist in a 7-year-old girl show expansion of a sclerotic distal scaphoid pole, which is suggestive of osteochondral overgrowth, whereas the proximal pole is fragmented in appearance (arrowhead), representing numerous and irregular ossification centers. The disease has three forms based on distribution: localized DEH (one epiphysis), classic DEH (more than one epiphysis), and generalized DEH (all epiphyses of an extremity from the pelvis to the foot).

Acquired growth abnormalities of the epiphysis can manifest with a configuration similar to that of the developmental disorders of the epiphysis. Fishtail deformity of the elbow is a delayed complication of a remote supracondylar, condylar, or Salter-Harris type I epiphyseal fracture of the humerus in early childhood (56). Precarious blood supply in the lateral trochlea causes a predisposition to osteonecrosis and failure of development or resorption of the lateral trochlear ossification centers, resulting in bony concavity of the central portion of the humerus and the characteristic fishtail configuration (56). The differential diagnosis includes normal preossification center, idiopathic osteonecrosis, OCD, and epiphyseal dysplasia, which are considered in the absence of prior distal humeral fracture (56).

Chondroblastomas.—Chondroblastomas are rare benign cartilaginous tumors with a good prognosis and low morbidity (57). An epiphyseal or apophyseal location is an important diagnostic feature, although the tumor may occasionally extend to the physis and rarely to the metaphysis (57,58). Radiographs show lucent lesions with circumscribed margins and a thin sclerotic rim (57,58). MRI demonstrates prominent marrow edema and periosteal reaction adjacent to the otherwise well-defined tumor (58) (Fig 24). The characteristic heterogeneous, lobular, or cobblestone pattern of a chondroid lesion is visualized with T1-weighted sequences, while low, intermediate, and high signal intensity at T2-weighted imaging represent calcifications, cellular chondroid matrix, and fluid. Enhancement of the surrounding reactive zones relative to the tumor is disproportionately intense, a feature that is also seen in osteomyelitis, osteoblastoma, eosinophilic granuloma, and osteoid osteoma (57,58).

Chondroblastoma in a 14-year-old adolescent girl. (A) Sagittal CT                         image of the knee shows a well-defined lucent lesion with a thin sclerotic                         rim and small internal calcifications situated in the distal femoral                         epiphysis. (B) Sagittal T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR image shows florid                         marrow and soft-tissue edema (arrows) surrounding the lesion.

Figure 24. Chondroblastoma in a 14-year-old adolescent girl. (A) Sagittal CT image of the knee shows a well-defined lucent lesion with a thin sclerotic rim and small internal calcifications situated in the distal femoral epiphysis. (B) Sagittal T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR image shows florid marrow and soft-tissue edema (arrows) surrounding the lesion.

Disorders of the Metaphysis

Metaphyseal Fractures.—The classic metaphyseal corner fracture or bucket handle fracture is highly specific for child abuse before walking age. It results from tractional and torsional forces applied to the extremity of infants younger than 1 year of age (59). It is characterized by separation of the epiphysis and adjacent physis from the metaphyseal bone at the level of the tight perichondrium attachment (21). Tangential views demonstrate the small corner of metaphysis separated from the metaphyseal edge by a thin linear radiolucency, and this may assume a bucket handle configuration with slight cranial or caudal angulation (59) (Fig 25). This fracture should be differentiated from the normal perichondral bone spur that is thin, linear, and attached to the adjacent bone with no intervening lucency (21).

Anteroposterior radiograph of the knee in a 1-month-old infant with                         metaphyseal fracture shows an osseous fragment (arrows) separated by a                         linear lucency from the edge of the metaphysis of the distal femur with a                         bucket handle configuration.

Figure 25. Anteroposterior radiograph of the knee in a 1-month-old infant with metaphyseal fracture shows an osseous fragment (arrows) separated by a linear lucency from the edge of the metaphysis of the distal femur with a bucket handle configuration.

Metaphyseal Tumors.—Cortical desmoids are benign self-limiting cortical irregularities that are typically seen in the medial supracondylar femur. They are common among boys aged 10–15 years old and are believed to be tug lesions secondary to traction at the insertion of the adductor magnus aponeurosis or at the origin of the medial head of the gastrocnemius tendon (60). At radiography, they manifest with bone erosion with chronic periosteal reaction. At MRI, they exhibit a low-signal-intensity rim with all sequences, with normal appearance of adjacent bone (8).

Nonossifying fibroma (NOF) is a nonneoplastic tumor of the long bones in individuals younger than 20 years old (61). Radiography demonstrates a well-defined lucent eccentric lesion close to the physis, typically in the posterior or medial cortex. It is called a fibrous cortical defect when the diameter is less than 2 cm (61). Because of its rapid growth and metaphyseal remodeling, it appears to migrate into the diaphysis, distinguishing it from the relatively fixed location of cortical desmoids. NOFs can increase or decrease in size or even disappear. Tumor size greater than 33 mm in the longitudinal plane or greater than 50% in the transverse plane causes a predisposition to a pathologic fracture, although cortical thinning, tumor location, and patient-related factors (eg, age, weight, and activity) contribute to overall fracture risk (62,63) (Fig 26).

Pathologic fracture in an NOF. (A) Sagittal CT image of the knee shows                         a well-defined lucent lesion with sclerotic rim in the posterior aspect of                         the proximal femur. There is an area of posterior cortical disruption                         (arrow) as well as a sclerotic line perpendicular to the lesion (arrowhead),                         which are concerning for stress changes. (B) Corresponding sagittal                         T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR image shows the lesion with both low and                         intermediate signal intensity. The stress changes manifest with a                         low-signal-intensity line highlighted by a background of extensive marrow                         edema, extending anterior to the lesion (arrowhead).

Figure 26. Pathologic fracture in an NOF. (A) Sagittal CT image of the knee shows a well-defined lucent lesion with sclerotic rim in the posterior aspect of the proximal femur. There is an area of posterior cortical disruption (arrow) as well as a sclerotic line perpendicular to the lesion (arrowhead), which are concerning for stress changes. (B) Corresponding sagittal T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR image shows the lesion with both low and intermediate signal intensity. The stress changes manifest with a low-signal-intensity line highlighted by a background of extensive marrow edema, extending anterior to the lesion (arrowhead).

A simple or unicameral bone cyst is a true cyst of intraosseous origin with the vast majority occurring in the 2nd decade of life (64,65). Radiography shows a moderately expansile lucent tumor with sharp and well-defined margins, characterized by a fallen fragment of bone within the medullary cavity when fractured. This fragment is considered pathognomonic of a simple bone cyst, although it is present in only 5% of cases (64).

An aneurysmal bone cyst is much rarer than a simple bone cyst but occurs in the same age group. Over 50% are seen in long bones, whereas 20% are seen in the spine (64). It is neither a cyst nor a neoplasm and is considered to be a reactive vascular process owing to previous trauma or a precursor tumor such as a giant cell tumor, chondroblastoma, osteoblastoma, chondromyxoid fibroma, or NOF. Radiography demonstrates an eccentric location, rapid bone destruction, and marked expansile remodeling leading to a blown-out appearance. Uneven remodeling localized to the outer cortical margin leads to imperceivable borders that simulate a more aggressive lesion (64). MRI shows fluid-fluid levels representing areas of blood of variable age (65).

Osteochondroma is a surface lesion composed of lamellar bone covered by a cartilage cap. It can arise from any bone undergoing endochondral maturation but is most common in long bones, particularly around the knee. Clinical symptoms are related to neurovascular impingement, osseous deformity, fracture, overlying bursa, pseudoaneurysm development, and rarely, malignant transformation. At imaging, it demonstrates cortical and medullary continuity, with location at the metaphysis, growing away from the joint (55).

At MRI, the cartilage cap can be measured from the osseous interface of the exostosis stalk to the edge of the cartilage cap at its thickest portion (66,67) (Fig 27). There is variability in the reported size criteria for the cartilage cap, although measurements greater than 1–3 cm after skeletal maturation should raise concern for malignant transformation to chondrosarcoma (67). A few authors recommend imaging surveillance of osteochondromas with cartilage caps approaching 2 cm as a reasonable and less morbid alternative to resection (67).

Osteochondroma. (A) Coronal T1-weighted MR image of the knee in a                         10-year-old boy shows an osteochondroma arising from the distal femoral                         metaphysis (arrow), exhibiting the characteristic continuity of the lesion                         with the central medullary cavity of the bone from which it arises. (B)                         Corresponding axial T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR image shows the cartilage                         cap thickness (green line indicates measurement). The measurement should be                         made perpendicular to the low-signal-intensity line of mature mineralization                         (arrowhead) at the cartilage interface with the osteochondroma stalk and                         should include the full thickness of high–fluid content cartilage in                         its thickest portion. The size of the cartilaginous cap in osteochondroma                         has been described with a variable range, although measurements greater than                         1–3 cm after skeletal maturation should raise concern for malignant                         transformation to chondrosarcoma.

Figure 27. Osteochondroma. (A) Coronal T1-weighted MR image of the knee in a 10-year-old boy shows an osteochondroma arising from the distal femoral metaphysis (arrow), exhibiting the characteristic continuity of the lesion with the central medullary cavity of the bone from which it arises. (B) Corresponding axial T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR image shows the cartilage cap thickness (green line indicates measurement). The measurement should be made perpendicular to the low-signal-intensity line of mature mineralization (arrowhead) at the cartilage interface with the osteochondroma stalk and should include the full thickness of high–fluid content cartilage in its thickest portion. The size of the cartilaginous cap in osteochondroma has been described with a variable range, although measurements greater than 1–3 cm after skeletal maturation should raise concern for malignant transformation to chondrosarcoma.

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone tumor in adolescents and young adults. The vast majority is the conventional type and is readily identified at radiography as an intramedullary mass with immature cloudlike bone formation in the metaphysis of long bones (68). Metaphyseal involvement often extends into the epiphysis, and initial or isolated manifestation within the epiphysis is rare. Radiologic features are aggressive and include periosteal reaction (Codman triangle, laminated, hair-on-end, or sunburst patterns), soft-tissue mass, and destruction of the bone cortex without osseous expansion (69).

Osteomyelitis.—Osteomyelitis primarily affects young children, with nearly 50% of cases occurring in preschool-aged children. It is twice as common as septic arthritis and has an incidence rate of 2–13 per 100 000 individuals in high-income countries and up to 80 per 100 000 individuals in low-income countries (22,27). Staphylococcus aureus is the most common pathogen. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection is on the rise and leads to increased debilitation with higher serum inflammatory markers, prolonged fever, and a longer hospital stay. Kingella kingae is increasingly recognized and is currently the leading gram-negative pathogen among children with osteomyelitis younger than 4 years of age (27).

Acute osteomyelitis primarily affects the highly vascular metaphysis of long bones, especially the femur, pelvis, tibia, and humerus. Epiphyseal involvement is more common in infants younger than 18 months of age when transphyseal vessels are still present. However, more recent studies suggest that epiphyseal involvement of pyogenic osteomyelitis is more common than classically taught. Factors associated with physeal disruption include aggressive organisms, the pressure of abscess formation, and contiguous avascular spread (30) (Fig 28).

Acute pyogenic osteomyelitis. Sagittal T1-weighted (A) and T2-weighted                         fat-suppressed (B) MR images of the ankle show extensive marrow edema                         involving the metaphysis and epiphysis of the distal tibia, with thin                         periosteal edema surrounding the anterior and posterior bony cortex                         (arrowheads in B). There is also a small joint effusion in the anterior                         tibiotalar joint (arrow in B).

Figure 28. Acute pyogenic osteomyelitis. Sagittal T1-weighted (A) and T2-weighted fat-suppressed (B) MR images of the ankle show extensive marrow edema involving the metaphysis and epiphysis of the distal tibia, with thin periosteal edema surrounding the anterior and posterior bony cortex (arrowheads in B). There is also a small joint effusion in the anterior tibiotalar joint (arrow in B).

Radiography, while an important early diagnostic step, is more useful in excluding fracture or malignancy rather than in helping diagnose osteomyelitis itself. MRI remains the most accurate tool, with higher sensitivity and specificity than radiography and bone scintigraphy. Acute osteomyelitis is characterized with low signal intensity at T1-weighted imaging (compared with that of adjacent muscle) and high signal intensity at fluid-sensitive imaging, reflecting the combination of infiltrated cells and reactive inflammatory response (22).

Chronic osteomyelitis is defined as symptoms of infection that last longer than 3 months, with imaging findings such as necrotic bone (sequestrum) surrounded by pus and reactive bone sclerosis (involucrum) (27,70). A linear defect in bone that allows drainage of purulent material to the soft tissues and skin is termed a cloaca. As with any pediatric disease, extension to the physis causes a predisposition to bone bridge formation, growth arrest, and limb angulation and shortening (27).

Chronic Nonbacterial Osteomyelitis or Chronic Recurrent Multifocal Osteomyelitis

Chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis or chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO) is a skeletal disorder of unknown cause, primarily occurring in children and adolescents with an average age of 10 years (22,71). It is a diagnosis of exclusion based on criteria including unknown causative organism, lack of abscess formation, prolonged course with recurrent episodes, nonspecific histopathologic results, laboratory findings that are consistent with subacute or chronic osteomyelitis, and association with pustulosis palmoplantar or acne (72,73). A lack of response to antibiotic therapy, symptomatic relief with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and bilateral involvement also favor the diagnosis (74,75).

It is most common in the lower extremity metaphysis, although the pelvis, spine, and medial clavicle can also be affected. The radiographic findings range from normal to lytic, lytic with sclerotic rim, purely sclerotic, or mixed pattern (75). MRI is highly sensitive in the assessment of active disease and extent by depicting marrow edema and contrast enhancement (73). Biopsy results aids in excluding entities that are usually considered first, such as tumors and pyogenic infections (71) (Fig 29).

CRMO. Coronal T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR images of both lower                         extremities in a 16-year-old adolescent boy show a large amount of bilateral                         and symmetric marrow edema in the metaphyses of the proximal and distal                         tibia extending into the epiphyses. When a diagnosis of CRMO is considered,                         further evaluation of the whole body is suggested to identify multifocal                         lesions that may be clinically asymptomatic.

Figure 29. CRMO. Coronal T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR images of both lower extremities in a 16-year-old adolescent boy show a large amount of bilateral and symmetric marrow edema in the metaphyses of the proximal and distal tibia extending into the epiphyses. When a diagnosis of CRMO is considered, further evaluation of the whole body is suggested to identify multifocal lesions that may be clinically asymptomatic.

Conclusion

Skeletal maturation is a dynamic process, making imaging evaluation challenging and fraught with difficulty. Recognizing normal developmental changes and their imaging features and classifying abnormalities on the basis of location and stage of development can aid in reliable differentiation, thereby guiding treatment and management.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank medical illustrator Bruno Baldissara Moreira, São Paulo, Brazil, for creating the illustrations.

1 Current address: Department of Medical Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Recipient of a Certificate of Merit award for an education exhibit at the 2020 RSNA Annual Meeting.

For this journal-based SA-CME activity, the authors, editor, and reviewers have disclosed no relevant relationships.

References

  • 1. Resnick D, Manolagas SC, Fallon MD. Histogenesis. Anatomy, and Physiology of Bone. In: Resnick D, Kransdorf MJ, eds. Bone and Joint Imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders/Elsevier, 2005;1–15.
  • 2. Mackie EJ, Ahmed YA, Tatarczuch L, Chen KS, Mirams M. Endochondral ossification: how cartilage is converted into bone in the developing skeleton. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2008;40(1):46–62.
  • 3. Dwek JR. The periosteum: what is it, where is it, and what mimics it in its absence? Skeletal Radiol 2010;39(4):319–323.
  • 4. Zember JS, Rosenberg ZS, Kwong S, Kothary SP, Bedoya MA. Normal Skeletal Maturation and Imaging Pitfalls in the Pediatric Shoulder. RadioGraphics 2015;35(4):1108–1122.
  • 5. Cunningham C, Scheuer L, Black S, Liversidge H, Christie A. Bone Development. In: Developmental juvenile osteology.2nd ed. San Diego, Calif: Elsevier Academic Press, 2016;19–35.
  • 6. Laor T, Jaramillo D. MR imaging insights into skeletal maturation: what is normal? Radiology 2009;250(1):28–38.
  • 7. Jaimes C, Chauvin NA, Delgado J, Jaramillo D. MR imaging of normal epiphyseal development and common epiphyseal disorders. RadioGraphics 2014;34(2):449–471.
  • 8. Lerisson H, Tillaux C, Boutry N. Radiographic/MR Imaging Correlation of the Pediatric Knee Growth. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2019;27(4):737–751.
  • 9. Chapman VM, Nimkin K, Jaramillo D. The pre-ossification center: normal CT and MRI findings in the trochlea. Skeletal Radiol 2004;33(12):725–727.
  • 10. Foster K, Chapman S, Johnson K. MRI of the marrow in the paediatric skeleton. Clin Radiol 2004;59(8):651–673.
  • 11. Jaramillo D, Laor T, Hoffer FA, et al. Epiphyseal marrow in infancy: MR imaging. Radiology 1991;180(3):809–812.
  • 12. Varich LJ, Laor T, Jaramillo D. Normal maturation of the distal femoral epiphyseal cartilage: age-related changes at MR imaging. Radiology 2000;214(3):705–709.
  • 13. Kan JH, Strouse PJ. Embryology, Anatomy, and Normal Findings. In: Coley BD, ed.Caffey’s pediatric diagnostic imaging. 13th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Elsevier, 2019;1219–1236.
  • 14. Walter WR, Goldman LH, Rosenberg ZS. Pitfalls in MRI of the Developing Pediatric Ankle. RadioGraphics 2021;41(1):210–223.
  • 15. Schaefer M, Black S, Scheuer L. Summaries. Recording Forms, and Practical Sequencing Information. In: Juvenile Osteology.San Diego, Calif: Elsevier Academic Press, 2009;337–364.
  • 16. Nguyen JC, Sheehan SE, Davis KW, Gill KG. Sports and the Growing Musculoskeletal System: Sports Imaging Series. Radiology 2017;284(1):25–42.
  • 17. Cepela DJ, Tartaglione JP, Dooley TP, Patel PN. Classifications In Brief: Salter-Harris Classification of Pediatric Physeal Fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016;474(11):2531–2537.
  • 18. Ecklund K, Jaramillo D. Patterns of premature physeal arrest: MR imaging of 111 children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178(4):967–972.
  • 19. Rosen RA, Deshmukh SM. Growth arrest recovery lines in hypoparathyroidism. Radiology 1985;155(1):61–62.
  • 20. Nixon GW. Hematogenous osteomyelitis of metaphyseal-equivalent locations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1978;130(1):123–129.
  • 21. Laor T, Jaramillo D. It’s time to recognize the perichondrium. Pediatr Radiol 2020;50(2):153–160.[Published correction appears in Pediatr Radiol 2020;50(2):291-292.].
  • 22. Chan BY, Gill KG, Rebsamen SL, Nguyen JC. MR Imaging of Pediatric Bone Marrow. RadioGraphics 2016;36(6):1911–1930.
  • 23. Piney A. The anatomy of the bone marrow: with special reference to the distribution of the red marrow. BMJ 1922;2(3226):792–795.
  • 24. Vogler JB 3rd, Murphy WA. Bone marrow imaging. Radiology 1988;168(3):679–693.
  • 25. Vande Berg BC, Malghem J, Lecouvet FE, Maldague B. Magnetic resonance imaging of normal bone marrow. Eur Radiol 1998;8(8):1327–1334.
  • 26. Ecklund K, Jaramillo D. Imaging of growth disturbance in children. Radiol Clin North Am 2001;39(4):823–841.
  • 27. Jaramillo D, Dormans JP, Delgado J, Laor T. St Geme JW 3rd. Hematogenous Osteomyelitis in Infants and Children: Imaging of a Changing Disease. Radiology 2017;283(3):629–643.
  • 28. Ogden JA. Pediatric osteomyelitis and septic arthritis: the pathology of neonatal disease. Yale J Biol Med 1979;52(5):423–448.
  • 29. Jaramillo D. Infection: musculoskeletal. Pediatr Radiol 2011;41(Suppl 1):S127–S134.
  • 30. Gilbertson-Dahdal D, Wright JE, Krupinski E, McCurdy WE, Taljanovic MS. Transphyseal involvement of pyogenic osteomyelitis is considerably more common than classically taught. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;203(1):190–195.
  • 31. Olstad K, Ekman S, Carlson CS. An Update on the Pathogenesis of Osteochondrosis. Vet Pathol 2015;52(5):785–802.
  • 32. West EY, Jaramillo D. Imaging of osteochondrosis. Pediatr Radiol 2019;49(12):1610–1616.
  • 33. Resnick D, Sweet DR, Madewell JE. Osteochondroses. In: Resnick D, Kransdorf MJ, eds.Bone and Joint Imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders/Elsevier, 2005;1089–1107.
  • 34. Rogers LF, Poznanski AK. Imaging of epiphyseal injuries. Radiology 1994;191(2):297–308.
  • 35. Craig JG, Cramer KE, Cody DD, et al. Premature partial closure and other deformities of the growth plate: MR imaging and three-dimensional modeling. Radiology 1999;210(3):835–843.
  • 36. Escott BG, Kelley SP. Management of traumatic physeal growth arrest. Orthop Trauma 2012;26(3):200–211.
  • 37. Ogden JA. The evaluation and treatment of partial physeal arrest. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987;69(8):1297–1302.
  • 38. Jaramillo D, Connolly SA, Mulkern RV, Shapiro F. Developing epiphysis: MR imaging characteristics and histologic correlation in the newborn lamb. Radiology 1998;207(3):637–645.
  • 39. Jaimes C, Jimenez M, Shabshin N, Laor T, Jaramillo D. Taking the stress out of evaluating stress injuries in children. RadioGraphics 2012;32(2):537–555.
  • 40. Laor T, Wall EJ, Vu LP. Physeal widening in the knee due to stress injury in child athletes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186(5):1260–1264.
  • 41. Zbojniewicz AM, Laor T. Focal Periphyseal Edema (FOPE) zone on MRI of the adolescent knee: a potentially painful manifestation of physiologic physeal fusion? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197(4):998–1004.
  • 42. Wu M, Bixby S, Kramer DE, Heyworth BE. Focal Periphyseal Edema (FOPE): A Newly Reported Cause of Knee Pain in Adolescent Athletes. Orthop J Sports Med 2018;6(7 suppl4):2325967118S0013.
  • 43. Giles E, Nicholson A, Sharkey MS, Carter CW. Focal Periphyseal Edema: Are We Overtreating Physiologic Adolescent Knee Pain? J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2018;2(4):e047.
  • 44. Starr V, Ha BY. Imaging update on developmental dysplasia of the hip with the role of MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;203(6):1324–1335.
  • 45. Rosenbaum DG, Servaes S, Bogner EA, Jaramillo D, Mintz DN. MR Imaging in Postreduction Assessment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Goals and Obstacles. RadioGraphics 2016;36(3):840–854.
  • 46. Harcke HT, Grissom LE. Performing dynamic sonography of the infant hip. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;155(4):837–844.
  • 47. Nguyen JC, Dorfman SR, Rigsby CK, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip-Child. J Am Coll Radiol 2019;16(5S):S94–S103.
  • 48. Craig JG, van Holsbeeck M, Zaltz I. The utility of MR in assessing Blount disease. Skeletal Radiol 2002;31(4):208–213.
  • 49. Gorbachova T, Melenevsky Y, Cohen M, Cerniglia BW. Osteochondral Lesions of the Knee: Differentiating the Most Common Entities at MRI. RadioGraphics 2018;38(5):1478–1495.
  • 50. Laor T, Zbojniewicz AM, Eismann EA, Wall EJ. Juvenile osteochondritis dissecans: is it a growth disturbance of the secondary physis of the epiphysis? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199(5):1121–1128.
  • 51. Wall E, Von Stein D. Juvenile osteochondritis dissecans. Orthop Clin North Am 2003;34(3):341–353.
  • 52. Kijowski R, Blankenbaker DG, Shinki K, Fine JP, Graf BK, De Smet AA. Juvenile versus adult osteochondritis dissecans of the knee: appropriate MR imaging criteria for instability. Radiology 2008;248(2):571–578.
  • 53. Degnan AJ, Ho-Fung VM. More Than Epiphyseal Osteochondromas: Updated Understanding of Imaging Findings in Dysplasia Epiphysealis Hemimelica (Trevor Disease). AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018;211(4):910–919.
  • 54. Lang IM, Azouz EM. MRI appearances of dysplasia epiphysealis hemimelica of the knee. Skeletal Radiol 1997;26(4):226–229.
  • 55. Murphey MD, Choi JJ, Kransdorf MJ, Flemming DJ, Gannon FH. Imaging of osteochondroma: variants and complications with radiologic-pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 2000;20(5):1407–1434.
  • 56. Narayanan S, Shailam R, Grottkau BE, Nimkin K. Fishtail deformity: a delayed complication of distal humeral fractures in children. Pediatr Radiol 2015;45(6):814–819.
  • 57. Kaim AH, Hügli R, Bonél HM, Jundt G. Chondroblastoma and clear cell chondrosarcoma: radiological and MRI characteristics with histopathological correlation. Skeletal Radiol 2002;31(2):88–95.
  • 58. Weatherall PT, Maale GE, Mendelsohn DB, Sherry CS, Erdman WE, Pascoe HR. Chondroblastoma: classic and confusing appearance at MR imaging. Radiology 1994;190(2):467–474.
  • 59. Dwek JR. The radiographic approach to child abuse. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469(3):776–789.
  • 60. Vieira RL, Bencardino JT, Rosenberg ZS, Nomikos G. MRI features of cortical desmoid in acute knee trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196(2):424–428.
  • 61. Levine SM, Lambiase RE, Petchprapa CN. Cortical lesions of the tibia: characteristic appearances at conventional radiography. RadioGraphics 2003;23(1):157–177.
  • 62. Arata MA, Peterson HA, Dahlin DC. Pathological fractures through non-ossifying fibromas. Review of the Mayo Clinic experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981;63(6):980–988.
  • 63. Easley ME, Kneisl JS. Pathologic fractures through nonossifying fibromas: is prophylactic treatment warranted? J Pediatr Orthop 1997;17(6):808–813.
  • 64. Parman LM, Murphey MD. Alphabet soup: cystic lesions of bone. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2000;4(1):89–101.
  • 65. Mascard E, Gomez-Brouchet A, Lambot K. Bone cysts: unicameral and aneurysmal bone cyst. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2015;101(1 suppl):S119–S127.
  • 66. Motamedi K, Seeger LL. Benign bone tumors. Radiol Clin North Am 2011;49(6):1115–1134, v.
  • 67. Bernard SA, Murphey MD, Flemming DJ, Kransdorf MJ. Improved differentiation of benign osteochondromas from secondary chondrosarcomas with standardized measurement of cartilage cap at CT and MR imaging. Radiology 2010;255(3):857–865.
  • 68. Yarmish G, Klein MJ, Landa J, Lefkowitz RA, Hwang S. Imaging characteristics of primary osteosarcoma: nonconventional subtypes. RadioGraphics 2010;30(6):1653–1672.
  • 69. Murphey MD, Robbin MR, McRae GA, Flemming DJ, Temple HT, Kransdorf MJ. The many faces of osteosarcoma. RadioGraphics 1997;17(5):1205–1231.
  • 70. Uçkay I, Jugun K, Gamulin A, Wagener J, Hoffmeyer P, Lew D. Chronic osteomyelitis. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2012;14(5):566–575.
  • 71. Iyer RS, Thapa MM, Chew FS. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis: review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196(6 suppl):S87–S91.
  • 72. Björkstén B, Boquist L. Histopathological aspects of chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1980;62(3):376–380.
  • 73. Jurik AG, Egund N. MRI in chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis. Skeletal Radiol 1997;26(4):230–238.
  • 74. Falip C, Alison M, Boutry N, et al. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO): a longitudinal case series review. Pediatr Radiol 2013;43(3):355–375.
  • 75. Manson D, Wilmot DM, King S, Laxer RM. Physeal involvement in chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis. Pediatr Radiol 1989;20(1-2):76–79.

Article History

Received: Apr 10 2021
Revision requested: May 28 2021
Revision received: June 28 2021
Accepted: July 2 2021
Published online: Feb 25 2022
Published in print: May 2022