Imaging Review of Gastrointestinal Motility Disorders
Abstract
The motor function of the gastrointestinal tract relies on the enteric nervous system, which includes neurons spanning from the esophagus to the internal anal sphincter. Disorders of gastrointestinal motility arise as a result of disease within the affected portion of the enteric nervous system and may be caused by a wide array of underlying diseases. The etiology of motility disorders may be primary or due to secondary causes related to infection or inflammation, congenital abnormalities, metabolic disturbances, systemic illness, or medication-related side effects. The symptoms of gastrointestinal dysmotility tend to be nonspecific and may cause diagnostic difficulty. Therefore, evaluation of motility disorders requires a combination of clinical, radiologic, and endoscopic or manometric testing. Radiologic studies including fluoroscopy, CT, MRI, and nuclear scintigraphy allow exclusion of alternative pathologic conditions and serve as adjuncts to endoscopy and manometry to determine the appropriate diagnosis. Additionally, radiologist understanding of clinical evaluation of motility disorders is necessary for guiding referring clinicians and appropriately imaging patients. New developments and advances in imaging techniques have allowed improved assessment and diagnosis of motility disorders, which will continue to improve patient treatment options.
Online supplemental material is available for this article.
©RSNA, 2022
SA-CME LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After completing this journal-based SA-CME activity, participants will be able to:
■ Review the pathophysiology and clinical symptoms of gastrointestinal motility disorders.
■ Describe how motility tests are performed and their results interpreted.
■ List the radiologic findings of common motility disorders throughout the gastrointestinal tract.
Introduction
The enteric nervous system is critical for gastrointestinal function. The enteric nervous system includes the myenteric (Auerbach) plexus—located between the inner circular muscle layer and the outer longitudinal muscle layer—and the submucosal (Meissner) plexus. The myenteric plexus coordinates the muscular contractions of peristalsis, while the submucosal plexus controls secretion and absorption throughout the gastrointestinal tract (1).
Gastrointestinal motility disorders are common and occur as a result of dysfunction or absence of the myenteric plexus within a segment of the gastrointestinal tract. Dysmotility occurs when the intestinal tract loses the ability to coordinate muscular contractions, thereby leading to clinical symptoms. Motility disorders may be related to primary (idiopathic) or secondary causes, including congenital abnormalities (eg, Hirschsprung disease), inflammatory or degenerative conditions (eg, achalasia), medication-related side effects (eg, opioids), or systemic illness (eg, diabetes mellitus). However, symptoms tend to be nonspecific and may include abdominal pain, bloating, nausea, heartburn, early satiety, postprandial fullness, or constipation. Therefore, clinical diagnosis of motility disorders frequently involves a combination of the clinical history, radiologic studies, endoscopy, and/or manometry.
This article discusses the common tests used to evaluate and diagnose motility disorders and describes findings of common motility disorders throughout the gastrointestinal tract. Pharyngeal motility disorders have previously been reviewed (2).
Imaging Modalities
Gastric-Emptying Scintigraphy
Gastric-emptying scintigraphy is a functional test to evaluate patients with postprandial nausea and vomiting and early satiety. Patients are required to fast for a minimum of 6 hours, and medications that affect gastric emptying (eg, prokinetics, opiates) should be stopped at least 48 hours before the examination. Hyperglycemia may cause delayed gastric emptying; therefore, fasting glucose levels are checked before performing the examination in patients with diabetes.
Gastric scintigraphy involves ingestion of a low-fat meal, consisting of technetium 99m (99mTc) sulfur colloid–labeled egg whites, bread, and water within 10 minutes. If the patient is unable to consume the meal, the standard reference ranges for gastric emptying will not apply. Imaging is performed with a gamma camera immediately after meal ingestion and again at 1, 2, and 4 hours after ingestion in anterior and posterior projections. Regions of interest are drawn around the stomach; the processing calculation uses a geometric mean, defined as the square root of the product of the anterior and posterior counts (Fig 1). Delayed gastric emptying is defined as gastric retention of greater than 60% at 2 hours or greater than 10% at 4 hours when the standard low-fat meal is used (3,4).
Small-Bowel Scintigraphy
Scintigraphic assessment of small-bowel transit is usually performed in conjunction with gastric emptying or whole-gut transit studies. The examination involves ingestion of a solid meal labeled with 99mTc (5). Sequential imaging is performed for 6 hours, and the amount of radiotracer that reaches the terminal ileum can be quantified to measure the percentage of small-bowel emptying. Studies have shown normal small-bowel transit values to be more than 50% at 6 hours (6). Delayed small-bowel transit occurs when radiotracer persists in loops of small bowel at 6 hours, with little to no activity in the terminal ileum (Fig 2).
Colon Scintigraphy
Assessment of colonic motility uses a pH-sensitive methacrylate-coated capsule containing indium 111 charcoal particles. The coated capsule dissolves on reaching the alkaline terminal ileum and releases the radioisotope into the colonic lumen (7). Anterior and posterior images are obtained with a camera at 4, 24, and 48 hours after ingestion to evaluate colonic transit.
The colon is divided into anatomic regions: segment 1 = ascending colon, segment 2 = transverse colon, segment 3 = descending colon, and segment 4 = rectosigmoid. Segment 5 refers to the expelled radioactive tracer. The geometric center is used to measure progression of radiotracer activity and represents a weighted average of the counts in each region (Fig 3).
For example, a low geometric center indicates that the mean activity is in the proximal colon, while a higher geometric center indicates that radiotracer has passed to the left side of the colon or been eliminated in stool. Normal values for geometric center have been established as 1.7–4.0 at 24 hours and 3.0–4.8 at 48 hours (8). Retention of tracer throughout the entire colon suggests slow-transit constipation, whereas concentration of tracer in the rectosigmoid colon could suggest an evacuation disorder.
Gastric Accommodation Testing
Assessment of gastric accommodation is performed with SPECT. After intravenous administration of 99mTc–sodium pertechnetate, which is taken up by gastric mucosa, three-dimensional SPECT volumetric imaging of the stomach is performed 10 minutes after injection for assessment of fasting volume. Subsequently, the patient consumes 300 mL of a nutrition drink (Ensure; Abbott Laboratories), followed by a second postprandial SPECT acquisition. The change in gastric volume between the postprandial and fasting states represents gastric accommodation.
Esophagography
Fluoroscopic evaluation of the esophagus allows both morphologic assessment of the esophagus as well as qualitative assessment of motility (9). Esophagography may be initially used in evaluation of patients with dysphagia to exclude a structural abnormality. During barium esophagography, the radiologist evaluates the esophageal mucosa and esophageal emptying with the patient in the upright position. Subsequently, with the patient in the recumbent right anterior oblique (RAO) position, the radiologist observes single swallows to evaluate esophageal motility and rapid sequential swallows to assess for strictures or rings. Gastroesophageal reflux may also be identified with the patient in the recumbent position.
Timed barium esophagography is performed to assess esophageal emptying in cases of suspected achalasia or for objectively assessing treatment response. The patient swallows a fixed volume of barium suspension while in the upright position, and left posterior oblique images are typically obtained at 1, 2, and 5 minutes after ingestion to measure the height of the retained barium column and the rate of emptying. Improvement in esophageal emptying after treatment of achalasia can be accurately evaluated by using the same protocol for follow-up esophagography (Fig 4).
Upper Gastrointestinal Series
An upper gastrointestinal series uses barium to evaluate the stomach and duodenum and is used for evaluation of abdominal pain, early satiety, dyspepsia, or postoperative anatomy. The examination is performed with the patient in multiple recumbent obliquities to allow detection of morphologic abnormalities of the gastric cardia, fundus, antrum, and pylorus and the duodenum. Upper gastrointestinal series are useful for assessing mechanical obstruction and can suggest gastroparesis by demonstrating lack of peristalsis, poor emptying at qualitative assessment, and a distended stomach with retained debris despite adequate fasting (10).
Small-Bowel Follow-through Study
A small-bowel follow-through study allows exclusion of mechanical obstruction, strictures, and diverticula, which can all cause delayed small-bowel transit. Fluoroscopic evaluation allows qualitative assessment of intestinal peristalsis and transit time from the duodenum to the cecum. The limitation of this technique is related to lack of data regarding the normal transit time of barium in the small bowel, although the largest study reported that 83% of patients had a transit time of less than 2 hours (11).
Radiopaque Marker Study
Radiopaque markers may be used to estimate colonic transit in patients with chronic constipation. The examination involves ingestion of a gelatin capsule containing radiopaque rings, followed by abdominal radiography to count the number of markers remaining in the abdomen. One option is to perform abdominal radiography 5 days after ingestion of a capsule with 24 markers. Normal transit is characterized by five markers (<20%) or fewer retained after 5 days (Fig 5) (12).
Defecography
Defecography allows anatomic and functional evaluation of the rectum and anus. Oral ingestion of barium approximately 45–60 minutes before the study helps in identification of an enterocele. With use of fluoroscopy, about 120–180 mL of thick barium paste is injected into the rectum with the patient in the left lateral decubitus position. Subsequently, with the patient sitting on a commode, fluoroscopic clips or spot images are obtained at rest and during pelvic floor contraction (squeezing), performance of the Valsalva maneuver, and expulsion of contrast material.
The anorectal angle (normally 108°–127° at rest), the location of the anorectal junction, rectal evacuation, and structural abnormalities (eg, rectocele and enterocele) are observed during the examination. Pelvic floor contraction is associated with contraction of the puborectalis muscle, elevation and anterior motion of the anorectal junction, and narrowing of the anorectal angle. Conversely, defecation is associated with relaxation of the puborectalis muscle and anal sphincter, a more obtuse anorectal angle, opening of the anal canal, and rectal emptying (13).
Dynamic MR defecography is also used to assess functional disorders of the pelvic floor, which may manifest as constipation, incontinence, or prolapse. The patient can be imaged supine in a closed-magnet system or sitting in an open-magnet system. Sonographic gel is introduced into the rectum, and dynamic imaging is performed by using a steady-state sequence in the midsagittal plane with the patient at rest and during squeezing and evacuation.
The anorectal angle is measured as an indicator of relaxation of the puborectalis muscle. A key advantage of MRI is the ability to visualize the entire pelvic floor to assess for weakness of the anterior, middle, and posterior compartments. In many cases, multicompartment abnormalities exist together and provide useful information for both gastroenterologists and surgeons (14).
Cine MR Enterography
Cine imaging in MR enterography is used to provide functional information about small-bowel motility (Movie 1). When small-bowel motility in healthy volunteers is compared with that in patients with chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (CIPO), cine images demonstrate increased luminal diameter and impaired contractility in patients with CIPO (15).
Intestinal pseudo-obstruction in a 69-year-old man. Cine MRI shows a dilated segment of small bowel in the right abdomen, with abrupt transition to normal-caliber terminal ileum. The dilated segment of small bowel demonstrates normal peristaltic activity. Subsequently, surgery was performed and also demonstrated abrupt transition in caliber of the small bowel without an associated abnormality, suggestive of intestinal pseudo-obstruction. The abnormal segment of small bowel was resected.
Computed Tomography
CT is most helpful in identification of structural or organic causes of dysmotility. Common findings may include diffuse dilatation of the small bowel and colon or the small-bowel feces sign (particulate matter intermixed with gas bubbles in the lumen of dilated small intestine), which is suggestive of obstruction (16).
Manometry
The functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) is a newer device that uses balloon distention to assess the cross-sectional area of the esophagus during volume-controlled distention. The FLIP has been useful in cases where findings at manometry and esophagography are discordant for achalasia and to assess for esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) owing to limited distensibility at the gastroesophageal junction. However, its role in clinical evaluation of esophageal motility is evolving (18).
Small-Bowel Manometry
Catheter-based manometry allows assessment of small-bowel contraction patterns and differentiation of the pathophysiology of underlying dysmotility. Myopathic disorders, including systemic sclerosis and visceral myopathy, are characterized by low-amplitude but normally propagated intestinal contractions within the affected segment (19). In contrast, neuropathic disorders such as autonomic neuropathy demonstrate normal-amplitude but uncoordinated (abnormally propagated) contractions (20,21).
Anorectal Manometry
Indications for anorectal manometry include diagnosis of dyssynergic defecation in constipated patients and identification of reduced anal sphincter function in patients with fecal incontinence (22).
Esophagus
Esophageal peristalsis is mediated by several different mechanisms. The proximal one-third of the esophagus is composed of striated muscle, the distal one-third is composed of smooth muscle, and the middle one-third contains a mixture of striated and smooth muscle. Peristalsis in the striated muscle is controlled by the lower motor neurons in the nucleus ambiguus of the brainstem. In contrast, local excitatory and inhibitory neuronal activation controls peristalsis of the smooth muscle segments (23). The lower esophageal sphincter (LES) consists of smooth muscle, which prevents gastroesophageal reflux when contracted and allows passage of food into the stomach when relaxed.
Esophageal dysmotility may manifest as nonspecific symptoms, including dysphagia, chest pain, and regurgitation (Tables 1, 2). The Chicago Classification version 4.0 of esophageal motility is an algorithmic approach to diagnosis of motility disorders (Table 3) (24).
Achalasia
Achalasia is characterized by failure of the LES to relax and absent peristalsis in the smooth muscle portion of the esophagus due to degeneration of ganglion cells in the myenteric plexus (25). The etiology of primary achalasia is unknown. Secondary achalasia (pseudoachalasia) may be caused by infiltrative malignancy at the gastroesophageal junction, circulating lung cancer–related antibodies, or Chagas disease.
Compared to patients with primary achalasia, patients with secondary achalasia are older at presentation, report a shorter duration of symptoms, and often have significant short-term weight loss. Additionally, the narrowed LES segment is longer with little or no proximal esophageal dilatation (26). Conditions that mimic achalasia include (a) distal strictures that have induced aperistalsis and (b) scleroderma associated with reflux-induced strictures. In both cases the myenteric plexus is intact, but the LES is strictured and increasing luminal pressure is ineffective at opening it.
Barium esophagography typically demonstrates a bird-beak deformity of the distal esophagus, caused by the persistently contracted LES and aperistalsis in the mid and distal esophagus, often with tertiary contractions and an air-fluid level (Fig 7). Without treatment, patients can progress to end-stage achalasia, in which the esophagus appears markedly dilated and tortuous with a sigmoid shape (Fig 8). Pseudoachalasia demonstrates similar characteristics at barium esophagography; therefore, it is important to evaluate the gastric cardia for a potential infiltrating mass (Fig 9).
Additionally, epiphrenic diverticula in the distal esophagus are frequently associated with motility disorders and are commonly seen in association with achalasia owing to increased intraluminal pressure (Fig 10) (28).
Manometry allows confirmation of the diagnosis of achalasia by showing characteristic pressure changes. The three types of achalasia are all characterized by absence of normal peristalsis but vary in regard to esophageal contractility and patterns of pressurization (Fig 11). Type I achalasia shows lack of esophageal peristalsis and a quiescent esophageal body. Type II achalasia (the most common type) demonstrates periods of simultaneous panesophageal pressurization due to contraction of the muscles of the distal esophagus. Type III achalasia demonstrates premature or spastic distal esophageal contractions with or without periods of panesophageal pressurization.
The treatment options for achalasia are primarily aimed at reducing the LES resting pressure. Preferred options include pneumatic dilation and myotomy (laparoscopic or endoscopic) in patients without contraindications to surgery. In patients who are poor surgical candidates, injection of botulinum toxin lowers LES pressure, although the effect is temporary. Patients with type III achalasia exhibit obstructive contractility of the distal esophagus and are less responsive to pneumatic dilation and myotomy than patients with type I or II achalasia. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is the preferred treatment in type III achalasia to tailor the length of the myotomy to include the involved smooth muscle (29).
Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction
Primary and secondary EGJOO are disorders caused by obstruction at the esophagogastric junction. For example, studies have demonstrated the association between long-term opioid therapy and elevated LES relaxation pressures (30). Postoperative changes related to fundoplication or compression due to hiatal hernia may also lead to EGJOO. Dysphagia is the most common presenting symptom, sometimes accompanied by noncardiac chest pain or regurgitation.
The diagnosis is made with high-resolution manometry, which demonstrates an elevated median integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) at the esophagogastric junction, but with sufficient esophageal peristalsis not meeting the criteria for achalasia. In addition, the combination of obstructive symptoms and supporting evidence of obstructive physiology from timed barium esophagography or the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) allows conclusive diagnosis (31,32).
Treatment of idiopathic EGJOO is based on the predominant symptom and may include conservative management if symptoms are mild or surgical myotomy if symptoms are severe.
Scleroderma
Scleroderma is a chronic multisystem disease of unknown etiology. The two subtypes include diffuse scleroderma and the CREST (calcinosis of the skin, Raynaud phenomenon, esophageal dysmotility, sclerodactyly, telangiectasia) syndrome.
Involvement of the gastrointestinal tract is seen in approximately 90% of patients with scleroderma; although the esophagus is the most frequently involved, any segment of the gastrointestinal tract may be affected. Atrophy and fibrosis of the smooth muscle in the lower two-thirds of the esophagus result in absent peristalsis and impaired function of the LES. Symptoms include gastroesophageal reflux due to the incompetent LES and dysphagia due to dysmotility. Complications from long-standing reflux include stricture or esophagitis (33).
Findings at barium esophagography include impaired or absent peristalsis with associated dilatation of the distal esophagus, gastroesophageal reflux, hiatal hernia, and a patulous gastroesophageal junction (Fig 12, Movie 2). Manometric findings include a hypotensive LES with low resting sphincter pressure and either low-amplitude contractions or aperistalsis in the distal smooth muscle portion of the esophagus (Fig 13).
Scleroderma. Esophagram in a 79-year-old woman with known scleroderma shows dilatation of the esophagus with severe esophageal dysmotility, characterized by absence of peristalsis. A hiatal hernia is also noted.
Treatment is aimed at improving the underlying symptoms of reflux, including use of proton-pump inhibitors.
Distal Esophageal Spasm
The pathophysiology of DES is related to impaired inhibitory innervation, leading to premature and rapidly propagated contractions of the distal esophagus (34). Patients with DES most commonly present with dysphagia and chest pain; symptoms are classically intermittent, ranging from mild to severe. The diagnosis of DES requires both clinically relevant symptoms and a conclusive manometric diagnosis showing simultaneous premature esophageal contractions in at least 20% of swallows, with normal LES relaxation. This feature allows differentiation of DES from type III achalasia, in which there is elevated LES relaxation pressure.
At barium esophagography, DES may demonstrate diffuse nonperistaltic contractions, which result in a rosary bead or corkscrew appearance of the distal esophagus, although this appearance is nonspecific (Fig 14, Movie 3). Management includes symptomatic relief with pharmacologic therapy (nitrates, calcium channel blockers). Endoscopic myotomy may provide relief in patients with persistent symptoms (35).
DES in a 78-year-old woman with dysphagia. Esophagram shows abnormal esophageal peristalsis with a large amount of peristaltic escape and simultaneous contraction of the distal esophagus, resulting in a corkscrew appearance.
Hypercontractile Esophagus
Hypercontractile (jackhammer) esophagus is an uncommon disorder likely caused by excessive cholinergic stimulation (36). A clinical diagnosis of hypercontractile esophagus requires both relevant symptoms (dysphagia and noncardiac chest pain) and a conclusive manometric diagnosis; esophagography is used to rule out mechanical obstruction. Manometry demonstrates high-pressure contractions in the smooth muscle of the esophagus, as demonstrated by a distal contractile vigor of greater than 8000 mm Hg ⋅ cm ⋅ sec (Fig 15) (37).
Postsurgical Dysmotility
Postoperative dysphagia can occur as a complication of bariatric surgery, known as post–obesity surgery esophageal dysfunction (POSED), or after Nissen fundoplication.
The pathophysiology of POSED is due to diminished compliance of the proximal gastric pouch in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or high pressure created by laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (38). POSED demonstrates aperistalsis of the esophagus, normal relaxation at the gastroesophageal junction, and increased gastric pressure (Fig 16). When the diagnosis is suspected, further investigation of the gastric pouch and anastomosis should be performed to exclude obstruction.
Dysphagia after Nissen fundoplication may be related to the obstructive effect of the fundoplication wrap. Therefore, preoperative imaging and manometry are important to assess for the presence of dysmotility (39).
Stomach
Gastric motility includes functions of the sympathetic, parasympathetic, and autonomic nervous systems. Accommodation of the gastric fundus and body is mediated by the vagus nerve, which allows relaxation so that ingested contents can be broken down by gastric acid and pepsin (40). The fundus also generates tonic and phasic contractions to transfer food to the antrum. Phasic contractions in the gastric antrum reduce solids down to small particle size, thereby allowing ingested contents to pass through the pylorus and into the small bowel as chyme. Gastric dysmotility may manifest as symptoms of postprandial nausea and vomiting and early satiety.
Gastroparesis
Gastroparesis is a syndrome of delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction (Fig 17). The cause may be idiopathic, or it may be secondary to diabetes mellitus, medications (eg, narcotics), electrolyte disturbances, surgery, infection, or autoimmune disorders (41). Autonomic dysfunction has also been described in patients with diabetic gastroparesis and chronic unexplained nausea and vomiting, with parasympathetic dysfunction leading to more severe upper gastrointestinal tract symptoms and delayed gastric emptying (42).
Rumination Syndrome
Rumination syndrome is a functional gastrointestinal disorder with unknown pathogenesis. The disorder is characterized by rapid onset of effortless regurgitation of recently ingested food into the mouth after most meals; the regurgitation is not preceded by nausea or retching. Unlike patients with gastroparesis, patients with rumination syndrome have normal gastric emptying and accommodation.
Although no specific imaging features are present, upper gastrointestinal tract series may demonstrate considerable gastroesophageal reflux (Movie 4). Manometry can also show reflux extending to the proximal esophagus with an associated increase in gastric pressure. Treatment of rumination syndrome involves behavioral modification (eg, diaphragmatic breathing) (43).
Rumination syndrome. Esophagram in a 44-year-old man in the upright position shows reflux of barium from the stomach into the esophagus (rumination), leading to episodes of vomiting.
Cannabis-induced Gastroparesis
Cannabinoids inhibit gastrointestinal motility through the CB1 and CB2 receptors. CB1 receptors are located throughout the gastrointestinal tract, including within myenteric and submucosal neurons. Camilleri (44) demonstrated that dronabinol, a nonselective cannabinoid agonist, delayed gastric emptying of solids without affecting gastric accommodation.
CT may show a dilated stomach without structural obstruction (Fig 19). In addition to the effects on the stomach, cannabinoids also inhibit intestinal peristalsis, resulting in dysmotility. Long-term cannabis users may also develop cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome, experiencing cyclic episodes of nausea and vomiting (45).
Impaired Gastric Accommodation
Patients with impaired accommodation demonstrate lack of relaxation of the gastric fundus, leading to rapid transit from the proximal stomach to the antrum. This process causes dyspeptic symptoms, including nausea, vomiting, early satiety or postprandial discomfort, and abdominal pain (46). Impaired gastric accommodation can be associated with functional dyspepsia or diabetes mellitus and can occur after Nissen fundoplication or Billroth II gastrectomy (Fig 20).
Small Intestine
The small intestine allows digestion and absorption of ingested contents through segmentation. Interstitial cells of Cajal are responsible for the pacemaker activity of gastrointestinal motility and result in slow-wave activation of smooth muscle, thereby resulting in peristalsis (47). These phasic contractions are the basic contractile activity of the small intestine, occur more regularly in the duodenum and jejunum, and become slower and less organized in the ileum to allow absorption of nutrients (48). During the interdigestive state, the migrating motor complex (MMC) changes the motor activity of smooth muscle and causes a cyclic pattern of phasic contractions to sweep undigested residual material through the small intestine (49).
Chronic Intestinal Pseudo-obstruction
CIPO is a rare disorder characterized by dysmotility, chronic intestinal dilatation, and progressively worsening symptoms (>6 months) in the absence of mechanical obstruction (Fig 21); it nearly always involves the small intestine. Primary CIPO may be due to myopathy, neuropathy, or disorders affecting the interstitial cells of Cajal (mesenchymopathy). Secondary causes include systemic connective-tissue diseases (eg, scleroderma, dermatomyositis), paraneoplastic syndromes, or infections (eg, Chagas disease) that affect the autonomic nervous system or intestinal smooth muscle. Owing to the presence of nonspecific symptoms such as abdominal pain, bloating, and distention, a mechanical cause of obstruction must be excluded with radiologic imaging or endoscopy.
The most common symptoms include abdominal pain, bloating, and distention. Diagnosis is often challenging but can be achieved by using fluoroscopy or CT to rule out mechanical obstruction, laboratory studies to assess for autoimmune disorders, and assessment of gastrointestinal dysmotility and impaired transit.
Complications include small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) and malabsorption. Treatment is focused on maintenance of nutrition, including enteral nutrition; however, patients may require gastrointestinal decompression, prokinetic agents, antibiotics, or surgery (50).
Scleroderma
Scleroderma is an acquired myopathic disorder, with the small intestine being the second most common site of gastrointestinal tract involvement after the esophagus. Dysmotility arises owing to neuropathic and myopathic changes resulting in smooth muscle atrophy and fibrosis. Studies have demonstrated reduced amplitude and frequency of the migrating motor complex (MMC), resulting in delayed small-bowel transit (51,52).
Fluoroscopy and CT may show characteristic findings, including small-bowel dilatation with closely stacked valvulae conniventes (hidebound appearance of the small bowel) and sacculations often along the mesenteric border (Figs 22, 23). Scintigraphy is useful in detecting delayed small-bowel transit.
Amyloidosis
Amyloidosis is a rare disorder characterized by extracellular tissue deposition of abnormal fibrillar protein. The disease is usually systemic, but 10%–20% of cases may be localized within the gastrointestinal tract (53). The pathogenesis is related to mucosal and neuromuscular infiltration by amyloid protein, resulting in associated histologic and radiologic changes; there is concurrent multiple myeloma in approximately 20% of cases (54). Clinical symptoms include gastrointestinal bleeding due to the presence of mucosal lesions; malabsorption related to mucosal infiltration; chronic dysmotility with constipation, abdominal pain, bloating, or CIPO; and protein-losing gastroenteropathy manifesting as diarrhea, edema, and ascites.
CT findings of small-bowel amyloidosis are varied, including long-segment circumferential mural thickening that may result in luminal narrowing, dilatation depending on the degree of hypomotility, mesenteric infiltration with soft-tissue thickening, and lymphadenopathy (Fig 24). In addition, fluoroscopic evaluation may show nodular irregular thickening or effacement of the valvulae conniventes or loss of haustral folds (55). Diagnosis of gastrointestinal amyloidosis requires tissue biopsy. Therapy for localized disease is directed at the gastrointestinal manifestations related to dysmotility.
Enteric Visceral Myopathy
Enteric visceral myopathy is a rare genetic disorder characterized by degeneration and fibrosis of smooth muscle in the gastrointestinal tract, leading to impaired intestinal motility without findings of mechanical obstruction; it may result in CIPO (56). Involvement may be diffuse or limited to focal segments of the bowel, and patients usually have chronic symptoms of abdominal pain, distention, nausea and vomiting, and chronic constipation (Fig 25). Diagnosis may be delayed owing to the presence of nonspecific symptoms and requires full-thickness intestinal biopsy.
Radiologic findings include esophageal aperistalsis, megaduodenum, and variable dilatation of the small and large intestine. Management of enteric visceral myopathy requires multidisciplinary therapy, including symptomatic improvement and monitoring of nutritional status.
Opioid-induced Hypomotility
Constipation is the most common and debilitating side effect of opioids. Opioids exert effects via μ receptors located in the submucosa of the small intestine (57). Stimulation of μ receptors in the enteric nervous system results in adverse gastrointestinal effects, causing nonpropulsive contractions in the small and large intestine, increased colonic fluid absorption, and stool desiccation (Fig 26).
The constipating effects of opioids are more common with long-term use and are likely dose related. The American Gastroenterological Association recommends use of laxatives as first-line therapy for opioid-induced constipation. In laxative-refractory cases, use of the μ–opioid receptor antagonists naloxegol or naldemedine is recommended over no treatment (58).
Large Intestine, Rectum, and Anus
Motility of the colon relies on phasic contractions and mass movements. Phasic contractions segment the colon into haustra, with slow mixing and retention of residue to allow absorption of water. Alternatively, mass movements are high-amplitude contractions of the circular muscular layer, which moves chyme into the rectum. Colonic peristalsis is stimulated by the gastrocolic reflex, which occurs within 30 minutes after ingestion of a meal.
Defecation requires coordinated actions between the colon, rectum, pelvic floor, and muscles of the anal sphincter. Both the external anal sphincter and puborectalis muscle are composed of striated muscle. The internal anal sphincter is a thickened band of circular smooth muscle that is the primary determinant of the resting pressure of the anal canal. The internal anal sphincter is innervated by the autonomic nervous system and is tonically contracted at rest.
Constipation and Colonic Inertia
Constipation results in variable symptoms, including excessive straining, hard stools, infrequent bowel movements, the sensation of incomplete evacuation or anorectal obstruction, and the need for manual maneuvers to assist defecation. Chronic constipation is defined as symptoms lasting longer than 3 months. The etiology is often multifactorial.
Diagnosis relies on clinical evaluation in conjunction with additional testing, including anorectal manometry or colonic transit study. However, further workup with colonoscopy must be performed in patients with unexplained weight loss, hematochezia, acute onset of constipation, or a family history of colorectal cancer. Fluoroscopic contrast enema examination is used to assess for anatomic abnormalities but does not allow assessment of the underlying cause of constipation (Fig 27). Initial management of constipation includes dietary modification and use of laxatives.
Colonic inertia may also lead to stercoral colitis, an inflammatory process of the colonic wall—usually the rectosigmoid colon—caused by increased intraluminal pressure from impacted fecal material. CT findings include colonic distention with concentric wall thickening, mural hyperenhancement, and pericolonic or rectal stranding (Fig 28). Stercoral colitis may lead to localized ischemic changes, ulceration of the rectosigmoid mucosa, and ultimately colonic perforation, which has a reported mortality rate as high as 60% (59).
Acute Colonic Pseudo-obstruction
Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (Ogilvie syndrome) is defined as acute colonic dilatation in the absence of mechanical obstruction. The pathogenesis is postulated to be an alteration in the autonomic nervous system affecting colonic motility, and it occurs in association with severe illness or after surgery in conjunction with metabolic abnormalities. Patients typically develop abdominal distention over 3–7 days and may also experience abdominal pain, nausea, or vomiting. Abdominal radiography and CT demonstrate colonic dilatation, with the cecum and ascending colon typically showing the most pronounced distention (Fig 29).
Water-soluble contrast enema examination or CT should be performed to exclude mechanical obstruction, and CT allows evaluation of luminal diameter and for mucosal ischemia. The osmotic agent in the water-soluble enema may help relieve the pseudo-obstruction, but this study should not be performed in patients with signs of peritonitis. The risk of colonic perforation is significant when the cecal diameter is greater than 12 cm or symptoms are present for longer than 6 days. Therefore, patients should be monitored with serial physical examinations and abdominal radiography.
Initial management includes supportive therapy. However, in patients with persistent symptoms and marked colonic distention, management options include intravenous administration of neostigmine or colonoscopic decompression (60).
Hirschsprung Disease
Hirschsprung disease is a congenital disorder defined by absence of the ganglion cells in the myenteric and submucosal plexuses of the distal colon due to impaired neural crest cell migration. The aganglionic segment of colon fails to relax, causing functional obstruction and upstream dilatation of the more proximal colon. Approximately 80% of cases affect the rectosigmoid colon (short-segment disease), but there may also be ultrashort-segment disease, long-segment disease, or total colonic aganglionosis. Signs and symptoms in the neonatal period include distention, constipation with failure to pass meconium in the first 48 hours, and bilious emesis. Diagnosis in adulthood is uncommon but may be suspected in cases of recurrent constipation and abdominal distention.
Contrast enema examination typically reveals a transition zone between the normal proximal colon and the aganglionic distal segment, mucosal irregularity, and reversal of the rectosigmoid index (measurement of the diameter of the rectum divided by the diameter of the sigmoid colon, which is normally >1 in neonates) (Figs 30, 31) (61). The diagnosis is confirmed with suction biopsy, which demonstrates absence of ganglion cells and hypertrophic nerve fibers. Treatment in the majority of patients requires resection of the aganglionic segment and a pull-through procedure (62).
Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
Functional obstruction of the anal canal, as seen with dyssynergic dysfunction, is an underlying cause of chronic constipation in up to 50% of patients.
Delayed initiation and impaired evacuation, in addition to decreased change in the anorectal angle, are highly predictive of this diagnosis (63,64). Additionally, paradoxical sphincter contraction can be seen with impression of the puborectalis muscle along the dorsal wall of the rectum during straining and evacuation (Figs 32, 33; Movie 5). Biofeedback therapy is the most effective treatment of dyssynergia.
Pelvic floor dyssynergia. MR defecography in a 57-year-old man during attempted evacuation shows paradoxical contraction of the puborectalis muscle, resulting in minimal evacuation of barium. The findings are consistent with pelvic floor dyssynergia.
Conclusion
Gastrointestinal motility disorders encompass a wide spectrum of pathologic conditions with complex pathogenesis. Symptoms are often nonspecific and overlap with those of other disease processes; thus, a thorough patient evaluation is critical. The specific radiologic and gastro-intestinal examinations chosen for the workup are dependent on the clinical history and symptoms. Radiologists should have an integrated understanding of the pathophysiology, as well as an understanding of both the radiologic and gastroenterologic findings, to effectively contribute to an accurate diagnosis.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge Christine Cooky Menias, MD, for assistance with several radiologic images.
Presented as an education exhibit at the 2021 RSNA Annual Meeting.
For this journal-based SA-CME activity, the authors A.E.B. and D.A.K. have provided disclosures (see end of article); all other authors, the editor, and the reviewers have disclosed no relevant relationships.
References
- 1. . The enteric nervous system and neurogastroenterology. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;9(5):286–294.
- 2. . Fluoroscopic Swallowing Examination: Radiologic Findings and Analysis of Their Causes and Pathophysiologic Mechanisms. RadioGraphics 2021;41(6):1733–1749.
- 3. . Gastrointestinal Motility. I. Esophageal Transit and Gastric Emptying. J Nucl Med 2015;56(8):1229–1238.
- 4. . Gastric Emptying Scintigraphy. J Nucl Med Technol 2019;47(2):111–119.
- 5. . The SNMMI and EANM practice guideline for small-bowel and colon transit 1.0. J Nucl Med 2013;54(11):2004–2013.[Published corrections appear in J Nucl Med 2014;55(3):521 and J Nucl Med 2018;59(4):710.]
- 6. . Comprehensive radionuclide esophagogastrointestinal transit study: methodology, reference values, and initial clinical experience. J Nucl Med 2015;56(5):721–727.
- 7. . Gastrointestinal Motility. II. Small-Bowel and Colon Transit. J Nucl Med 2015;56(9):1395–1400.
- 8. . Transit of solids through the human colon: regional quantification in the unprepared bowel. Am J Physiol 1990;258(6 Pt 1):G856–G862.
- 9. . Imaging Tips for Performing a Perfect Barium Swallow. RadioGraphics 2019;39(5):1325–1326.
- 10. . An 8-year review of barium studies in the diagnosis of gastroparesis. Clin Radiol 2008;63(4):407–414.
- 11. . Small intestine transit time in the normal small bowel study. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1968;104(3):522–524.
- 12. . More movement with evaluating colonic transit in humans. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2019;31(2):e13541.
- 13. . Dynamic fluoroscopic defecography: updates on rationale, technique, and interpretation from the Society of Abdominal Radiology Pelvic Floor Disease Focus Panel. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021;46(4):1312–1322.
- 14. . MR defecography technique: recommendations of the Society of Abdominal Radiology's Disease-focused Panel on Pelvic Floor Imaging. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021;46(4):1351–1361.
- 15. . Assessment of small bowel motility in patients with chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction using cine-MRI. Am J Gastroenterol 2013;108(7):1130–1139.
- 16. . The small-bowel feces sign. Radiology 2002;225(2):378–379.
- 17. . High-resolution esophageal manometry: interpretation in clinical practice. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2017;33(4):301–309.
- 18. . Esophageal Motility Disorders: Current Approach to Diagnostics and Therapeutics. Gastroenterology 2022;162(6):1617–1634.
- 19. . American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society consensus statement on intraluminal measurement of gastrointestinal and colonic motility in clinical practice. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2008;20(12):1269–1282.
- 20. . Expert consensus document: advances in the diagnosis and classification of gastric and intestinal motility disorders. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;15(5):291–308.
- 21. . Intestinal manometry: who needs it? Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench 2015;8(4):246–252.
- 22. . Review of the indications, methods, and clinical utility of anorectal manometry and the rectal balloon expulsion test. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2022;34(9):e14335.
- 23. . Physiology of normal esophageal motility. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008;42(5):610–619.
- 24. . Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021;33(1):e14058.
- 25. . Achalasia: a systematic review. JAMA 2015;313(18):1841–1852.
- 26. . Diagnosis of primary versus secondary achalasia: reassessment of clinical and radiographic criteria. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175(3):727–731.
- 27. . Esophageal achalasia: a risk factor for carcinoma—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus 2017;30(10):1–8.
- 28. . Dysphagia revisited: common and unusual causes. RadioGraphics 2015;35(1):105–122.
- 29. . ACG Clinical Guidelines: Diagnosis and Management of Achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol 2020;115(9):1393–1411.
- 30. . Diagnosis and Management of Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 2020;16(3):131–138.
- 31. . What is new in Chicago Classification version 4.0? Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021;33(1):e14053.
- 32. . Role of nuclear medicine in evaluating patients with suspected gastrointestinal motility disorders. Semin Nucl Med 1995;25(4):289–305.
- 33. . Esophageal disease in scleroderma. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006;40(9):769–775.
- 34. . Distal Esophageal Spasm: A Review. Am J Med 2018;131(9):1034–1040.
- 35. . Distal esophageal spasm: an update. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2013;15(9):325.
- 36. . Jackhammer Esophagus: From Manometric Diagnosis to Clinical Presentation. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;2019:5036160.
- 37. . Chicago Classification update (v4.0): technical review on diagnostic criteria for hypercontractile esophagus. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021;33(6):e14115.
- 38. . Postobesity Surgery Esophageal Dysfunction: A Combined Cross-Sectional Prevalence Study and Retrospective Analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2020;115(10):1669–1680.
- 39. . Complications of Antireflux Surgery. Am J Gastroenterol 2018;113(8):1137–1147.
- 40. . Gastric accommodation: physiology, diagnostic modalities, clinical relevance, and therapies. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021;33(12):e14213.
- 41. . American Gastroenterological Association. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the diagnosis and treatment of gastroparesis. Gastroenterology 2004;127(5):1592–1622.
- 42. . Autonomic function in gastroparesis and chronic unexplained nausea and vomiting: relationship with etiology, gastric emptying, and symptom severity. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2020;32(8):e13810.
- 43. . Diagnosis and Treatment of Rumination Syndrome: A Critical Review. Am J Gastroenterol 2019;114(4):562–578.
- 44. . Cannabinoids and gastrointestinal motility: pharmacology, clinical effects, and potential therapeutics in humans. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2018;30(9):e13370.
- 45. . Abdominal Imaging Manifestations of Recreational Drug Use. RadioGraphics 2020;40(7):1895–1915.
- 46. . Impaired gastric accommodation and its role in dyspepsia. Gut 2006;55(12):1685–1691.
- 47. . Interstitial cells of Cajal generate a rhythmic pacemaker current. Nat Med 1998;4(7):848–851.
- 48. . Normal physiology of small intestinal motility. Surg Clin North Am 1993;73(6):1173–1192.
- 49. . The migrating motor complex: control mechanisms and its role in health and disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;9(5):271–285.
- 50. . Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Chronic Intestinal Pseudo-Obstruction. J Clin Gastroenterol 2018;52(6):477–489.
- 51. . Review article: pathogenesis and clinical manifestations of gastrointestinal involvement in systemic sclerosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2017;45(7):883–898.
- 52. . Gastrointestinal Involvement in Systemic Sclerosis: An Update. J Clin Rheumatol 2018;24(6):328–337.
- 53. . Amyloidosis: an overview. Semin Roentgenol 1986;21(2):103–112.
- 54. . Amyloidosis: Multisystem Spectrum of Disease with Pathologic Correlation. RadioGraphics 2021;41(5):1454–1474.
- 55. . Amyloidosis: review and CT manifestations. RadioGraphics 2004;24(2):405–416.
- 56. . Hollow Visceral Myopathy, a Rare Gastrointestinal Disorder: A Case Report and Short Review. J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep 2021;9:23247096211034303.
- 57. . Opioid-induced bowel dysfunction: epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and initial therapeutic approach. Am J Gastroenterol Suppl 2014;2(1):31–37.
- 58. . American Gastroenterological Association Institute Guideline on the Medical Management of Opioid-Induced Constipation. Gastroenterology 2019;156(1):218–226.
- 59. . Stercoral colitis complicated with ischemic colitis: a double-edge sword. BMC Gastroenterol 2017;17(1):129.
- 60. . Colonic pseudoobstruction: CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190(6):1521–1526.
- 61. . Diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167(2):517–520.
- 62. . Diagnosis of Hirschsprung disease. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2020;23(1):8–22.
- 63. . Predictive value of impaired evacuation at proctography in diagnosing anismus. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177(3):633–636.
- 64. . MR defecography in patients with dyssynergic defecation: spectrum of imaging findings and diagnostic value. Br J Radiol 2011;84(998):136–144.
Article History
Received: Mar 17 2022Revision requested: Apr 13 2022
Revision received: May 11 2022
Accepted: May 20 2022
Published online: Oct 07 2022
Published in print: Nov 2022